Evaluation of an Organic Rankine Cycle Using a Non-Imaging Solar Concentrator for Different Working Fluids

Abstract

The Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) is a feasible technology that can be applied for small-scale power generation in residential and commercial buildings. However, a solar thermal power plant may not compete with that of a thermal power plant using conventional heat source such as coal or natural gas but environmental impact. On the other hand, the cost of a power plant may be reduced by improving the system performance. Using non-imaging concentrators can eliminate the necessity of sun tracking system. Covering the concentrators by evacuated glass tube can reduce the heat loss from the absorber, and improves the effective life-cycle of optical components. Therefore, a non-imaging concentrator was considered as a steam generator of solar power plant. In order to evaluate the system performance, simulations were conducted by using aspenHYSYS software for different working fluids. The maximum performance is obtained for the case of R-141b for the pressure difference of 39 bars to be 15.3%. The best performance improvement is attained for water and R-141b to be about 8.2% and 7.8%, respectively. The working fluid, R-141b shows a better performance due to its lower boiling point and may be preferable for small scale applications.

Keywords

• Organic Rankine Cycle, solar power, non-imaging, compound parabolic concentrator, involute reflector

Evaluation of an Organic Rankine Cycle Using a Non-Imaging Solar Concentrator for Different Working Fluids

Abstract

.

Keywords

• xx

References

1. Mehrabanjahromi MH, Gharehchahi H, Khosravi AR.Modelling and Simulation of a Hybrid Controller for Solar Thermal Generation, Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research. 2013; 3:149-155.
2. Rayegan R, Tao YX. A procedure to select working fluids for solar organic rankine cycle (ORCS). Renewable Energy, 2011;36: 659-670.
3. Wolpert JL, Riffat SB.Solar-powered Rankine system for domestic applications. Appl Therm Eng, 1996;16: 281–289.
4. Tchanche BF. Papadakis G, Lambrinos G, Frangoudakis A. Fluid selection for a low- temperature solar organic Rankine cycle. 2009; 29: 2468–2476.
5. Calise F, d’Accadia MD, Vicidomini M, Scarpellino M.Design and simulation of a prototype of a small-scale solar CHP system based on evacuated flat-plate solar collectors and Organic Rankine Cycle, 2015;90: 347-363.
6. Ustaoglu A, Okajima J, Zhang X, Maruyama S. Performance evaluation of a non-imaging solar concentrator in terms of optical and thermal characteristics, In Press (Early View Online) , Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy. (2015). DOI 10.1002/ep.12236
7. Howell JR, Bannerot RB, Vliet GC. Solar- Thermal Energy Systems Analysis and Design, (McGraw-Hill, 1982) p. 22.
8. Ogallagher, J.J., Snail, K., Winston, R., Peek, C., Garrison, J.D., A new evacuated CPC collector tube, Sol. Energy 29, 575–577(1982).

9. Snail, K., Ogallagher, J.J., Winston, R., A stationary evacuated collector with integrated concentrator, Sol. Energy 33, 441–449(1984).
10. Powell RL. CFC phase-out: have we met the challenge? Journal of Fluorine Chemistry, 13th European Symposium on Fluorine Chemistry (ESFC- 13). 2002; 114: 237 –250.