Regional Analysis of Organic Agriculture, Husbandry, and Beekeeping Efficiency in Türkiye

Abstract

Organic production enhances soil fertility, preserves biodiversity, and reduces pollution by avoiding from chemical pesticides and genetically modified organisms. Moreover, the increasing consumer demand for organic foods has encouraged producers to prioritize soil health and sustainable agricultural practices. The objective of this study is to analyze the development of organic agriculture, husbandry, and beekeeping, which contribute to biodiversity and ecosystem preservation through pollination, in Türkiye. Additionally, the study aims to offer insights for policy makers to establish a well-balanced production network. In this study, Türkiye's provinces were classified according to The Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics (NUTS)-Level 1 (12 regions) and evaluated with Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA). Organic agriculture was evaluated Super Efficiency (SE) model while organic husbandry-beekeping was evaluated Lee and Zu model which is taken into account zero data. Moreover, to derive a final ranking of organic agriculture and organic husbandry-beekeeping, the Copeland method, based on superiority comparison and not requiring normalization, was used. This study is noteworthy as the first of its kind to comprehensively consider organic agriculture, animal husbandry, and beekeeping collectively.

Keywords

• organic agriculture
• organic husbandry
• organic beekeping
• Sustainability
• Data Envelopment Analysis

References

1. Aghasafari H, Karbasi A, Mohammadi H & Calisti R (2020). Determination of the best strategies for development of organic farming: A SWOT–Fuzzy Analytic Network Process approach. Journal of Cleaner Production 277: 124039. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.124039
2. Ak İ (2017). Organic Livestock in Turkey. Proceeding of The Eurasian Agriculture and Natural Sciences Congress,, (pp. 190-192). Bishkek, Kyrgzstan
3. Åkerfeldt M P, Gunnarsson S, Bernes G & Blanco-Penedo I (2021). Health and welfare in organic livestock production systems—a systematic mapping of current knowledge. Organic Agriculture 11(1): 105-132
4. Andersen P & Petersen N C (1993). A procedure for ranking efficient units in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science 39: 1261-1264
5. Angón E, Bragulat T, García A, Giorgis A & Perea J (2021). Key factors affecting the technical efficiency of bee farms in the province of La Pampa (Argentina): A two-stage DEA approach. Revista de la Facultad De Ciencias Agrarias UNCuyo 55(1): 150-163
6. Artukoglu M M, Olgun A & Adanacioglu H (2010). The efficiency analysis of organic and conventional olive farms: Case of Turkey. Agricultural Economics 56(2): 89 - 96
7. Aşkan E (2023). Increasing Honey Production Effectiveness in Erzincan and Van Provinces. Sustainability 15(9): 7524
8. Aydın B, Aktürk D & Arsoy D (2020). Economic and efficiency analysis of beekeeping activity in Turkey: Case of Çanakkale Province. Ankara Üniv Vet Fak Derg 67: 23-32

9. Banker R, Charnes A & Cooper W (1984). Some models for estimating techical and scale inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis. Management Science 30: 1078-1092
10. Basavalingaiah K, Paramesh V, Parajuli R, Girisha H, Shivaprasad M, Vidyashree G & Rajanna G (2022). Energy flow and life cycle impact assessment of coffee-pepper production systems: An evaluation of conventional, integrated and organic farms in India. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 92(January): 106687
11. Casolani N, Nissi E, Giampaolo A & Liberato L (2021). Evaluating the effects of European support measures for Italian organic farms. Land use policy 102: 105225
12. Ceyhan V, Canan S, Yıldırım Ç & Türkten H. (2017). Economic Structure and Services Efficiency of Turkish Beekeepers’ Association. European Journal of Sustainable Development 6(4): 53-64
13. Charnes A, Cooper W & Rhodes E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research 2: 429-444
14. Charyulu D K & Biswas S (2010). Economics and efficiency of organic farming vis-à-vis conventional farming in India. Ahmedabad, India: Indian Institute of Management
15. Chen Y (2005). Measuring super-efficiency in DEA in the presence of infeasibility. European Journal of Operational Research 161(2): 545- 551
16. Chen Y & Liang L (2011). Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility: One model approach. European Journal of Operational Research 213(1): 359-360
17. Cook W, Liang L, Zha Y & Zhu J (2009). A modified super-efficiency DEA model for infeasibility. Journal of the Operational Research Society 60(2): 276-281
18. Dogan N & Adanacioglu H (2021). Performance Evaluation of Beekeeping Farms: A Case Study from Gümüşhane, Turkey. Pakistan J. Zool 53(5): 1837-1846
19. Durán-Lara E F, Valderrama A & Marican A (2020). Natural organic compounds for application in organic farming. Agriculture 10(2): 41. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture10020041
20. Ersoy Y, Tehci A & Yıldız S (2021). Efficiency measurement in businesses producing organic products within the scope of ecological marketing: The example of a tea business. Akademia Journal of Nature and Human Sciences 7(1): 19-31, (In Turkish).
21. Ferenczi A, Szucs I & Gáthy A (2023). Economic Sustainability Assessment of a Beekeeping Farm in Hungary. Agriculture 13(6): 1262
22. Gomes E, Abreu U, Mello J, Carvalho T & Zen S (2015). Economic and socio-environmental performance assessment of beef cattle production systems: a data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach with weight restrictions. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 44(6): 219-225
23. He D, Deng X, Jin G, Wang X, Zhang Y, Sun Z & Zhao Z (2022). Ecological efficiency of grass-based livestock husbandry under the background of rural revitalization: An empirical study of agro-pastoral ecotone. Frontiers in Environmental Science 10(848134): 1-12
24. Kashiwagi K & Kamiyama H (2023). Effect of adoption of organic farming on technical efficiency of olive-growing farms: empirical evidence from West Bank of Palestine. Agricultural and Food Economics 11(26): 1-28
25. Koner N & Laha A (2024). Estimating Marketing Efficiency of Organic Farmers: Evidence from Districts of West Bengal India. International Journal of Rural Management 20(3): 335-352. https://doi.org/10.1177/09730052241229685
26. Kuhna L, Balezentis T, Hou L & Wang D (2020). Technical and environmental efficiency of livestock farms in China: A slacks-based DEA approach. China Economic Review 62: 101213
27. Kuosmanen N, Yli-Heikkilä M, Väre M & Kuosmanen T (2021). Productive performance of organic crop farms in Finland 2010–2017. Organic Agriculture 11: 1-14
28. Lee H S, & Zhu J (2012). Super-efficiency infeasibility and zero data in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research 216(2): 429-433
29. Lee H S, Chu CW & Zhu J (2011). Super-efficiency DEA in the presence of infeasibility. European Journal of Operational Research 212(1): 141-147
30. Lovell C & Rouse A (2003). Equivalent standard DEA models to provide super-efficiency scores. Journal of the Operational Research Society 54: 101–108
31. Makri P, Papanagiotou P & Papanagiotou E (2015). Efficiency and economic Analysis of Greek Beekeeping Farms. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science 21(3): 479-484
32. Manta F, Morrone D, Toma P & Campobasso F (2023). Determining paths of innovation: The role of culture on the adoption on organic farming management. Business Strategy and the Environment 32(1): 96-109
33. Manuelian C, Penasa M, Costa L, Burbi S, Righi F & Marchi M (2020). Organic Livestock Production: A Bibliometric Review. Animals 10(4): 618
34. Melo M (2021). Organic Rice Production and Consumption to Sustain Food Security in Oriental Mindoro, Philippines. Review of Integrative Business and Economics Research 10(3): 338-354
35. Menten C, Çekiç B & Özal Saraç N. (2023). Evaluation of Organic Agriculture Production Efficiency in OECD Countries within the Framework of Sustainable Development Goals. Hacettepe University Journal of Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences 41(Special issue on Agriculture): 77-97. (In Turkish)
36. Nastis S A, Bournaris T & Karpouzos D (2019). Fuzzy data envelopment analysis of organic farms. Operational Research 19: 571-584
37. Pandey U & Singh S (2021). Environmental performance evaluation of European farms by assessing polluting factors in joint production. Journal of Cleaner Production 328: 129457
38. Poudel K L, Johnson T G, Yamamoto N, Gautam S & Mishra B (2015). Comparing technical efficiency of organic and conventional coffee farms in rural hill region of Nepal using data envelopment analysis (DEA) approach. Organic Agriculture 5: 263-275
39. Raimondo M, Caracciolo F, Nazzaro C & Marotta G (2021). Organic Farming Increases the Technical Efficiency of Olive Farms in Italy. Agriculture 11(3): 209
40. Riar A, Mandloi L, Sendhil R, Poswal R, Messmer M & Bhullar G (2020). Technical efficiencies and yield variability are comparable across organic and conventional farms. Sustainability 12(10): 4271
41. Saari D. & Merlin V (1996). The Copeland method. Economic Theory 8: 51-76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01212012
42. Saati S & Memariani A (2005). Reducing weight flexibility in fuzzy dea. Appl Math Comput 161(2): 611–622
43. Sapbamrer R & Thammachai A (2021). A systematic review of factors influencing farmers’ adoption of organic farming. Sustainability 13(7): 3842. doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/su13073842
44. Seiford L & Zhu J (1999). Infeasibility Of Super-Efficiency Data Envelopment Analysis Models. INFOR: Information Systems and Operational Research 37(2): 174-187
45. Sink N, Petkovsek M M, Veberic R & Marsic N K (2017). Chemical composition and morphometric traits and yield ofcarrots grown in organic and integrated farming systems. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 41(6): 452-462. doi:https://doi.org/10.3906/tar-1705-8
46. Sintori A, Konstantidelli V, Gouta P & Tzouramani I (2023). Profitability, Productivity, and Technical Efficiency of Cretan Olive Groves across Alternative Ecological Farm Types. Agriculture 13(12): 2194
47. Sundrum A (2001). Organic livestock farming: a critical review. Livestock Production Science 67(3): 207-215. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(00)00188-3
48. T.R. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. (2024, May 16). Retrieved from T.R. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry: https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Konular/Bitkisel-Uretim/Organik-Tarim/Yetkili-Kuruluslar-KSK
49. TR Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry. (2024, May 9). Retrieved from 2022 Organic Agriculture Statistics: https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Konular/Bitkisel-Uretim/Organik-Tarim/Istatistikler
50. Uzundumlu A S, Tamşen M & Bilgiç A (2021). Comparison of organic and conventional wheat in terms of efficiency and cost in Turkey: a case study of Erzurum Province. Custos e@ gronegócio online 17: 217-238
51. Yadava A K (2024). Macroeconomic determinants of organic farming efficiency: Double bootstrap DEA estimates from the Indian states. Regional Science Policy & Practice Regional Science Policy & Practice 16(6): 100036
52. Yadava A K & Komaraiah J B (2021). Benchmarking the performance of organic farming in India. Journal of Public Affairs 21(2): e2208
53. Yan J & Zhang Y (2023). Quantitative assessment, spatial and temporal characteristics, and dynamic evolution of carbon emissions from animal husbandry in China: 2001–2020. Environmental Science and Pollution Research 30: 116186–116201
54. Zhen H, Qiao Y, Ju X, Hashemi F & Knudsen M T (2023). Organic conversion tea farms can have comparable economic benefits and less environmental impacts than conventional ones—A case study in China. Science of The Total Environment 877: 162698
55. Zor M, Özüpek B, Pekacar S & Deliorman D (2023). Antioxidants, enzyme inhibitory activities, and phytochemical profiles of seven medicinal plants grown with organic farming techniques. Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 47(6): 918-930. doi:https://doi.org/10.55730/1300- 011X.3137