A Comparative Analysis of the Access Levels of Individuals with Disabilities to Public Services and the Influencing Factors According to Their Residence in Rural and Urban Areas

Year 2026, Volume: 32 Issue: 2, 347 - 362, 24.03.2026

Merve Yılmaz , Cengiz Sayın

https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1724041

https://izlik.org/JA57ZY34AA

Abstract

Using Antalya province as a case study, this research investigates access to essential public services for individuals with physical, hearing, and visual impairments and the factors influencing it. Data were collected via face-to face interviews and questionnaires from 61 individuals with physical disabilities, 60 with hearing impairments, and 60 with visual impairments. Independent samples t-tests were employed to assess geographic disparities in access, while ordinal logistic regression analysis identified predictive factors. Analysis revealed that individuals with physical and visual disabilities experienced Limited Access (Level 2) in both rural and urban areas. In contrast, individuals with hearing disabilities demonstrated Full Access (Level 1) in urban areas but Limited Access in rural settings. The results indicate that while place of residence (rural versus urban) did not significantly impact access for the physically disabled group, rural residence negatively affected service access for those with hearing and visual impairments. Public services should therefore be reconfigured to address specific barriers for different disability groups and to implement effective oversight to improve overall accessibility. 

Keywords

Accessibility , Antalya , Individuals with disabilities , Ordinal logistic regression analysis , Public social services , Rural and urban , Turkiye.

References

• Akın H B & Şentürk E (2012). Analysing levels of happiness of individuals with ordinal logistic analysis. Oneri 10(37): 183–193 (In Turkish)
• Ay H M & İlkhan Söylemez D (2024). Municipal barrier-free life practices and the case of Konya Metropolitan Municipality. Bitlis Eren Journal of Social Research 2(3): 139–162 (In Turkish)
• Berkün S (2016). Principles of the European Urban Charter regarding disabled and socio-economically disadvantaged individuals in cities and the accessibility of public institutions and organizations in the city of Bursa. The Journal of Aksaray University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences 8(1): 61–72 (In Turkish)
• Bezyak J L, Sabella S A & Gattis R H (2017). Public transportation: An investigation of barriers for people with disabilities. Journal of Disability Policy Studies 28(1): 52–60
• Çınarlı S (2010). Public Services for Persons with Disabilities. Istanbul: Kazancı Publications. (In Turkish)
• Doğanay G & Henden K Ş (2016). The “Other” Women of Rural and Urban Areas: Women with Disabilities in Trabzon. https://www.academia.edu/29462449 (In Turkish)
• Franche R L, Murray E J, Ostry A, Ratner P A, Wagner S L & Harder H G (2010). Work disability prevention in rural areas: A focus on healthcare workers. Rural and Remote Health 10(4): 249–272
• Gething L (1997). Sources of double disadvantage for people with disabilities living in remote and rural areas of New South Wales, Australia. Disability & Society 12(4): 513–531
• Iezzoni L I, Killeen M B & O'Day B L (2006). Rural residents with disabilities confront substantial barriers to obtaining primary care. Health Services Research 41(4p1): 1258–1275
• Ipsen C, Hall J P & Lui J (2022a). Rural disability and community participation. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences 3: 1–9
• Ipsen C, Ward B & Myers A (2022). Events across the life course contribute to higher mobility impairment rates in rural U.S. Frontiers in Rehabilitation Sciences 3: 863716
• Karadağ Z & Eroğlu D (2019). Gender-based effects on the participation of disabled women living in rural areas in social life: The case of Bulanık district. Journal of Sociology 39: 33–52 (In Turkish)
• Kesgin B (2014). Local social policies for persons with disabilities. Contemporary Local Governments 23(4): 1–15 (In Turkish)
• Kino H (2017). Effectiveness of Local Public Services for Persons with Disabilities: The Case of Sakarya (Master’s Thesis). Sakarya University (In Turkish)
• Koçak F A, Kurt E E, Şaş S, Koçak Y, Erdem H R, Tuncay F & Büyükturan Ö (2018). Distribution of disabilities among geriatric patients applying to the disabled health board in a rural area. Turkish Journal of Osteoporosis 24(3): 92–99 (In Turkish)
• Kuleli K (2012). Accessibility According to TS EN 81-70 and prEN 81-82 Standards. https://share.google/lprJjnQXRCbqT1ycA (In Turkish)
• Kurt H İ (2015). Local Governments and Services for Persons with Disabilities. In M. Ökmen (Ed.), Current Developments in Local Governments (pp. 413–434). Bursa: Ekin Publishing House. (In Turkish)
• Lang R (2007). The Development and Critique of the Social Model of Disability (Working Paper No. 3). Leonard Cheshire Disability and Inclusive Development Centre, University College London.
• Liang J, Bi G & Zhan C (2020). Multinomial and ordinal logistic regression analyses with multi-categorical variables using R. Annals of Translational Medicine 8: 16
• Mahmood S E, Singh A & Zaidi Z H (2015). Disability in the rural areas of Bareilly, India. Indian Journal of Health Sciences and Biomedical Research (KLEU) 8(2): 115–119
• McCullagh P (1980). Regression models for ordinal data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society 42(2): 109–142
• Nerse S (2020). Problems and interaction differences of disabled people in rural areas. Journal of Oriental Scientific Research 12(3): 603–618 (In Turkish)
• Nkomo N, Dube A & Marucchi D (2020). Rural young children with disabilities: Education, challenges, and opportunities. International Journal on Studies in Education 2(2): 134–145
• Roult R, Carbonneau H, Belley-Ranger É, St-Onge M, Brunet I & Adjizian J M (2017). Leisure for people with disabilities in rural Quebec. Societies 7(3): 22
• SBB (2023). The Twelfth Development Plan (2024–2028). https://www.sbb.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/On-Ikinci-KalkinmaPlani_2024-2028_11122023.pdf (In Turkish)
• Seeley J (2001). Recognising Diversity: Disability and Rural Livelihoods Approaches in India. https://cdn.odi.org/media/documents/2817.pdf
• Seyyar A (2008). Social Policy Terms: An Encyclopedic Dictionary. Istanbul: Beta Publications. (In Turkish)
• Şen G (2022). Economic examination of disabled women living in rural areas: The case of Kütahya province. Eurasian Journal of Social and Economic Research 9(2): 177–189 (In Turkish)
• Şemşit S, Uçar A & Yüksel M A (2016). Perspectives of European Union policies on the services provided by municipalities to persons with disabilities. Social Sciences Journal ICEBSS Special Issue: 205–223 (In Turkish)
• Terzi Y (2019). Logistic Regression Analysis. https://share.google/8c0puvrGn9c0vpqdG (In Turkish)
• Tınar Y (2018). Management and Delivery of Public Services for Persons with Disabilities: A Comparative Evaluation. Ankara: Seçkin Publications. (In Turkish)
• Tiyek R, Eryiğit B H & Baş E (2016). The accessibility problem of persons with disabilities and a research within the framework of TSE standards. Journal of Kastamonu University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences 12(2): 226–261 (In Turkish)
• TUIK (2010). Research on the Problems and Expectations of Persons with Disabilities. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Bulten/Index?p=Ozurlulerin Sorun-ve-Beklentileri-Arastirmasi-2010-6370 (In Turkish)
• TUIK (2011). Population and Housing Survey. https://ailevecalisma.gov.tr/media/5677/nufus-ve-konut-arastirmasi-engellilik-arastirma sonuclari.pdf (In Turkish)
• WHO (2001). International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/international-classification-of-functioning-disability-and-health
• Yavuz S, Deveci M, Karabulut T & Şentürk E (2014). Determination of the factors affecting university students’ urban satisfaction by ordinal logistic regression analysis: The case of Erzincan University. Journal of Cumhuriyet University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences 15(1): 95–114 (In Turkish)
• Yazıcıoğlu Y & Erdoğan S (2004). Applied Scientific Research Methods with SPSS. Ankara: Detay Publications. (In Turkish)
• Yenipazarlı A, Çondur F & Cömertler N (2020). Satisfaction of persons with disabilities with public services: The case of Nazilli district. Journal of Aydın Adnan Menderes University Institute of Social Sciences 7(2): 77–93 (In Turkish)
• Zama S Y, Ashok N C & Kulkarni P (2013). Understanding the needs of persons with disabilities in rural and urban Mysore: A step towards exploring the unreached. International Journal of Health & Allied Sciences 2(2): 133–137