Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

PRE-SERVICE SCIENCE TEACHERS’ VIEWS TOWARDS UNIVERSE

Year 2020, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 209 - 225, 31.12.2020

Gülşah Uluay

https://doi.org/10.35346/aod.799809
Cited By: 3

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the views of pre-service science teachers about the universe and its properties. This study which consists of qualitative data is designed as a case study. The study was carried out with senior students who studied in a science education department of a public university in Turkey. This study was carried out with senior students who were studying at the department of science education at the education faculty of a public university in Turkey and were referred to as pre-service teachers in this study. 66 participants were included in the data collection process. A structured interview form consisting of four open-ended questions and one sentence completion based on metaphorical description was used as data collection tool. The data was analyzed with content analysis method. According to the analysis results, the participants have misconceptions about the expansion of the universe. However, it was remarkable that the pre-service science teachers in the study group were not confident in explaining the composition of the universe.

Keywords

Pre-service science teacher astronomy universe interview

References

  • Atwood, V. A., & Atwood, R. K. (1995). Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of what causes night and day. School Science and Mathematics, 95(6), 290-294.
  • Bailey, J. M., & Slater, T. F. (2003). A review of astronomy education research. Astronomy Education Review, 2(2), 20-45.
  • Botha, E. (2009). Why metaphor matters in education. South African Journal of Education, 29(4), 431-444.
  • Brunsell, E., & Marcks, J. (2005). Identifying a baseline for teachers’ astronomy content knowledge. Astronomy Education Review, 2(3), 38-46.
  • Coble, K., Nickerson, M. D., Bailey, J. M., Trouille, L. E., Cochran, G. L., Camarillo, C. T., & Cominsky, L. R. (2013). Investigating student ideas about cosmology II: Composition of the universe. Astronomy Education Review, 12(1).
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.
  • Corbetta, P. (2003). Social research: Theory, methods and techniques. London: Sage Publications.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. California: Sage Publications.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
  • De Leo-Winkler, M. A., Wilson, G., Green, W., Chute, L., Henderson, E., & Mitchell, T. (2019). The vibrating universe: Astronomy for the deaf. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(3), 222-230.
  • Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children’s ideas in science. Milton Keyes, UK: Open University Press.
  • Dunlop, J. (2000). How children observe the universe. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 17(2), 194-206.
  • Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115.
  • Emrahoğlu, N., & Öztürk, A. (2009). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının astronomi kavramlarını anlama seviyelerinin ve kavram yanılgılarının incelenmesi üzerine boylamsal bir araştırma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18(1), 165-180.
  • Frede, V. (2006). Pre-service elementary teacher’s conceptions about astronomy. Advances in Space Research, 38(10), 2237-2246.
  • Hancock, D. R., & Algozzine, B. (2006). Doing case study research: A practical guide for beginning researchers. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Kanlı, U. (2014). A study on identifying the misconceptions of pre-service and in-service teachers about basic astronomy concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 471-479.
  • Karataş, Z. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Manevi Temelli Sosyal Hizmet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 62-80.
  • Korur, F. (2015). Exploring seventh-grade students’ and pre-service science teachers’ misconceptions in astronomical concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 1041-1060.
  • Krippendorff, K. (1989). Content analysis. In E. Barnouw, G. Gerbner, W. Schramm, T. L. Worth, & L. Gross (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Communication (Vol. 1, pp. 403-407). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/226.
  • Küçüközer, H. (2008). The effects of 3D computer modelling on conceptual change about seasons and phases of the moon. Physics Education, 43(6), 632-636.
  • Küçüközer, H., Bostan, A., & Işıldak, R. S. (2010). İlköğretim matematik öğretmeni adaylarının bazı astronomi kavramlarına ilişkin fikirlerine öğretimin etkileri. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(1), 105-124.
  • Lelliott, A., & Rollnick, M. (2010). Big ideas: A review of astronomy education research 1974–2008. International Journal of Science Education, 32(13), 1771-1799.
  • Li, P. C., Guo, M., & Chen, B. (2020). Shadow of a spinning black hole in an expanding universe. Physical Review D, 101(8), 1-28.
  • Lightman, A. (1999). Yıldızların zamanı. (M. Alev, Çev.) İstanbul: Pro-Mat Basım Yayın.
  • Lightman, A., & Sadler, P. M. (1993). Teacher predictions versus actual student gains. The Physics Teacher, 31(3), 162-167.
  • Low, G. (2008). Metaphor and Education. Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (p. 212-231). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • McNeill, P. & Chapman, S. (2005). Research methods. New York: Routledge.
  • Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar). Ankara: Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.
  • National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
  • Özdemir, M. (2010). Nitel veri analizi: Sosyal bilimlerde yöntembilim sorunsalı üzerine bir çalışma. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), 323-343.
  • Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., ... & Zonca, E. (2016). Planck 2015 results-XIII. cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 594(A13), 1-63.
  • Percy, J. R. (2006). Teaching astronomy? Why and how?. Journal of the American Association of Variable Star Observers (JAAVSO), 35, 248-254.
  • Prather, E. E., Slater, T. F., & Offerdahl, E. G. (2002). Hints of a fundamental misconception in cosmology. Astronomy Education Review, 1(2), 28-34.
  • Sadler, P. M., Coyle, H., Miller, J. L., Cook-Smith, N., Dussault, M., & Gould, R. R. (2010). The astronomy and space science concept inventory: Development and validation of assessment instruments aligned with the K–12 national science standards. Astronomy Education Review, 8(1), 1-28.
  • Schleigh, S. P., Slater, S. J., Slater, T. F., & Stork, D. J. (2015). The new curriculum standards for for astronomy in The United States. Latin American Journal of Astronomy Education, 20, 131-151.
  • Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., Limon, M., Meyer, S. S., Page, L., Tucker, G. S., Weiland, J. L., Wollack, E., & Wright, E. L. (2003). First-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP)* observations: determination of cosmological parameters. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 148(1), 175-194.
  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedurs and tecniques. Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage.
  • Tobin, K., & Tippins, D. J. (1996). Metaphors as seeds for conceptual change and the improvement of science teaching. Science Education, 80(6), 711-730.
  • Trumper, R. (2001). A cross-age study of senior high school students' conceptions of basic astronomy concepts. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19(1), 97-109.
  • Trumper, R. (2006). Teaching future teachers basic astronomy concepts—seasonal changes—at a time of reform in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(9), 879-906.
  • Türkoğlu, O., Örnek, F., Gökdere, M., Süleymanoğlu, N., & Orbay, M. (2009). On pre-service science teachers preexisting knowledge levels about basic astronomy concepts. International Journal of Physical Sciences, 4(11), 734-739.
  • Uğurlu, N. B. (2005). İlköğretim 6. sınıf öğrencilerinin dünya ve evren konusu ile ilgili kavram yanılgıları. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1).
  • Yair, Y., Mintz, R., & Litvak, S. (2001). 3D-Virtual reality in science education: An implication for astronomy teaching. The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 20(3), 293-305.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.

FEN BİLGİSİ ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ EVREN HAKKINDAKİ GÖRÜŞLERİ

Year 2020, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 209 - 225, 31.12.2020

Gülşah Uluay

https://doi.org/10.35346/aod.799809
Cited By: 3

Abstract

Bu çalışmanın amacı, fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının evren ve evrenin özelliklerine ilişkin görüşlerinin tespit edilmesidir. Söz konusu amaç doğrultusunda tasarlanan ve nitel verilerden oluşan bu çalışma durum araştırması türündedir. Araştırma Türkiye’de bir devlet üniversitesinin eğitim fakültesi fen bilgisi eğitimi anabilim dalında öğrenim görmekte olan ve bu çalışmada öğretmen adayları olarak ifade edilen son sınıf öğrencileri ile yürütülmüştür. Veri toplama sürecine 66 katılımcı dahil olmuştur. Veri toplama aracı olarak dört açık uçlu soru ve bir metaforik betimlemeye dayalı cümle tamamlamasından oluşan yapılandırılmış görüşme formu kullanılmıştır. Veriler içerik analizi metodu ile incelenmiştir. Analiz sonuçlarına göre, katılımcıların evrenin genişlemesine ilişkin kavram yanılgıları bulunmaktadır. Bununla birlikte, çalışma grubunda yer alan öğretmen adaylarının evrenin bileşimini açıklama noktasında kendilerinden emin olamamaları dikkat çekici olmuştur.

Keywords

fen bilgisi öğretmen adayı astronomi evren görüşme

References

  • Atwood, V. A., & Atwood, R. K. (1995). Preservice elementary teachers' conceptions of what causes night and day. School Science and Mathematics, 95(6), 290-294.
  • Bailey, J. M., & Slater, T. F. (2003). A review of astronomy education research. Astronomy Education Review, 2(2), 20-45.
  • Botha, E. (2009). Why metaphor matters in education. South African Journal of Education, 29(4), 431-444.
  • Brunsell, E., & Marcks, J. (2005). Identifying a baseline for teachers’ astronomy content knowledge. Astronomy Education Review, 2(3), 38-46.
  • Coble, K., Nickerson, M. D., Bailey, J. M., Trouille, L. E., Cochran, G. L., Camarillo, C. T., & Cominsky, L. R. (2013). Investigating student ideas about cosmology II: Composition of the universe. Astronomy Education Review, 12(1).
  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge.
  • Corbetta, P. (2003). Social research: Theory, methods and techniques. London: Sage Publications.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. California: Sage Publications.
  • Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
  • De Leo-Winkler, M. A., Wilson, G., Green, W., Chute, L., Henderson, E., & Mitchell, T. (2019). The vibrating universe: Astronomy for the deaf. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 28(3), 222-230.
  • Driver, R., Guesne, E., & Tiberghien, A. (1985). Children’s ideas in science. Milton Keyes, UK: Open University Press.
  • Dunlop, J. (2000). How children observe the universe. Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia, 17(2), 194-206.
  • Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107-115.
  • Emrahoğlu, N., & Öztürk, A. (2009). Fen bilgisi öğretmen adaylarının astronomi kavramlarını anlama seviyelerinin ve kavram yanılgılarının incelenmesi üzerine boylamsal bir araştırma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 18(1), 165-180.
  • Frede, V. (2006). Pre-service elementary teacher’s conceptions about astronomy. Advances in Space Research, 38(10), 2237-2246.
  • Hancock, D. R., & Algozzine, B. (2006). Doing case study research: A practical guide for beginning researchers. New York: Teachers College Press.
  • Kanlı, U. (2014). A study on identifying the misconceptions of pre-service and in-service teachers about basic astronomy concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 10(5), 471-479.
  • Karataş, Z. (2015). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Manevi Temelli Sosyal Hizmet Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 62-80.
  • Korur, F. (2015). Exploring seventh-grade students’ and pre-service science teachers’ misconceptions in astronomical concepts. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 11(5), 1041-1060.
  • Krippendorff, K. (1989). Content analysis. In E. Barnouw, G. Gerbner, W. Schramm, T. L. Worth, & L. Gross (Eds.), International Encyclopedia of Communication (Vol. 1, pp. 403-407). New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from http://repository.upenn.edu/asc_papers/226.
  • Küçüközer, H. (2008). The effects of 3D computer modelling on conceptual change about seasons and phases of the moon. Physics Education, 43(6), 632-636.
  • Küçüközer, H., Bostan, A., & Işıldak, R. S. (2010). İlköğretim matematik öğretmeni adaylarının bazı astronomi kavramlarına ilişkin fikirlerine öğretimin etkileri. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(1), 105-124.
  • Lelliott, A., & Rollnick, M. (2010). Big ideas: A review of astronomy education research 1974–2008. International Journal of Science Education, 32(13), 1771-1799.
  • Li, P. C., Guo, M., & Chen, B. (2020). Shadow of a spinning black hole in an expanding universe. Physical Review D, 101(8), 1-28.
  • Lightman, A. (1999). Yıldızların zamanı. (M. Alev, Çev.) İstanbul: Pro-Mat Basım Yayın.
  • Lightman, A., & Sadler, P. M. (1993). Teacher predictions versus actual student gains. The Physics Teacher, 31(3), 162-167.
  • Low, G. (2008). Metaphor and Education. Raymond W. Gibbs, Jr. (Ed.), In The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought (p. 212-231). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • McNeill, P. & Chapman, S. (2005). Research methods. New York: Routledge.
  • Miles, M, B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. (2nd ed). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı. (2018). Fen bilimleri dersi öğretim programı (İlkokul ve Ortaokul 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 ve 8. Sınıflar). Ankara: Millî Eğitim Bakanlığı.
  • National Research Council. (2000). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school: Expanded edition. Washington, D.C.: National Academies Press.
  • Özdemir, M. (2010). Nitel veri analizi: Sosyal bilimlerde yöntembilim sorunsalı üzerine bir çalışma. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 11(1), 323-343.
  • Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., Arnaud, M., Ashdown, M., Aumont, J., Baccigalupi, C., ... & Zonca, E. (2016). Planck 2015 results-XIII. cosmological parameters. Astronomy & Astrophysics, 594(A13), 1-63.
  • Percy, J. R. (2006). Teaching astronomy? Why and how?. Journal of the American Association of Variable Star Observers (JAAVSO), 35, 248-254.
  • Prather, E. E., Slater, T. F., & Offerdahl, E. G. (2002). Hints of a fundamental misconception in cosmology. Astronomy Education Review, 1(2), 28-34.
  • Sadler, P. M., Coyle, H., Miller, J. L., Cook-Smith, N., Dussault, M., & Gould, R. R. (2010). The astronomy and space science concept inventory: Development and validation of assessment instruments aligned with the K–12 national science standards. Astronomy Education Review, 8(1), 1-28.
  • Schleigh, S. P., Slater, S. J., Slater, T. F., & Stork, D. J. (2015). The new curriculum standards for for astronomy in The United States. Latin American Journal of Astronomy Education, 20, 131-151.
  • Spergel, D. N., Verde, L., Peiris, H. V., Komatsu, E., Nolta, M. R., Bennett, C. L., Halpern, M., Hinshaw, G., Jarosik, N., Kogut, A., Limon, M., Meyer, S. S., Page, L., Tucker, G. S., Weiland, J. L., Wollack, E., & Wright, E. L. (2003). First-year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP)* observations: determination of cosmological parameters. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series, 148(1), 175-194.
  • Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedurs and tecniques. Newbury Park, C. A.: Sage.
  • Tobin, K., & Tippins, D. J. (1996). Metaphors as seeds for conceptual change and the improvement of science teaching. Science Education, 80(6), 711-730.
  • Trumper, R. (2001). A cross-age study of senior high school students' conceptions of basic astronomy concepts. Research in Science & Technological Education, 19(1), 97-109.
  • Trumper, R. (2006). Teaching future teachers basic astronomy concepts—seasonal changes—at a time of reform in science education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(9), 879-906.
  • Türkoğlu, O., Örnek, F., Gökdere, M., Süleymanoğlu, N., & Orbay, M. (2009). On pre-service science teachers preexisting knowledge levels about basic astronomy concepts. International Journal of Physical Sciences, 4(11), 734-739.
  • Uğurlu, N. B. (2005). İlköğretim 6. sınıf öğrencilerinin dünya ve evren konusu ile ilgili kavram yanılgıları. Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 25(1).
  • Yair, Y., Mintz, R., & Litvak, S. (2001). 3D-Virtual reality in science education: An implication for astronomy teaching. The Journal of Computers in Mathematics and Science Teaching, 20(3), 293-305.
  • Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
There are 47 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Other Fields of Education
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Gülşah Uluay

Publication Date December 31, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2020 Volume: 4 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Uluay, G. (2020). FEN BİLGİSİ ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ EVREN HAKKINDAKİ GÖRÜŞLERİ. Anadolu Öğretmen Dergisi, 4(2), 209-225. https://doi.org/10.35346/aod.799809
AMA Uluay G. FEN BİLGİSİ ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ EVREN HAKKINDAKİ GÖRÜŞLERİ. AOD. December 2020;4(2):209-225. doi:10.35346/aod.799809
Chicago Uluay, Gülşah. “FEN BİLGİSİ ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ EVREN HAKKINDAKİ GÖRÜŞLERİ”. Anadolu Öğretmen Dergisi 4, no. 2 (December 2020): 209-25. https://doi.org/10.35346/aod.799809.
EndNote Uluay G (December 1, 2020) FEN BİLGİSİ ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ EVREN HAKKINDAKİ GÖRÜŞLERİ. Anadolu Öğretmen Dergisi 4 2 209–225.
IEEE G. Uluay, “FEN BİLGİSİ ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ EVREN HAKKINDAKİ GÖRÜŞLERİ”, AOD, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 209–225, 2020, doi: 10.35346/aod.799809.
ISNAD Uluay, Gülşah. “FEN BİLGİSİ ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ EVREN HAKKINDAKİ GÖRÜŞLERİ”. Anadolu Öğretmen Dergisi 4/2 (December 2020), 209-225. https://doi.org/10.35346/aod.799809.
JAMA Uluay G. FEN BİLGİSİ ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ EVREN HAKKINDAKİ GÖRÜŞLERİ. AOD. 2020;4:209–225.
MLA Uluay, Gülşah. “FEN BİLGİSİ ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ EVREN HAKKINDAKİ GÖRÜŞLERİ”. Anadolu Öğretmen Dergisi, vol. 4, no. 2, 2020, pp. 209-25, doi:10.35346/aod.799809.
Vancouver Uluay G. FEN BİLGİSİ ÖĞRETMEN ADAYLARININ EVREN HAKKINDAKİ GÖRÜŞLERİ. AOD. 2020;4(2):209-25.

Cited By

“Yıldız, kuyruklu yıldız ve takımyıldızı” kavramlarına ilişkin öğrencilerin zihinsel modellerinin belirlenmesi ve eğitim düzeylerine göre karşılaştırılması
Kocaeli Üniversitesi Eğitim Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.33400/kuje.1222937
Fizik Öğretmenlerinin Parçacık Fiziğine Yönelik Alan Bilgilerinin Gelişimi
Eğitim ve Toplum Araştırmaları Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.51725/etad.1108748
Türkiye’deki Astronomi Eğitimi Araştırmalarının İncelenmesi: Bir Betimsel İçerik Analizi
Maarif Mektepleri Uluslararası Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.46762/mamulebd.883360
 Download Cover Image