A Neo-Classical Realist Account of Türkiye’s Foreign Policy Behavior: The Comparison of Bülent Ecevit’s 1978-1979 and 1999-2002 Governments
Abstract
This study examines and compares the foreign policy behavior of Türkiye under the premiership of Bülent Ecevit between 1978-1979 and 1999-2002 via utilization of neo-classical realist theory. The article argues that the permissive strategic environment in both periods, détente in the former and unipolar international system in the latter paved the way for Türkiye’s multi-dimensional foreign policy which put special emphasis on neighboring regions. The worldviews of Ecevit and his foreign ministers Gündüz Ökçün and İsmail Cem as well as the emergence of grave economic problems in the country also contributed to the consolidation of region-centric foreign policy streak in both periods. Yet, while the arrival of the Second Cold War in December 1979 following the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan interrupted Türkiye’s multi-dimensional foreign policy stance for a while, the increasing trend towards multi-polarity starting from mid-2000s facilitated Türkiye’s pursuit of more autonomous foreign policy line.
Keywords
Neo-classical Realism, Türkiye, Foreign Policy Behavior, Bülent Ecevit, Multi-Dimensional Foreign Policy
References
- Akdevelioğlu, Atay and Ömer Kürkçüoğlu (2009), “İran ile İlişkiler”, Oran, Baskın, (Ed.), Türk Dış Politikası: Kurtuluş Savaşı’ndan Bugüne Olgular, Belgeler, Yorumlar Volume 1 1919-1980 (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları): 801-807.
- Aydın, Mustafa and Damla Aras (2004), “Ortadoğu’da Ekonomik İlişkilerin Siyasi Çerçevesi: Türkiye’nin İran, Irak ve Suriye ile Bağlantıları”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 1 (2): 103-128.
- Aykan, Mahmut Bali (1993), “The Palestinian Question in Turkish Foreign Policy from the 1950s to the 1990s”, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 25 (1): 91-110.
- Başlamış, Cenk (1999, November 4), “Rusya’da Sıcak Temas”, Milliyet.
- Benli Altunışık, Meliha and Özlem Tür (2006), “From Distant Neighbors to Partners? Changing Syrian-Turkish Relations”, Security Dialogue, 37 (2): 229-248.
- Boll, Michael M. (1979), “Turkey between East and West: The Regional Alternative”, The World Today, 35 (9): 360-368.
- Brawley, Mark R. (2009), “Neoclassical Realism and Strategic Calculations: Explaining Divergent British, French, and Soviet Strategies Toward Germany between the World Wars (1919-1939)”, Lobell, Steven E., Norrin M. Ripsman, Jeffrey W. Taliaferro, (Eds.), Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 75-98.
- Brecher, Michael, Blema Steinberg and Janice Stein (1969), “A Framework for Research on Foreign Policy Behavior”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 13 (75): 75-94.
- Cem, İsmail (2002), “Turkish Foreign Policy: Opening New Horizons for Turkey at the Beginning of a New Millennium”, Turkish Policy Quarterly, 1 (1): 1-6.
- Commission of the European Communities Spokesman’s Group and Directorate General for Information (1979), “The People’s Republic of China and the European Community”, http://aei.pitt.edu/8242/1/31735055282226_1.pdf (30.05.2022).