YABANCI DİL OLARAK İNGİLİZCE BAĞLAMINDA ÜNİVERSİTE ÖĞRENCİLERİNİN DİL ÖĞRENME STRATEJİLERİNİN BELİRLENMESİ

Year 2014, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 225 - 239, 01.12.2014

Sabahattin Yeşilçınar

Abstract

Dil öğrenme stratejileri, öğrencilerin öğrenme sürecinde performansını artırmak için kullandıkları eylemlerdir. Dil öğrenme stratejileri üzerine çok çalışma olmasına rağmen, cinsiyet ve sınıf düzeyi açısından üniversite öğrencilerin strateji kullanımıyla ilgili çalışmalar yok denecek kadar azdır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, üniversite öğrencileri tarafından tercih edilen dil öğrenme stratejilerini ölçmek ve tercih ettikleri bu stratejilerin cinsiyet ve sınıf düzeyi açısından bir farklılık yaratıp yaratmadığını ortaya çıkarmaktır. Çalışma Muş Alparslan Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi’nin farklı bölümlerinde öğrenim gören 150 öğrenciden oluşmaktadır. Sonuçlar, dil öğrenme sürecinde, öğrencilerin kullandığı dil öğrenme stratejilerinin orta seviyede olduğunu, en çok kullanılan stratejilerin üstbilişsel ve en az tercih edilen stratejilerin ise bilişsel stratejiler olduğunu göstermiştir. Sonuçlar cinsiyet ve sınıf düzeyi açısından anlamlı bir fark olduğunu gösteriyor ki bu da kızların erkeklerden; birinci sınıfların ikinci sınıflardan daha çok strateji kullandığını gösteriyor.

Keywords

Language learning strategies, EFL, Gender

Identifying Learner Strategies of University Students in an EFL Context

Abstract

Learning strategies are the actions that learners use to improve their performance in the learning process. Though many studies have focused on the language learning strategies, a somewhat smaller body of research studies has dealt with university students’ use of strategies in terms of gender and class grade. The aim of this study is to measure the language learning strategies preferred by the university students and to reveal whether their preferred learning strategies create any differences in terms of gender and class grades. The study covers 150 students who study in different departments in the Faculty of Education, Muş Alparslan University. The results indicated that language learning strategies that students use are mid-level and they use metacognitive strategies the most and cognitive strategy the least during the language learning process. A significant difference was also found in terms of gender and class grade, meaning that girls use language learning strategies than boys do and first grade students use strategies more than second grades.

Keywords

Dil öğrenme stratejileri, EFL, Cinsiyet

References

• Akbary, R. & Talebinezhad, M. R. (2003). The relationship between the use of language
• learning strategies by Iranian learners of English, their foreign language proficiency, and the learners’ IQ scores. IJAL, Vol. 6, no. 1. Pp. 1-20
• Anderson, N. (1999). Exploring Second Language Reading: Issues and Strategies. TESL- EJ, vol. 4, no. 1.
• Aslan, O. (2009). The Role of Gender and Language Learning Strategies in Learning English. Unpublished M.A. Thesis.
• Bialystok, E. (1981) The role of conscious strategies in second language proficiency. Modern Language Journal, 65, pp. 24-35.
• Bremner, S. (1999). Language learning strategies and language proficiency: Investigating the relationship in hong Kong. The Canadian Modern Language Review, Vol. 55, pp. 490-514.
• Chamot, A. U. & El-Dinary, P. B. (1999). Children’s learning strategies in language im- mersion classroom. Modern Language Journal, vol. 83, pp.319-338
• Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in Learning and Using a Second Language. TESL-EJ, vol. 3, no. 4.
• Cohen, A.D., & Aphek, E. (1981). Easifying second language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, pp. 221-235.
• Dreyer, C. (1992). Learner variables as predictors of ESL proficiency. Unpublished doc- toral dissertation, Potchefstroom University, South Africa.
• Dreyer, C. & Oxford, R., 1996: Learning strategies and other predictors of ESL proficien- cy among Afrikaans-speakers in South Africa. In R. Oxford (Ed.), Language Lear- ning Strategies Around the World: Cross-cultural Perspectives (pp. 61-74). Manoa: University of Hawaii Press
• Ehrman, M. E. & Oxford, R. L. (1989). Effects of sex differences, career choice, and psychological type on adult language learning strategies. Modern Language Journal 73, pp. 1-13.
• Ehrman, M.E., & Oxford, R.L., 1995. Cognition plus: Correlates of language learning success. Modern Language Journal 79 (1), pp. 67–89.
• Green, J. (1991). Language learning strategies of Puerto Rican university students. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Puerto Rico Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, San Juan, PR.
• Green, J. M. (1992). Additional analyses of Puerto Rican strategy data. Unpublished manuscript, University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez.
• Green, J. M. & Oxford, R. (1993). New analyses on expanded Puerto Rican strategy data.
• Unpublished manuscript, University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez and University of Ala- bama, Tuscaloosa, AL.
• Green, J. & Oxford, R.L., 1995: A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and- gender. TESOL Quarterly, 29, pp. 261-297.
• Griffiths, C. (2008). Lessons from Good Language Learners (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambri- dge University Press
• Gömleksiz, M. N. (2013). Türkçe öğretmeni adaylarının İngilizce dil öğrenme stratejile- rine ilişkin görüşlerinin incelenmesi. A. Ü. SBE Dergisi. yıl:6, sayı:11, pp. 573-601
• Kurt, G. & Atay, D. (2006). Language learning strategies used by Turkish 6th and 8th graders. Hasan Ali Yücel Eğitim Dergisi, sayı 2, pp. 123-137.
• Lachini, K. (1997). The impact of language proficiency on language communication and learning strategies. Iranian journal of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 2, pp. 35-90
• Lan, R., & Oxford, R.L. (2003). Language learning strategy profiles of elementary school students in Taiwan. IRAL, 41, pp. 339–379.
• Lee, K. O. (2003). The relationship of school year, sex and proficiency on the use of lan- guage learning strategies in learning English of Korean junior high school students. Asian EFL Journal, 5(3), pp. 1-36.
• Lee, K. R. & Oxford, R. L. (2008). Understanding EFL Learners’ Strategy Use and Stra- tegy
• Awareness. The Asian EFL Journal, Volume 10, Number 1, pp. 7-32
• Mochoizuki, A. (1999). Language learning strategies used by Japanese university stu- dents. RELC Journal, vol. 30, pp. 101-113
• Noguchi, T. (1991). Review of language learning strategy research and its implications. Unpublished bachelor‘s thesis, Tottori University, Tottori, Japan.
• O’Malley, J. M & Chamot, A. U.(1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisi- tion. Cambridge University Press: USA
• Oxford, R L (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know.New York: Newbury House
• Oxford, R. L. (1993a). Instructional implications of gender differences in language lear- ning styles and strategies. Applied Language Learning 4, pp. 65-94.
• Oxford, R. L. (1993b). La difference continue... : Gender differences in second/foreign language learning styles and strategies. In J. Sutherland (ed.), Exploring gender, pp. 140-147. Englewood Cliffs, N J: Prentice-Hall.
• Oxford, R. L. & Nyikos, M. (1989). Variables affecting choice of language learning stra- tegies by university students. Modern Language Journal 73(2), pp. 291-300.
• Oxford, R. L. & Burry-stock, J. A. (1995). Assessing The Use of Language Learning
• Strategies Worldwide with the Esl/Efl Version of the Strategy Inventory For Language Learning (SILL). System. Vol. 23, No. I, pp. pp. 1-23
• Oxford, R. L. & Ehrman, M. E. (1995). Adults’ Language Learning Strategies in an in- tensive foreign language program in the United States. System, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 359-386
• Oxford, R. L., Nyikos, M. and Ehrman, M. (1988). Vive la difference? Reflections on sex differences in use of language learning strategies. Foreign Language Annals 21(4), pp. 321-329.
• Oxford, R. L., Park-oh, Y., Ito, S. and Sumrall, M. (1993a). Factors affecting achievement in a satellite delivered Japanese language program. American Journal of Distance Education 7, pp. 10-25.
• Oxford, R. L., Park-oh, Y., Ito, S. and Sumrall, M. (1993b). Learning a language by sa- tellite:
• What influences achievement? System 21(1), pp. 31-48.
• Oxford, R., Cho, Y., Leung, S., & Kim, H-J. (2004). Effect of the presence and difficulty of task on strategy use: An exploratory study. International Review of Applied Lin- guistics, 42, pp. 1-47.
• Ozseven, S. (1993). The Relationship between language learning strategies and oral per- formance of Turkish EFL graduate science participants in preparatory programs. Unpublished M.A. Thesis, Bilkent University, Ankara.
• Politzer, R. (1983). An exploratory study of self-reported language learning behaviors and their relation to achievement. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 6, pp. 54-65.
• Politzer, R. & McGroarty, M. (1985). An exploratory study of learning behaviors and their relationship to gains in linguistic and communicative competence. TESOL Qu- arterly 19, pp. 103-124.
• Rubin, J. (1975). What the ‘good language learner’ can teach us, TESOL Quarterly, 9, pp. 41-51.
• Sheorey, R. (1999). An examination of language learning strategy use in the setting of an indigenized variety of English. System, Vol. 27, pp. 173-190
• Tabanlıoğlu, S. (2003). The relationship between learning styles and language learning strategies of pre-intermediate EAP students. M.A. Thesis
• Tercanlıoğlu, L. (2004). Exploring gender effect on adult foreign language learning stra- tegies. Issues In Educational Research, 14(2), pp. 181-193.
• Tran,T.V. (1988). Sex differences in English language acculturation and learning strate- gies among Vietnamese adults aged 40 and over in the United States. Sex Roles 19, pp. 747–758.
• Yalçın, M. (2006). Differences in the perceptions on language learning strategies of English preparatory class students studying at Gazi University. Unpublished M.A. Thesis
• Yang, N.-D. (1992). Second language learners’ beliefs about language learning and their use of learning strategies: A study of college students of English in Taiwan. Unpub- lished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin, TX.
• Yang, N.-D. (1993). Understanding Chinese students’ language beliefs and learning stra- tegy use. Paper presented at the annual meeting of International Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Atlanta, GA.
• Zimmerman,B. J. & Martinez-Pons, M. (1990). Student differences in self-regulated lear- ning: Relating grade, sex and giftedness to self-efficacy and strategy use. Journal of Educational psychology, 82, pp. 51-59