Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Coğrafya Tahayyülleri: Ulusal Kimlik, Anlatı ve Sınır

Year 2018, , 139 - 143, 10.04.2018
https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.371303

Abstract

Bu
çalışma, birbiriyle bağlantılı üç araştırma alanı olan ulusal kimlik, anlatı ve
sınır arasındaki ilişkileri incelemektedir. Bu üç kavram coğrafyanın üretimi ve
yeniden inşası için elzemdir. Bu çalışma bu üç kavramı tanıtıp, bunlar
arasındaki bağlantıları ortaya çıkarmakta ve bu şekilde ulusal kimliklerin
sınır ve anlatı kavramları ile ilişkili bir şekilde anlaşılması ve çalışılması
için kavramsal bir çerçeve çizmektedir. Ayrıca ulusal kimliklerin tarihsel
olarak modern yapılar olduğu, anlatılar ile oluşturulduğu, içselleştirildiği,
çoklu ve sürekli değişim halinde olduğu ileri sürülmektedir. Bu nedenle anlatı
ve söylem kavramları bu kimliklerin üretimi ve yeniden inşası için gereklidir.
Bu makale, aynı zamanda ulusal kimliklerin doğrudan sınır kurumu ile ilgili
olduklarını savunmaktadır. Sınır kurumu kavramından kastedilen bir coğrafya
üzerine çizilmiş fiziksel bir çizgi veya bir tel örgü değil, sosyal ve mekânsal
benzerlik ve farklılaşmaların oluştuğu bir süreçtir. Bu kimliklere anlam veren
işte bu sınır kurumu sürecidir.

References

  • Agnew, J. (2008). Borders on the mind: re-framing border thinking. Ethics & Global Politics, 1(4), 175-191.
  • Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso Books.
  • Arendt, H. (1998). The Human Condition. USA: University of Chicago Press.
  • Bachelard, G. (1994). The Poetics of Space. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Balibar, E. (2002). Politics and the Other Scene. London: Verso Books.
  • Barth, F. (1998). Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. USA: Waveland Press.
  • Benhabib, S. (2002). The claims of culture: Equality and diversity in the global era. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). Structures, habitus, practices. The logic of practice, 52-65.
  • Bourdieu, P., & Thompson, J. B. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. USA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bruner, J. (2004). Life as narrative. Social Research, 71(3), 691-710.
  • De Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (1999). The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse & Society, 10(2), 149-173.
  • De Fina, A. (2011). Discourse and identity. In: T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Gellner, E. (2006). Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. California: Stanford University Press.
  • Hall, S. (1992). The question of cultural identity. In: S. Hall, C. Nelson & P. Treichler (eds.), Modernity and Its Futures, (s. 595-635). Oxford: Polity Press.
  • Hall, S. (1996). Who needs identity. Questions of cultural identity, 16(2), 1-17.
  • Hobsbawm, E. J. (1992). Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (Vol. 142). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Meinhof, U. H., & Galasinski, D. (2005). The language of belonging. In: The Language of Belonging (pp. 13-49). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Newman, D. (2006). The lines that continue to separate us: borders in our 'borderless' world. Progress in Human Geography, 30(2), 143-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0309132506ph599xx
  • Newman, D., & Paasi, A. (1998). Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: boundary narratives in political geography. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 186-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/030913298666039113
  • Özkirimli, U. (2003). The nation as an artichoke? A critique of ethnosymbolist interpretations of nationalism. Nations and Nationalism, 9(3), 339-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1469-8219.00100
  • Paasi, A. (1998). Boundaries as social processes: Territoriality in the world of flows. Geopolitics, 3(1), 69-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14650049808407608
  • Paasi, A. (2011). A border theory: an unattainable dream or a realistic aim for border scholars?. In: Wastl-Walter, D. (Ed.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Border Studies, (pp. 11-31). London: Routledge.
  • Paasi, A. (2012). Border studies reanimated: going beyond the territorial/relational divide. Environment and Planning A, 44(10), 2303-2309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a45282
  • Sack, R. D. (1986). Human Territoriality: Its Theory and History. UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage.
  • Smith, A. D. (1986). The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Somers, M. R. (1994). The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and society, 23(5), 605-649.
  • Somers, M. R., & Gibson, G. D. (1993). Reclaiming the epistemological other: narrative and the social constitution of identity. CSST Working Papers. WP No: 94. USA: University of Michigan
  • Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. UK: Cambridge University Press.

Imagining Geography: National Identity, Narrative and Bordering

Year 2018, , 139 - 143, 10.04.2018
https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.371303

Abstract

This paper explores the relationships between
three interconnected research domains: national identity, narrative and border.
These three concepts are crucial to produce and re-produce geography. This
paper introduces these three concepts and explores how they are connected to
each other, in order to draw a conceptual framework to understand and study
national identities in relation to borders and narratives. The paper argues
that national identities are historically modern constructs produced through
narratives, internalised, multiple and subject to change. Narratives and
discourses are significant to produce and reproduce these identities. Thus,
narratives and identities are interdependent. This paper also argues that national
identities are directly related to borders. By border concept, this paper does
not only refer to a physical line or fences on space, but bordering as a
process through which social and spatial homogenisations and differentiations
occur. It is this bordering process that gives significance to identities.
   

References

  • Agnew, J. (2008). Borders on the mind: re-framing border thinking. Ethics & Global Politics, 1(4), 175-191.
  • Anderson, B. (2006). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso Books.
  • Arendt, H. (1998). The Human Condition. USA: University of Chicago Press.
  • Bachelard, G. (1994). The Poetics of Space. Boston: Beacon Press.
  • Balibar, E. (2002). Politics and the Other Scene. London: Verso Books.
  • Barth, F. (1998). Ethnic Groups and Boundaries: The Social Organization of Culture Difference. USA: Waveland Press.
  • Benhabib, S. (2002). The claims of culture: Equality and diversity in the global era. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1990). Structures, habitus, practices. The logic of practice, 52-65.
  • Bourdieu, P., & Thompson, J. B. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. USA: Harvard University Press.
  • Bruner, J. (2004). Life as narrative. Social Research, 71(3), 691-710.
  • De Cillia, R., Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (1999). The discursive construction of national identities. Discourse & Society, 10(2), 149-173.
  • De Fina, A. (2011). Discourse and identity. In: T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Discourse studies: A multidisciplinary introduction. London: SAGE Publications.
  • Gellner, E. (2006). Nations and Nationalism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. California: Stanford University Press.
  • Hall, S. (1992). The question of cultural identity. In: S. Hall, C. Nelson & P. Treichler (eds.), Modernity and Its Futures, (s. 595-635). Oxford: Polity Press.
  • Hall, S. (1996). Who needs identity. Questions of cultural identity, 16(2), 1-17.
  • Hobsbawm, E. J. (1992). Nations and Nationalism Since 1780: Programme, Myth, Reality. UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Lefebvre, H. (1991). The production of space (Vol. 142). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Meinhof, U. H., & Galasinski, D. (2005). The language of belonging. In: The Language of Belonging (pp. 13-49). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Newman, D. (2006). The lines that continue to separate us: borders in our 'borderless' world. Progress in Human Geography, 30(2), 143-161. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/0309132506ph599xx
  • Newman, D., & Paasi, A. (1998). Fences and neighbours in the postmodern world: boundary narratives in political geography. Progress in Human Geography, 22(2), 186-207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1191/030913298666039113
  • Özkirimli, U. (2003). The nation as an artichoke? A critique of ethnosymbolist interpretations of nationalism. Nations and Nationalism, 9(3), 339-355. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1469-8219.00100
  • Paasi, A. (1998). Boundaries as social processes: Territoriality in the world of flows. Geopolitics, 3(1), 69-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14650049808407608
  • Paasi, A. (2011). A border theory: an unattainable dream or a realistic aim for border scholars?. In: Wastl-Walter, D. (Ed.), The Ashgate Research Companion to Border Studies, (pp. 11-31). London: Routledge.
  • Paasi, A. (2012). Border studies reanimated: going beyond the territorial/relational divide. Environment and Planning A, 44(10), 2303-2309. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a45282
  • Sack, R. D. (1986). Human Territoriality: Its Theory and History. UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Said, E. W. (1979). Orientalism. New York: Vintage.
  • Smith, A. D. (1986). The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Somers, M. R. (1994). The narrative constitution of identity: A relational and network approach. Theory and society, 23(5), 605-649.
  • Somers, M. R., & Gibson, G. D. (1993). Reclaiming the epistemological other: narrative and the social constitution of identity. CSST Working Papers. WP No: 94. USA: University of Michigan
  • Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. UK: Cambridge University Press.
There are 31 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Bilal Görentaş 0000-0002-6802-5007

Publication Date April 10, 2018
Acceptance Date December 29, 2017
Published in Issue Year 2018

Cite

APA Görentaş, B. (2018). Imagining Geography: National Identity, Narrative and Bordering. Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6(1), 139-143. https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.371303

Anemon Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Creative Commons Atıf-GayriTicari 4.0 Uluslararası Lisansı (CC BY NC) ile lisanslanmıştır.