Identification of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Genotypes Tolerant to Water Stres
Abstract
The present research was carried out to determine water-stress tolerance of linoleic sunflower genotypes (P64LE119, PR63F73, P64LL62) grown under different water stress conditions [no water-stress (I100); mild water-stress (I70); strong water-stress (I35)] in the years 2015 and 2016. Variance analyses revealed significant differences between the genotypes (P<0.01). As the average of two years, the greatest yield was obtained from no water-stress x genotype interaction (I100xP64LE119) with 4094.66 kg ha-1, the lowest yield was obtained from strong water stress x genotype interaction (I35xPR63F73) with 2487.81 kg ha-1. Again as the average of two years, the greatest chlorophyll content was obtained from no water-stress x genotype interaction (I100xP64LE119) with 49.83 spad, the lowest value was obtained from strong water stress x genotype interaction (I35xPR63F73) with 34.39 spad. The greatest crop water stress index was obtained from strong water stress x genotype interaction (I35xPR63F73) with 0.53, the lowest value was obtained from no water-stress x genotype interaction (I100xP64LE119) with 0.21. The P64LE119 genotype with optimum water use efficiency and prominent with crop water stress index and chlorophyll content both in no water-stress and strong water stress treatments was identified as water stress-resistant and the genotype was considered to have reliable characteristics potentially to be used in further water stress-resistance studies.
Keywords
References
- Afkari A (2010). The effect of water deficit on characteristics physiological-chemical of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) varieties. Advances in Environmental Biology 4(1): 24-30
- Alahdadi I, Oraki H & Khajani F P (2011). Effect of water stress on yield and yield components of sunflower genotypes. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(34): 6504-6509
- Alderfasi A A & Nielsen D C (2001). Use of crop water stress index for monitoring water status and scheduling irrigation in wheat. Agriculture Water Management 47: 69-75
- Ali M D & Shui L T (2009). Potential evapotranspiration model for Muda Irrigation Project, Malaysia. Water Resources Management 23(1): 57-69
- Blake G R & Hartge K H (1986). Bulk density. In: Klute, A. (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, Part 1. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, Monograph 9, pp. 363-375
- Chaves M M (1991). Effect of water deficits on carbon assimilation. Journal of Experimental Botany 42(1): 1-16
- Chimenti C, Pearson A & Hall J (2002). Osmotic adjustment and yield maintenance under drought in sunflower. Field Crops Research 75(2): 235-246
- Choudhury B J & Idso S B (1984). Simulating sunflower canopy temperatures to infer root-zone soil water potential. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 31: 69-78
Details
Primary Language
English
Subjects
Engineering
Journal Section
Research Article
Authors
Ali Beyhan Uçak
*
Türkiye
Publication Date
September 5, 2018
Submission Date
March 22, 2017
Acceptance Date
September 20, 2017
Published in Issue
Year 2018 Volume: 24 Number: 3