Welfare Effects of Food Tariff Changes on Urban and Rural Households

Year 2024, Volume: 30 Issue: 4, 759 - 773, 22.10.2024

Azadeh Falsafian , Mohammad Ghahremanzadeh Samaneh Khalili Malekshahi

https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.1467418

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effects of food tariff changes on the welfare of urban and rural households in Iran. The study considers the role of households as consumers, producers, and workers, as well as the market structure over the past fifteen years. Firstly, the study estimated the consumption behavior for the main food groups using the QUAIDS and pseudo-panel data. Then, the extent of tariff pass-through to domestic food prices was determined, and after that, price-wage elasticity and wage changes as a result of tariff changes were estimated. Finally, it calculated the effect of tariff changes on household purchasing power and income through an indirect utility function to get welfare effects. The results indicate that tariff pass-through to food prices is incomplete and varies between urban and rural areas. The study has found that skilled labor is more sensitive to food tariff reductions than unskilled labor, particularly in rural areas. The results reveal that tariff changes positively affect urban households' welfare, while rural households experience a loss due to these changes. Urban areas benefit from reduced household expenditure, while food prices are increasing in rural areas due to weak or absent tariff pass-through. Although these increases favor producers, they do not compensate for the loss consumers suffer, resulting in reduced welfare in rural areas. The findings show that the effects of tariff changes vary across regions, not only between urban and rural areas but also among different provinces. Furthermore, the tariff reductions have been a boon for consumers, but a bane for producers, ultimately harming production in the long term. The findings suggest that regional markets may be either sufficient or insufficient to convert pass-through-the-border prices into domestic prices. Therefore, policymakers can use this study as a useful guide to reform the regional market structure to raise household welfare, food security, and income inequality.

Keywords

Food Demand, Pseudo-Panel Data, Welfare effect, Wage, Tariff

Supporting Institution

The authors declare that no funds, grants, or other support were received during the preparation of this manuscript.

References

• Anwar R & Guha A (2023). A study on dynamics of food inflation in India. The Indian Economic Journal 71(5): 783-804. https://doi.org/10.1177/00194662231186555
• Bansah M & Mohsin M (2021). Welfare implications of trade liberalization when revenue matters. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 30(4): 574-595, https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2021.1883722
• Campa J & Goldberg L (2002). Exchange rate pass-through into import prices: A macro or micro phenomenon, NBER Working Paper, No. 8934
• Chao C C, Ee M S, Nguyen X & Yu E S E (2019). Trade liberalization, firm entry, and income inequality. Review of International Economics 27(4): 1021–1039. https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12413
• Cherkaoui M, Khellaf A & Nihou A (2011). The price effect of tariff liberalization in Morocco: Measuring the impact on household welfare. Working Paper, 637, Economic Research Forum.
• Cho, S. W. & Diaz, J. P. (2010). The welfare impact of trade. Economic Inquiry 49(2): 379-397
• Dhamija N (2023). Distributional Effects of Trade Liberalization on Wages in India. Foreign Trade Review, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/00157325221126588
• Dix-Carneiro R & Traiberman S h (2023). Globalization, trade imbalances and inequality. Journal of Monetary Economics 133(3): 48-72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmoneco.2022.10.002
• Echeverría L & Molina J A (2022). How does household welfare vary in response to changes in food prices? Poor vs. non-poor households. Applied Economics Letters 31(9): 854–862. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2022.2153788
• Ghosh S, Doğan B, Can M, Shah MI & Apergis N (2023). Does economic structure matter for income inequality? Quality and Quantity, 57: 2507–2527. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-022-01462-1
• Han, J., Liu, R., Marchand, B. U. & Zhang, J. 2016. Market structure, imperfect tariff pass-through, and household welfare in Urban China. Journal of International Economics 100: 220-232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2016.02.006.
• Hassan F & Kornher L (2022). Farm wage and Rice Price dynamics in Bangladesh. Food Security 14: 127–146. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-021-01187-3
• Hayashi F (2000). Econometrics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
• Hossain S M (2011). Liberalizing Agriculture by OECD Countries: Welfare, Growth and Distributional Impact in Developing Countries. International Journal of Economics and Finance 3(3): 167-176
• Husted, S. & Melvin, M. (2012). International Economics. 9th Edition, Pearson, England.
• Hyun-Jung N, Frijns B & Ryu D (2024). Trade openness and income inequality: The moderating role of institutional quality. Global Finance Journal, 60, 100959. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2024.100959.
• Kareem O I (2014). The welfare impact in Nigeria of the ECOWAS common external tariff: A distributional effects analysis. United Nations Conference On Trade and Development, Trade Policies, Household Welfare and Poverty Alleviation: Case studies from the Virtual Institute academic network, New York and Geneva
• Khan M A, Walmsley T & Mukhopadhyay K (2021). Trade liberalization and income inequality: The case for Pakistan. Journal of Asian Economics 74(C): 101310
• Le, M.S. (2014). Trade openness and household welfare within a country: A microeconomic analysis of Vietnamese households. Journal of Asian Economics 33: 56-70
• Lopez A V, Cicatiello C, Principato L & Secondi L (2022). Consumer expenditure, elasticity and value of food waste: A Quadratic Almost Ideal Demand System for evaluating changes in Mexico during COVID-19. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences 82: 101065. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101065
• Marchand BU (2012). Tariff pass-through and the distributional effects of trade liberalization. Journal of Development Economics 99(2): 265-281
• Marchand B U. (2019). Inequality and trade policy: the pro-poor bias of contemporary trade restrictions. Review of Income and Wealth 65: 123-152. https://doi.org/10.1111/roiw.12433
• Mensah I (2019). Trade liberalization and its impact on income distribution in Ghana. Transnational Corporations Review 11(3): 208-221. https://doi.org/10.1080/19186444.2019.1642058
• Mogendi J O, Nganga T K & Barasa L N (2023). Pass-Through Effects of the East African Community Common External Tariffs on Kenya’s Domestic Prices. Journal of Economic Integration 38(3): 466–495. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27242697
• Muñoz T M G, Baleix J M & Odeh O (2020). Inequality in Latin America: the role of the nature of trade and partners. Economics, 14 (1): 2020-25. https://doi.org/10.5018/economics-ejournal.ja.2020-25
• Murakami Y (2021). Trade liberalization and wage inequality: Evidence from Chile. The Journal of International Trade and Economic Development 30(3): 407-438. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2020.1871502.
• Naanwaab C (2022). The Impact of Trade Liberalization on Income Inequality: Does the Direction of Trade Matter? International Economic Journal 36(6): 1-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/10168737.2022.2105378
• Nicita A (2004). Who benefited from trade liberalization in Mexico? Measuring the effects on household welfare. World Bank Policy Research, Working Paper, 3265.
• Nicita A (2009). The price effect of tariff liberalization: Measuring the impact on household welfare. Journal of Development Economics 89: 19–27
• Okodua H (2014). Household Welfare Impact of Trade Liberalization in Nigeria: A Computable General Equilibrium Model. 17th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, June 18 – 20, 2014, Dakar, Senegal.
• Poi B (2012). Easy demand-system estimation with QUAIDS. The Stata Journal 12(3): 433-446. Porto G (2006). Using survey data to assess the distributional effects of trade policy. Journal of International Economics, 70(1): 140–160.
• Rasool H & Tarique M D (2018). Testing the link between Rural Wages and Food Inflation in India An Co-integration Approach. Journal of Business and Management, 20(1): 87-98. https://doi.org/10.9790/487X-2001018798
• Rojas-Vallejos J & Turnovsky S J (2017). Tariff reduction and income inequality: Some empirical evidence. Open Economies Review 28(4): 603–631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11079-017-9439-
• Rosenfeld T, Mota I & Pereira E (2024). International Trade and Income Inequality: The Case of Latin American Countries. The International Trade Journal 38(4): 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2024.2341624
• Seshan G K (2014). The Impact of Trade Liberalization on Household Welfare in a Developing Country with Imperfect Labor Markets. The Journal of Development Studies 50(2): 226-243
• Sethi, P., Bhattacharjee, S., Chakrabarti, D. & Tiwari, Ch. (2021). The impact of globalization and financial development on India’s income inequality. Journal of Policy Modeling 43: 639–56
• Shinyekwa, I.M.B., Bulime, E.N.W., & Nattabi, A.K. (2021). Trade, revenue, and welfare effects of the AfCFTA on the EAC: An application of WITS-SMART simulation model. Business Strategy and Development 4(1): 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsd2.157
• Silva R P & Krivonos E (2021). The effects of trade openness on rural-urban sectoral employment, wages, and earnings: Evidence from Peru's second wave of trade liberalization. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 30(8): 1138-1167. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2021.1936134
• Tabash M I, Elsantil Y, Hamadi A & Drachal K (2024). Globalization and Income Inequality in Developing Economies: A Comprehensive Analysis. Economies 12(1): 1-23. https://doi.org/10.3390/economies12010023
• Taylor J E, Naude, A Y & Jesurun-Clements N (2010). Does agricultural trade liberalization reduce rural welfare in less developed countries? The case of CAFTA. Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy 32(1): 95-116
• The Islamic Republic of Iran Customs Administration. (2020). Import and export regulations and annex tables for 2005-2020. The commercial publishing company, Tehran, Iran
• Topuz S, & Dağdemir O (2020). Analysis of the relationship between trade openness, structural change, and income inequality under Kuznets curve hypothesis: The case of Turkey. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development 29(6): 647-664
• Vellinga N & TanakaT (2024). Updating the analysis of rice import liberalization in Japan: a dynamic-stochastic CGE modelling approach. Applied Economics, pp. 1–19.
• https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2024.2305617 Vo T T & Nguyen D X (2021). Impact of Trade Liberalization on Household Welfare: An Analysis Using Household Exposure-to-Trade Indices. Social Indicator Research, 153: 503–531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-020-02499-1
• Wang B, Qian X, Li Y & Cao J (2024). Pro-poor consumption effects of trade liberalization: Evidence from China. China Economic Review, 86, 102189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2024.102189.