Research Article

Optimization of Bioactive Compound Extraction from Propolis by Reflux, Maceration and Ultrasound-assisted Methods and Characterization of the Extracts

Volume: 31 Number: 2 March 25, 2025
EN

Optimization of Bioactive Compound Extraction from Propolis by Reflux, Maceration and Ultrasound-assisted Methods and Characterization of the Extracts

Abstract

The region, botanical origin, and bee species influence the raw propolis content and its bioactive properties. Additionally, the extraction methods, solvents, and various process parameters significantly affect the bioactive properties of propolis extract, which is consumed as a food supplement or pharmaceutical product. In this study, propolis with a chestnut botanical origin, obtained from the Black Sea region in Turkey, was used as the raw material. The process parameters of three basic extraction methods— maceration (M), reflux (R), and ultrasound-assisted (UA)—were optimised using response surface methodology. Antioxidant activity (AA) and total phenolic content (TPC) were used as response parameters. The optimised levels for M were 78.46% ethanol concentration and 71.05 hours for extraction time; for R, 80.64% ethanol concentration, 117.44 minutes for extraction time, and 38.38°C for temperature; and for UA, 82.49% ethanol concentration, 59.12 minutes for extraction time, and 40.53°C for temperature. The results were statistically validated using the t-test. The AA, TPC, and phenolic, volatile, and mineral contents were compared among the optimised chestnut propolis extracts. Chrysin, a flavone, and pinocembrin, a flavanone, along with ferulic and ellagic acid, among the phenolic acids, were identified as the most abundant phenolic compounds. Among the 11 elements, the highest macro elements were Na, K, and Ca, while the trace elements were Fe and Zn. The phenolic, volatile, and mineral compositions of the optimised propolis extracts exhibited heterogeneous distributions. However, fatty acids (e.g., 18:0, 18:1) were present at relatively high levels only in R; phenolic compounds were obtained in relatively high amounts via M extraction. Some minor volatiles were detected only by UA extraction. Following the characterisation of the optimised extracts, it was determined that each extraction method has its own unique advantages. The results indicate that all three methods should be optimised and used together to achieve the highest component composition and bioactivity.

Keywords

Supporting Institution

Kastamonu Univercity Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit

Project Number

KÜ-BAP01/2021-14.

Ethical Statement

Not Applicable.

Thanks

This research was supported by Kastamonu University, Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (KÜBAP) with Project Number KÜ-BAP01/2021-14. The authors would like to thank the KÜBAP for their support.

References

  1. Abduh M Y, Ramdhani F, Setiawan A, Rifqialdi G, Rahmawati A & Zainudin I M (2023). Determination of productivity, yield and bioactivity of propolis extract produced by Tetragonula spp. Cultivated in Modular tetragonula hives. Heliyon: 9(6) https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e17304
  2. Acun S & Gül H (2021). Usage of microencapsulated pine propolis in cupcake production. Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 11(2): 1205-1217 (in Turkish). https://doi.org/10.21597/jist.855038
  3. Al Khalifa A S & Ahmad D (2010). Determination of key elements by ICP-OES incommercially available infant formulae and baby foods in Saudi Arabia. African Journal of Food Science 4(7): 464 – 468
  4. Al Dreini S, Fatfat Z, Abou Ibrahim N, Fatfat M Gali-Muhtasib H & Khalife H (2023). Thymoquinone enhances the antioxidant and anticancer activity of Lebanese propolis. World Journal of Clinical Oncology 14(5): 203–214. https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v14.i5.203
  5. Anonymous (2021). Turkish Food Codex Bee Products Communiqué (draft), Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry of the Republic of Turkey, https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Duyuru/1346/Mevzuat-Taslagi-Turk-Gida-Kodeksi-Ari-Urunleri-Tebligi (24.11.2024).
  6. Anonymous (2024). Delta 3 Carene: The Terpene for Healthy Bones (and Can Cause Cotton mouth), https://leafwell.com/blog/delta-3-carene (24.01.2024)
  7. Arda G (2022). Determination of macro and micro element contents in propolis products by ICP-OES, MSc Thesis, Tekirdağ Namık Kemal University. Tekirdağ
  8. Asem N, Abdul Gapar N A, Abd Hapit N H & Omar E A (2020). Correlation between total phenolic and flavonoid contents with antioxidant activity of Malaysian stingless bee propolis extract. Journal of Apicultural Research, 59(4): 437-442. https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2019.1684050

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Basic Food Processes

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

March 25, 2025

Submission Date

August 28, 2024

Acceptance Date

November 11, 2024

Published in Issue

Year 2025 Volume: 31 Number: 2

APA
Şenol Yazkan, S. N., & Hendek Ertop, M. (2025). Optimization of Bioactive Compound Extraction from Propolis by Reflux, Maceration and Ultrasound-assisted Methods and Characterization of the Extracts. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 31(2), 359-372. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1540221
AMA
1.Şenol Yazkan SN, Hendek Ertop M. Optimization of Bioactive Compound Extraction from Propolis by Reflux, Maceration and Ultrasound-assisted Methods and Characterization of the Extracts. J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili. 2025;31(2):359-372. doi:10.15832/ankutbd.1540221
Chicago
Şenol Yazkan, Sevde Nur, and Müge Hendek Ertop. 2025. “Optimization of Bioactive Compound Extraction from Propolis by Reflux, Maceration and Ultrasound-Assisted Methods and Characterization of the Extracts”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 31 (2): 359-72. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1540221.
EndNote
Şenol Yazkan SN, Hendek Ertop M (March 1, 2025) Optimization of Bioactive Compound Extraction from Propolis by Reflux, Maceration and Ultrasound-assisted Methods and Characterization of the Extracts. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 31 2 359–372.
IEEE
[1]S. N. Şenol Yazkan and M. Hendek Ertop, “Optimization of Bioactive Compound Extraction from Propolis by Reflux, Maceration and Ultrasound-assisted Methods and Characterization of the Extracts”, J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 359–372, Mar. 2025, doi: 10.15832/ankutbd.1540221.
ISNAD
Şenol Yazkan, Sevde Nur - Hendek Ertop, Müge. “Optimization of Bioactive Compound Extraction from Propolis by Reflux, Maceration and Ultrasound-Assisted Methods and Characterization of the Extracts”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 31/2 (March 1, 2025): 359-372. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1540221.
JAMA
1.Şenol Yazkan SN, Hendek Ertop M. Optimization of Bioactive Compound Extraction from Propolis by Reflux, Maceration and Ultrasound-assisted Methods and Characterization of the Extracts. J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili. 2025;31:359–372.
MLA
Şenol Yazkan, Sevde Nur, and Müge Hendek Ertop. “Optimization of Bioactive Compound Extraction from Propolis by Reflux, Maceration and Ultrasound-Assisted Methods and Characterization of the Extracts”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 31, no. 2, Mar. 2025, pp. 359-72, doi:10.15832/ankutbd.1540221.
Vancouver
1.Sevde Nur Şenol Yazkan, Müge Hendek Ertop. Optimization of Bioactive Compound Extraction from Propolis by Reflux, Maceration and Ultrasound-assisted Methods and Characterization of the Extracts. J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili. 2025 Mar. 1;31(2):359-72. doi:10.15832/ankutbd.1540221

Cited By

Journal of Agricultural Sciences is published as open access journal. All articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).