Determination of the Seed Yield and Quality Characteristics of Some Advanced- Generation Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Lines

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the seed yield, yield components, and seed quality values of some field pea genotypes grown under Bursa ecological conditions. The trials were carried out at Bursa Uludag University, Faculty of Agriculture, Agricultural Research and Application Center in the years 2013-2014 and 2015-2016. The present study was conducted with three replications according to the randomized complete block design. The 7 pea lines (PS1, PS2, PS3, PS4, PS5, PS6, PS7) and Golyazi cultivar were used as the plant material. These lines were obtained as a result of the hybridization studies that were started in 2007. The Golyazi cultivar, which was developed by Bursa Uludag University, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, was used as the control cultivar. In this study, plant height, the number of pods per plant, the number of seeds per pod, the number of seeds per plant, 1000-seed weight, seed yield, crude protein ratio, and crude protein yield were determined. PS1 line gave the highest values in terms of 1000-seed weight (288.87 g), seed yield (3336.3 kg/ha), and crude protein yield (619.1 kg/ha) based on two-year results. It was also determined that the PS1 line is a good cultivar candidate especially, in terms of seed yield.

Keywords

• Genotypes
• Plant height
• 1000-seed weight
• Crude protein ratio
• Crude protein yield

References

1. Ada R, Ceyhan E, Celik S A, Harmankaya M & Ozcan M M (2019). Fatty acid compo-sition and mineral contents of pea genotype seeds. Iranian Journal of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering (IJCCE) 38: 153-158
2. Ambika S, Manonmani V & Somasundaram G (2014). Review on effect of seed size on seedling vigour and seed yield. Research Journal of Seed Science 7(2): 31-38
3. Anonymous (2020). TUIK, Crop production statistics. https://data.tuik.gov.tr/Kategori/GetKategori?p=tarim-111&dil=1 (Access date : 01.03.2021)
4. Anonymous (2021). TTSM, National variety list. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/BUGEM/TTSM/Menu/30/Kayit-Listeleri (Access date: 10.08.2021)
5. Anonymous (2016). Ministry of Agriculture and Foresty, General Directorate of Mete-orology, Unpublished records.
6. Anwar R A, Jalal O A & Sarkawth A A (2014). Study five genotypes of pea (Pisum sativum L.) in terms of yield and yield components under conditions Sulaymanyah-Bakrajo. International Journal of Engineering and Technology Research 2:18-22
7. Arevalo L S, Oosterhuis D M, Coker D & Brown R S (2008). Physiological response of cotton to high night temperature. Physiological Response of Cotton to High Tempe-ratures 2: 63- 68
8. Biarnés-Dumoulin V, Denis J B, Lejeune-Héanut I & Etévé G (1996). Interpreting yi-eld instability in pea using genotypic and environmental covariates. Crop Science 36: 15-120

9. Bitew Y, Asargew F & Beshir O (2014). Effect of plant spacing on the yield and yield component of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) at Adet, North Western Ethiopia. Agri-culture, Forestry and Fisheries 3(5): 368-373
10. Cacan E, Kaplan M, Kokten K & Tutar H (2018). Evaluation of some forage pea (Pi-sum sativum ssp. arvense L.) lines and cultivars in terms of seed yield and straw qua-lity. Igdır Üniversity Journal of the Institute of Science and Technology 8(2): 275-284
11. Celis-Diez J L, Bustamante R O & Vásquez R A (2004). Assessing frequency-dependent seed size selection: a field experiment. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 81: 307-312
12. Ceyhan E (2003). Determination of some agricultural characters and their heredity through linextester method in pea parents and crosses. PhD Thesis, Selcuk Univer-sity, Konya, Turkey
13. Egli D B & Bruening W P (2002). Flowering and fruit set dynamics at phloem‐isolated nodes in soybean. Field Crops Research 79: 9-19 DOI: 10.1016/S0378 4290(02)00016-3
14. Gan Y P Jayakumar, Zentner R P & McDonald C L (2006). Selection for seed size and its impact on grain yield and quality in kabuli chickpea. Canadian Journal of Plant Science 86(2): 345-352
15. Gantner R, Stjepanovic M & Gantner V (2008). Precipitation and temperature effects upon grain yield of field pea. Cereal Research Communications 36: 1503-1506
16. Georgieva N, Nikolova I & Kosev V (2015). Association study of yield and its compo-nents in pea (Pisum sativum L.). International Journal of Pharmacognosy 2(11): 536-542
17. Goa Y & Ashamo M (2014). Evaluation of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes per-formance for yield and yield components at five growing environments of Southern Ethiopia. Current Research in Agriculture Science 1: 65-76
18. Goswami K & Shukla P (2019). Evaluation of improved varieties of field pea (Pisum sativum) for nutritional and functional quality. International Journal of Chemical Studies 7(5): 2260– 2266
19. Gullap M K, Erkovan H I, Halıloglu K & Koç A (2017). Is plant growth promotıng rhızobacterıa an alternatıve to mıneral phosphorus fertılızer ın pea seed productıon? Scientific Papers. Series A. Agronomy LX: 264-269
20. Halil D S & Uzun A (2020). Combining abilities and heterotic groups for seed yield and yield components in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Journal of Agricultural Sciences 26: 415-423
21. Harvey D M (1980). Seed production in leafless and conventional phenotypes of Pisum sativum L. in relation to water availability within a controlled environment. Annals of Botany 45: 673–680
22. Hedhly A (2011). Sensitivity of flowering plant gametophytes to temperature fluctua-tions. Environmental and Experimental Botany 74: 9-16
23. Ibrahim D M, Mohamed S J & Ahmed S M (2019). Effects of plant density on seed yield and it’s components of two pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars under rainfed condition in Sulaimani province. Journal of Kerbala for Agricultural Sciences 6(1): 36-48
24. Jiang Y, Lindsay D L, Davis A R, Wang Z, MacLean D E, Warkentin T D & Bueckert R A (2020). Impact of heat stress on pod-based yield components in field pea (Pi-sum sativum L.). Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 206:76–89
25. Kadıoglu S, Tan M, Kadıoglu B & Tasgın G (2020). Determination of yield and some characteristics of forage pea genotypes (Pisum sativum ssp. arvense L.) under Erzu-rum conditions. Ataturk University Journal of Agricultural Faculty 51(2): 151-158
26. Kaushal N, Bhandari K, Siddique K H M & Nayyar H (2016). Food crops face rising temperatures: An overview of responses, adaptive mechanisms, and approaches to improve heat 21 tolerance. Cogent Food & Agriculture 2: 1-42
27. Kosev V & Mikic A (2012). Assessing relationships between seed yield components in spring-sown field pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars in Bulgaria by correlation and path analysis. Spanish Journal of Agriculture Research 10: 1075-1080
28. Kosev V (2014). Breeding and genetic assessment of some quantitative traits in crosses forage pea (Pisum sativum L.). Open Journal of Genetics 4: 22–29
29. Krga I, Sımıć A, Mandıć V, Bıjelıć Z, Dželetovıć Ž, Vasıljevıć S & Adžıć S (2019). Forage yield and protein content of dıfferent fıeld pea cultıvars and oat mıxtures grown as wınter crops. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 2019 24(2): 170-177
30. Krizmanić G, Tucak M, Brkić A, Marković M, Jovanović V S, Beraković I & Čupić T (2020). The impact of plant density on the seed yield and the spring field pea’s yield component. Poljoprıvreda 26:(1) 25-31
31. Księżak J, Bojarszczuk J & Staniak M (2018). Evaluation of the concentration of nut-rients in the seeds of faba bean (Vicia faba L. major) and Pea (Pisum sativum L.) depending on habitat conditions. Polish Journal of Environmental Studies 27(3): 1133-1143
32. Kumar B, Kumar A, Singh A K & Lavanya G R (2013). Selection strategy for seed yield and maturity in field pea (Pisum sativum L. arvense). African Journal of Agri-cultural Research 8: 5411–5415
33. Lakić Ž, Stanković S, Pavlović S, Krnjajić S & Popović V (2019). Genetic variability in quantitative traits of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding 55(1): 1-7
34. Marohnić I. (2006): Grašak - buduće glavno bjelančevinasto krmivo Europe. Krmiva 48(6): 363-368
35. Popović S, Stjepanović M, Grljušić S, Čupić T, Tucak M & Bukvić G (2002). Prinos i kakvoća zrna jarog stočnog graška. Krmiva 44 (4): 191-197
36. Prasad D, Verma O P, Lal K, Verma H, Jaiswal A & Yadav M K (2019). Identification of elite genotypes for certain quantitative traits in field pea (Pisum sativum L. var. arvense). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 2019 8(3): 498-505
37. Rapčan I, Bukvić G, Grljušić S, Teklić T & Jurišić M (2010). Yield of green mass, grain and other yield components of field pea (Pisum sativum L.) in dependence of agroecological conditions and seed maturity. Mljekarstvo 60 (2), 104-112
38. Servet A & Ates E (2004). Determination of some agricultural characters in field pea (Pisum arvense L.) lines at Tekirdag (Turkey) ecological conditions. Cuban Journal of Agricultural Science 38: 313-316
39. Shereena J & N Salim (2006). Chilling tolerance in Pisum sativum L. seeds: An ecolo-gical adaptation. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 5: 1047–1050
40. Singh N I, Ali S & Chauhan J S (2009). Effect of seed size on quality within seed lot of pea and correlation of standard germination, vigour with field emergence test. Natu-re Science 7:72-78
41. Singh S K, Singh V P, Srivastava S, Singh A K, Chaubey B K & Srivastava R K (2018). Estimation of correlation coefficient among yield and attributing traits of field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Legume Research 41(1): 20-26
42. Smitchger J & Weeden N F (2018). The ideotype for seed size: a model examining the relationship between seed size and actual yield in pea. International Journal of Ag-ronomy 1-7 DOI: 10.1155/2018/9658707
43. Tan M, Koc A & Dumlu Gul Z (2012). Morphological characteristics and seed yield of East Anatolian local forage pea (Pisum sativum ssp. arvense L.) ecotypes. Turkish Journal of Field Crops 17 (1): 24-30
44. Tawaha A M &Turk M A (2004). Field pea seeding management for Semi-arid Medi-terranean Conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 190: 86-92
45. Tekeli A S & Ates E (2003). Yield and its components in field pea (Pisum arvense L.). Journal of Central European Agriculture 4: 313-318
46. Ton A, Karakoy T, Anlarsal A E & Turkeri M (2018). Investigation of grain yield and yield components of some field pea (Pisum sativum L.) genotypes in Mediterranean climate conditions. Legume Research 41(1): 41-47
47. Uzun A & Acikgoz E (1998). Effect of sowing season and seeding rate on the morpho-logical traits and yields on pea cultivars of differing leaf types. Journal of Agro-nomy and Crop Science 181: 215-222
48. Uzun A, Bilgili U, Sincik M, Filya I & Acikgoz E (2005). Yield and quality perfor-mances of forage type pea strains contrasting leaf types. European Journal of Agro-nomy 22: 85-94
49. Uzun A, Gun H & Acikgoz E (2012). Determination of grass, seed and crude protein yields of some forage pea (Pisum sativum L.) varieties that are harvested at different developmental stages. Journal of Uludag University Faculty of Agriculture 26(1): 27-38