Effect of Nitrogen and Boron Treatments on Harvest Index and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Sugar Beet

Year 2023, Volume: 29 Issue: 3, 881 - 894, 25.09.2023

Bedriye Bilir , Kadir Saltalı

https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1197102

Cited By: 1

Abstract

The use of optimum nitrogen (N) and boron (B) fertilizers is crucial for both yield and quality in sugar beet production. For this reason, it is necessary to determine the rate of use and recycling parameters of the applied nutrients by the plants in order to optimize yield and quality during production. This study aims to examine the effect of different doses of nitrogen (N) and boron (B) treatment on sugar harvest index (SHI), nitrogen harvest index (NHI), and nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) parameters and to determine the economic optimum nitrogen rates (EONR) in sugar beet. The study’s experiment was set up in a randomized block factorial design with three replications. Five doses of N (0, 90, 180, 270, and 360 kg N ha-1) and four doses of B (0, 2, 4, and 6 kg B ha-1) were applied in the study. According to the results of the research, the SHI decreased statistically significantly with the increase of dose of the N treatment, but the NHI was not affected by the N treatment. The physiological efficiency of nitrogen in taproot dry matter yield (NPETDMY) and physiological efficiency of nitrogen in sugar yield (NPESY) decreased statistically significantly (p<0.01) with the increase in the dose of N treatment. A similar case was observed in the parameters of nitrogen agronomic efficiency (NAgE) and nitrogen uptake efficiency (NUpE). The increase in boron treatment doses statistically significantly (p<0.01) increased the NAgE in the first year. The EONR, calculated using the quadratic model, was found to be 240 kg N ha-1 on average 3 of two years. As a result, the nitrogen use potential decreased with the increase of N doses applied to sugar beet. The use of EONR is recommended for optimum sugar beet yield and quality in the region.

Keywords

Sugar harvest index, physiological efficiency of nitrogen, nitrogen agronomic efficiency, nitrogen uptake efficiency, economic optimum nitrogen rates

Supporting Institution

KSU BAP

Project Number

2017/4-22D

References

• Ali F, Ali A, Gul H, Sharif M, Sadiq A, Ahmed A, Ullah A, Mahar A & Kalhora S A (2015). Effect of Boron Soil Application on Nutrients Efficiency in Tobacco Leaf. American Journal of Plant Sciences 6:1391-1400. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajps.2015.69139.
• Allison L E & Moodie C D (1965). Carbonate,” In: Black, C. A., Ed., Methods of soil analysis. Part 2: Chemical and microbiological properties, Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, pp.1379-1398.
• Allison M F, Armstrong M J K, Jaggard W A, Todd D & Milford G F J (1996). An analysis of the agronomic, economic and environmental effects of applying N fertilizer to sugar beet (Beta vulgaris). The Journal of Agricultural Science 127:475-486. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021859600078709
• Alpaslan M, Gunes A & Inal A (1998). Experiment Technique Book. Ankara University, Faculty of Agriculture Publication, Ankara, No:1501:57.
• Anas M, Liao F, Verma K K, Sarwar M A, Mahmood A, Chen Z L, Li Q, Zeng X P, Liu Y & Li Y R (2020). Fate of nitrogen in agriculture and environment agronomic, ecophysiological and molecular approaches to improve nitrogen use efficiency. Biological Research 53(47):1-20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40659-020-00312-4.
• Anonymous (2020). Turkish Sugar Sector Report 2020. Date of access: July, 02, 2021. https://www.turkseker.gov.tr/data/dokumanlar/2020_Sektor_Raporu.pdf.
• Anonymous (2021). Plant Nutrition Statistics, Fertilizer and diesel prices according to years. Date of access: July, 02, 2021. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/Konular/Bitkisel-Uretim/Bitki-Besleme-ve-Tarimsal Teknolojiler/Bitki-Besleme-Istatistikleri.
• Atar B, Kara B & Kucukyumuk B (2017). Determination of Nitrogen Efficiency in Winter Bread Wheat Cultivars. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 23:119-127.
• Bremner J M (1965). Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Agronomy Monograph. 9. Madison, WI: ASA. https://doi.org /10.2134/ agronmonogr9.2.c33.
• Bremner J M (1996). Nitrogen Total. Chemical Methods, SSSA Book Series Number, 3, pp.1085-1112. https://doi.org/ 10.2136/sssabookser5.3.c37.
• Buyuk G (2006). The effect of varying nitrogen doses at different periods to the nitrogen use efficiency, grain yield and quality of the corn genotypes at Cukurova conditions. PhD Thesis. Cukurova University, Institute of Science and Technology, Department of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, Adana.
• Camacho-Cristobal J J, Rexach J & Gonzalez-Fontes A (2008). Boron in plants: Deficiency and toxicity. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology 50:1247-1255. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2008.00742.x.
• Cartwright B, Tiller K G, Zarcinas B A & Spouncer L A (1983). The chemical assessment of the boron status of soils. Australian Journal of Soil Research 21:321-332. https://doi.org/10.1071/SR9830321
• Cerrato M E & Blackmer A M (1990). Comparison of models for describing; corn yield response to nitrogen fertilizer. Agronomy Journal 82(1):138-143. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj 1990.00021962008200010030x.
• Ciampiti I A & Vyn T J (2012). Physiological perspectives of changes over time in maize yield dependency on nitrogen uptake and associated nitrogen efficiencies: a review. Field Crops Research 133: 48-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2012.03.008
• Cimrin K M (2001). The Effect of Fertilization on N, P, K Content and Uptake of Sugar beet. Yuzuncu Yil University, Faculty of Agriculture. Journal Agriculture of Science 11(1):5–10.
• Dikici H (2007). Effect of Different Response Models and Fertilizer-Crop Prices on Economic Optimum Nitrogen Levels. KSU Journal of Science and Engineering 10(2): 89-93. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy10091237.
• Durak A & Ulubas G (2017). The Effects of Boron Fertilization to Yield Properties in Sugar beet. Turkish Journal Of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology 5(7):745-749. https://doi.org/10.24925/TURJAF.V5I7.745-749.1152.
• Fageria N K, Baligar V C & Li Y C (2008). The Role of Nutrient Efficient Plants in Improving Crop Yields in the Twenty First Century. Journal of Plant Nutrition 31: 1121–1157. https://doi.org/10.1080/0190416080216068
• Fageria N K (2014). Nitrogen Harvest Index and its Association With Crop Yields. Journal of Plant Nutrition 37(6):795-810. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2014.881855
• Fixen P, Brentrup F, Bruulsema T, Garca F, Nortons R & Zingore S (2014). Nutrient/Fertilizer Use Efficiency: Measurement, Current Situation and Trends. Managing Water and Fertilizer for Sustainable Agricultural Intensification. ISBN 979-10-92366-02-0.30s.
• Gee G W & Bouder J W (1986). Particle Size Analysis. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part I Agronomy, (9). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
• Good A G, Shrawat A K & Muench D G (2004). Can less yield more? Is reducing nutrient input into the environment compatible with maintaining crop production? Trends in Plant Science 9(12):597-605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2004.10.008.
• Gucdemir I H (2006). Turkey Fertilizer and Fertilization Guide. In Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs 5:231.
• Helmke P A & Sparks D L (1996). Lithium, Sodium, Potassium, Rubidium, and Calcium. Sparks D.L. Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3 Chemical Methods pp.551-574.
• Hirose T (2012). Leaf-level nitrogen use efficiency: definition and importance. Oecologia 169(3):591-597. DOI 10.1007/s00442-011-2223-6.
• Hoffmann C M (2006). Physiological basis of the yield potential of sugar beet. SugarInd 131:863-870.
• Ilbas A I, Yildirim B, Arslan B & Gunel E (1996). A research on the examination of relations between nitrogen dosages and yield of sugar beet and determination of natural and economic optimum nitrogen dosage. Yuzuncu Yil University Journal of Agricultural Sciences 6(1):97-113.
• Jacobs A, Koch H J & Marlander B (2018). Preceding crops influence agronomic efficiency in sugar beet cultivation. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 38:5. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0469-z.
• Karam F, Mounzer O, Sarkis F & Lahoud R (2002). Yield and nitrogen recovery of lettuce under different irrigation regimes. Journal of Applied Horticulture 4(2):70-76. doi:10.37855/jah.2002.v04i02.21.
• Kavas M F & Leblebici M J (2004). Quality and Operation Control Laboratories Handbook, Turkey Sugar Factories Inc. General Directorate, Ankara, pp.85-196.
• Keeney D & Olson R (2009). Sources of nitrate to ground water. Critical Reviews Environmental 16:257-304. https://doi.org/10.1080/10643388609381748.
• Laufer D, Nielsen P O, Wilting H, Koch J & Marlander B (2016). Yield and nitrogen use efficiency of fodder and sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) in contrasting environments of northwestern Europe. European Journal of Agronomy 73:124-132. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2015.11.008.
• Lindsay W L & Norvell W A (1978). Development of a DTPA Soil Test for Zinc, Iron, Manganese and Copper. Soil Science Society of American Proceeding 42:421-428. https://doi.org/10.2136/sssaj1978.03615995004200030009x.
• Malnou C S, Jaggard K W & Sparkes D L (2006). A canopy approach to nitrogen fertilizer recommendations for the sugar beet crop. European Journal of Agronomy 25: 254-263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.06.002.
• Malnou C S, Jaggard K W & Sparkes D L (2008). Nitrogen fertilizer and the efficiency of the sugar beet crop in late summer. European Journal of Agronomy 28:47-56. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2007.05.001.
• Marlander B, Hoffmann C, Koch H J, Ladewig E, Merkes R, Petersen J & Stockfisch N (2003). Environmental Situation and Yield Performance of the Sugar Beet Crop in Germany:Heading for Sustainable Development. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 189:201–226. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1439-037X.2003.00035.x
• Marschner P (2012). Marschner’s Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. USA: Academic Press. ISBN: 9780123849052, USA, pp.672.
• Mekdad A A A (2015). Sugar Beet Productivity as Affected by Nitrogen Fertilizer and Foliar Spraying with Boron. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 4:181-196.
• Milford G F & Watson D J (1971). The Effect of Nitrogen on the Growth and Sugar Content of Sugar Beet. Annals of Botany 35(2):287-300. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a084478.
• Moll R H, Kamprath E J & Jackson W A (1982). Analysis and Interpretation of Factors Which Contribute to Efficiency of Nitrogen Utilization. Agronomy Journal 74:262–264. http://dx.doi.org/10.2134/agronj1982.00021962007400030037x.
• Neeteson J J & Wadman W P (1987). Assessment of economically optimum application rates of fertilizer N on the basis of response curves. Fertilizer Research 12:37-52.
• Nelson D W, Sommers L E, Madison W I & Series B (1996). Total carbon, organic carbon and organic matter. Methods of Soil Analysis, 3:961-1010. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr9.2.2ed.c29.
• Olsen S R & Sommers E L (1982). Phosphorus Soluble in Sodium Bicarbonate, Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties.
• Pooniya V, Shivay Y S, Madan P & Bansal R (2018). Relative Performance of Boron, Sulphur and Zinc Coatings onto Prilled Urea For Increasing Productivity and Nitrogen Use Efficiency In Maize. Experimental Agriculture 54(4):577-591. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0014479717000254.
• Porker K, Straight M & Hunt J R (2020). Evaluation of G × E × M Interactions to Increase Harvest Index and Yield of Early Sown Wheat. Sec. Crop and Product Physiology 11:14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.00994.
• Rezvani S M, Noruzi, A, Azari K & Jafari A M (2013). Determination of an appropriate model for optimum use of N fertilizer in furrow irrigation. Journal of Sugar beet 29(1): 53-63.
• Rhoades J D (1996). Salinity: Electrical Conductivity and Total Dissolved Solids in: D. L. Sparks, P. A. Page, R. H. Helmke, P. N. Loeppert, M. A. Soltanpour et al. 1996. Methods of Soil Analysis.
• Richards L A (1954). Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. Agriculture Handbook pp.60.
• SASS. 1999. Sas user’s guide: Statistic. statistical anal. systems institute inc.
• Sayili M & Akca H (2004). Comparison of different models for describing sugar beet yield response to nitrogen fertilizer. Asian Journal of Plant Science 3(4):529-531. https://doi.org/10.3923/ajps.2004.529.531
• Shivay Y S, Prasad R, Pooniya V, Pal M & Bansal R (2017). Response of spring wheat to boron coated urea and its effect on nitrogen use efficiency. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 40(13):1920-1927. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2016.1270313.
• Smil, V. 2011. Nitrogen cycle and world food production. Word agriculture scientific, 9-13.
• Stevens W B, Violett R D, Skalsky S A & Mesbah A O (2008). Response of eight sugar beet varieties to in- creasing nitrogen application: I. Root, sucrose, and top yield. Journal of American Society of Sugar Beet Technologist 45:65-83.
• Sulfab H A, Bakhit B E M I, Hagalla E, Karima A, Asha I & Marajan W A (2017). Effect of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Growth, Yield and Sucrose Concentration of Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) Under Saline Soil in El Kadaro. Sudan. Journal of Agriculture and Research 3(12):5-19.
• Tsialtas J T & Maslaris N (2005). Effect of N fertilization rate on sugar yield and non-sugar impurities of sugar beets (Beta vulgaris) grown under Mediterranean conditions. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 191:330-339. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1439-037X.2005.00161.x
• Varga I, Jovic J, Rastija M, Kulundzinc A M, Zebec V, Loncaric Z, Iljkic, D, Antunovic M (2022). Efficiency and Management of Nitrogen Fertilization in Sugar Beet as Spring Crop: A. Review. Nitrogen 3:170-185. . https://doi.org/10.3390/nitrogen3020013.
• Wang Y, Zhao Z, Wang S, Shi L & Xu F (2021). Genotypic differences in the synergistic effect of nitrogen and boron on the seed yield and nitrogen use efficiency of Brassica napus. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 102(9): 3563-3571. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.11700.
• Yilmaz, G. F. 2015. Determination of Relations Among Nitrogen use Efficiencies and Yield and Quality Properties of Some Bread Wheat Grown ın the Central Anatolia Region. Konya.
• Zhang X, Davidson E A, Mauzerall D L, Searchinger T D, Dumas P & Shen Y (2015). Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature 528:51–59. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature15743