EN
In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas syringae Pathovars: Image Processing as an Alternative Method
Abstract
Türkiye, with an apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) production amount of 833,398 tons per year, ranks first in fresh apricot production and dried apricot export in the world. Malatya, Iğdır, and Elazığ constitute the main apricot production centers in Turkey. Many table and dried apricot cultivars have been grown in Türkiye. Local apricot cultivars such as cv. Şalak (or Aprikoz), cv. Tebereze, cv. Ordubat, cv. Ağcanabat, and cv. Ağerik are widely grown in the Aras Valley, including Iğdır and Kağızman. In this study, DNA barcoding of local cultivars based on the ITS region was performed and their distribution demonstrated in the Aras Valley. The reactions of these apricot cultivars to the causal agents of bacterial canker, which negatively affect the yield and quality of apricot cultivation, were also determined. Alternative methods such as image-processing technology and CHAID analysis have also been successfully used for cultivar reaction tests. It was determined that "Şalak" is economically important and the most common apricot cultivar in the Aras Valley. In addition, the Ağcanabat cultivar was sensitive to the causal agents of disease, while other local apricot cultivars were tolerant to it.
Keywords
Supporting Institution
The study was funded by Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK)
Project Number
120O825
Thanks
We are grateful to Dr. Monika Kaluzna (POLAND) and Prof. Dr. Hatice Özaktan for providing the reference strains that were used in this study. Furthermore, we also thank Sezer Şiktaş and Doç. Dr. Nihal Acarsoy Bilgin helped us with the survey of apricot orchards.
References
- References Abacı Z T & Asma B M (2010). Bazı kayısı çeşitlerinin farklı ekolojik alanlardaki biyolojik özelliklerinin analizi. Research Journal of Biological Sciences, 3(1):165-168.
- Ahmad M & Morgan V (1994). Characterization of a cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) rhizobiophage and its effect on cowpea nodulation and growth. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 18:297-301. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00570632
- Akbaba M & Özaktan H (2021). Evaluation of bacteriophages in the biocontrol of Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae isolated from cankers on sweet cherry (Prunus avium L.) in Turkey. Egyptian Journal of Biological Pest Control, 31(1):1-11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41938-021-00385-7
- Akın M, Eyduran E & Reed B M (2017). Use of RSM and CHAID data mining algorithm for predicting mineral nutrition of hazelnut. Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture, 128(2):317-317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-016-1110-6
- Alim M & Kaya G (2005). Iğdır'da kayısı tarımı ve başlıca sorunları. Doğu Coğrafya Dergisi,10(14):47-65.https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ataunidcd/issue/2435/30937
- Asma B M (2000). Kayısı Yetiştiriciliği. Evin Ofset, Malatya.
- Asma B M & Ozturk K (2005). Analysis of morphological, pomological and yield characteristics of some apricot germplasm in Turkey. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 52:305–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-003-1384-5
- Aydin A, Ince A G, Uygur Gocer E & Karaca M (2018). Single cotton seed DNA extraction without the use of enzymes and liquid nitrogen. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin, 27(10):6722-6726.
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Agricultural Engineering (Other)
Journal Section
Research Article
Early Pub Date
May 24, 2023
Publication Date
September 25, 2023
Submission Date
December 12, 2022
Acceptance Date
February 17, 2023
Published in Issue
Year 2023 Volume: 29 Number: 3
APA
Akbaba, M., Hürkan, K., & Karahan, A. E. (2023). In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas syringae Pathovars: Image Processing as an Alternative Method. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 29(3), 842-853. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1217921
AMA
1.Akbaba M, Hürkan K, Karahan AE. In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas syringae Pathovars: Image Processing as an Alternative Method. J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili. 2023;29(3):842-853. doi:10.15832/ankutbd.1217921
Chicago
Akbaba, Mustafa, Kaan Hürkan, and Ahmet Erhan Karahan. 2023. “In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas Syringae Pathovars: Image Processing As an Alternative Method”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 29 (3): 842-53. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1217921.
EndNote
Akbaba M, Hürkan K, Karahan AE (September 1, 2023) In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas syringae Pathovars: Image Processing as an Alternative Method. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 29 3 842–853.
IEEE
[1]M. Akbaba, K. Hürkan, and A. E. Karahan, “In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas syringae Pathovars: Image Processing as an Alternative Method”, J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 842–853, Sept. 2023, doi: 10.15832/ankutbd.1217921.
ISNAD
Akbaba, Mustafa - Hürkan, Kaan - Karahan, Ahmet Erhan. “In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas Syringae Pathovars: Image Processing As an Alternative Method”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 29/3 (September 1, 2023): 842-853. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1217921.
JAMA
1.Akbaba M, Hürkan K, Karahan AE. In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas syringae Pathovars: Image Processing as an Alternative Method. J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili. 2023;29:842–853.
MLA
Akbaba, Mustafa, et al. “In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas Syringae Pathovars: Image Processing As an Alternative Method”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 29, no. 3, Sept. 2023, pp. 842-53, doi:10.15832/ankutbd.1217921.
Vancouver
1.Mustafa Akbaba, Kaan Hürkan, Ahmet Erhan Karahan. In Vitro Evaluation of Apricot Cultivars Response to Pseudomonas syringae Pathovars: Image Processing as an Alternative Method. J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili. 2023 Sep. 1;29(3):842-53. doi:10.15832/ankutbd.1217921
Cited By
Effects of plant-derived smoke, karrikin, and salinity stress on Prunus armeniaca cv. Şalak seeds and seedlings: A morphological, biochemical, and molecular approach
Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1297788