Application of Multicriteria Decision-Making Methods in Lettuce Production Based on Agronomic and Economic Criteria

Year 2026, Volume: 32 Issue: 2, 222 - 236, 24.03.2026

Radomir Bodiroga , Grujica Vico Ljubiša ševkušić Slađana Savić Jelena Dragišić Maksimović Vuk Maksimović Milica Stojanović

https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1668621

https://izlik.org/JA25MR64EE

Abstract

Lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) is an annual leafy vegetable crop from the Asteraceae family with the possibility to grow all year round. Two lettuce cultivars (red 'Murai' and green 'Aleppo') were cultivated in a greenhouse using two biofertilizers (a mixture of different effective microorganisms and Trichoderma spp. fertilizer), and their combination, during three consecutive growing seasons. This study aimed to find the optimal combination of fertilization treatments and growing seasons depending on different production criteria, using a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method, Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to COmpromise Solution (MARCOS). A total number of 12 lettuce production models (alternatives) were proposed regarding fertilization treatments and planting dates. The study analyzed 12 criteria, which were divided into three groups: quantity, quality, and economic criteria. Weight coefficients were determined using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method while, the stability of the obtained ranking list was investigated by applying comparative analysis using four other MCDM methods, as well as by performing sensitivity analysis through four scenarios. Cultivar 'Murai' showed the best results in the winter growing season with the application of Trichoderma spp. fertilizer, while cultivar 'Aleppo' in the spring with the combined fertilizers (effective microorganisms + Trichoderma spp). This study supports farmers and agricultural companies in optimizing planting schedules and biofertilizer selection 
tailored to specific cultivars, integrating quantity, quality, and economic criteria to enhance productivity and sustainability. Furthermore, it reveals the significant role of cultivar choice in optimizing biofertilizer type and growing season selection for lettuce production, demonstrating the MARCOS method’s robustness as a decision-support tool in agricultural planning and management.  

Keywords

Lettuce , Biofertilizer , Seasonality , MARCOS method , AHP , Sensitivity analysis

Supporting Institution

The authors declare that the study is funded by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia under contract number 451-03-136/2025-03/200053 and contract number 451-03-136/2025-03/200010.

Project Number

The authors declare that the study is funded by the Ministry of Science, Technological Development and Innovation of the Republic of Serbia under contract number 451-03-136/2025-03/200053 and contract number 451-03-136/2025-03/200010.

Thanks

The authors extend their gratitude to Iceberg Salat Centar (Serbia) for offering technical assistance with agricultural practices throughout the experiments.

References

• Al-Harbi A-S Kamal M (2001). Application of the AHP in project management. International Journal of Project Management 19: 19-27. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0263-7863(99)00038-1
• Avio L, Sbrana C, Giovannetti M & Frassinetti S (2017). Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi affect total phenolics content and antioxidant activity in leaves of oak leaf lettuce varieties. Scientia Horticulturae 224: 265-271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.06.022
• Ayuso-Calles M, García-Estévez I, Jiménez-Gómez A, Flores-Félix J D, Escribano-Bailón M T & Rivas R (2020). Rhizobium laguerreae improves productivity and phenolic compound content of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) under saline stress conditions. Foods 9: 1166. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods9091166
• Barickman T C, Sublett W L, Miles C A, Crow D & Scheenstra E (2018). Lettuce biomass accumulation and phytonutrient concentrations are influenced by genotype, N application rate and location. Horticulturae 4: 12. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae4030012
• Bodiroga R, Sredojević Z, Vico G & Govedarica-Lučić A (2022). Influence of different production methods on economic results of greenhouse vegetable production. Custos e Agronegocio Online 18: 44-62
• Božanić D, Tešić D & Kočić J (2019). Multi-Criteria FUCOM – Fuzzy MABAC model for the selection of location for construction of single span bailey bridge. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering 2: 132-146. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame1901132b
• Cataldo D A, Maroon M, Schrader L E & Youngs V L (1975). Rapid colorimetric determination of nitrate in plant tissue by nitration of salicylic acid. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 6: 71-80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00103627509366547
• Chakraborty S, Chattopadhyay R & Chakraborty S (2020). An integrated D-MARCOS method for supplier selection in an iron and steel industry. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering 3: 49-69. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame2003049c
• D’Antonio P, Fiorentino C, AbdelRahman M A E, Sannino M, Scalcione E, Lacertosa G, Modugno F, Marsico A, Donvito A R, Conceição L A, Drosos M & Scopa A (2025). Modeling climatic, terrain and soil factors using AHP in GIS for grapevines suitability assessment. Sustainable Development 33: 970-991. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3136
• Dengiz O, Çağlar A & Özkan B (2025). A new innovative approach with revised pythagorean fuzzy SWARA in assessing of soil erodibility factor. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 31: 182-195. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1501907
• Dragišić Maksimović J & Živanović B (2012). Quantification of the antioxidant activity in salt-stressed tissues. Methods in Molecular Biology 913: 237-250. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-61779-986-0_16 Ecer F & Pamučar D (2021). MARCOS technique under intuitionistic fuzzy environment for determining the COVID-19 pandemic performance of insurance companies in terms of healthcare services. Applied Soft Computing 104: 107199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107199
• Ersen N (2024). Assessment of medicinal and aromatic plants’ contribution to the country’s economy by hybrid multi-criteria decision-making approach: the case of Turkey. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 30: 304-316. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1308059
• Fasusi O A, Cruz C & Babalola O O (2021). Agricultural sustainability: microbial biofertilizers in rhizosphere management. Agriculture 11: 163. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11020163
• Ghorbanpour A, Salimi A, Ghanbary M A T, Pirdashti H & Dehestani A (2018). The effect of Trichoderma harzianum in mitigating low temperature stress in tomato (Solanum https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.11.028 lycopersicum L.) plants. Scientia Horticulturae 230: 134-141.
• Hao K, Fei L, Liu L, Jie F, Peng Y, Liu X, Khan S A, Wang D & Wang X (2022). Comprehensive evaluation on the yield, quality, and water nitrogen use efficiency of mountain apple under surge-root irrigation in the Loess Plateau based on the improved TOPSIS method. Frontiers in Plant Science 13: 853546. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.853546
• Hwang C-L & Yoon K (1981). Methods for multiple attribute decision making. In Methods for multiple attribute decision making. Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications a state-of-the-art survey. 58-191.
• Ibáñez A, Garrido-Chamorro S, Vasco-Cárdenas M F & Barreiro C (2023). From lab to field: biofertilizers in the 21st century. Horticulturae 9: 1306. https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae9121306
• Işık M (2023). Determining alternative crops with multi criteria decision making methods within the framework of land risk criteria. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 29: 161-170. https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.930020
• Jana J & Moktan P (2013). Nitrate concentration of leafy vegetables: a survey of nitrite concentrations in retail fresh leafy vegetables from daily markets of different locations. ISABB Journal of Food Agricultural Sciences 3: 1-5. https://doi.org/10.5897/ISABB-JFAS11.033
• Kumar S, Diksha Sindhu S S & Kumar R (2022). Biofertilizers: an ecofriendly technology for nutrient recycling and environmental sustainability. Current Research in Microbial Sciences 3: 100094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crmicr.2021.100094
• Lichtenthaler H K & Wellburn A R (1983). Determinations of total carotenoids and chlorophylls A and B of leaf extracts in different solvents. Biochemical Society Transactions 11: 591-592. https://doi.org/10.1042/bst0110591
• Liu X, Ardo S, Bunning M, Parry J, Zhou K, Stushnoff C, Stoniker F, Yu L & Kendall P (2007). Total phenolic content and DPPH radical scavenging activity of lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) grown in Colorado. LWT - Food Science and Technology 40: 552-557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2005.09.007
• Lukić R, Vojteski Kljenak D, Anđelić S & Gavrilović M (2021). Application of WASPAS method in the evaluation of efficiency of agricultural enterprises in Serbia. Ekonomika poljoprivrede 68: 375-388. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj2102375L
• MacCrimmon K R (1968). Decision making Among Multiple-Attribute Alternatives: A Survey and Consolidated Approach. RAND Corporation. Santa Monica, CA, USA.
• Maksimović A, Puška A, Šakić Bobić B & Grgić Z (2021). A model for supporting the decision of plum variety selection based on fuzzy logic. Journal of Central European Agriculture 22: 450-461. https://doi.org/10.5513/JCEA01/22.2.2946
• Mampholo B M, Maboko M M, Soundy P & Sivakumar D (2016). Phytochemicals and overall quality of leafy lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) varieties grown in closed hydroponic system. Journal of Food Quality 39: 805-815. https://doi.org/10.1111/jfq.12234
• Meng C, Xu D, Son Y-J, Kubota C, Lewis M & Tronstad R (2014). An integrated simulation and AHP approach to vegetable grafting operation design. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 102: 73-84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2014.01.007 Mousavi A, Aghbolaghi E A, Khorramifar A, Gancarz M, Darvishi Y, Stasiak M, Miernik A & Karami H (2022). Life cycle assessment for environmental impact reduction and evaluation of the energy indices in lettuce production. Applied Sciences 12: 10348. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122010348
• Nedeljković M, Puška A, Suzić R & Maksimović A (2022). Multicriteria model of support for the selection of pear varieties in raising orchards in the Semberija region (Bosnia and Herzegovina). Sustainability 14: 1584. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031584 Pamučar D & Ćirović G (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using multi-attributive border approximation area comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications 42: 3016-3028. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.057
• Pramanik P K, Biswas S, Pal S, Marinković D & Choudhury P (2021). A comparative analysis of multi-criteria decision-making methods for resource selection in mobile crowd computing. Symmetry 13: 1713. https://doi.org/10.3390/sym13091713
• Qin X X, Zhang M Y, Han Y Y, Hao J H, Liu C J & Fan S X (2018). Beneficial phytochemicals with anti-tumor potential revealed through metabolic profiling of new red pigmented lettuces (Lactuca sativa L.). International Journal of Molecular Sciences 19: 1165. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19041165 Rouphael Y, Vitaglione P, Colla G, Napolitano F, Raimondi G, Kyriacou M, Colantuono A, Giordano M, Pannico A, Maiello R & De Pascale S (2019). Influence of mild saline stress and growing season on yield and leaf quality of baby lettuce grown in floating system. Acta Horticulturae: 147-152. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2019.1242.20
• Santander C, Vidal G, Ruiz A, Vidal C & Cornejo P. (2022). Salinity eustress increases the biosynthesis and accumulation of phenolic compounds that improve the functional and antioxidant quality of red lettuce. Agronomy 12: 598. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12030598
• Shabani E, Alemzadeh Ansari N, Fayezizadeh M R & Caser M (2024). Can Trichoderma harzianum be used to enhance the yield and nutrient uptake of Lactuca sativa cv “Lollo Rosso” in floating systems?. Food Science & Nutrition 12: 4800-4809. https://doi.org/10.1002/fsn3.4127
• Simko I, Hayes R J, Mou B & Mccreight J D (2014). Lettuce and Spinach. In Yield Gains in Major U.S. Field Crops. ASA, CSSA, and SSSA. 53-85.
• Stevens R, Buret M, Garchery C, Carretero Y & Causse M (2006). Technique for rapid, small-scale analysis of vitamin C levels in fruit and application to a tomato mutant collection. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 54: 6159-6165. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf061241e
• Stević Ž, Miškić S, Vojinović D, Huskanović E, Stanković M & Pamučar D (2022). Development of a model for evaluating the efficiency of transport companies: PCA-DEA-MCDM model. Axioms 11: 140. https://doi.org/10.3390/axioms11030140
• Stević Ž, Pamučar D, Puška A & Chatterjee P (2020). Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to COmpromise Solution (MARCOS). Computers & Industrial Engineering 140: 106231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106231
• Stojanović M, Milosavljević D, Dragišić Maksimović J, Maksimović V, Govedarica-Lučić A & Bodiroga R (2024a). Selection of the optimal lettuce cultivar to agronomic traits in summer production using multicriteria decision-making MABAC method. In B. Pašalić (Ed.), XIII International Symposium on Agricultural Sciences, AGRORES 2024, Book of proceedings (pp. 64-73). University of Banja Luka, Faculty of Agriculture.
• Stojanović M, Milosavljević D, Dragišić Maksimović J, Maksimović V, Govedarica-Lučić A & Bodiroga R (2024b). Novel batavia lettuce cultivars-Choosing the optimal cultivar for fresh and processed products using WASPAS method. In D. Kovacevic (Ed.), XV International Scientific Agricultural Symposium “Agrosym 2024,” Jahorina, October 10-13, 2024, Bosnia and Herzegovina (pp. 346-352). University of East Sarajevo, Faculty of Agriculture.
• Sumaryanti L, Rahayu T K, Prayitno A & Salju (2019). Comparison study of SMART and AHP method for paddy fertilizer recommendation in decision support system. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science 343: 012207. https://doi.org/10.1088/17551315/343/1/012207
• Taherdoost H & Madanchian M (2023). Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) methods and concepts. Encyclopedia 3: 77-87. https://doi.org/10.3390/encyclopedia3010006 genotypes for a
• Tobar-Tosse D E, dos Santos Candido W, da Silva Santos L, Castoldi R, Costa Silva E H & Trevisan Braz L (2022). Identifying crisphead lettuce wider range https://doi.org/10.21930/rcta.vol23_num1_art:1964 of environments. Ciencia y Tecnología Agropecuaria 23: e1964.
• Vico G, Bodiroga R & Stupar S (2020). A two-stage multi criteria decision making in crop-livestock farming. In New Technologies, Development and Application III. Springer International Publishing. 803-810.
• Vico G, Govedarica-Lučić A, Rajić Z, Bodiroga R, Mičić I, Zec Sambol S & Mičić M (2017). Multi attribute assessment approach in vegetable production. Economics of Agriculture 64: 1355-1364. https://doi.org/10.5937/ekoPolj1704355V
• Yang X A-O, Gil M A-O, Yang Q A-O & Tomás-Barberán F A-O (2022). Bioactive compounds in lettuce: highlighting the benefits to human health and impacts of preharvest and postharvest practices. Comprehensive Reviews in Food Science and Food Safety 21: 4-45. https://doi.org/10.1111/1541-4337.12877
• Ye L, Zhao X, Bao E, Li J, Zou Z & Cao K (2020). Bio-organic fertilizer with reduced rates of chemical fertilization improves soil fertility and enhances tomato yield and quality. Scientific Reports 10: 177. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-56954-2
• Zavadskas E K, Govindan K, Antucheviciene J & Turskis Z (2016). Hybrid multiple criteria decision-making methods: a review of applications for sustainability issues. Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja 29: 857-887. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2016.1237302
• Zavadskas E K, Turskis Z, Antucheviciene J & Zakarevicius A (2012). Optimization of Weighted Aggregated Sum Product Assessment. Elektronika ir Elektrotechnika 122: 3-6. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.eee.122.6.1810