Effects of Shade Nets on the Microclimate and Growth of the Tomato

Year 2023, Volume: 29 Issue: 2, 443 - 454, 31.03.2023

Nefise Yasemin Tezcan , Hazal Taşpınar Candan Korkmaz

https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1073156

Cited By: 1

Abstract

This study evaluates the effects of shading nets with photoselective features, with an open-field control. A green-shade net with a shading intensity of 40% intensity and blue, pearl, and yellow-shade nets with shading intensity of 75% were used as netting materials and the total radiation and photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) transmittance of the shade nets were analysed. The environmental conditions such as air temperature, relative humidity, and canopy temperature were measured with the aid of appropriate sensors. Tomatoes were grown to determine the effects of shade nets on crops cultivated under the four shade nets, and an additional treatment (control) was used in which tomatoes were grown under full sun conditions. The vegetative growth parameters, fruit quality parameters and yields were assessed and the findings showed that shading resulted in a significant increase in the total yield and pearl-shade nets are the best choice for producing a high quality tomato crop based on PAR transmittance (between 44.8% and 52.8%).

Keywords

Coloured shade nets, Radiation transmittance, Climate change, Soil water content, Crop growing

Supporting Institution

Akdeniz University Scientific Research Projects Unit

Project Number

FBA-2017.05.0104.002

References

• Abdrabbo M A A, Farag A A, Hassanein M K & Abou-Hadid A F (2010). Water consumption of eggplant under different microclimates. J BioL Chem Environ 5(3): 239-255.
• Arthurs S P, Stamps R H & Giglia F F (2013). Environmental modification inside photoselective shadehouses. American Society for Horticultural Science 48(8): 975-979. doi.org/10.21273/hortsci.48.8.975
• Barroso M R, Meneses J F & Mexia J T (1999). Comparison between greenhouse type, and their effects on two lettuce cultivars yield, and botrytis incidence. Acta Horticulturae 491:137-142. doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.1999.491.19
• Briassoulis D, Mistriotis A & Eleftherakis D (2007a). Mechanical behaviour and properties of agricultural nets-Part I: Testing methods for agricultural nets. Polymer Testing 26(6): 822-832. doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.05.007
• Briassoulis D, Mistriotis A & Eleftherakis D (2007b). Mechanical behaviour and properties of agricultural nets. Part II: Analysis of the performance of the main categories of agricultural nets. Polymer Testing 26(8): 970-984. doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.06.010
• Castellano S, Scarascia Mugnozza G, Russo G, Briassoulis D, Mistriotis A, Hemming S & Waaijenberg D (2008a). Plastic nets in agriculture: A general review of types and applications. Applied Engineering in Agriculture 24(6): 799-808. doi.org/10.13031/2013.25368 DOI: 10.13031/2013.25368
• Castellano S, Scarascia Mugnozza G, Russo G, Briassoulis D, Mistriotis A, Hemming S & Waaijenberg D (2008b). Design and use criteria of netting systems for agricultural production in Italy. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 39(3): 31-42. doi.org/10.4081/jae.2008.3.31
• De Castro Ferreira R, Silva N F & De Sousa Bezerra R (2010). Effects of photoselective shade nets on the meteorological elements, growth and radiation use efficiency of cucumber. XVIIth World Congress of the International Commission of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering (CIGR), 13-17 June, Canada, pp. 1-9
• Diaz-Perez J C (2013). Bell pepper (Capsicum annum L.) crop as affected by shade level: microenvironment, plant growth, leaf gas exchange, and leaf mineral nutrient concentration. HortScience 48(2):175-182. doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI.48.2.175
• Diaz-Perez J C & John K (2019). Bell pepper (Capsicum annum l.) under coloured shade nets: Plant growth and physiological responses. Hortscience 54(10): 1795-1801. doi.org/10.21273/hortsci14233-19
• Doorenbos J & Kassam A H (1979). Yield response to water. FAO, Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 33.
• Gaurav A K (2014). Effect of coloured shade nets and shade levels on production and quality of cut greens. Master Thesis, Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi, India.
• Geoola F, Kashti Y & Peiper U M (1998). A model greenhouse for testing the role of condensation, dust and dirt on the solar radiation transmissivity of greenhouse cladding materials. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 71(4): 339-346. doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1998.0333
• Geoola F, Kashti Y, Levi A & Brickman R (2004). Quality evaluation of anti-drop properties of greenhouse cladding materials. Polymer Testing 23(7): 755-761. doi.org/10.1016/j.polymertesting.2004.04.006
• Ilic Z S, Milenkovic L, Sunic L, Barac S, Mastilovic J, Kevresan Z & Fallik E (2017). Effect of shading by coloured nets on yield and fruit quality of sweet pepper. Zemdirbyste-Agriculture 104(1): 53-62. doi.org/10.13080/z-a.2017.104.008
• Jifon J L & Syvertsen J P (2003). Kaolin particle film applications can increase photosynthesis and water use efficiency of “Rubby red” grapefruit leaves. Journal of the American Society Horticultural Science 128(1): 107-112. doi.org/10.21273/JASHS.128.1.0107
• Kırda C, Cetin M, Dasgan Y, Topcu S, Kaman H, Ekici B, Derici M R, Ozguven A I (2004). Yield response of greenhouse grown tomato to partial root drying and conventional deficit irrigation. Agricultural Water Management 69(3): 191-201. doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2004.04.008
• Kittas C, Baille A & Giaglaras P (1999). Influence of covering material and shading on the spectral distribution of light in greenhouses. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research 73(4): 341-351. doi.org/10.1006/jaer.1999.0420
• Kittas C, Rigakis N, Katsoulas N & Bartzanas T (2009). Influence of Shading Screens on Microclimate, Growth and Productivity of Tomato. Acta Horticulturae 807(1): 97-102. doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2009.807.10
• Kittas C, Tchamitchian M, Katsoulas N, Karaiskou P & Papaioannou C (2006). Effect of two UV absorbing greenhouse covering films on growth and yield of an eggplant soilless crop. Scientia Horticulturae 110(1): 30-37. doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.06.018
• Kotilainen T, RobsonT M & Hernandez H (2018). Light quality characterization under climate screens and shade nets for controlledenvironment agriculture. PLoS ONE 13(6): 1-22. doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199628
• López D, Carazo N, Rodrigo M C & Garcia J (2007). Coloured shade nets effects on tomato crops quality. Acta Horticulturae 747(747): 121-124. doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2007.747.12
• Meena R K & Vashisth A (2014b). Effect of microenvironment under different colour shade nets on biophysical parameters and radiation use efficiency in spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Journal of Agricultural Physics 14(2): 181-188.
• Meena R K, Vashisth A, Singh R, Singh B & Manjaih K M (2014a). Study on change in microenvironment under different coloured shade nets and its impact on yield of spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.). Journal of Agrometeorology 16(1): 104-111. doi.org/10.54386/jam.v16i1.1493
• Milenkovic L, Ilic Z S, Durovka M, Kapoulas N, Mirecki N & Fallik E (2012). Yield and pepper quality as affected by light intensity using coloured shade nets. Agriculture and Forestry 58(1): 19-33.
• Möller M & Assouline S (2007). Effects of a shading screen on microclimate and crop water requirements. Irrigation Science 25: 171-181. doi.org/10.1007/s00271-006-0045-9
• Nangare D D, Singh J, Meena V S, Bhushan B & Bhatnagar P R (2015). Effect of green shade nets on yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) in semi-arid region of Punjab. Asian Journal of Advances in Basic and Applied Science 1(1): 1-8.
• Nemera D B, Zur N, Lukyanov V, Shlizerman L, Ratner K, Shahak Y, Cohen S & Sadka A (2015). Top photoselective netting results in improved microclimate, productivity, physiological performance and water-use efficiency in citrus. International Syposium on New Tecnologies and Management for Greenhouse, 19-23 July, Evora, Portekiz.
• O’Toole J C & Real J (1984). Canopy target Dimensions for Infrared Thermometry. Agronomy Journal 76: 863-865. doi.org/10.2134/agronj1984.00021962007600050035x
• Ombodi A, Pek Z, Szuvandzsiev P, Lugasi A, Ledone Darazsi H & Helyes L (2016). Effect of coloured shade nets on some nutritional characteristics of a kapia type pepper grown in plastic tunnel. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences 3(2): 25-33. doi.org/10.18380/szie.colum.2016.3.2.25
• Ozturk H H (2008). Greenhouse climatic technique, Hasad publications, Istanbul, Turkey.
• Öner Ç, Yıldırım O, Uygan D & Boyacı H (2002). Irrigation scheduling of drip-irrigated tomatoes using class a pan evaporation. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 26(4): 171-178.
• Schettini E (2011). Nets for peach protected cultivation. Journal of Agricultural Engineering 42(4): 25-32. doi.org/10.4081/jae.2011.4.25
• Shahak Y (2008). Photo selective netting for improved performance of horticultural crops: A review of ornamental and vegetable studies carried in Israel. Acta Horticulturae 770: 161-168. doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2008.770.18
• Shahak Y, Gussakovsky E E, Gal E & Ganelevin R (2004). Colornets: Crop protection and light quality manipulation in one technology. Acta Horticulturae 659(659): 143-151. doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2004.659.17
• Statuto D & Picuno P (2017). Micro-climatic effect of shading plastic nets for crop protection in Mediterranean areas. 45. Symposium “Actual Tasks on Agricultural Engineering”, Opatija, Croatia: 557-566.
• Tafoya F A, Yanez Juarez M G, Lopez Orona C A, Lopez R M, De Jesus Velazquez Alcaraz T & Valdes T D (2018). Sunlight transmitted by coloured shade nets on photosynthesis and yield of cucumber. Ciencia Rural 48(9): 1-9. doi.org/10.1590/0103-8478cr20170829
• Tezcan N Y (2018). Green Coloured Shade Nets Effects on Soil Water Content and Plant Root Distributions on Tomato Cultivars. Fresenius Environmental Bulletin 27(11): 7698-7703.
• Zhang Q, Bi G, Li T, Wang Q, Xing Z, LeCompte J & Harkess R L (2022). Color shade nets affect plant growth and seasonal leaf quality of Camellia sinensis grown in mississippi, the United States. Front Nutr 9: 1-13. doi.org/10.3389/fnut.2022.786421