Evaluation of Some Operational Parameters of a Vacuum Single-Seed Planter in Maize Sowing

Abstract

The objective of the study was to evaluate the performance of a vacuum single-seed planter in field conditions to optimize some operating parameters in maize production. Three forward speed of the tractor (4.0, 5.4 and 7.9 km h-1) and five target seed spacing (102, 147, 195, 247 and 309 mm) were evaluated by examining the mean seed spacing, coefficient of precision in spacing, miss index, multiple index, quality of feed index, sowing depth, deviation from the row (inter-row spacing), mean emergence time, emergence rate index and percentage emergence. The point dropped in a furrow of seed, depth of seed placement, emergence rate and three indices of uniformity in seed spacing and precision coefficients of sowing quality were determined. The planter performed the best performance at the lowest forward speed and the highest target seed spacing. However, the deviation of seeds from the intended point in intra-row spacing was significantly affected only by the forward speed (P<0.001). Improvement in the larger seed spacing was due to the lower variation. Increasing the forward speed resulted in a shallower sowing depth. The desired planting depth was also obtained at 4.0 km h-1 in all plots. Increasing target seed spacing increased the emergence percent by about 35% while increasing forward speed decreased the emergence percent by 10%. Sowing at 4.0 km h-1 resulted in the lowest miss, multiple and precision indices (5.1% 2.9%, and 15.3%, respectively), and a quality of feed index as high as 92% was obtained in similar conditions. The results indicated that, with single-seed planters, success may be achieved in a conventional tillage maize production system at a target seed spacing of more than 102 mm and tractor forward speeds of less than 7.9 km h-1, and thus satisfying farmers who carry out maize sowing by conventional tillage.

Keywords

• Plant spacing
• tractor forward speed
• sowing depth
• deviation from row
• sowing uniformity

References

1. Bracy R P, Parish R L & McCoy J E (1999). Precision seeder uniformity varies with theoretical spacing. Horttechnology 9(1): 47-50 Erbach D C (1982). Tillage for continuous corn and corn‐soybean rotation. Transaction of the. ASAE 25(4): 906‐911, 918 Griepentrog H W (1998). Seed distribution over the area. EurAgEng. 98-A-059, Oslo. Heege H J (1993). Seeding method performance for cereals, rape and beans. Transactions of the ASAE 36(3): 653 – 661 ISO (1984). Sowing Equipment – Test Methods. Part I: Single Seed Drills, 7256/1 Ivancan S, Sito S & Fabijanic G (2004). Effect of precision drill operating speed on the intra-row seed distribution for parsley. Biosystems Engineering 89(3): 373-376 doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.07.007 Kachman S D & Smith J A (1995). Alternative measures of accuracy in plant spacing for planters using single seed metering. Transactions of the ASAE 38(2): 379 – 387 doi:10.13031/2013.27843 Karayel D & Özmerzi A (2002). Effect of tillage methods on sowing uniformity of maize. Canadian Biosystems Engineering 44: 2.23-2.26. Mohsenin N N (1986). Physical Properties of Plant and Animal Materials. Gordon and Breach Science Publisher, New York Nafziger E D (1996). Effects of missing and two plant hills on corn grain yield. J. of Production Agriculture 9(2): 238-240 doi:10.2134/jpa1996.0238 Nielsen R L (1995). Planting speed effects on stand establishment and grain yield of corn. Journal of production agriculture, 8: 391-393 Önal İ (2011). Ekim, Bakım, Gübreleme Makinaları. Ege Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları (in Turkish), Turkey Özmerzi A, Karayel D & Topakci M (2002). Effect of sowing depth on precision seeder uniformity. Biosystems Engineering 82(2): 227–230 doi:10.1006/bioe.2002.0057 Özmerzi A & Keskin R (1983). A research on the methods used to measure sowing depth. Uludag University Jurnal of Agriculture Faculty 1(2): 1 – 11 Panning J W, Kocher M F, Smith J A & Kachman S D (2000). Laboratory and field testing of seed spacing uniformity for sugarbeet planters. Applied Engineering in Agriculture, 16(1): 7-13 Peterson C L, Dowding E A, Hawley K N & Harder RW (1983). The chisel-planter minimum tillage systems. Transactions of the ASAE 26(2): 378-383. doi: 10.13031/2013.33941 Raoufat M H & Mahmoodieh R A (2005). Stand establishment responses of maize to seedbed residue, seed drill coulters and primary tillage systems. Biosystems Engineering 90(3): 261-269 doi: 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.11.012 Singh R C, Singh G & Saraswat D C (2005). Optimizing of design and operational parameters of pneumatic seed metering device for planting cottonseeds. Biosystem Engineering 92(4): 429–438 doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2005.07.002 Staggenborg S A, Taylor R K & Maddux L D (2004). Effect of planter speed and seed firmers on corn stand establishment. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 20(5): 573−580 doi:10.13031/2013.17457 Stipesevic B, Jug D, Jug I, Zugec I, Stosic M & Kolar D (2009). Influence of different soil tillage systems on soybean yield and yield components. Journal of Agricultural Machinery Science 5(3): 263-267 Topakci M, Karayel D, Canakci M, Furat S & Uzun B (2011). Sesame hill dropping performance of a vacuum seeder for different tillage practices. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 27(2): 203-209 doi: 10.13031/2013.36487 Wanjura D F & Hudspeth E B (1969). Performance of vacuum wheels metering individual cottonseed. Transactions of the ASAE 12(6): 775-777 doi: 10.13031/2013.38951