Türkiye’nin Dış Politika Davranışının Neoklasik Realist Bir Açıklaması: Bülent Ecevit’in 1978-1979 ve 1999-2002 Hükümetlerinin Karşılaştırılması

Yıl 2023, , 315 - 343, 13.06.2023

Fatma Aslı Kelkitli

https://doi.org/10.53376/ap.2023.12

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu çalışma, neoklasik realist teoriden yararlanarak 1978-1979 ve 1999-2002 yılları arasında Ecevit’in başbakanlığında Türkiye’nin dış politika davranışını inceleyip karşılaştırmaktadır. Makale, her iki dönemde de müsamahakâr stratejik ortamın, önceki dönemdeki yumuşamanın, ikinci dönemdeki tek kutuplu uluslararası sistemin, Türkiye’nin komşu bölgelere özel vurgu yapan çok boyutlu dış politikasının önünü açtığını öne sürmektedir. Ecevit ve dışişleri bakanları Gündüz Ökçün ve İsmail Cem’in dünya görüşleri ile ülkede ciddi ekonomik sorunların ortaya çıkması da her iki dönemde de bölge merkezli dış politika çizgisinin pekişmesine katkı sağlamıştır. Her ne kadar İkinci Soğuk Savaş’ın Aralık 1979’da Afganistan’a Sovyet müdahalesinin ardından gelmesi Türkiye’nin çok boyutlu dış politika duruşunu bir süreliğine kesintiye uğratsa da Soğuk Savaş sonrası dönemde artan çok kutupluluk eğilimi Türkiye’nin daha özerk bir dış politika izlemesini kolaylaştırmıştır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Neoklasik Realizm, Türkiye, Dış Politika Davranışı, Bülent Ecevit, Çok Boyutlu Dış Politika

A Neo-Classical Realist Account of Türkiye’s Foreign Policy Behavior: The Comparison of Bülent Ecevit’s 1978-1979 and 1999-2002 Governments

Öz

This study examines and compares the foreign policy behavior of Türkiye under the premiership of Bülent Ecevit between 1978-1979 and 1999-2002 via utilization of neo-classical realist theory. The article argues that the permissive strategic environment in both periods, détente in the former and unipolar international system in the latter paved the way for Türkiye’s multi-dimensional foreign policy which put special emphasis on neighboring regions. The worldviews of Ecevit and his foreign ministers Gündüz Ökçün and İsmail Cem as well as the emergence of grave economic problems in the country also contributed to the consolidation of region-centric foreign policy streak in both periods. Yet, while the arrival of the Second Cold War in December 1979 following the Soviet intervention in Afghanistan interrupted Türkiye’s multi-dimensional foreign policy stance for a while, the increasing trend towards multi-polarity starting from mid-2000s facilitated Türkiye’s pursuit of more autonomous foreign policy line.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Neo-classical Realism, Türkiye, Foreign Policy Behavior, Bülent Ecevit, Multi-Dimensional Foreign Policy

Kaynakça

• Akdevelioğlu, Atay and Ömer Kürkçüoğlu (2009), “İran ile İlişkiler”, Oran, Baskın, (Ed.), Türk Dış Politikası: Kurtuluş Savaşı’ndan Bugüne Olgular, Belgeler, Yorumlar Volume 1 1919-1980 (İstanbul: İletişim Yayınları): 801-807.
• Aydın, Mustafa and Damla Aras (2004), “Ortadoğu’da Ekonomik İlişkilerin Siyasi Çerçevesi: Türkiye’nin İran, Irak ve Suriye ile Bağlantıları”, Uluslararası İlişkiler, 1 (2): 103-128.
• Aykan, Mahmut Bali (1993), “The Palestinian Question in Turkish Foreign Policy from the 1950s to the 1990s”, International Journal of Middle East Studies, 25 (1): 91-110.
• Başlamış, Cenk (1999, November 4), “Rusya’da Sıcak Temas”, Milliyet.
• Benli Altunışık, Meliha and Özlem Tür (2006), “From Distant Neighbors to Partners? Changing Syrian-Turkish Relations”, Security Dialogue, 37 (2): 229-248.
• Boll, Michael M. (1979), “Turkey between East and West: The Regional Alternative”, The World Today, 35 (9): 360-368.
• Brawley, Mark R. (2009), “Neoclassical Realism and Strategic Calculations: Explaining Divergent British, French, and Soviet Strategies Toward Germany between the World Wars (1919-1939)”, Lobell, Steven E., Norrin M. Ripsman, Jeffrey W. Taliaferro, (Eds.), Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 75-98.
• Brecher, Michael, Blema Steinberg and Janice Stein (1969), “A Framework for Research on Foreign Policy Behavior”, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 13 (75): 75-94.
• Cem, İsmail (2002), “Turkish Foreign Policy: Opening New Horizons for Turkey at the Beginning of a New Millennium”, Turkish Policy Quarterly, 1 (1): 1-6.
• Commission of the European Communities Spokesman’s Group and Directorate General for Information (1979), “The People’s Republic of China and the European Community”, http://aei.pitt.edu/8242/1/31735055282226_1.pdf (30.05.2022).
• Cumhuriyet, 25 March 1978.
• Çuhadar, Ç. Esra, Juliet Kaarbo, Barış Kesgin and Binnur Özkeçeci-Taner (2021), “Turkish Leaders and Their Foreign Policy Decision-Making Style: A Comparative and Multi-Method Perspective”, Turkish Studies, 22 (1): 1-27.
• Dewitt, David B. and John J. Kirton (1983), Canada as a Principal Power: A Study in Foreign Policy and International Relations (Toronto: Wiley).
• Donelli, Federico and Ariel Gonzalez Levaggi (2016), “Becoming Global Actor: The Turkish Agenda for the Global South”, Rising Powers Quarterly, 1 (2): 93-115.
• Ecevit, Bülent (2008), Dış Politika ve Kıbrıs Dosyası (İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları).
• Ecevit, Bülent (2010), Ecevit’in Açıklamaları 1976 (İstanbul: Türkiye İş Bankası Kültür Yayınları).
• Erkan, Süleyman (2017), “CIA Günlük Raporlarına Göre Türkiye’de 1978 Bülent Ecevit Hükümeti Dönemi”, History Studies, 9 (1): 127-144.
• Fiammenghi, Davide, Sebastian Rosato, Joseph M. Parent, Jeffrey W. Taliaferro, Steven E. Lobell, Norrin M. Ripsman and Kevin Narizny (2018), “Correspondence: Neoclassical Realism and Its Critics”, International Security, 43 (2): 193-203.
• Gençalp, Ebru (2014), “Türk Basınında İkili Ziyaretler Boyutunda Türk Sovyet İlişkileri”, Çağdaş Türkiye Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 14 (29): 315-352.
• Giritli, İsmet (1981), “Romanya ve Türk-Romen İlişkileri”, İstanbul Üniversitesi Hukuk Mecmuası, 45 (1-4): 235-248.
• Gözen, Ramazan (2005), “Causes and Consequences of Turkey’s Out-of-War Position in the Iraq War of 2003”, The Turkish Yearbook, 36: 74-99.
• Gülbay, Alper (2019), “Huzursuz Bir Ortaklığın Ses Getiren Hamlesi: CHP-MSP Koalisyon Hükümeti ve Kıbrıs Barış Harekâtı”, Cumhuriyet Tarihi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 15 (30): 333-361.
• Gwertzman, Bernard (1978), “Turkish Chief Sees No Russian Threat”, The New York Times, May 30, https://www.nytimes.com/1978/05/30/archives/new-jersey-pages-turkish-chief-sees-no-russian-threat-ecevit-says.html (05.06.2022).
• Hale, William (2013), Turkish Foreign Policy since 1774 (Abingdon: Routledge).
• Hazar, Numan (2012), “Türkiye Afrika’da: Eylem Planı’nın Uygulanması ve Değerlendirme On Beş Yıl Sonra”, ORSAM, 124: 1-17.
• Holsti, Ole R. (1962), “The Belief System and National Images: A Case Study”, Conflict Resolution, 6 (3): 244-252.
• Hürriyet (1999, June 28), “Mehmet Keçeciler Cem’in Yerine Gitti”.
• Hürriyet (2000, November 3), “Toskay, Irak’ı Uyardı Karışma”.
• İpek, Volkan and Gonca Biltekin (2013), “Turkey’s Foreign Policy Implementation in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Post-International Approach”, New Perspectives on Turkey, 49: 121-156.
• Jenkins, Gareth H. (2012), “Occasional Allies, Enduring Rivals: Turkey’s Relations with Iran”, Silk Road Paper: 1-76.
• Kasapsaraçoğlu, Murat (2021), “Amerikan Belgelerinde Türkiye’nin İç Politikası: Ecevit ve Demirel Hükümetleri Dönemi (1974-1980)”, Gazi Akademik Bakış, 14 (28): 21-42.
• Kayaoğlu, Barın (2014), “The Limits of Turkish-Iranian Cooperation, 1974-80”, Iranian Studies, 47 (3): 463-478.
• Kınıklıoğlu, Suat (2000), “Bülent Ecevit: The Transformation of a Politician”, Turkish Studies, 1 (2): 1-20.
• Kornilov, Alexander (2013), “Musa Qasimli: USSR-Turkey: From Normalization of Relations till the New Cold War (1960-1979)”, Bilge Strateji, 5 (8): 173-176.
• Kumral, Mehmet Akif (2016), Rethinking Turkey-Iraq Relations: The Dilemma of Partial Cooperation (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
• Kumral, Mehmet Akif (2020), Exploring Emotions in Turkey-Iran Relations: Affective Politics of Partnership and Rivalry (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan).
• Kupchan, Charles A. (1998), “After Pax Americana: Benign Power, Regional Integration and the Sources of a Stable Multipolarity”, International Security, 23 (2): 40-79.
• Kut, Gün (2010), “Türk Dış Politikasında Çokyönlülüğün Yakın Tarihi: Soğuk Savaş Sonrası Devamlılık ve Değişim”, Boğaziçi Üniversitesi-TÜSİAD Dış Politika Forumu Araştırma Raporu: 1-56.
• Levaggi, Ariel Gonzalez (2013), “Turkey and Latin America: A New Horizon for a Strategic Relationship”, Perceptions, 18 (4): 99-116.
• Makovsky, Alan (1999), “The New Activism in Turkish Foreign Policy”, Insight Turkey, 1 (2): 3-21.
• Meibauer, Gustav, Linde Desmaele, Tudor Onea, Nicholas Kitchen, Michiel Foulon, Alexander Reichwein and Jennifer Sterling-Folker (2021), “Forum: Rethinking Neoclassical Realism at Theory’s End”, International Studies Review, 23 (1): 268-295.
• Mouritzen, Hans (2022), “Between Polarity and Foreign Policy: Freedom of Manoeuvre Is the Missing Link”, Graeger, Nina, Bertel Heurlin, Ole Waever and Anders Wivel (Eds.), Polarity in International Relations: Past, Present, Future (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan): 101-126.
• Müftüler, Meltem and Müberra Yüksel (1997), “Turkey: A Middle Power in the New Order”, Cooper, Andrew F. (Ed.), Niche Diplomacy: Middle Powers after the Cold War (New York: St. Martin’s Press): 184-196.
• Nachmani, Amikam (2003), Turkey: Facing a New Millennium: Coping with Intertwined Conflicts (Manchester: Manchester University Press).
• Neziroğlu, İrfan and Tuncer Yılmaz (2014), Başbakanlarımız ve Genel Kurul Konuşmaları, Cilt 7 (Ankara: TBMM Basımevi).
• Olson, Robert (2000), “Turkey-Iran Relations, 1997 to 2000: The Kurdish and Islamist Questions”, Third World Quarterly, 21 (5): 871-890.
• Oppermann, Kai, Klaus Brummer and Niels Van Willigen (2017), “Coalition Governance and Foreign Policy Decision Making”, European Political Science, 16 (4): 489-501.
• Öniş, Ziya and James Riedel (1993), Economic Crises and Long-Term Growth in Turkey (Washington: The World Bank).
• Önsoy, Murat (2017), “Latin America-Turkey Relations: Reaching out to Distant Shores of the Western Hemisphere”, Gözen Ercan, Pınar (Ed.), Turkish Foreign Policy: International Relations, Legality and Global Reach (Cham: Palgrave Macmillan): 237-258.
• Örmeci, Ozan (2011), Portrait of a Turkish Social Democrat: Ismail Cem (Ph.D. Thesis) (Ankara: Bilkent University).
• Özcan, Gencer (2021), “Yetmişli Yıllarda ‘Dış Politika’”, Kaynar, Mete Kaan (Ed.), Türkiye’nin 1970’li Yılları (İstanbul: İletişim): 261-306.
• Özkan, Mehmet (2010), “What Drives Turkey’s Involvement in Africa?”, Review of African Political Economy, 37 (126): 533-540.
• Rathbun, Brian (2008), “A Rose by Any Other Name: Neoclassical Realism as the Logical and Necessary Extension of Structural Realism”, Security Studies, 17: 294-321.
• Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2022a), “Türkiye’s Political Relations with Russian Federation”, https://www.mfa.gov.tr/Türkiye_s-political-relations-with-russian-federation.en.mfa (20.06.2022).
• Republic of Türkiye Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2022b), “Türkiye’s Relations with the Latin American and the Caribbean Countries”, https://www.mfa.gov.tr/i_Türkiye_s-relations-with-the-latin-american-and-the-caribbean-countries.en.mfa (22.06.2022).
• Ripsman, Norrin M., Jeffrey W. Taliaferro and Steven E. Lobell (2016), Neoclassical Realist Theory of International Politics (New York: Oxford University Press).
• Ronen, Yehudit and Hay Eytan Cohen Yanarocak (2013), “Casting off the Shackles of Libya’s Arab-Middle Eastern Foreign Policy: A Unique Case of Rapprochement with Non-Arab Türkiye (1970s-2011)”, The Journal of North African Studies, 18 (3): 494-508.
• Rose, Gideon (1998), “Neoclassical Realism and Theories of Foreign Policy”, World Politics, 51 (1): 144-172.
• Salık, Nuri (2018), İki Darbe Arasında Türkiye’nin Suriye Politikası: 1960-1980 (Ph.D. Thesis) (Ankara: Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt Üniversitesi).
• Sanlı, Ferit Salim (2021), “Gazetecilik Yıllarında Bülent Ecevit ve Anti-Komünizm (1950-1961)”, Gazi Akademik Bakış, 15 (29): 131-154.
• Schweller, Randall L. (1998), Deadly Imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler’s Strategy of World Conquest (New York: Columbia University Press).
• Schweller, Randall L. (2004), “Unanswered Threats: A Neoclassical Realist Theory of Underbalancing”, International Security, 29 (2): 159-201.
• Sert, Hüseyin (2020), “Bir Raporun Hikayesi: Türkiye’nin Batı ile İttifakında Dışişleri Bürokrasisinin Rolü ve Bakanlık İçi Bir İtiraz Olarak Üçüncü Dünyacılık”, Ankara Üniversitesi SBF Dergisi, 75 (1): 97-125.
• Singer, Morris (1981), “Turkey in Crisis”, Current History, 80 (462): 27-31.
• Sinkaya, Bayram (2012), “Rationalization of Turkey-Iran Relations: Prospects and Limits”, Insight Türkiye, 14 (2): 137-156.
• Snyder, Jack L. (1991), Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition (Ithaca: Cornell University Press).
• Sowerwine, James Edward (1987), Dynamics of Decision-Making in Turkish Foreign Policy, 1961-1980 (Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis) (Madison: The University of Wisconsin-Madison).
• Stergiou, Andreas (2021), Greece’s Ostpolitik: Dealing with the “Devil” (Cham: Springer).
• Sterling-Folker, Jennifer (1997), “Realist Environment, Liberal Process, and Domestic-Level Variables”, International Studies Quarterly, 41 (1): 1-25.
• Taliaferro, Jeffrey W. (1998), “Quagmires in the Periphery: Foreign Wars and Escalating Commitment in International Conflict”, Security Studies, 7 (3): 94-144.
• Taliaferro, Jeffrey W., Steven E. Lobell, and Norrin M. Ripsman (2009), “Introduction: Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy”, Lobell, Steven E., Norrin M. Ripsman, Jeffrey W. Taliaferro, (Eds.), Neoclassical Realism, the State, and Foreign Policy (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press): 1-41.
• TBMM (1978), “Gündüz Ökçün-Dışişleri Bakanlığı 1978 Yılı Bütçe Kanunu Tasarısı Münasebetiyle”, Cumhuriyet Senatosu Tutanak Dergisi, 36: 199-369.
• TBMM (1979a), “Gündüz Ökçün-Cumhuriyet Senatosu Elazığ Üyesi Cahit Dalokay ve Arkadaşlarının, Türkiye’nin Dış İlişkileri Üzerinde Bir Genel Görüşme Açılmasına Dair Önergeleri Münasebetiyle”, Cumhuriyet Senatosu Tutanak Dergisi, 40: 149-180.
• TBMM (1979b), “Gündüz Ökçün-Dışişleri Bakanlığı 1979 yılı Bütçe Kanunu Tasarısı Münasebetiyle”, Cumhuriyet Senatosu Tutanak Dergisi, 41: 562-686.
• TBMM (1980), Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Hükümeti ile Sovyet Sosyalist Cumhuriyetleri Birliği Hükümeti Arasındaki Karadeniz’de Kıta Sahanlığı Sınırlandırması Hakkında Anlaşmanın Onaylanmasının Uygun Bulunduğuna İlişkin Kanun, https://www5.tbmm.gov.tr/tutanaklar/KANUNLAR_KARARLAR/kanuntbmmc064/kanunmgkc064/kanunmgkc06402355.pdf (10.06.2022).
• TBMM (2000), “İsmail-Cem Dış Siyasetteki Son Gelişmeler ve Gerçekleştirdiği Temaslara İlişkin”, Cumhuriyet Senatosu Tutanak Dergisi, 31: 191-380.
• TBMM (2020), Türkiye Cumhuriyeti Hükümeti ile Somali Federal Cumhuriyeti Hükümeti Arasında Enerji ve Madencilik Alanında İşbirliğine Dair Mutabakat Zaptı ile Mutabakat Zaptında Değişik Yapılmasına Dair Notaların Onaylanmasının Uygun Bulunduğuna Dair Kanun Teklifi, https://www.tbmm.gov.tr/Milletvekilleri/UyeKomisyonKonusmaTutanakDetay?tutanakId=34004 (17.06.2022).
• Tunç, Hakan (2003), “The Lost Gamble: The 2000 and 2001 Turkish Financial Crises in Comparative Perspective”, Öniş, Ziya and Barry Rubin (Eds.), The Turkish Economy in Crisis (London: Frank Cass): 31-53.
• UN (1978), Refusal of South Africa to Comply with UN Resolutions on Namibia, Situation in Namibia Resulting from the Illegal Occupation of the Territory by South Africa, Question of Southern Rhodesia, Declaration on Namibia and Programme of Action in Support of Self-Determination and National Independence for Namibia, https://digitallibrary.un.org/ (17.06.2022).
• UN (1979), Question of Namibia, Investments in South Africa, Military Collaboration with South Africa, Economic Collaboration with South Africa, Oil Embargo against South Africa, https://digitallibrary.un.org/ (17.06.2022).
• UN (1999), Necessity of Ending the Economic, Commercial and Financial Embargo Imposed by the United States of America against Cuba, https://digitallibrary.un.org/ (22.06.2022).
• UN (2000), Necessity of Ending the Economic, Commercial and Financial Embargo Imposed by the United States of America against Cuba, https://digitallibrary.un.org/ (22.06.2022).
• UN (2001), Necessity of Ending the Economic, Commercial and Financial Embargo Imposed by the United States of America against Cuba, https://digitallibrary.un.org/ (22.06.2022).
• UN (2002), Necessity of Ending the Economic, Commercial and Financial Embargo Imposed by the United States of America against Cuba, https://digitallibrary.un.org/ (22.06.2022).
• United States of America Department of State Office of the Historian (2022), “Détente and Arms Control, 1969–1979”, https://history.state.gov/milestones/1969-1976/detente (23.05.2022).
• Waltz, Kenneth N. (1979), Theory of International Politics (New York: McGraw Hill).
• Waltz, Kenneth N. (1996), “International Politics Is Not Foreign Policy”, Security Studies, 6 (1): 54-57.
• Whitney, Craig R. (1978), “Soviet Union and Turkey Sign Nonaggression, Trade and Cultural Pacts”, The New York Times, June 24, https://www.nytimes.com/1978/06/24/archives/soviet-union-and-Türkiye-sign-nonaggression-trade-and-cultural-pacts.html (09.06.2022).
• Wohlforth, William C. (1999), “The Stability of a Unipolar World”, International Security, 24 (1): 5-41.
• Wohlforth, William C. (2009), “Unipolarity, Status Competition, and Great Power War”, World Politics, 61 (1): 28-57.
• Wohlforth, William C. (2016), “Realism and Foreign Policy”, Smith, Steve, Amelia Hadfield, Tim Dunne, (Eds.), Foreign Policy: Theories, Actors, Cases (Oxford: Oxford University Press): 35-53.