Some Physical and Nutritional Properties of Hulled Wheat

Abstract

To design a machine for handling, cleaning, conveying, storing and milling, the physical properties of material must be known. For this purpose, einkorn and emmer wheat physical properties were investigated in this study. For einkorn spikelets, length, width, thickness, equivalent diameter, sphericity, surface area, volume, aspect ratio, bulk density, true density, porosity thousand spikelet weight, angle of repose, terminal velocity were found to be 10.88 mm, 3.33 mm, 2.15 mm, 4.34 mm, 0.39 %, 52.22 mm2, 23.47 mm3, 0.31, 410.64 kg/m3, 1034.00 kg/m3, 60.28 %, 37.78 g, 22.01°, 4.81 m/s, respectively. For emmer spikelets, corresponding values are 12.36 mm, 4.97 mm, 2.72 mm, 5.67 mm, 0.45 %, 83.91 mm2, 51.85 mm3, 0.40, 476.79 kg/m3, 1003.35 kg/m3, 52.48 %, 78.82 g, 23.02°, 5.30 m/s, respectively. For einkorn kernels, corresponding values are 6.77 mm, 2.87 mm, 1.88 mm, 3.37 mm, 0.49 %, 29.86 mm2, 11.66 mm3, 0.43, 793.02 kg/m3, 1239.25 kg/m3, 36.00 %, 30.82 g, 22.31°, 5.61 m/s and for emmer kernels, 7.61 mm, 2.64 mm, 2.31 mm, 3.59 mm, 0.47 %, 35.28 mm2, 14.65 mm3, 0.35, 725.00 kg/m3, 1248.33 kg/m3, 41.92 %, 37.08 g, 24.02°, 5.96 m/s, respectively. Also the differences of hulled wheat were examined as in comparison with common wheat. It was determined that hulled wheat kernels are smaller but denser than common wheat

Keywords

• Hulled wheat,einkorn,emmer,physical properties

Kavuzlu Buğdayların Bazı Fiziksel ve Besinsel Özellikleri

Abstract

Taşıma, temizleme, depolama ve öğütme makinalarının tasarımı için malzemenin fiziksel özelliklerinin bilinmesi gerekir. Bu amaçla, bu çalışmada siyez ve gerniğin fiziksel özellikleri araştırılmıştır. Siyezin kavuzlu hali için uzunluk, genişlik, kalınlık, eşdeğer çap, küresellik, yüzey alanı, şekil oranı, hacim, yığın yoğunluğu, gerçek yoğunluk, gözeneklilik, bin dane ağırlığı, yığılma açısı ve kritik hız sırasıyla 10.88 mm, 3.33 mm, 2.15 mm, 4.34 mm, % 0.39, 52.22 mm2, 23.47 mm3, 0.31, 410.64 kg/m3, 1034.00 kg/m3, % 60.28, 37.78 g, 22.01°, 4.81 m/s olarak tespit edilmiştir. Gernik için aynı değerler, 12.36 mm, 4.97 mm, 2.72 mm, 5.67 mm, % 0.45, 83.91 mm2, 51.85 mm3, 0.40, 476.79 kg/m3, 1003.35 kg/m3, % 52.48, 78.82 g, 23.02°, 5.30 m/s bulunmuştur. İlgili değerler sırasıyla, siyezin özü için 6.77 mm, 2.87 mm, 1.88 mm, 3.37 mm, % 0.49, 29.86 mm2, 11.66 mm3, 0.43, 793.02 kg/m3, 1239.25 kg/m3, % 36.00, 30.82 g, 22.31°, 5.61 m/s, gerniğin danesi için ise 7.61 mm, 2.64 mm, 2.31 mm, 3.59 mm, % 0.47, 35.28 mm2, 14.65 mm, 0.35, 725.00 kg/m3, 1248.33 kg/m3, % 41.92, 37.08 g, 24.02°, 5.96 m/s olarak saptanmıştır. Ayrıca kavuzsuz buğdaylara göre farklılıklar irdelenmiştir. Kavuzlu buğday danelerinin kavuzsuz buğdaylara göre daha küçük fakat daha yoğun olduğu tespit edilmiştir

Keywords

• Kavuzlu buğday,siyez,gernik,fiziksel özellikler

References

1. Abdel-Aal, E-S.M., P. Hucl, F.W. Sosulski and P.R. Bhirud. 1997. Kernel, milling and baking properties of spring-type spelt and einkorn wheats. Journal of Cereal Science 26: 363-370.
2. Abdel-Aal, E-S.M. and P. Hucl. 2002. Amino acid composition and vitro protein digestibility of selected ancient wheats and their end products. Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 15: 737-747.
3. Al-Mahasneh, M.A. and T.M. Rababah. 2007. Effect of moisture content on some physical properties of green wheat. Journal of Food Engineering 79: 1467–1473.
4. Bilanski, W.K. and R. Lal. 1965. Behavior of threshed materials in a vertical wind tunnel. Transactions of the ASAE 8(3):411-413.
5. Blanco, A., B. Giorgi, P. Perrino and R. Simeone. 1990. Genetic resources and breeding for improved quality in durum wheat. Agricoltura Ricerca 12:41-58.
6. Borghi, B., R. Castagna, M. Corbellini, M. Heun and F. Salamini. 1996. Breadmaking quality of einkorn wheat (Titicum monococcum ssp. monococcum). Cereal Chemistry 73: 208–214.
7. Brandolini, A., A. Hidalgo and S. Moscaritolo. 2007. Chemical composition and pasting properties of einkorn (Triticum monococcum L. Subsp. monococcum) whole meal flour Journal of Cereal Science 47(3):599-609.
8. Castagna, R., B. Borghi, M. Heun and F. Salamini.1996. Integrated approach to einkorn wheat breeding. Hulled Wheats. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Hulled Wheats. Castelvecchio Pascoli, Tuscany, Italy, pp. 183-192.

9. D’Egidio, M.G. and V. Vallega. 1994. Bread baking and dough mixing quality of diploid wheat, Triticum monococcum L. Italian Food and Beverage Technology 4:6-9.
10. Demirbaş, H.Y. and İ. Dursun. 2007. Determination of some physical properties of wheat grains by using image analysis. Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 13(3):176-185.
11. Dursun, E. and I. Dursun. 2005. Some physical properties of caper seed. Biosystems Engineering 92 (2): 237–245.
12. Dziki,D and J. Laskowski. 2005. Wheat kernel physical properties and milling process. Acta Agrophysica 6: 59- 71.
13. Giuliani, A., A. Karagöz and N. Zencirci. 2007. Marketing Underutilized Crops: Livelihoods and Markets of 'Emmer (Triticum dicoccon)' in Türkiye. Global Facilitation Unit for Underutilized Species (GFU), Rome, Italy, pp. 1-41
14. Gupta, R.K. and S.K. Das. 1997. Physical properties of sunflower seeds. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 66: 1 – 8.
15. Karagöz, A. 1996. Agronomic practices and socioeconomic aspects of emmer and einkorn cultivation in Turkey. Hulled Wheats. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Hulled Wheats. Castelvecchio Pascoli, Tuscany, Italy, pp. 172-177.
16. Khoshtaghaza, K. and R. Mehdizadeh. 2006. Aerodynamic properties of wheat kernel and straw materials. Agricultural Engineering International: the CIGR Ejournal. 7: 1-9.
17. Kimber, G. and E.R. Sears. 1983. Assignment of genome symbols in the Triticea. In `Proceedings of the 6th International Wheat Genetic Symposium', (S. Sakamoto, ed.), Plant Germplasm Institute, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan,1195-1196.
18. Lİje, H., B. Mİller, A.M. Laustsen and A. Hansen. 2003. Chemical composition, functional properties and sensory profiling of einkorn (Triticum monococcum L.). Journal of Cereal Science 37: 231-240.
19. Mohsenin, N. N. 1986. Physical properties of plant and animal materials. New York: Gordon and Breach Science Publishers.
20. Nesbitt, M. and D. Samuel. 1996. From staple crop to extinction? The archaeology and history of the hulled wheats. In: Padulosi, S., Hammer, K., Heller, J. (Eds.), Hulled Wheats. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Hulled Wheats. Castelvecchio Pascoli, Tuscany, Italy, pp. 41–100.
21. Padulosi, S., T. Hodgkin, J.T. Williams and N. Haq. 2002. Underutilized Opportunities in the 21st Century. In: Engels, J.M.M., V. Ramanatha Rao, A.H.D. Brown and M.T. Jackson (eds.). Managing Plant Genetic Diversity. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, pp. 323-338.
22. Perrino, P., S. Infantino, P. Basso, A. Di Marzio, N. Volpe and G. Laghetti. 1993. Valutazione e selezione di farro in ambienti marginali dell’appennino molisano. L’Informatore Agrario 43:41-44.
23. Sacilik, K., R. Oztürk and R. Keskin. 2003. Some physical properties of hemp seed. Biosystems Engineering 86 (2): 191–198.
24. Shellard, J.E. and R.H. Macmillan. 1978. Aerodynamic properties of threshed wheat materials. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 23: 273-281.
25. Strehlow, W., G. Hertzka and W. Weuffen, 1994. Aspetti nutrizionali. In: Le caratteristiche dietetiche del farro. Un cereale della salute, Potenza, Italy (P. Perrino, D. Semeraro, and G. Laghetti, Eds.), pp. 52– 66. CNR, Bari.
26. Tabatabaeefar, A. 2003. Moisture-dependent physical properties of wheat. International Agrophysics 17: 207– 211.
27. Vallega, V. 1992. Agronomic performance and breeding value of selected strains of diploid wheat, Triticum monococcum. Euphytica 61: 13–23.
28. Varnamkhasti, M.G., H. Mobli, A. Jafari, M.H. Soltanabadi, S. Rafiee and R. Sadeghi. 2007. Some physical properties of rough rice (Oryza Sativa L.) grain. Journal of Cereal Science 47(3):496-501.