Business Cycle Volatility in Turkey

Year 2019, Volume: 7 Number: ICOAEF’ 19, 105 - 109, 05.11.2019

Pinar Gebesoglu

https://doi.org/10.18506/anemon.573190

Abstract

This study investigates
the long-term dynamic relation among the volatility of the business cycles in
Turkey and the the current account balance, financial capital flows, terms of
trade and money supply volatility. The volatilities of the designated variables
are derived by employing ARCH/ GARCH type processes. The ARDL model covering
the period 1998Q1:2018Q4 indicates that there is cointegration among the
volatilities of the selected variables. The VECM model is formed to investigate
dynamic correcting movement in deviations from long-run equilibrium. It is
concluded that the volatility of business cycles in Turkey can be explained by
the fluctuations in financial capital flows as well as volatilities observed in
terms of trade and money supply in the long run.   

Keywords

Business Cycle Volatility, Financial Capital Flows, Current Account, ARDL, VECM

Türkiye’de İş Çevrimi Değişkenliği

Abstract

Bu çalışmada Türkiye’de
iş çevrimlerinin değişkenliği ile cari açık dengesi, finansal sermaye akımları,
ticaret haddi ve para arzı değişkenliği arasındaki uzun vadeli dinamik
ilişkiler incelenmektedir. Belirlenen değişkenlerin değişkenlikleri ARCH ve
GARCH tipi süreçler ile elde edilmiştir. 1998Ç1:2018Ç4 dönemini kapsayan ARDL
modeli seçilen değişkenler arasında eş bütünleşme ilişkisi tespit edilmiştir.
Uzun vadeli dengeden sapmalarda gözlenen dinamik düzeltme hareketini
gözlemlemek üzere Vektör Hata Düzeltme Modelinden faydalanılmış ve modelin uzun
vadede istikrarlı olduğu gözlenmiştir. 
Türkiye’de iş çevrimi değişkenliğinin finansal sermaye akımlarındaki
hareketlerin yanı sıra dış ticaret hadlerinde ve para arzında gözlenen
değişkenlik ile açıklanabileceği sonucuna varılmaktadır.

Keywords

İş Çevrimi Değişkenliği, Finansal Sermaye Akımları, Cari Açık, ARDL, VECM

References

• Alp, H., Başkaya, Y.S., Kılınç M. & Yücel C. Y. (2012). Stylized Facts for Business Cycles in Turkey. TCMB Working Paper. No.12/02.
• Alper C. E. (2000). Stylized Facts of Business Cycles, Excess Volatility and Capital Flows: Evidence from Mexico and Turkey. Working Papers 2000/11. Boğaziçi University Department of Economics.
• Andrews, D. & Rees, D. (2009). Macroeconomic Volatility and Terms of Trade Shocks. Reserve Bank of Australia Research Discussion Paper 2009-05.
• Arshad, S., Rizvi, S.A.R. & Ibrahim, M. H. (2014). Tripartite Analysis Across Business Cycles in Turkey: A Multi-timescale Inquiry of Efficiency, Volatility and Integration. Borsa Istanbul Review. 14-4(2014) 224- 235.
• Brooks, C. & Burke, S. P. (2003). Information criteria for GARCH model selection. The European Journal of Finance, Vol.9, 2003 Issue.6, 557-580.
• Buch, C. M., Döpke, J. & Pierdzioch, C. (2002). Financial Openness and Business Cycle Volatility. Kiel Institute for World Economics, Kiel Working Paper No.1121.
• Denizer, C., İyigün, M. & Owen, A. (2000). Finance and Macroeconomic Volatility, Board Governors of the Federal Reserve System. International Finance Discussion Papers No. 670.
• Hamilton, J.D. & Susmel, R. (1994). Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity and changes in regime. Journal of Econometrics, 64(1-2), 307-333.
• Hodrick, R.J. & Prescott, E., C. (1997). Postwar US Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 29, 1-16.
• Kaminsky, G. L., Reinhart, C. M. & Vegh, C.A (2004). When It Rains It Pours: Procyclical Capital Flows and Macroeconomic Policies. NBER Working Paper No. 10780.
• Kose, M. A. (2002). Explaining Business Cycles in Small Open Economies: How Much Do World Prices Matter? Journal of International Economics, 56 (2), 299-327.
• Kose, M. A., E. S. Prasad & Terrones M. E. (2003). Financial Integration and Macroeconomic Volatility. IMF Working Paper WP/03/50.
• Kose, M. A., E. S. Prasad & Terrones M. E. (2004). How do trade and financial integration affect the relationship between growth and volatility? Journal of International Economics Volume 69, Issue 1, June 2006, 176-202.
• Loayza, N. & Raddatz, C. (2006). The Structural Determinants of External Vulnerability, The Growth and Welfare effects of Macroeconomic Volatility. Universitat Pompeu Fabra (Barcelona, Catalunya) Spain.
• Mendoza, E.G. (1995). The Terms of Trade, The Real Exchange Rate, and Economic Fluctuations. International Economic Review, 36(1), 101-137. Olani, A. (2018). Capital Flows, Capital Controls and Business Cycles. https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=MWITFall2018&paper_id=1
• Olani, A. (2018). Capital Flows, Capital Controls and Business Cycles. https://editorialexpress.com/cgi-bin/conference/download.cgi?db_name=MWITFall2018&paper_id=1
• Razin, A. & Rose A. K. (1992). Business-Cycle Volatility and Openness: an Exploratory Cross-Section Analysis. NBER Working Papers 4208.
• Tharavanij, P. (2007). Capital Market and Business Cycle Volatility. MPRA Paper No. 5188, https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/5188.
• Tiryaki, G. F. (2003). Financial Development and Economic Fluctuations. Middle East Technical University Studies in Development, 2003, 30(1), 89- 106.