Research Article

A Comparative Study of Passive and Active Tumor Targeting Using Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery Systems

Volume: 6 Number: 1 January 31, 2018
EN TR

A Comparative Study of Passive and Active Tumor Targeting Using Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery Systems

Abstract

Nanoparticle-mediated drug targeting is an active area of cancer research and hold enormous potential in improving anticancer efficacy by providing tumor tissue specificity. Herein, tumor targeting capabilities of nanoparticles between passive targeting approach via the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect and active targeting approach via the biotin receptors were compared to determine targeting efficiency rates. For this reason, Fe3O4@SiO2(FITC)-DOX (for passive targeting) and Fe3O4@SiO2(FITC)-BTN/DOX (for active targeting) multifunctional nanoparticles combining imaging and therapy were used. Fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry were employed to both visualize and quantify the accumulation of nanoparticles into the tumor cells. The results demonstrated that active targeting strategy considerably enhanced nanoparticle accumulation in the cervical carcinoma HeLa cells with a 2-fold increase in comparison to passive targeting. Targeted nanoparticles exhibited higher cytotoxicity in cancer cells with an approximately 2.5-fold better half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) value than untargeted nanoparticles. Moreover, it was found that targeted nanoparticles increased the number of apoptotic cells by nearly 21.1% as compared to untargeted nanoparticles. These observations show that active tumor targeting drug delivery systems could be more promising for enhancing the chemotherapeutic effects of anticancer drugs as compared to passive tumor targeting drug delivery systems.

Keywords

References

  1. [1] L. Y. Rizzo, B. Theek, G. Storm, F. Kiessling and T. Lammers, “Recent progress in nanomedicine: therapeutic, diagnostic and theranostic applications”, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 24 (6), pp. 1159–1166, 2013. [2] I. Ojima, X. Geng, X. Wu, C. Qu, C. P. Borella, H. Xie, S. D. Wilhelm, B. A. Leece, L. M. Bartle, V. S. Goldmacher and R. V. J. Chari, “Tumor-Specific Novel Taxoid-Monoclonal Antibody Conjugates”, J. Med. Chem., 45, pp. 5620–5623, 2002. [3] S. Jaracz, J. Chen, L. V. Kuznetsova and I. Ojima, “Recent advances in tumor-targeting anticancer drug conjugates”, Bioorg. Med. Chem., 13, pp. 5043–5054, 2005. [4] S. M. Moghimi, A. C. Hunter and J. C. Murray, “Nanomedicine: current status and future prospects”, FASEB J., 19, pp. 311–330, 2005. [5] H. Maeda, J. Wu, T. Sawa, Y. Matsumura and K. Hori, “Tumor vascular permeability and the EPR effect in macromolecular therapeutics: a review”, J. Control. Release, 65 (1–2), pp. 271–284, 2000. [6] F. Danhier, O. Feron and V. Préat, “To exploit the tumor microenvironment: passive and active tumor targeting of nanocarriers for anti-cancer drug delivery, J. Control. Release”, 148 (2), pp. 135–146, 2010. [7] G. Russell-Jones, K. McTavish, J. McEwan, J. Rice and D. Nowotnik, “Vitamin-mediated targeting as a potential mechanism to increase drug uptake by tumors”, J. Inorg. Biochem., 98, pp. 1625–1633, 2004. [8] C. P. Leamon and J.A. Reddy, “Folate-targeted chemotherapy”, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 56, pp. 1127–1141, 2004. [9] G. Russell-Jones, K. McTavish and J. McEwan, “Preliminary studies on the selective accumulation of vitamin-targeted polymers within tumors”, J. Drug Target., 19(2), pp. 133–139, 2011. [10] S. Chen, X. Zhao, J. Chen, J. Chen, L. Kuznetsova, S. S. Wong and I. Ojima, “Mechanism-Based Tumor-Targeting Drug Delivery System. Validation of Efficient Vitamin Receptor-Mediated Endocytosis and Drug Release”, Bioconjug. Chem., 21, pp. 979–987, 2010. [11] C. Daglioglu, “Enhancing tumor cell response to multidrug resistance with pH-sensitive quercetin and doxorubicin conjugated multifunctional nanoparticles”, Colloids Surf. B Biointerfaces, 156, pp. 175–185, 2017. [12] C. Daglioglu, “Environmentally responsive dual-targeting nanoparticles: improving drug accumulation in cancer cells as a way of preventing anticancer drug efflux”, J. Pharma. Sci., (epub ahead of print) DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xphs.2017.10.029, 2017. [13] G. Minotti, P. Menna, E. Salvatorelli, G. Cairo and L. Gianni, “Anthracyclines: molecular advances and pharmacologic developments in antitumor activity and cardiotoxicity”, Pharmacol. Rev., 56, pp. 185–229, 2004. [14] C. Daglioglu and B. Okutucu, “Synthesis and characterization of AICAR and DOX conjugated multifunctional nanoparticles as a platform for synergistic inhibition of cancer cell growth”, Bioconjug. Chem., 27, pp. 1098−1111, 2016. [15] C. Daglioglu and B. Okutucu, “Therapeutic effects of AICAR and DOX conjugated multifunctional nanoparticles in sensitization and elimination of cancer cells via survivin targeting”, Pharm. Res., 34, pp. 175−84, 2017.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Engineering

Journal Section

Research Article

Authors

Cenk Dağlıoğlu
İZMİR YÜKSEK TEKNOLOJİ ENSTİTÜSÜ
0000-0002-3857-2317
Türkiye

Publication Date

January 31, 2018

Submission Date

November 7, 2017

Acceptance Date

December 28, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2018 Volume: 6 Number: 1

APA
Dağlıoğlu, C. (2018). A Comparative Study of Passive and Active Tumor Targeting Using Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery Systems. Academic Platform - Journal of Engineering and Science, 6(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.21541/apjes.349889
AMA
1.Dağlıoğlu C. A Comparative Study of Passive and Active Tumor Targeting Using Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery Systems. APJES. 2018;6(1):1-7. doi:10.21541/apjes.349889
Chicago
Dağlıoğlu, Cenk. 2018. “A Comparative Study of Passive and Active Tumor Targeting Using Nanoparticles As Drug Delivery Systems”. Academic Platform - Journal of Engineering and Science 6 (1): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.21541/apjes.349889.
EndNote
Dağlıoğlu C (January 1, 2018) A Comparative Study of Passive and Active Tumor Targeting Using Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery Systems. Academic Platform - Journal of Engineering and Science 6 1 1–7.
IEEE
[1]C. Dağlıoğlu, “A Comparative Study of Passive and Active Tumor Targeting Using Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery Systems”, APJES, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 1–7, Jan. 2018, doi: 10.21541/apjes.349889.
ISNAD
Dağlıoğlu, Cenk. “A Comparative Study of Passive and Active Tumor Targeting Using Nanoparticles As Drug Delivery Systems”. Academic Platform - Journal of Engineering and Science 6/1 (January 1, 2018): 1-7. https://doi.org/10.21541/apjes.349889.
JAMA
1.Dağlıoğlu C. A Comparative Study of Passive and Active Tumor Targeting Using Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery Systems. APJES. 2018;6:1–7.
MLA
Dağlıoğlu, Cenk. “A Comparative Study of Passive and Active Tumor Targeting Using Nanoparticles As Drug Delivery Systems”. Academic Platform - Journal of Engineering and Science, vol. 6, no. 1, Jan. 2018, pp. 1-7, doi:10.21541/apjes.349889.
Vancouver
1.Cenk Dağlıoğlu. A Comparative Study of Passive and Active Tumor Targeting Using Nanoparticles as Drug Delivery Systems. APJES. 2018 Jan. 1;6(1):1-7. doi:10.21541/apjes.349889

Cited By