EN
TR
Comparison of the Vacuum Dynamics of Conventional and Quarter Individual Milking Systems
Abstract
The effect of machine milking on udder health has been recognized for the past 100 years. Among different milking
systems, a new quarter individual milking system called the Multilactor®
(MULTI) has been developed to eliminate
some detrimental effects of conventional milking systems (CON) and conventional systems with periodic air ingress
(BIO) on udder health. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of milk flow on average liner vacuum
during the b and d phases of pulsation in all systems by using a wet-test method defined in ISO 6690 (2007).
Measurements were conducted in three different milking parlours where CON, BIO and MULTI were installed
separately. It was found that, at an average flow rate of 4.8 l min-1, the average vacuum in the liner during the bphase was 35.0 kPa in CON, 32.6 kPa in BIO and 31.1 kPa in the MULTI system, compliant with the desired
average vacuum in the liner of 32-42 kPa mentioned in ISO 5707 (2007). The average liner vacuum values during
the d-phase differs from one system to another and these values were calculated to be 34.2 kPa, 12.3 kPa and 14.8
kPa for CON, MULTI and BIO, respectively. The reason why CON differs as compared to MULTI and BIO can be
attributed to the fact that both, MULTI and BIO use the BioMilker system that allows periodic air ingress under the
teat
Keywords
References
- Hamann J, Bronzo V, Moroni P, Casula A & Zecconi A (2001). Conventional and positive pressure pulsation effects on bovine teats and on immunological components of different milk fractions. Milchwissenshaft (Milk Science International) 56(8): 423-427
- Hoefelmayr T & Maier J (1979). So arbeitet der BioMilker. Milchpraxis 17: 2-65 ISO/DIN 5707 (2007). Milking machine installations - constructions and performance. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland
- ISO/DIN 6690 (2007). Milking machine installations - mechanical tests. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland
- NMC (1996). Procedures for Evaluating Vacuum Levels and Air Flow in Milking Systems. The National Mastitis Council, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Oz H, Rose S, Brunsch R & Bilgen H (2008). Wet and Dynamic Tests in Conventional and Single Tube Milking Clusters. In: Proceedings of the AgEng2008- International Conference on Agricultural Engineering–Agricultural & Biosystems Engineering for a Sustainable World, 23-25 June, Paper No. OP 495, Hersonissos-Kreta, Greece
- Rasmussen M.D, Reinemann D.J & Mein G.A (2003). Measuring Vacuum in Milking Machines. International Dairy Federation. Bulletin-FIL-IDF (Belgium) 381, 19-32
- Reinemann D.J, Schuring N & Bade R.D (2007). Methods for measuring and interpreting milking vacuum. In: Proceedings of Sixth International Dairy Housing Conference. 16-18 June, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA Wirtz N, Oechtering K, Tholen E, Trappman W, McLean J (ed.) & Sinclair M (ed.) (2002).
- Comparison of an automatic milking system to a conventional milking parlor. In Prooceedings of First North American Conference on Robotic Milking, III50-III-53, Toronto, Canada Worstorff H, Prediger A & Auernhammer H (1983).
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
-
Journal Section
Research Article
Publication Date
September 5, 2010
Submission Date
February 10, 2010
Acceptance Date
-
Published in Issue
Year 2010 Volume: 16 Number: 3
APA
Öz, H., Rose-meıerhöfer, S., Ströbel, U., & Ammon, C. (2010). Comparison of the Vacuum Dynamics of Conventional and Quarter Individual Milking Systems. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 16(3), 162-168. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001135
AMA
1.Öz H, Rose-meıerhöfer S, Ströbel U, Ammon C. Comparison of the Vacuum Dynamics of Conventional and Quarter Individual Milking Systems. J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili. 2010;16(3):162-168. doi:10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001135
Chicago
Öz, Hülya, Sandra Rose-meıerhöfer, Ulrich Ströbel, and Christian Ammon. 2010. “Comparison of the Vacuum Dynamics of Conventional and Quarter Individual Milking Systems”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 16 (3): 162-68. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001135.
EndNote
Öz H, Rose-meıerhöfer S, Ströbel U, Ammon C (September 1, 2010) Comparison of the Vacuum Dynamics of Conventional and Quarter Individual Milking Systems. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 16 3 162–168.
IEEE
[1]H. Öz, S. Rose-meıerhöfer, U. Ströbel, and C. Ammon, “Comparison of the Vacuum Dynamics of Conventional and Quarter Individual Milking Systems”, J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili, vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 162–168, Sept. 2010, doi: 10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001135.
ISNAD
Öz, Hülya - Rose-meıerhöfer, Sandra - Ströbel, Ulrich - Ammon, Christian. “Comparison of the Vacuum Dynamics of Conventional and Quarter Individual Milking Systems”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 16/3 (September 1, 2010): 162-168. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001135.
JAMA
1.Öz H, Rose-meıerhöfer S, Ströbel U, Ammon C. Comparison of the Vacuum Dynamics of Conventional and Quarter Individual Milking Systems. J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili. 2010;16:162–168.
MLA
Öz, Hülya, et al. “Comparison of the Vacuum Dynamics of Conventional and Quarter Individual Milking Systems”. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 16, no. 3, Sept. 2010, pp. 162-8, doi:10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001135.
Vancouver
1.Hülya Öz, Sandra Rose-meıerhöfer, Ulrich Ströbel, Christian Ammon. Comparison of the Vacuum Dynamics of Conventional and Quarter Individual Milking Systems. J Agr Sci-Tarim Bili. 2010 Sep. 1;16(3):162-8. doi:10.1501/Tarimbil_0000001135
Cited By
Süt Sağım Makinelerinde Çalışma Vakumu ve Süt Akış Hızı Değişimlerinin Ortalama Pençe Vakumuna Etkisi
ÇOMÜ Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.33202/comuagri.659663The effects of quarter-individual milking in conventional milking parlours on the somatic cell count and udder health of dairy cows
Journal of Dairy Research
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022029912000611Effects of quarter individual and conventional milking systems on teat condition
Preventive Veterinary Medicine
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.01.006