Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results

Volume: 22 Number: 1 September 11, 2006
  • M. Uzel
  • R. Erginer
  • M. Goksan
  • M. Senocak
  • M. Alver
EN TR

Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results

Abstract

Several different methods such as fluoroscopi, CT scaning, monoplaner or biplaner direct radiography can be used determination of femoral neck torsion angle. In our study femoral neck torsion angle has been determined in one adult skelatal module and 22 hips of 10 adults. CT-scaning, monoplaner (Dunn) and biplaner (Magiligan, Ryder-Crane) direct radiographic methods have been used in the study and the results have been compared by using statistical analysis method. It has been observet that CT scaning is reliable acording to direct visual examination method, Dunn and Ryder-Crane medhods are reliable according to CT scaning. The results of Magiligan method have been found to be different than CT results.

Keywords

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

-

Authors

M. Uzel This is me

R. Erginer This is me

M. Goksan This is me

M. Senocak This is me

M. Alver This is me

Publication Date

September 11, 2006

Submission Date

March 5, 2014

Acceptance Date

-

Published in Issue

Year 1988 Volume: 22 Number: 1

APA
Uzel, M., Erginer, R., Goksan, M., Senocak, M., & Alver, M. (2006). Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 22(1), 18-21. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v22i1.978
AMA
1.Uzel M, Erginer R, Goksan M, Senocak M, Alver M. Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006;22(1):18-21. doi:10.3944/aott.v22i1.978
Chicago
Uzel, M., R. Erginer, M. Goksan, M. Senocak, and M. Alver. 2006. “Determining of the Femoral Neck Torsion Angle Using CT-Scaning, Monoplanar, Biplanar Direct Radiographic Methods and Comparison of the Results”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 22 (1): 18-21. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v22i1.978.
EndNote
Uzel M, Erginer R, Goksan M, Senocak M, Alver M (September 1, 2006) Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 22 1 18–21.
IEEE
[1]M. Uzel, R. Erginer, M. Goksan, M. Senocak, and M. Alver, “Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results”, Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 18–21, Sept. 2006, doi: 10.3944/aott.v22i1.978.
ISNAD
Uzel, M. - Erginer, R. - Goksan, M. - Senocak, M. - Alver, M. “Determining of the Femoral Neck Torsion Angle Using CT-Scaning, Monoplanar, Biplanar Direct Radiographic Methods and Comparison of the Results”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 22/1 (September 1, 2006): 18-21. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v22i1.978.
JAMA
1.Uzel M, Erginer R, Goksan M, Senocak M, Alver M. Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006;22:18–21.
MLA
Uzel, M., et al. “Determining of the Femoral Neck Torsion Angle Using CT-Scaning, Monoplanar, Biplanar Direct Radiographic Methods and Comparison of the Results”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, vol. 22, no. 1, Sept. 2006, pp. 18-21, doi:10.3944/aott.v22i1.978.
Vancouver
1.M. Uzel, R. Erginer, M. Goksan, M. Senocak, M. Alver. Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006 Sep. 1;22(1):18-21. doi:10.3944/aott.v22i1.978