Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Feed Values of Sunflower Heads and Stovers Treated with Different Methods and Possibilities of Using as Roughage

Year 1997, Volume: 03 Issue: 03, 52 - 56, 01.08.1997
https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000000329

Abstract

This study was carried out to determine the effects of different urea treatments 4% urea; US. 4% urea+molasses; UMS, and 4% urea+soybean extract treated stovers and heads; USS on the digestibilities of the -sunflower stovers and heads and also to determine the possibilities of utilizing of these stovers and heads as an alternative roughage source. Four native Karayaka hoggets were used in digestion trial. Digestibility coefficients related to dry matter, organic matters, crude protein of the untreated stovers and heads UTS , US, UMS, and USS were determined as; 35.771, 46.232, 6.037 %; 42.478, 47.742, 37.916%; 62.334, 51.085, 45.311%; 55.232, 59.340, 56.330%, respectively. Energy values SV were determined as; 5.468, 14.353, 15.550, 26.757 SV, respectively. Fattening period was 70 days and animal materials were 40 hoggets.Total weight gains, daily weight gains, daily forage intakes, daily concentrate intakes and feed efficiency ratios feed/gain were found as: 7.02, 7.54. 7.70, 9.23 Kg; 100.00±12.95, 107.72±15.78, 109.57±11.56, 127.43±15.70 g; 553.86, 550.00, 574.36, 575.86 g; 599.21, 592.43, 598.21, 598.79 g; 11.53, 10.61, 10.71, 9.22 for UTS, US, UMS, and USS, respectively.

References

  • Aky ı ld ı z, A.R., 1984. Yemler Bilgisi Laboratuar Klavuzu. A.O. Zir. Fak.Yay.895., Uyg. Klav. 213.
  • Aky ı ld ı z, A.R.,1986. Yemler Bilgisi veTeknolojisi. A.O. Fakültesi, Yay ı n No: 97.
  • Cafantaris, B., Khan, J., MenkeK.H.,1983. Treatment of Straw with Urea and Plant Extract Containing UreaseNutrition Abst. and (Series B) 54:6.
  • Cheva-Isarakul, B.; KanjanapruthipongJ., 1986. A Comparison of Urea-treated Rice Straw with Urea-molasses Sprayed Rice Straw as Basal Diets for Growing Cattle. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Workshop of the Australian-Asian fibrous Agricultural Residues Research Network.
  • Çak ı r, A., Haş imoğ lu, S., Aksoy, A., 1981. Çiftlik Hayvanlar ı n ı n Uygulamal ı Besleme ve Yemlenmesi. A.Ü. Zir. Fak. Yay., (Ders Notu)
  • Çerçi, i.H., Sar ı , M.,1990. Ürenin Rasyonlara Farkl ı Yöntemlerle ilave Edilmesinin Keçilerde Sindirilme Dereceleri ve Azot. Dengesi Üzerine Etkileri. A.Ü.Zir. Fak. Derg. 37(1): 160-172.
  • Dias-da-Silva, A.A., Ferreira, A.M., Guedes, C.V.M., Mascarenhas Ferreira, A., 1988. Effects of Moisture Level, Treatment Time and Soybean Addition on the NutritiveValue of Urea-treated Maize Stover. Anim. Feed Sci. and Tech. 19 (1-2):67-77.
  • Drackley, J.K., Clark, A.K., Sahlu, T., Schingathe, D.J., 1985. Evaluation of Sunflower Crop Residue in Rations for Growing Holstein Heifers. Nutr. Abst. and Reviews (Series B), 56:4.
  • Du, Z Y., Ji Y.L., Huang, Y.X., Zhany, S.W., Liu, M.X., 1992. Effects of Ammonia Treatment on Nutritive Value of Wheat Straw and Maize Stover for Beef Cattle. Nutr. Abst. and Reviews (Series B), 62:12.
  • Düzgüneş , O., Kesici, T., Kavuncu, O., Gürbüz, F., 1987.. Araştı rma ve Deneme Metodları (istatistik Metodlar ı 2). Ank. Only. Zir. Fak. Yay. 1021., Ders kitab ı , 295.
  • Ergül, M., 1993. Yemler Bilgisi veTeknolojisi. E.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi, Yay ı n No:487
  • Hai, N.V., Singh, G.P., 1993. Effect of Feeding Urea Supplemented and Urea-treated Oat Straw on Nutrient Utilization and Cost of Feeding in Crossbred Cattle. Nutr. abst. and.reviews (Series B), 63:10.
  • Haoque, M., Davis, C.H., Saadulah, M., Dolberg, F., 1983. A Note on the Performance of Cattle Fed Treated Paddy Straw with Animal Urine as a Source of Ammonia. Nutr. Abst. And Reviews (Series B), 54:9.
  • Joy, M., Al ı bes, X., Munoz, F., 1992. Chemical Treatment of Lignosellülosic Residues with Urea. Nutr. Abst. and Reviews (Series B), 64:2.
  • Karabulut, A., 1986. Üre ve NaOH ile Muamele Edilmiş Buğday Samanı nı n Yem Değeri Üzerinde Bir Ara ştı rma. U.Ü. Zir. Fak. Derg., 5: 1-9.
  • Munoz, F., Joy, M., Fac ı , R., Al ı bes, X.,1991. Treatment of Lignosellülosic Residues with Urea. Influence of Dosage, Moisture, Temperature and Addition of Ureases. Nutr. Abst. and Reviews (Series B), 62:11.
  • Nakanishi, M., Perera, N., Okamoto,M., Yoshida, N., 1992. Effect of Molasses on Utilization of Urea Treated Straw. Research Bulletin of Obihiro University,17:4.
  • Ocak, N.,1992. Üre ile Muamelenin Çeltik ve M ı s ı r Samanı nı n Sindirilebilirlikleri ve Yem Değeri Üzerindeki Etkileri. O.M.Ü. Fen Bil. Ens. Yük. Lis. Tzi.
  • Orsko, E.R., 1988. lmprovement of oor Quality Forages and oughages. In: Feed Science. World Animal Science. B.Ed. Sarı çiçek, B.Z., Ocak, N., 1994. M ı s ı r Koçanı nı n Yem Değeri Üzerine Bir Ara ştı rma. Hay. Ara ş . Der., 4 (1): 43- 46.
  • Stephenson, R.G.A., Huff, J.L., Krebs, G., Hawitt, C.J., 1992. Effect of Molasses, Sodium Bentonite and Zeolite on Urea Toxicity. Nutr. Abst. and Reviews (Series B), 6-16.
  • Trung, L.T., Rowar, N.B., Velasco, N.B., V ı nh, P.Q., Palo, L.P., 1989. Urea-treated vs Urea- molasses-sprayed Rice Straw with two concentrate Feeding Frequencies for Yearling Brahman Grades. Nutr. Abst. and Reviews (Series B), 61:9.
  • Tosun, A., 1993. Waste Biomass in Turkey and Solar Drying as a New Alternative for its Utilization as Feed. B.Ü. Enviromental Sciences Instute.
  • Williams, P.E.V., lnnes, G.M., Brewer, A., 1984. Ammonia Treatment of Straw via the Hydrolysis of Urea. 1. Effects of Dry Matter and Urea Concentrations on the Rate of Hydrolysis of Urea. Nutrition Abst. and Reviews, (Series B), 54:12.

Farklı Yöntemlerle Muamele Edilmi ş Ayçiçeği Sap ve Tablalar ı n ı n Yem Değerleri ve Kaba Yem Olarak Kullan ı labilme Olanaklar ı

Year 1997, Volume: 03 Issue: 03, 52 - 56, 01.08.1997
https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000000329

Abstract

Bu çal ışma, farkl ı şekillerde uygulanan üre muamelelerinin %4 üre; ÜA, %4 üre+melas: OMA, %4 üre+soya fasülyesi ekstrakt ı ; ÜSA ayçiçeği sap ve tablaları n ı n AST sindirilme düzeyleri üzerindeki etkilerinin ve bu şekilde muamele edilmiş AST'nin kaba yem kayna ğı olarak kullan ı labilme olanaklar ı n ı n belirlenmesi amac ı yla yürütülmü ştür. Sindirim denemesinde 4 Karayaka koçu kullan ı lm ışt ı r. Muamelesiz AST ile 0A, OMA ve OSA'n ı n kuru madde, organik maddeler, ham protein sindirilme dereceleri s ı ras ı yla; %35.771, 46.232, 6.037; % 42.478, 47.742. 37.916; %62.334, 51.085, 45.311; %55.232, 59.340, 56.330, enerji değerleri ise 5.468, 14.353. 15.550, 26.757 Ni şasta .Değeri ND olarak saptanm ışt ı r. Yemleme denemesi 40 tokluyla 70 gün sürdürülmü ştür. Toplam ve günlük a ğı rl ı k kazanc ı sı ras ı yla, 7.02, 7.54, 7.70, 9.23 Kg;100.00±12.95, 107.72±15.78, 109.57±11.56, 127.43±15.70; günlük kaba yem tüketimi ve kesif yem tüketimi 553.86, 550.00, 574.36, 575.86 g; 599.21, 592.43, 598.21. 598.79 g ve yemden yararlanma oranlar ı s ı ras ı yla; 11.53, 10.61, 10.71, 9.22 olarak saptanm ıştı r.

References

  • Aky ı ld ı z, A.R., 1984. Yemler Bilgisi Laboratuar Klavuzu. A.O. Zir. Fak.Yay.895., Uyg. Klav. 213.
  • Aky ı ld ı z, A.R.,1986. Yemler Bilgisi veTeknolojisi. A.O. Fakültesi, Yay ı n No: 97.
  • Cafantaris, B., Khan, J., MenkeK.H.,1983. Treatment of Straw with Urea and Plant Extract Containing UreaseNutrition Abst. and (Series B) 54:6.
  • Cheva-Isarakul, B.; KanjanapruthipongJ., 1986. A Comparison of Urea-treated Rice Straw with Urea-molasses Sprayed Rice Straw as Basal Diets for Growing Cattle. Proceedings of the Sixth Annual Workshop of the Australian-Asian fibrous Agricultural Residues Research Network.
  • Çak ı r, A., Haş imoğ lu, S., Aksoy, A., 1981. Çiftlik Hayvanlar ı n ı n Uygulamal ı Besleme ve Yemlenmesi. A.Ü. Zir. Fak. Yay., (Ders Notu)
  • Çerçi, i.H., Sar ı , M.,1990. Ürenin Rasyonlara Farkl ı Yöntemlerle ilave Edilmesinin Keçilerde Sindirilme Dereceleri ve Azot. Dengesi Üzerine Etkileri. A.Ü.Zir. Fak. Derg. 37(1): 160-172.
  • Dias-da-Silva, A.A., Ferreira, A.M., Guedes, C.V.M., Mascarenhas Ferreira, A., 1988. Effects of Moisture Level, Treatment Time and Soybean Addition on the NutritiveValue of Urea-treated Maize Stover. Anim. Feed Sci. and Tech. 19 (1-2):67-77.
  • Drackley, J.K., Clark, A.K., Sahlu, T., Schingathe, D.J., 1985. Evaluation of Sunflower Crop Residue in Rations for Growing Holstein Heifers. Nutr. Abst. and Reviews (Series B), 56:4.
  • Du, Z Y., Ji Y.L., Huang, Y.X., Zhany, S.W., Liu, M.X., 1992. Effects of Ammonia Treatment on Nutritive Value of Wheat Straw and Maize Stover for Beef Cattle. Nutr. Abst. and Reviews (Series B), 62:12.
  • Düzgüneş , O., Kesici, T., Kavuncu, O., Gürbüz, F., 1987.. Araştı rma ve Deneme Metodları (istatistik Metodlar ı 2). Ank. Only. Zir. Fak. Yay. 1021., Ders kitab ı , 295.
  • Ergül, M., 1993. Yemler Bilgisi veTeknolojisi. E.Ü. Ziraat Fakültesi, Yay ı n No:487
  • Hai, N.V., Singh, G.P., 1993. Effect of Feeding Urea Supplemented and Urea-treated Oat Straw on Nutrient Utilization and Cost of Feeding in Crossbred Cattle. Nutr. abst. and.reviews (Series B), 63:10.
  • Haoque, M., Davis, C.H., Saadulah, M., Dolberg, F., 1983. A Note on the Performance of Cattle Fed Treated Paddy Straw with Animal Urine as a Source of Ammonia. Nutr. Abst. And Reviews (Series B), 54:9.
  • Joy, M., Al ı bes, X., Munoz, F., 1992. Chemical Treatment of Lignosellülosic Residues with Urea. Nutr. Abst. and Reviews (Series B), 64:2.
  • Karabulut, A., 1986. Üre ve NaOH ile Muamele Edilmiş Buğday Samanı nı n Yem Değeri Üzerinde Bir Ara ştı rma. U.Ü. Zir. Fak. Derg., 5: 1-9.
  • Munoz, F., Joy, M., Fac ı , R., Al ı bes, X.,1991. Treatment of Lignosellülosic Residues with Urea. Influence of Dosage, Moisture, Temperature and Addition of Ureases. Nutr. Abst. and Reviews (Series B), 62:11.
  • Nakanishi, M., Perera, N., Okamoto,M., Yoshida, N., 1992. Effect of Molasses on Utilization of Urea Treated Straw. Research Bulletin of Obihiro University,17:4.
  • Ocak, N.,1992. Üre ile Muamelenin Çeltik ve M ı s ı r Samanı nı n Sindirilebilirlikleri ve Yem Değeri Üzerindeki Etkileri. O.M.Ü. Fen Bil. Ens. Yük. Lis. Tzi.
  • Orsko, E.R., 1988. lmprovement of oor Quality Forages and oughages. In: Feed Science. World Animal Science. B.Ed. Sarı çiçek, B.Z., Ocak, N., 1994. M ı s ı r Koçanı nı n Yem Değeri Üzerine Bir Ara ştı rma. Hay. Ara ş . Der., 4 (1): 43- 46.
  • Stephenson, R.G.A., Huff, J.L., Krebs, G., Hawitt, C.J., 1992. Effect of Molasses, Sodium Bentonite and Zeolite on Urea Toxicity. Nutr. Abst. and Reviews (Series B), 6-16.
  • Trung, L.T., Rowar, N.B., Velasco, N.B., V ı nh, P.Q., Palo, L.P., 1989. Urea-treated vs Urea- molasses-sprayed Rice Straw with two concentrate Feeding Frequencies for Yearling Brahman Grades. Nutr. Abst. and Reviews (Series B), 61:9.
  • Tosun, A., 1993. Waste Biomass in Turkey and Solar Drying as a New Alternative for its Utilization as Feed. B.Ü. Enviromental Sciences Instute.
  • Williams, P.E.V., lnnes, G.M., Brewer, A., 1984. Ammonia Treatment of Straw via the Hydrolysis of Urea. 1. Effects of Dry Matter and Urea Concentrations on the Rate of Hydrolysis of Urea. Nutrition Abst. and Reviews, (Series B), 54:12.
There are 23 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

B.zehra Sarıçiçek This is me

Ali Vaiz Garipoğlu This is me

Publication Date August 1, 1997
Submission Date August 1, 1997
Published in Issue Year 1997 Volume: 03 Issue: 03

Cite

APA Sarıçiçek, B., & Garipoğlu, A. V. (1997). Feed Values of Sunflower Heads and Stovers Treated with Different Methods and Possibilities of Using as Roughage. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 03(03), 52-56. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000000329

Journal of Agricultural Sciences is published open access journal. All articles are published under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY).