Research Article

In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas syringae Pathovars: Image Processing as an Alternative Method

Volume: 29 Number: 3 September 25, 2023
EN

In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas syringae Pathovars: Image Processing as an Alternative Method

Abstract

Türkiye, with an apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) production amount of 833,398 tons per year, ranks first in fresh apricot production and dried apricot export in the world. Malatya, Iğdır, and Elazığ constitute the main apricot production centers in Turkey. Many table and dried apricot cultivars have been grown in Türkiye. Local apricot cultivars such as cv. Şalak (or Aprikoz), cv. Tebereze, cv. Ordubat, cv. Ağcanabat, and cv. Ağerik are widely grown in the Aras Valley, including Iğdır and Kağızman. In this study, DNA barcoding of local cultivars based on the ITS region was performed and their distribution demonstrated in the Aras Valley. The reactions of these apricot cultivars to the causal agents of bacterial canker, which negatively affect the yield and quality of apricot cultivation, were also determined. Alternative methods such as image-processing technology and CHAID analysis have also been successfully used for cultivar reaction tests. It was determined that "Şalak" is economically important and the most common apricot cultivar in the Aras Valley. In addition, the Ağcanabat cultivar was sensitive to the causal agents of disease, while other local apricot cultivars were tolerant to it.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

The study was funded by Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK)

Project Number

120O825

Thanks

We are grateful to Dr. Monika Kaluzna (POLAND) and Prof. Dr. Hatice Özaktan for providing the reference strains that were used in this study. Furthermore, we also thank Sezer Şiktaş and Doç. Dr. Nihal Acarsoy Bilgin helped us with the survey of apricot orchards.

References

  1. References Abacı Z T & Asma B M (2010). Bazı kayısı çeşitlerinin farklı ekolojik alanlardaki biyolojik özelliklerinin analizi. Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 3(1):165-168.
  2. Ahmad M & Morgan V (1994). Characterization of a cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) rhizobiophage and its effect on cowpea nodulation and growth. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 18:297-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00570632
  3. Akbaba M & Özaktan H (2021). Evaluation of bacteriophages in the biocontrol of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae isolated from cankers on sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) in Turkey. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control, 31(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-021-00385-7
  4. Akın M, Eyduran E & Reed B M (2017). Use of RSM and CHAID data mining algorithm for predicting mineral nutrition of hazelnut. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 128(2):317-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-016-1110-6
  5. Alim M & Kaya G (2005). Iğdır'da kayısı tarımı ve başlıca sorunları. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi,10(14):47-65.https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ataunidcd/issue/2435/30937
  6. Asma B M (2000). Kayısı Yetiştiriciliği. Evin Ofset, Malatya.
  7. Asma B M & Ozturk K (2005). Analysis of morphological, pomological and yield characteristics of some apricot germplasm in Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 52:305–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-003-1384-5
  8. Aydin A, Ince A G, Uygur Gocer E & Karaca M (2018). Single cotton seed DNA extraction without the use of enzymes and liquid nitrogen. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 27(10):6722-6726.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Agricultural Engineering (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Early Pub Date

May 24, 2023

Publication Date

September 25, 2023

Submission Date

December 12, 2022

Acceptance Date

February 17, 2023

Published in Issue

Year 2023 Volume: 29 Number: 3

APA
Akbaba, M., Hürkan, K., & Karahan, A. E. (2023). In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas syringae Pathovars: Image Processing as an Alternative Method. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 29(3), 842-853. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1217921
AMA
1.Akbaba M, Hürkan K, Karahan AE. In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas syringae Pathovars: Image Processing as an Alternative Method. J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili. 2023;29(3):842-853. doi:10.15832/ankutbd.1217921
Chicago
Akbaba, Mustafa, Kaan Hürkan, and Ahmet Erhan Karahan. 2023. “In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas Syringae Pathovars: Image Processing As an Alternative Method”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 29 (3): 842-53. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1217921.
EndNote
Akbaba M, Hürkan K, Karahan AE (September 1, 2023) In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas syringae Pathovars: Image Processing as an Alternative Method. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 29 3 842–853.
IEEE
[1]M. Akbaba, K. Hürkan, and A. E. Karahan, “In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas syringae Pathovars: Image Processing as an Alternative Method”, J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 842–853, Sept. 2023, doi: 10.15832/ankutbd.1217921.
ISNAD
Akbaba, Mustafa - Hürkan, Kaan - Karahan, Ahmet Erhan. “In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas Syringae Pathovars: Image Processing As an Alternative Method”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 29/3 (September 1, 2023): 842-853. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1217921.
JAMA
1.Akbaba M, Hürkan K, Karahan AE. In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas syringae Pathovars: Image Processing as an Alternative Method. J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili. 2023;29:842–853.
MLA
Akbaba, Mustafa, et al. “In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas Syringae Pathovars: Image Processing As an Alternative Method”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 29, no. 3, Sept. 2023, pp. 842-53, doi:10.15832/ankutbd.1217921.
Vancouver
1.Mustafa Akbaba, Kaan Hürkan, Ahmet Erhan Karahan. In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas syringae Pathovars: Image Processing as an Alternative Method. J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili. 2023 Sep. 1;29(3):842-53. doi:10.15832/ankutbd.1217921

Cited By

Journal of Agricultural Sciences is published as open access journal. All articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).