Young’ın Çift Yarık Deneyinde Işığın Düalist Davranışından Kaynaklı Açığa Çıkan Felsefi Sorunlar

Abstract

Bu makalenin amacı Young’ın çift yarık deneyinde ışığın düalist davranışından kaynaklı açığa çıkan felsefi sorunlara bir bakış sergilemektir. Bunun için Young'ın çift yarıklı deneyinin kısa bir özeti verilerek deneye ait matematiksel denklemlerin hâlihazırdaki mevcut felsefeye etkileri sorgulanırken diğer yandan bu deneyin yol açtığı ontolojik ve epistemolojik kaygılar tartışılmaktadır. Bu tartışmayı yapabilmek adına ise konu ile ilgili kuantum mekanikçilerin ve filozofların görüşleri dikkate alınıp aralarında bir ilişki kurulmaya çalışılmıştır.

Keywords

• ışığın doğası,Young deneyi,kuantum felsefesi

Philosophical Issues Arising from Dual Nature of Light in Young’s Double-Slit Experiment

Abstract

This study aims to present a perspective regarding the philosophical issues arising from the dual nature of light in Young’s double-slit experiment. In this regard, a summary of Young’s double-slit experiment was presented, the effect of the mathematical equations of the experiment on the existing philosophical was questioned, and the ontological and epistemological concerns arising from this experiment were discussed. To realize this discussion, the opinions of several philosophers of quantum mechanics were considered and an attempt made to establish a relationship between them.

Keywords

• nature of light,young’s double-slit experiment,philosophy of quantum mechanics

References

1. Capra, F. (2010). The Tao of physics: An exploration of the parallels between modern physics and eastern mysticism. Shambhala Publications.
2. Close, F. (2006). The New Cosmic Onion: quarks and the nature of the universe. CRC Press.
3. Collingwood, R. G. (1960). The idea of nature (Vol. 31). Oxford University Press.
4. Crease, R. P., & Goldhaber, A. S. (2014). The quantum moment: how Planck, Bohr, Einstein, and Heisenberg taught us to love uncertainty. WW Norton & Company.
5. Davies, P. (1984). God and The New Physics. Simon and Schuster, New York, s. 100.
6. Descartes, R. (1996). Discourse on the method: And, meditations on first philosophy. Yale University Press.
7. Durğun, S. (2015). Effects of Quantum Theory on Sartre’s Existentialism. Uludağ University Faculty of Arts and Sciences Journal of Philosophy, 24.
8. Feynman, R. P. (1949). Space-time approach to quantum electrodynamics. Physical Review, 76(6), 769. Feynman, R. P. (2001). The character of physical law (messenger lectures, 1964).

9. Fischer, F. (1998). Beyond empiricism: policy inquiry in post positivist perspective. Policy studies journal, 26(1), 129-146.
10. Gribbin, J. (1995). Schrodinger's Kittens and the Search for Reality. Universities Press.
11. Gribbin, J. (2011). In search of Schrodinger's cat: Quantum physics and reality. Bantam.
12. Işıklı, Ş. (2011). Kuantum mekaniği ilkelerinin felsefi içerimleri, Doktora tezi, Ankara Üniversitesi.
13. Işıklı, Ş. (2012). Kuantum Felsefesi. (1. Baskı). Ankara: Birleşik Yayınevi. (In Turkish)
14. Kamözüt, C. (2005). Consitency of Realistic Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics. Unpuplished Master Thesis in Middle East Techinical Universty, Ankara.
15. Kant, I. (2004). Immanuel Kant: Prolegomena to Any Future Metaphysics: That Will Be Able to Come Forward as Science: With Selections from the Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.
16. Koç, Y. (1983). Doğa’nın Kuantum Mekaniksel Betimlemesi ve Ölçme Sorunu. (1.Basım) İstanbul: İstanbul Üniversitesi Yayınları. (In Turkish)
17. Neumaier, A. & Westra, D. (2011). Classicalland Quantum Mechanics Via Lie Algebras. Universty of Vienna, Austria.
18. Newton, I. (1998). Mathematical Principles of Nature Philosophy and his Systems of the World (translated by A. Motte, revised and annotated by F. Cajori).
19. Omnes, R. (1994). Philosophie de la science contemporaine. Gallimard.
20. Öner, M. Y. (2000). Diyalektik: Olasılıktan Determinizme Doğru. (3.Baskı). İstanbul: Belge Yayıncılık. (In Turkish)
21. Pais, A. (2000). The Genius od Science: A Portrait Gallery. Oxford; New York: Oxford Universty Press.
22. Sears, F. W., Zemansky, M. W., Young, H. D., & Freedman, R. A. (2014). Sears and Zemansky's University Physics: With Modern Physics: Technology Update. Pearson.
23. Sekmen, S. (2006). Parçacık Fiziği: En Küçüğü Keşfetme Macerası. Ankara: ODTÜ Yayıncılık. (In Turkish)
24. Taslaman, C. (2008). Kuantum Teorisi Felsefe ve Tanrı. (2.Baskı). İstanbul: İstanbul Yayınevi. (In Turkish)
25. Warburton, N. (2004). Philosophy: the basics. Routledge.
26. Zohar, D., & Marshall, I. N. (1990). The quantum self: Human nature and consciousness defined by the new physics. New York, NY, US: William Morrow & Co.