JOURNAL OF ATATÜRK YOLU PRINCIPLES ON THE WRITING RULES

Manuscripts sent to the Journal of Atatürk Yolu for publication should be prepared using the Article Template (https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/download/journal-file/23325). Due to double blind peer review, the identity and contact information of the author(s) should not be included in the manuscript template.
The manuscript should be arranged as Abstract, Extended Abstract, Introduction, Chapters, Conclusion, Bibliography and Appendix. Extended Abstracts are also requested for Turkish articles after the evaluation process is approved. Extended Abstract should contain the purpose, method and conclusion of the article and should consist of 600-800 words.
NOTE: Extended Abstract is not required during submission.

REFERENCES AND BIBLIOGRAPHY
References should be in accordance with Chicago Manual of Style. Authors are required to edit footnotes and create bibliography based on the examples below. Detailed information is available at http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/tools_citationguide/citation-guide-1.html. The examples given below are the adaptation of the Chicago Manual of Style method to the Journal of Atatürk Yolu.
EXAMPLES:
FF: First footnote
SF: Subsequent/short footnotes
B: Bibliography
NOTE: In the subsequent/short footnotes “ibid (mentioned work)” or any abbreviation like this should not be used. If the title of the reference is long, it should be shortened. Examples are below.

Book (one writer):
İD: Halil İnalcık, Atatürk ve Demokratik Türkiye, Ankara: Kronik Kitap, 2020, 15.
SD: İnalcık, Atatürk ve Demokratik, 241. (Eser ismi uzunsa kısaltılmalıdır.)
K: İnalcık, Halil. Atatürk ve Demokratik Türkiye. Ankara: Kronik Kitap, 2020.

Book (two or more authors):
İD: Bipan Chandra, Mridula Mukherjee, Aditya Mukherjee, India since Independence, Haryana: Penguin Books, 1999, 29.
SD: Chandra, vd., India since Independence, 29.
K: Chandra, Bipan, Mridula Mukherjee, Aditya Mukherjee. India since Independence. Haryana: Penguin Books, 1999.

Book (if there is a translator/editor in addition to the author):
İD: Bernard Lewis, Modern Türkiye’nin Doğuşu, Çev. Metin Kıratlı, Ankara: TTK, 9. Baskı, 2004, 78.
SD: Lewis, Modern Türkiye’nin Doğuşu, 78.
K: Lewis, Bernard. Modern Türkiye’nin Doğuşu. Çev. Metin Kıratlı. Ankara: TTK, 9. Baskı, 2004.

Book Chapter:
İD: Zafer Toprak, “İki Lozan, Ulus Devletin Doğuş Süreçleri”, İlk ve Son Barış 100. Yılında Lozan, Ed. Bülent Özükan, İstanbul: Boyut Yayıncılık, 2021, 52-68.
SD: Toprak, “İki Lozan”, 55.
K: Toprak, Zafer. “İki Lozan, Ulus Devletin Doğuş Süreçleri”, İlk ve Son Barış 100. Yılında Lozan, İlk ve Son Barış 100. Yılında Lozan. Ed. Bülent Özükan. İstanbul: Boyut Yayıncılık, 2021: 52-68.

Journal Article:
İD: İlber Ortaylı, “Yanya Vilayetinin Limanı Olarak 19. Asrın İkinci Yarısında Preveze”, Belleten, 62 (1998), 137-146.
SD: Ortaylı, “Yanya Vilayetinin Limanı”, 139.
K: Ortaylı, İlber. “Yanya Vilayetinin Limanı Olarak 19. Asrın İkinci Yarısında Preveze”, Belleten. 62 (1998): 137-146.

Journal Article (electronic):
• DOI and Access date should be spesified in the article.
İD: Hikmet Bayur, “Atatürk’ten Anılar", Belleten, 52 (1988), 939-952, doi.org/10.37879/belleten.1988.939.
SD: Bayur, “Atatürk’ten Anılar", 940.
K: Bayur, Hikmet. “Atatürk’ten Anılar", Belleten. 52 (1988): 939-952. doi.org/10.37879/belleten.1988.939.

Newspaper Article:
İD: Mümtaz Faik Fenik, “Dünya Harbi Bitti”, Ulus, 15 Ağustos 1945, 1.
SD: Fenik, “Dünya Harbi Bitti”, 1.
K: Fenik, Mümtaz Faik. “Dünya Harbi Bitti”, Ulus. 15 Ağustos 1945.

Encyclopedia Entry:
İD: Sina Akşin, “İttihat ve Terakki”, Tanzimat’tan Cumhuriyet’e Türkiye Ansiklopedisi, Cilt 5, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 1985, 1422-1435.
SD: Akşin, “İttihat ve Terakki”, 1422.
K: Akşin, Sina. “İttihat ve Terakki”, Tanzimat’tan Cumhuriyet’e Türkiye Ansiklopedisi. Cilt 5, İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 1985: 1422-1435.

Thesis or Dissertation:
İD: Cezmi Eraslan, II. Abdülhamit Devrinde Osmanlı Devleti’nin İslam Birliği Siyaseti, Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 1991, 110.
SD: Eraslan, II. Abdülhamit Devrinde, 110.
K: Eraslan, Cezmi. II. Abdülhamit Devrinde Osmanlı Devleti’nin İslam Birliği Siyaseti. Doktora Tezi, İstanbul Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, 1991.

NOTE: The types of works to be added to the Bibliography should be arranged in the following order and under these headings:
Archives
Official Publications
Copyright Works
Periodicals
Internet Resources
Oral History Interviews

NOTE: Appendix should be indicated at the end of the manuscript, a short information about the content of the document should be included and the resource of the document should be written in accordance with scientific citation rules below the appendix.

Ethical Principles
1- Regarding ethical principles values, the Journal of Atatürk Yolu takes into account the criteria determined by the COPE (Committee of Publication Ethics) and the principles determined in the YÖK (Council of Higher Education) Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Directive.
2- For researches requiring ethics committee permit, approval of ethics committee is obligatory. This approval should be stated and documented in the article.
3- Manuscripts sent to the journal, yet detected as against the rules of research and publication ethics during the evaluation process will be rejected. If any contradiction is found out after the publication process, the article will be removed from the publication.

4-If the manuscript derived from a thesis is not two-authored (supervisor-student), a statement of renounce must be received from the thesis supervisor.
5- Authors' Responsibility: The author ensures that the manuscript submitted to the journal is in accordance with the ethical rules, publication principles and writing rules adopted by the journal.
6- Referees’ Responsibility: The referee evaluates the manuscript by taking into account the principles determined by COPE and submits the report containing his/her opinions about the manuscript to the editorial board within the given time.
7- Editors' Responsibility: Editor;
• conducts the evaluation process of manuscripts submitted to the journal in a fair manner without any regard to religion, language, race, gender, nationality, seniority or institutional relationship,
• does not share the referee evaluation process with third parties by keeping it confidential,
• takes into account the COPE guidelines in terms of compliance of the evaluation process with ethical standards,
• provides the necessary cooperation and coordination to complete the evaluation process within the given time,
• applies the sharing of information with the Editorial Board regarding the evaluation and publication processes within the framework of COPE guidelines,
• complies with the standards set by COPE when duplicate publication, slicing, plagiarism, fictitious data, conflict of interest and suspicion of unfair authorship arise regarding a manuscript submitted to the journal for publication or published in previous issues.

Publication Principles
1- The Journal of Atatürk Yolu (JOAY) is published biannually in Spring (May) and Autumn (November) by Ankara University, Institute of Turkish Revolution History.
2- The JOAY adopts the open access policy.
3- The language of the journal is Turkish and English. Manuscripts written in other languages and sent to the journal are evaluated with the approval of the Editorial Board.
4- No payment is requested from the authors who submit manuscripts to the journal and no royalties are paid to the authors. The copright of the published articles belongs to the Journal of Atatürk Yolu.
5- If the authors submit their manuscripts to the journal, it means that they accept the JOAY's publication principles.
6- Manuscripts submitted to the journal must not have been published elsewhere or sent elsewhere for publication. Manuscripts should be prepared in accordance with scientific research criteria and publication ethics. The JOAY owns all publication rights from the moment the manuscripts are accepted.
7- Manuscripts sent to the journal are evaluated on condition that they comply with the spelling rules. The evaluation period of the manuscripts is three months on average. After the manuscripts are checked with the iThenticate Plagiarism Program, they are evaluated by the Editorial Board and sent to the referees, and in line with the reports from the referees, it is decided to print / request / reject the manuscripts.
8- An extended abstract in English is requested for articles in Turkish after evaluation process is approved.
9- After approval process, the manuscripts are published with the acceptance of at least eight members of the Editorial Board.