Mısır-Soya Birlikte Ekim Sisteminde Su-Verim ve Alan Eşdeğer Oranı İlişkisinin Belirlenmesi

Abstract

Bu çalışma, mısır Zea mays L. ve soya Gliycine max L. bitkilerinin birlikte ekim intercropping sistemi ile “saf mısır MM , 1 sıra mısır/1 sıra soya 1M/1S , 2 sıra mısır/1 sıra soya 2M/1S , 2 sıra soya/1 sıra mısır 2S/1M ve saf soya MS ” nın verim-su ilişkilerini, verim bileşenlerini ve alan eşdeğer oranını LER belirlemek amacıyla 1998-1999 yıllarında, Harran Üniversitesi, Ziraat Fakültesi araştırma ve uygulama alanında yürütülmüştür. A sınıfı buharlaşma kabında saptanan toplam 4 günlük buharlaşmanın 100%, 80% ve 60%’ ı, sırasıyla IK1, IK2 ve IK3 konularına sulama suyu olarak uygulanmıştır. Araştırma sonucunda, birlikte ekim sisteminde mısır bitkisinde en yüksek ve en düşük dane verim ortalamaları IK1 ve IK3 sulama düzeyinde sırasıyla 10.53-4.59 ve 8.15-3.57 t ha-1 arasında belirlenmiştir. Bitki boyları içinde, verim sonuçlarına benzer değerler alınmış, en yüksek ve en düşük IK1 ve IK3 konusundasırasıyla 214182 ve 167-152 cmarasında gerçekleşmiştir. Bitki boyları kısaldıkça mısır verimlerinin düştüğü belirlenmiştir. Koçan kalınlığı ve boyunda çok önemli bir fark bulunmamıştır. Soya bitkisi verimleri, mısır verimlerine benzer gerçekleşmiş, IK1ve IK3 konusunda 3.31-1.28 ve 2.27-0.90 t ha-1 arasında değişmiştir. En yüksek LER değeri 1M/1S’ da hesaplanmış bunu sırasıyla 2M/1S ve 1M/2S uygulamaları izlemiştir. Sulama düzeylerine göre en yüksek sulama suyu randımanı IWUE ve su kullanım randımanı WUE değerleri 2M/1S birlikte ekim sisteminde sırasıyla 0.87 ve 0.77 kg m-3, en düşük IWUE ve WUE değerleri 1M/2S birlikte ekim sisteminde sırasıyla 0.51 ve 0.50 kg m-3 olarak hesaplanmıştır

Keywords

• Birlikte ekim sistemi
• mısır+soya
• alan eşdeğer oranı
• su-verim ilişkisi

A Study on Determination of Water-Yield Relationships and Land Equivalent Ratio in Corn-Soybean Intercropping System

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine water-yield relationship and land equivalent ration of cornsoybean intercropping system. The intercropping system consisted of only corn MM , 1 row corn and 1 row soybean 1M/1S , 2 rows corn and 1 row soybean 2M/1S , 2 rows soybean and 1 row corn 2S/1M and only soybean. The experiments were carried out in research fields of Faculy of Agriculture at Harran University, Sanliurfa, Turkey, during 1998-1999. Irrigation water was applied as 100% IK1 , 80% IK2 , and 60% IK3 of total of four-day evaporation obtained from standard Class A Pan. The results showed that maximum averaged yield values of 10.53-4.59 t ha-1 were obtained from IK1 treatment group while minimum averaged yileds of 8.15-3.57 t ha-1 were determined in IK1 treatment group. Similar to yield results, maximum plant height ranging from 214-182 cm and minimum plant heights of 167-152 cm were achieved in IK1 and IK3 treatment groups, respectively. Corn yield decreased as the plant height decreased. No significant differences were observed on ears diematers and ears height. Yield results for soybean were similar to those in corn. Maximum averaged yields 3.31-1.28 t ha-1 were determined in IK1 whilst minimum averaged yields 2.27-0.90 t ha-1 were obtaied in IK3 treatment groups. Maximum land equivalent ratio was found in 1M/1S intercropping application and was followed by 2M/1S and 1M/2S, respectively. Maximum irrigation water and seasonal water consumption was determined in IK1 treatment group. Based on the irrigation treatments, maximum irrigation water use efficiency IWUE of 0.87 kg m-3 and water use efficiency WUE of 0.77 kg m-3 were obtained in 2M/1S intercropping application while minimum values of IWUE 0.51 kg m-3 and WUE 0.50 kg m-3 were obtained in 1M/2S application

Keywords

• Intercropping
• corn+soybean
• land equivalent ration
• water-yield relationship

References

1. Carruthers, K., B. Prithiviraj, Q. F. D. Cloutier, R. C. Martin and D. L. Smith. 2000. Intercropping corn with soybean, llpin and forages: yield component responses. European J. of Argon.12: 103–115.
2. Daren, D. R., D. R. Buxton and T. E. Devine. 1999. Sorghum ıntercropping effects on yield, morphology, and quality of forage soybean SLW, Specific Leaf Weight. Crop Sci. 39:1380–1384.
3. Edje, O. T. 1989. Energy, protein and fodder yield as indices of intercrop productivity. Proceedings of a Workshop on Research Methods for Cereal/Legume Intercropping in Eastern and Southern Africa Held at Lilongwe, 23-27 January Malawi.
4. Egli, D. B. and Z. W. Yu. 1991. Crop growth rate and seeds per unit area in soybeans. Crop. Sci. 31: 439-442.
5. Garrity, P. D., D. G. Watts, C. Y. Sullivan and J. R. Gilley. 1982. Moisture deficits and grain sorghum performance. evapotranspirasion yield relationships Agron. J. 74: 815- 820.
6. Gary, W. L. and C. A. Francis. 1999. Integrated agricultural systems. Strip intercropping effects on yield and yield components of corn, grain sorghum, and soybean. Pub. In Agron. J. 91:807-813.
7. Georgis, K., A. A. Negasi, Dadi Legese and W. Sinebo. 1989. Cereal/legume intercropping research in Ethiopia. proceedings of a workshop on research methods for cereal/legume intercropping in Ethiopia. Proceedings of a Workshop on Research Methods for Cereal/Legume Intercropping in Eastern and Southern Africa Held at Lilongwe, 23-27 January Malawi.
8. Ghaffarzadeh, M., F. G. Prechac and R. M. Cruse. 1994. Grain yield response of corn, soybean and oat grown in a strip intercropping system. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 9: 171-177.

9. Howell, T. A., H. A. Cuenca and K. H. Solomon. 1990. Crop Yield response. management of farm irrigation systems. Trans. ASAE Monograph Chap S. USA.
10. Howell, T. A., A. D. Schneider and S. R. Evertt. 1997. Subsurface and surface micro irrigation of corn-Southern High Plains. Trans. Of the ASAE. 40 (3): 635-641.
11. Howell, T. A., J. A. Tolk, A. D. Schneider and S. R. Evertt. 1998. Evapotranspirasyon, yield, and water use efficiency of corn hybrids differing in maturity. Agron. J. 90:3-9.
12. Kanber, R. 1984. Çukurova koşullarında açık su yüzeyi buharlaşmasında (class A pan) yararlanarak birinci ve ıkinci ürün yerfıstığının sulanması Topraksu Araştırma Enstitüsü Müdürlüğü Yayınları Genel Yayın No:114 Tarsus.
13. Kisyombe, F. W. 1989. Statistical analysis of on-farm intercropping trials the malawi experience. proceedings of a workshop on research methods for Cereal/Legume Intercropping in Eastern and Southern Africa Held at Lilongwe, 23-27 January Malawi.
14. Magar, S. S. 1995. Adoption of micro irrigation technology in sugarcane on vertisoils semi arid climate. micro irrigation for a Changing World. Conserving resources/Preserving the Environment Proceedings of the International Micro irrigation Congress. Edited by Freddie R. Lamm. April 2-6, 1995, Hyatt Regency Orlando, Florida. Published by Am. Soc. of Agri. Eng. P:735-739.
15. Mann, J. D. and E. G. Jaworski. 1970. Comparison of stresses which may limit soybean yields. Crop Sci. 10: 620-624.
16. Mead, R. and R. W. Willey. 1980. The concept of land equivalent ratio and advantages in yield from ıntercropping. Experimental Agriculture 16:217-218.
17. Mejia, M. N., C. A. Madramootoo and R. S. Broughton. 2000. Influence of water table management on corn and soybean yields. Agricultural Water Management 46:73-89.
18. Musick, L. T. and D. A. Dusek. 1980. Irrigated corn yield response to water. Trans. ASAE. 23: 92-98,103.
19. Mwaipaya, A. M. 1989. Intercropping Research Experience in Zambia. Proceedings of a Workshop on Research Methods for Cereal/Legume Intercropping in Eastern and Southern Africa Held at Lilongwe, 23-27 January Malawi.
20. Ngwira, L. D. M., A. B. C. Mkandawira, O. T. Edje and R. Tinsley. 1989. Malawi Experiences in Intercropping Research. Proceedings of a Workshop on Research Methods for Cereal/Legume Intercropping in Eastern and Southern Africa Held at Lilongwe, 23-27 January Malaw.
21. Norwood, C. A. 1999. Water use and yield of dryland row crops as affected by tillage. Agronomy. J. 91:108-115.
22. Phene, C. J. and T. A. Howell. 1984. Soil sensor control of highfrecuency irrigation. Trans. ASAE 27 (2):392-396.
23. Schou, J. B., P. L. Jeffers and J. G. Streeter. 1978. Effects of reflectors. black boards or shades applied at different stages of plant development on yield of soybeans. Crop Sci. 18:29-34.
24. Yurtsever, N. 1984 Deneysel İstatistik Metodlar. Tarım Orman Ve Köy İşleri Bakanlığı Köy Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü Yayınları 623. Ankara.
25. Willey, R. W. 1979. Intercropping: It' s Importance and Research Needs. Part I. Competition and Yield Advantages. Field Crop Abstracts, 32:1-10.