Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results

Cilt: 22 Sayı: 1 11 Eylül 2006
  • M. Uzel
  • R. Erginer
  • M. Goksan
  • M. Senocak
  • M. Alver
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica Kapak
Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica
PDF İndir
EN TR

Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results

Abstract

Several different methods such as fluoroscopi, CT scaning, monoplaner or biplaner direct radiography can be used determination of femoral neck torsion angle. In our study femoral neck torsion angle has been determined in one adult skelatal module and 22 hips of 10 adults. CT-scaning, monoplaner (Dunn) and biplaner (Magiligan, Ryder-Crane) direct radiographic methods have been used in the study and the results have been compared by using statistical analysis method. It has been observet that CT scaning is reliable acording to direct visual examination method, Dunn and Ryder-Crane medhods are reliable according to CT scaning. The results of Magiligan method have been found to be different than CT results.

Keywords

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

-

Bölüm

-

Yazarlar

R. Erginer Bu kişi benim

M. Senocak Bu kişi benim

Yayımlanma Tarihi

11 Eylül 2006

Gönderilme Tarihi

5 Mart 2014

Kabul Tarihi

-

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 1988 Cilt: 22 Sayı: 1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v22i1.978

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA79XK48ZL

Kaynak Göster

RIS / Bibtex
APA
Uzel, M., Erginer, R., Goksan, M., Senocak, M., & Alver, M. (2006). Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, 22(1), 18-21. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v22i1.978
AMA
1.Uzel M, Erginer R, Goksan M, Senocak M, Alver M. Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006;22(1):18-21. doi:10.3944/aott.v22i1.978
Chicago
Uzel, M., R. Erginer, M. Goksan, M. Senocak, ve M. Alver. 2006. “Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 22 (1): 18-21. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v22i1.978.
EndNote
Uzel M, Erginer R, Goksan M, Senocak M, Alver M (01 Eylül 2006) Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 22 1 18–21.
IEEE
[1]M. Uzel, R. Erginer, M. Goksan, M. Senocak, ve M. Alver, “Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results”, Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, c. 22, sy 1, ss. 18–21, Eyl. 2006, doi: 10.3944/aott.v22i1.978.
ISNAD
Uzel, M. - Erginer, R. - Goksan, M. - Senocak, M. - Alver, M. “Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica 22/1 (01 Eylül 2006): 18-21. https://doi.org/10.3944/aott.v22i1.978.
JAMA
1.Uzel M, Erginer R, Goksan M, Senocak M, Alver M. Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2006;22:18–21.
MLA
Uzel, M., vd. “Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results”. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica, c. 22, sy 1, Eylül 2006, ss. 18-21, doi:10.3944/aott.v22i1.978.
Vancouver
1.M. Uzel, R. Erginer, M. Goksan, M. Senocak, M. Alver. Determining of the femoral neck torsion angle using CT-scaning, monoplanar, biplanar direct radiographic methods and comparison of the results. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 01 Eylül 2006;22(1):18-21. doi:10.3944/aott.v22i1.978