Energy and Exergy Analysis of Palm Tree Pruning Residues Gasification

Abstract

Gasification is the process of obtaining syngas containing combustible gases such as H2, CO and small amounts of CH4 from biomass by performing partial combustion with a limited oxygen supply or with the help of suitable oxidants such as CO2 and water vapor. The efficiency of the gasification process is the most important parameter that determines the success of the system. In this study, the performance of the system in the gasification of palm pruning residues was evaluated by energy and exergy analysis methods. The gasification process was carried out at 7.6 Nm3/h and 10.2 Nm3/h air flow rates in the laboratory type fixed bed downdraft gasification unit manufactured in the Biosystems Engineering Department. The lower heating value of the syngas obtained as a result of gasification was found to be 4.09 MJ/Nm3 at 7.6 Nm3/h air flow rate and 3.76 MJ/Nm3 at 10.2 Nm3/h air flow rate. It has been observed that the lower heating value of the syngas is lower at high air flow rate. Energy efficiencies of the gasification system at 7.6 and 10.2 Nm3/h air flow rate were calculated as 47.6% and 52.8%, and exergy efficiencies were calculated as 43.7% and 48.1%, respectively. Exergy efficiencies were found to be lower than energy efficiencies in both air flow rates. However, as the air flow rate increased, the energy and exergy efficiencies also increased. The results obtained are similar to the results of previous studies on gasification of biomass.

Keywords

• Biomass
• Syngas
• heating value
• irreversibility
• partial combustion
• LHV

References

1. Beno WW, Edwin M & Joseph Sekhar S (2020). Energy and exergy evaluation of rice processing mills working with biomass gasifier in parboiling process. Fuel 259 (116255):1-10
2. Chern SM, Walawender W P & Fan LT (1989). Mass and energy balance analyses of a downdraft gasifier. Biomass 18: 127–151
3. Cohce MK, Dincer I & Rosen MA (2011). Energy and exergy analyses of a biomass-based hydrogen production system. Bioresource Technology 102: 8466–8474
4. Dalmiş İ S, Kayişoğlu B, Tuğ S, Aktaş T, Durgut M R & Taşçi Durgut F (2018). A prototype downdraft gasifier design with mechanical stirrer for rice straw gasification and comparative performance evaluation for two different airflow paths. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 24: 329–339
5. Diken B & Kayişoǧlu B (2020). A research on the determination of the gasification performance of grass pellets. Journal of Tekirdag Agricultural Faculty 17: 24–36
6. Gu H, Tang Y, Yao J & Chen F (2019). Study on biomass gasification under various operating conditions. Journal of the Energy Institute 92: 1329–1336
7. Gunarathne D, Jatunarachchi S S, Senanayake N S & Wei B (2013). The Effect of Throat Diameter on the Performance a Downdraft Biomass Gasifier. International Journal of Energy Engineering 3: 171–175
8. Hao X H, Guo L J, Mao X, Zhang X M & Chen X J (2003). Hydrogen production from glucose used as a model compound of biomass gasified in supercritical water. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 28: 55–64

9. Hosseini M, Dincer I & Rosen M A (2012). Steam and air fed biomass gasification: Comparisons based on energy and exergy. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy 37(21):16446–16452
10. Iribarren D, Susmozas A, Petrakopoulou F & Dufour J (2014). Environmental and exergetic evaluation of hydrogen production via lignocellulosic biomass gasification. Journal of Cleaner Production 69: 165–175
11. Karamarkovic R & Karamarkovic V (2010). Energy and exergy analysis of biomass gasification at different temperatures. Energy 35: 537–549
12. Laurence L C & Ashenafi D (2012). Syngas treatment unit for small scale gasification - Application to IC engine gas quality requirement. Journal of Applied Fluid Mechanics 5: 95–103.
13. Manatura K, Lu J H, Wu K T & Hsu H T (2017). Exergy analysis on torrefied rice husk pellet in fluidized bed gasification. Applied Thermal Engineering 111: 1016–1024
14. Monir M U, Abd Aziz A, Kristanti R A & Yousuf A (2018). Gasification of lignocellulosic biomass to produce syngas in a 50 kW downdraft reactor. Biomass and Bioenergy 119: 335–345
15. Pellegrini L F & Oliveira S (2007). Exergy analysis of sugarcane bagasse gasification. Energy 32: 314–327
16. Ptasinski K J, Prins M J & Pierik A (2007). Exergetic evaluation of biomass gasification. Energy 32: 568–574
17. Rao M S, Singh S P, Sodha M S, Dubey A K & Shyam M (2004). Stoichiometric, mass, energy and exergy balance analysis of countercurrent fixed-bed gasification of post-consumer residues. Biomass and Bioenergy 27: 155–171
18. Saidur R, Boroumandjazi G, Mekhilef S, Mohammed HA (2012). A review on exergy analysis of biomass based fuels. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 16: 1217–1222
19. Samadi S H, Ghobadian B & Nosrati M (2020). Prediction and estimation of biomass energy from agricultural residues using air gasification technology in Iran. Renewable Energy 149: 1077–1091
20. Simone M, Barontini F, Nicolella C & Tognotti L (2012). Gasification of pelletized biomass in a pilot scale downdraft gasifier. Bioresource Technology 116: 403–412
21. Sreejith C C, Muraleedharan C & Arun P (2013). Energy and exergy analysis of steam gasification of biomass materials: A comparative study. International Journal of Ambient Energy 34: 35–52
22. Tang Y, Dong J, Chi Y, Zhou Z & Ni M (2016). Energy and Exergy Analyses of Fluidized-Bed Municipal Solid Waste Air Gasification. Energy and Fuels 30: 7629–7637