Doğrudan ve Geleneksel Ekimin Toprak Özelliklerine ve İkinci Ürün Mısır Verim Karakteristiklerine Etkisi

Abstract

Bu çalışmada; birinci ürün kışlık buğday sonrası ikinci ürün mısır üretiminde filizlenme oranı, ürün verimi, toprak özellikleri ve çizi karakteristikleri dikkate alınarak, modifiye edilmiş doğrudan ekim makinesinin performansının DP2 , geleneksel CT ve doğrudan ekim DP1 yöntemlerine göre karşılaştırılması amaçlanmaktadır. Tarla denemeleri tesadüf parselleri deneme planına göre altı tekrarlı olarak yapılmıştır. Sıra üzeri mesafe 18 cm ye ayarlanmış ve kabul edilebilir aralık oranı tüm yöntemlerde yaklaşık %90 olarak bulunmuştur. İkizlenme oranı değeri en düşük CT %0.56 yönteminde, en yüksek ise DP1 %3.89 yönteminde elde edilmiştir. Tohumun sıra üzeri dağılım varyasyon katsayısı bütün uygulamalarda üst sınır kabul edilen %29’dan daha düşük hesaplanmıştır. Ekim derinliği 6 cm ye ayarlanmış ve en iyi ekim derinliği CT uygulamasında 5.99 cm ve en kötü ekim derinliği ise DP2 2.90 cm uygulamasında elde edilmiş ve ekim derinliği her üç yöntemde istatistiksel olarak farklılık göstermiştir. Toprak işleme yöntemleri filizlenme oranını ve ortalama verimi istatistiksel olarak etkilememiştir. Modifiye edilmiş doğrudan ekim makinesinin performans parametreleri oldukça iyi görünmesine rağmen, sert toprak koşullarında daha iyi ekim derinliği elde edebilmek için makinenin daha fazla baskı kuvveti uygulayabilecek hale getirilmesi gerekli görünmektedir

Keywords

• Toprak işleme
• doğrudan ekim
• tohum dağılımı
• ekim indisleri
• filizlenme oranı
• mısır verimi

Effects of Direct and Conventional Planting on Soil Properties and Yield Characteristics of Second Crop Maize

Abstract

Conventional tillage CT , a commercial direct planter DP1 , and a modified direct planter DP2 were used in this study to determine the performance of DP compared to CT and DP1 in second crop maize after winter wheat. Experiments were conducted with six replications through complete randomized block design. Average seed spacing was about 18 cm and the quality of feed index was about 90% in all methods. Multiple index was the smallest 0.56% in CT, suggesting best horizontal seed distribution whereas DP1 had the highest rate 3.89% . Variation about the mean seed spacing was less than the upper limit of 29% in precision in spacing in all cases. The adjusted seeding depth was 6.0 cm in CT 5.99 cm with the best placement and the poorest placement was found in DP2 2.90 cm . Seed depth distribution was different in the three cases P

Keywords

• Tillage
• direct planting
• seed distribution
• seeding indices
• emergence rate
• maize yield

References

1. Akbaş, F. 2004. Determination of the variability of some soil properties on a field (classified as entisols) using classical and geostatistical methods. PhD Dissertation. p.113, Department of Soil Sciences, Gaziosmanpaşa University, Tokat.
2. Al-Kaisi, M. 2001. Impact of tillage and crop rotation systems on soil carbon sequestration. University Extention, Iowa State http://www.extension.iastate.edu/Publications/PM1871. pdf PM 1871.
3. Aydın, N., S. Gökmen and A. Yıldırım. 2007. Determination of combining ability of inbred corn lines in terms of grain yield and some other characteristics by topcrossing method. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 13(2): 120-127.
4. Bilbro, J.D. and D.F. Wanjura. 1982. Soil crusts and cotton emergence relationships. Transaction of the ASAE 25(4): 1484-1487.
5. Bosoi, E.S., O.V. Verniaev, I.I. Smirnov and S. Shakh, 1987. Theory, Construction and Calculations of Agricultural Machines, Vol. 1, Oxonian Press, New Delhi.
6. Bucher, D. H., D.J. Long and D.T. Sorlie. 1983. Seedbed preparation and chemical incorporation in direct planting. Transaction of the ASAE 83:1521.
7. Cassel, D.K. and M.G. Wagger. 1996. Residue management for irrigation maize grain and silage production. Soil and Tillage Research 39: 101-114
8. Chastin, T.G., J.K. Ward and D.J. Wysocki. 1995. Stand establishment response of soft winter wheat to seed bed residue and seed size. Crop Science 35: 213–218.

9. Darmora, D.P. and K.P. Pandey. 1995. Evaluation of performance of furrow openers of combined seed and fertiliser drills. Soil and Tillage Research 34: 127–139.
10. Erbach, D.C. 1981. Planting for crop production with conservation. In: crop production with conservation in the 1980s. ASAE Publication 7-81: 50–56.
11. Fallahi, F. and M.H. Raoufat. 2008. Row-crop planter attachments in a direct planting system: a comparative study. Soil and Tillage Research 98(1): 27-34
12. Frye, W.W. and C.W. Lindwall. 1986. Aero-tillage research priorities. Soil and Tillage Research 8: 311-316
13. Heege, H.J., 1993. Seeding methods performance for cereals, rape and beans. Transaction ASAE 36 (3):653- 661.
14. International Organisation for Standardization. 1984. Seeding equipment – test methods – Part I: Single seed drills (Presicion drills), ISO – 7256/1.
15. Junior, V. V., M.P. Carvalho, J. Dafonte, O.S. Freddi, E. V. Vazquez and O.E. Ingaramo. 2006. Spatial variability of soil water content and mechanical resistance of Brazilian ferralsol. Soil and Tillage Research 88:166- 177.
16. Kachman, S.D. and J.A. Smith, 1995. Alternative measures of accuracy in plant spacing for planters using single seed metering. Transactions of the ASAE 38(2):379-387.
17. Karayel, D., and A. Özmerzi, 2005. Hassas ekimde gömücü ayakların tohum dağılımına etkisi. Akdeniz Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 18(1): 139-150.
18. Karayel, D., and A. Özmerzi, 2007. Comparison of vertical and lateral seed distribution of furrow openers using a new criterion. Soil and Tillage Research 95: 69-75
19. Korucu, T. 2002. An investigation on direct planting possibilities of second crop maize in Cukurova region. PhP Disseration. Çukurova University, Department of Agricultural Machinery, Turkiye, p.112.
20. Korucu, T., S. Arslan, H. Dikici, N. Tursun. 2008. A comparison of conventional and direct drilling systems for Mediterranean Turkey: 1st year results. 5th International Soil Conference. Proceedings: 87-95. June 30 – July 2, 2008, Brno. in eastern
21. Lemunyon, J. 2008. Direct planting and crop residue management. http://www.sera17.ext.vt.edu/Documents/BMP_tillage.p df.
22. McCarthy, J.R., D.L. Pfost and H.D. Currence. 1993. Direct planting and residue management to reduce soil erosion. Agricultural Publication G1650, University Extention, University of Missouri, Columbia.
23. Morrison, J.E. and C.F. Abrams. 1978. Direct planting opener for planters and transplanters. Transaction of the ASAE 21(5): 843-847.
24. Opara-Nadi, O.A. 2008. Direct planting for increased crop production. www.fao.org/ag/ags/AGSE/7mo/69/chapter8.pdf
25. Özmerzi, A. and R. Keskin. 1983. Tohum derinliğinin Chapter 8. ölçülmesinde uygulanan yöntemler üzerine bir araştırma. Uludağ Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi 1(2): 1-11.
26. Raoufat, M.H. and R.A. Mahmoodieh. 2005. Stand establishment response of maize to seedbed residue, seed drill coulters and primary tillage systems. Biosystems Engineering 90: 261–269.
27. Singh, R.C., G. Singh, D.C. Saraswat, 2005. Optimisation of design and operational parameters of a pneumatic seed metering device for planting cottonseeds. Biosystems Engineering 92(4): 429–438.
28. Smith, M.J. 1981. Soil Mechanics. 4th edition. Longman Scientific&Techical.
29. Swan, J.B., R.L. Higgs., T.B. Bailey, N.C. Wollenhaupt, W.H. Paulson and A.E. Peterson. 1994. Surface residue an in-row treatment effects on long-term no-tillage and continuous corn. Agronomy Journal 86: 711–718.
30. Wells, B.L., T.O. Borich and J.D. Frus. 1983. Direct planting in an Iowa county. Journal Soil Water Conservation 38: 284–286.
31. Yalçın, H. 1998. A study on investigation of the suitable tillage methods in second crop maize for silage. PhD Dissertation. Department of Agricultural Machinery, Ege University, İzmir.
32. Yalçın, H. and E. Çakır. 2006. Tillage effects and energy efficiencies of subsoiling and direct seeding in light soil and yield of second crop corn for tillage in western Turkey. Soil and Tillage Research 90: 250-255.