Research Article

Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures

Volume: 12 Number: 1 February 27, 2026
EN TR

Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures

Abstract

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of three different intravenous induction agents—propofol, etomidate, and thiopental—on hemodynamic parameters, recovery times, and postoperative cognitive functions in patients undergoing short-duration ambulatory vaginal gynecologic procedures. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at the Gynecology and Obstetrics Operating Room of Istanbul Training and Research Hospital between March and May 2010. A total of 120 patients, aged 25–75 years and classified as ASA physical status I–II, were included. Patients were randomly divided into three groups: Group P (Propofol 2 mg·kg⁻¹), Group E (Etomidate 0.3 mg·kg⁻¹), and Group T (Thiopental 5–7 mg·kg⁻¹). All groups received fentanyl 1.5 µg·kg⁻¹ for analgesia. Hemodynamic parameters, recovery times, Ramsey Sedation Scores, and Mini-Mental Test (MMT) scores were recorded and analyzed. Results: In Group P, significant decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were observed following induction (p<0.05). Group E maintained hemodynamic stability, whereas Group T exhibited moderate hypotension. Recovery time was significantly shorter in Group P compared to the other groups (p<0.01). There were no significant differences in MMT scores among the groups at the postoperative 30ᵗʰ minute (p>0.05), whereas at the 2ⁿᵈ hour, Groups P and E showed higher scores than Group T (p<0.05). Conclusion: In ambulatory gynecologic procedures, propofol demonstrated a favorable profile with respect to rapid recovery and early improvement in postoperative cognitive function. Etomidate appeared advantageous in maintaining hemodynamic stability and may be considered a suitable alternative, particularly for patients with cardiovascular risk or hemodynamic vulnerability. However, anesthetic selection in the general population should be individualized based on patient characteristics and surgical conditions. Thiopental was associated with prolonged recovery and delayed cognitive restoration in some cases, and these findings warrant confirmation in larger, multicenter studies.

Keywords

References

  1. Aggarwal, S., Goyal, V. K., Chaturvedi, S. K., Mathur, V., Baj, B., & Kumar, A. (2016). A comparative study between propofol and etomidate in patients under general anesthesia. Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier), 66(3), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2014.10.005
  2. Alappat, A. M. (2018). Evaluation of Haemodynamic Stability Following Induction of General Anaesthesia with Propofol and Etomidate in Normotensive and Hypertensive Patients: A Comparative Study (Doctoral dissertation, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (India)).
  3. Apfelbaum, J. L., Hagberg, C. A., Connis, R. T., Abdelmalak, B. B., Agarkar, M., Dutton, R. P., Fiadjoe, J. E., Greif, R., Klock, P. A., Mercier, D., Myatra, S. N., O'Sullivan, E. P., Rosenblatt, W. H., Sorbello, M., & Tung, A. (2022). 2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology, 136(1), 31–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004002
  4. Bilotta, F., Stazi, E., Zlotnik, A., Gruenbaum, S. E., & Rosa, G. (2014). Neuroprotective effects of intravenous anesthetics: a new critical perspective. Current pharmaceutical design, 20(34), 5469–5475. https:// doi.org/10.2174/1381612820666140325110113
  5. Butterfield, N. N., Graf, P., Macleod, B. A., Ries, C. R., & Zis, A. P. (2004). Propofol reduces cognitive impairment after electroconvulsive therapy. The journal of ECT, 20(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00124509- 200403000-00002
  6. Canbek, O., Ipekcıoglu, D., Menges, O. O., Atagun, M. I., Karamustafalıoglu, N., Cetinkaya, O. Z., & Ilnem, M. C. (2015). Comparison of Propofol, Etomidate, and Thiopental in Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial. The journal of ECT, 31(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000190
  7. Deng, Q., Tang, M., Gao, J., & Liang, P. (2025). Association between gut microbiota dysbiosis and perioperative neurocognitive disorder and postoperative complications after valve replacement surgery: a prospective cohort study. BMC anesthesiology, 26(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12871-025-03521-0
  8. Evered, L., Silbert, B., Knopman, D. S., Scott, D. A., DeKosky, S. T., Rasmussen, L. S., Oh, E. S., Crosby, G., Berger, M., Eckenhoff, R. G., & Nomenclature Consensus Working Group (2018). Recommendations for the Nomenclature of Cognitive Change Associated with Anaesthesia and Surgery-2018. Anesthesiology, 129(5), 872–879. https://doi.org/10.1097/ ALN.0000000000002334

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Medical Education

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

February 27, 2026

Submission Date

October 16, 2025

Acceptance Date

February 18, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 12 Number: 1

APA
Kumaş Solak, S., Vatansever, Ş., & Tozan, E. N. (2026). Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures. Aydın Sağlık Dergisi, 12(1), 61-74. https://izlik.org/JA26PK92SM
AMA
1.Kumaş Solak S, Vatansever Ş, Tozan EN. Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures. Aydın Health. 2026;12(1):61-74. https://izlik.org/JA26PK92SM
Chicago
Kumaş Solak, Sezen, Şule Vatansever, and Emine Nur Tozan. 2026. “Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures”. Aydın Sağlık Dergisi 12 (1): 61-74. https://izlik.org/JA26PK92SM.
EndNote
Kumaş Solak S, Vatansever Ş, Tozan EN (February 1, 2026) Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures. Aydın Sağlık Dergisi 12 1 61–74.
IEEE
[1]S. Kumaş Solak, Ş. Vatansever, and E. N. Tozan, “Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures”, Aydın Health, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 61–74, Feb. 2026, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA26PK92SM
ISNAD
Kumaş Solak, Sezen - Vatansever, Şule - Tozan, Emine Nur. “Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures”. Aydın Sağlık Dergisi 12/1 (February 1, 2026): 61-74. https://izlik.org/JA26PK92SM.
JAMA
1.Kumaş Solak S, Vatansever Ş, Tozan EN. Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures. Aydın Health. 2026;12:61–74.
MLA
Kumaş Solak, Sezen, et al. “Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures”. Aydın Sağlık Dergisi, vol. 12, no. 1, Feb. 2026, pp. 61-74, https://izlik.org/JA26PK92SM.
Vancouver
1.Sezen Kumaş Solak, Şule Vatansever, Emine Nur Tozan. Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures. Aydın Health [Internet]. 2026 Feb. 1;12(1):61-74. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA26PK92SM

All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Common Attribution Licence. (CC-BY-NC 4.0)