Facebook Sosyal Sermayeyi Nasıl Etkiler?

Year 2018, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 39 - 61, 06.07.2018

Deniz Eniç

Abstract

Son dönemde
bilgi ve iletişim teknolojilerinde ortaya çıkan gelişmelerin sonucu olan
çevrimiçi sosyal paylaşım platformları, günümüzde sosyal ilişkilerin
sürdürülmesinde önemli rol oynamaktadır. Çevrimiçi sitelerin gün geçtikçe
popülerleşmesi, araştırmacıları bu platformların günlük yaşam çıktılarını incelemeye yönlendirmektedir. Mevcut makalenin temel amacı en popüler
sosyal ağ sitelerinden biri olan Facebook’un sosyal sermaye üzerine etkilerini
incelemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, alanda yapılan görgül çalışma bulguları
değerlendirilmiştir. İncelenen araştırmalar, Facebook kullanımı ve aracı sosyal
sermaye arasında pozitif bir ilişki olduğunu göstermektedir. Öte yandan, alan
yazında Facebook ve dayanışmacı sosyal sermaye arasındaki ilişkiye dair birbiri
ile çelişen bulgular mevcuttur. Ayrıca, ele alınan çalışmaların ardından tüm
Facebook eylemlerinin benzer düzeyde sosyallik içermediği ve Facebook’un sosyal
sermaye üzerindeki etkisinin sitede kullanılan iletişim pratiklerine bağlı
olduğu anlaşılmaktadır. Facebook gibi sosyal ağlarda
belirli iletişim pratiklerini kullanan kişiler, bu platformlardan daha fazla sosyal sermaye kazanmaktadır. Sonuç
olarak, mevcut makale boyunca Facebook’un sosyal sermaye üzerindeki rolü ve bu sitenin nasıl
etkin bir şekilde
kullanılabileceği hakkında hem kullanıcılara ve hem de araştırmacılara önemli bilgiler sunulmaktadır.

Keywords

Sosyal Ağ Siteleri, Facebook, Aracı Sosyal Sermaye, Dayanışmacı Sosyal Sermaye

How Does Facebook Affect Social Capital?

Abstract

Online social
sharing platforms, which are the result of recent developments in information and
communication technologies, play an important role in maintaining social
relationships today. The increase
in the popularity of online
sites lead researchers to study the daily life outputs of these
sites. The main purpose of the current
paper is to investigate impact
of Facebook, which is the one of the most popular social network
sites, on social capital. For this purpose, findings of the studies conducted in the field have been evaluated. The results of these studies
indicate that there is positive relationship between Facebook
use and bridging social capital. On the other hand, there exist conflicting
findings in the literature about association between Facebook and bonding
social capital. Also, after the studies
it has been noticed that not all Facebook activities are equally social and impact of this site on social
capital depends on communication practices used in there. Individuals who use
certain communication practices in social network sites like Facebook gain more
social capital from those platforms. To conclude, throughout the present article
crucial information is provided to both users and researchers about the role of
Facebook on social capital and how this platform can be used effectively.

Keywords

Social Network Sites, Facebook, Bridging Social Capital, Bonding Social Capital

References

• Abeele, M. M. V. Antheunis, M. L. Pollmann, M. M. Schouten, A. P. Liebrecht, C. C. van der Wijst, P. J. ... ve Maes, F. A. (2018). Does Facebook Use Predict College Students’ Social Capital? A Replication of Ellison, Steinfield, and Lampe’s (2007) Study Using the Original and More Recent Measures of Facebook Use and Social Capital. Communication Studies, 69(3), 272-282.
• Adler, P. S. ve Kwon, S. W. (2002). Social capital: Prospects for a new concept. Academy of Management Review, 27(1), 17-40.
• Ağcasulu, H. (2017). Sosyal sermaye kuramı ve temel bakış açılarının karşılaştırılması. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi Vizyoner Dergisi, 8(17), 114-129.
• Barkhuus, L. ve Tashiro, J. (2010). Student socialization in the age of Facebook. In Proceedings of the sigchi conference on human factors in computing systems (133-142). Newyork: ACM.
• Bohn, A. Buchta, C. Hornik, K. ve Mair, P. (2014). Making friends and communicating on Facebook: Implications for the access to social capital. Social Networks, 37, 29-41.
• Brandtzæg, P. B. (2012). Social networking sites: Their users and social implications-A longitudinal study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(4), 467-488.
• Brandtzæg, P. B. Lüders, M. ve Skjetne, J. H. (2010). Too many Facebook “friends”? Content sharing and sociability versus the need for privacy in social network sites. Intl. Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 26(11-12), 1006-1030.
• Burke, M. Kraut, R. ve Marlow, C. (2011). Social capital on Facebook: Differentiating uses and users. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (571-580), Newyork: ACM.
• Burke, M. Marlow, C. ve Lento, T. (2010). Social network activity and social well-being. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (1909- 1912). Newyork: ACM. Ellison, N. B. Steinfield, C. ve Lampe, C. (2007). The benefits of Facebook “friends:” Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 12(4), 1143-1168.
• Ellison, N. B. Steinfield, C. ve Lampe, C. (2010). Connection strategies: Social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media & Society, 1-20.
• Ellison, N. B. Vitak, J. Gray, R. ve Lampe, C. (2014). Cultivating social resources on social network sites: Facebook relationship maintenance behaviors and their role in social capital processes. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 19(4), 855-870.
• Ertan, A. (2010). The determinants of social capital on Facebook. Science and Technology Policies Research Center TEKPOL Working Paper Series [online]. Middle East Technical University.
• Giordano, G. N. ve Lindstrom, M. (2010). The impact of changes in different aspects of social capital and material conditions on self-rated health over time: A longitudinal cohort study. Social Science & Medicine, 70(5), 700-710.
• Haythornthwaite, C. (2005). Social networks and Internet connectivity effects. Information, Community & Society, 8(2), 125-147.
• Hudaykulov, A. ve Hongyi, X. (2015). The effects of social capital on team performance: A study of RD departments in Uzbekistan. International Journal of Innovation and Economic Development, 1(1), 80-91.
• Johnston, K. Tanner, M. Lalla, N. ve Kawalski, D. (2013). Social capital: The benefit of Facebook ‘friends’. Behaviour & Information Technology, 32(1), 24-36.
• Karagülle, A. E. ve Çaycı, B. (2014). Ağ toplumunda sosyalleşme ve yabancılaşma. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 4(1), 1-9.
• Kılıç, Ç. (2015). Gündem Belirleme Kuramı Çerçevesinde Siyasal Karar Verme Sürecine Sosyal Medya Etkisinin İncelenmesi (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi). İstanbul Ticaret Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul. Kraut, R. Kiesler, S. Boneva, B. Cummings, J. Helgeson, V. ve Crawford, A. (2002). Internet paradox revisited. Journal of Social Issues, 58(1), 49-74.
• Kraut, R. Patterson, M. Lundmark, V. Kiesler, S. Mukophadhyay, T. ve Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being?. American Psychologist, 53(9), 1017-1031.
• Kwon, M. W. D’Angelo, J. ve McLeod, D. M. (2013). Facebook use and social capital: To bond, to bridge, or to escape. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 33(1-2), 35-43.
• Nie, N. H. (2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the Internet: Reconciling conflicting findings. American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 420-435.
• Ongan, N. T. (2013). Sosyal Uyum-Sosyal Sermaye Eksenli Kalkınma Yaklaşımının Sınıfsal Sonuçlarına İlişkin Bir Değerlendirme. Çalışma ve Toplum, 36(1), 211-227.
• Parks, M. R. ve Floyd, K. (1996). Making friends in cyberspace. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 1(4), JCMC144.
• Prince, M. J. Harwood, R. H. Blizard, R. A. Thomas, A. ve Mann, A. H. (1997). Social support deficits, loneliness and life events as risk factors for depression in old age. The Gospel Oak Project VI. Psychological Medicine, 27(2), 323-332.
• Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Newyork: Simon and Schuster.
• Raza, S. A. Qazi, W. ve Umer, A. (2016). Facebook is a source of social capital building among university students: evidence from a developing country. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 55(3), 295-322.
• Steinfield, C. Ellison, N. B. ve Lampe, C. (2008). Social capital, self-esteem, and use of online social network sites: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 434-445.
• Subrahmanyam, K. Reich, S. M. Waechter, N. ve Espinoza, G. (2008). Online and offline social networks: Use of social networking sites by emerging adults. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 29(6), 420-433. Valenzuela, S. Park, N. ve Kee, K. F. (2009). Is there social capital in a social network site?: Facebook use and college students' life satisfaction, trust, and participation1. Journal of Computer‐Mediated Communication, 14(4), 875-901.
• Yıldız, M. (2017) İletişim sürecinde sosyal medya ve sosyal sermaye. The Journal of Social Science, 1(2), 71-82.