Araştırma Makalesi

Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures

Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1 27 Şubat 2026
PDF İndir
EN TR

Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures

Öz

ABSTRACT Objective: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of three different intravenous induction agents—propofol, etomidate, and thiopental—on hemodynamic parameters, recovery times, and postoperative cognitive functions in patients undergoing short-duration ambulatory vaginal gynecologic procedures. Methods: This prospective observational study was conducted at the Gynecology and Obstetrics Operating Room of Istanbul Training and Research Hospital between March and May 2010. A total of 120 patients, aged 25–75 years and classified as ASA physical status I–II, were included. Patients were randomly divided into three groups: Group P (Propofol 2 mg·kg⁻¹), Group E (Etomidate 0.3 mg·kg⁻¹), and Group T (Thiopental 5–7 mg·kg⁻¹). All groups received fentanyl 1.5 µg·kg⁻¹ for analgesia. Hemodynamic parameters, recovery times, Ramsey Sedation Scores, and Mini-Mental Test (MMT) scores were recorded and analyzed. Results: In Group P, significant decreases in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were observed following induction (p<0.05). Group E maintained hemodynamic stability, whereas Group T exhibited moderate hypotension. Recovery time was significantly shorter in Group P compared to the other groups (p<0.01). There were no significant differences in MMT scores among the groups at the postoperative 30ᵗʰ minute (p>0.05), whereas at the 2ⁿᵈ hour, Groups P and E showed higher scores than Group T (p<0.05). Conclusion: In ambulatory gynecologic procedures, propofol demonstrated a favorable profile with respect to rapid recovery and early improvement in postoperative cognitive function. Etomidate appeared advantageous in maintaining hemodynamic stability and may be considered a suitable alternative, particularly for patients with cardiovascular risk or hemodynamic vulnerability. However, anesthetic selection in the general population should be individualized based on patient characteristics and surgical conditions. Thiopental was associated with prolonged recovery and delayed cognitive restoration in some cases, and these findings warrant confirmation in larger, multicenter studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Kaynakça

  1. Aggarwal, S., Goyal, V. K., Chaturvedi, S. K., Mathur, V., Baj, B., & Kumar, A. (2016). A comparative study between propofol and etomidate in patients under general anesthesia. Brazilian journal of anesthesiology (Elsevier), 66(3), 237–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2014.10.005
  2. Alappat, A. M. (2018). Evaluation of Haemodynamic Stability Following Induction of General Anaesthesia with Propofol and Etomidate in Normotensive and Hypertensive Patients: A Comparative Study (Doctoral dissertation, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (India)).
  3. Apfelbaum, J. L., Hagberg, C. A., Connis, R. T., Abdelmalak, B. B., Agarkar, M., Dutton, R. P., Fiadjoe, J. E., Greif, R., Klock, P. A., Mercier, D., Myatra, S. N., O'Sullivan, E. P., Rosenblatt, W. H., Sorbello, M., & Tung, A. (2022). 2022 American Society of Anesthesiologists Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology, 136(1), 31–81. https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000004002
  4. Bilotta, F., Stazi, E., Zlotnik, A., Gruenbaum, S. E., & Rosa, G. (2014). Neuroprotective effects of intravenous anesthetics: a new critical perspective. Current pharmaceutical design, 20(34), 5469–5475. https:// doi.org/10.2174/1381612820666140325110113
  5. Butterfield, N. N., Graf, P., Macleod, B. A., Ries, C. R., & Zis, A. P. (2004). Propofol reduces cognitive impairment after electroconvulsive therapy. The journal of ECT, 20(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00124509- 200403000-00002
  6. Canbek, O., Ipekcıoglu, D., Menges, O. O., Atagun, M. I., Karamustafalıoglu, N., Cetinkaya, O. Z., & Ilnem, M. C. (2015). Comparison of Propofol, Etomidate, and Thiopental in Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Randomized, Double-blind Clinical Trial. The journal of ECT, 31(2), 91–97. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCT.0000000000000190
  7. Deng, Q., Tang, M., Gao, J., & Liang, P. (2025). Association between gut microbiota dysbiosis and perioperative neurocognitive disorder and postoperative complications after valve replacement surgery: a prospective cohort study. BMC anesthesiology, 26(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/ s12871-025-03521-0
  8. Evered, L., Silbert, B., Knopman, D. S., Scott, D. A., DeKosky, S. T., Rasmussen, L. S., Oh, E. S., Crosby, G., Berger, M., Eckenhoff, R. G., & Nomenclature Consensus Working Group (2018). Recommendations for the Nomenclature of Cognitive Change Associated with Anaesthesia and Surgery-2018. Anesthesiology, 129(5), 872–879. https://doi.org/10.1097/ ALN.0000000000002334

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil

İngilizce

Konular

Tıp Eğitimi

Bölüm

Araştırma Makalesi

Yayımlanma Tarihi

27 Şubat 2026

Gönderilme Tarihi

16 Ekim 2025

Kabul Tarihi

18 Şubat 2026

Yayımlandığı Sayı

Yıl 2026 Cilt: 12 Sayı: 1

Kaynak Göster

APA
Kumaş Solak, S., Vatansever, Ş., & Tozan, E. N. (2026). Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures. Aydın Sağlık Dergisi, 12(1), 61-74. https://izlik.org/JA26PK92SM
AMA
1.Kumaş Solak S, Vatansever Ş, Tozan EN. Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures. Aydın Sağlık. 2026;12(1):61-74. https://izlik.org/JA26PK92SM
Chicago
Kumaş Solak, Sezen, Şule Vatansever, ve Emine Nur Tozan. 2026. “Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures”. Aydın Sağlık Dergisi 12 (1): 61-74. https://izlik.org/JA26PK92SM.
EndNote
Kumaş Solak S, Vatansever Ş, Tozan EN (01 Şubat 2026) Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures. Aydın Sağlık Dergisi 12 1 61–74.
IEEE
[1]S. Kumaş Solak, Ş. Vatansever, ve E. N. Tozan, “Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures”, Aydın Sağlık, c. 12, sy 1, ss. 61–74, Şub. 2026, [çevrimiçi]. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA26PK92SM
ISNAD
Kumaş Solak, Sezen - Vatansever, Şule - Tozan, Emine Nur. “Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures”. Aydın Sağlık Dergisi 12/1 (01 Şubat 2026): 61-74. https://izlik.org/JA26PK92SM.
JAMA
1.Kumaş Solak S, Vatansever Ş, Tozan EN. Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures. Aydın Sağlık. 2026;12:61–74.
MLA
Kumaş Solak, Sezen, vd. “Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures”. Aydın Sağlık Dergisi, c. 12, sy 1, Şubat 2026, ss. 61-74, https://izlik.org/JA26PK92SM.
Vancouver
1.Sezen Kumaş Solak, Şule Vatansever, Emine Nur Tozan. Comparison of the Effects of Different Anesthetic Agents on Hemodynamics, Recovery, and Postoperative Cognitive Function in Ambulatory Gynecologic Procedures. Aydın Sağlık [Internet]. 01 Şubat 2026;12(1):61-74. Erişim adresi: https://izlik.org/JA26PK92SM

All site content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Common Attribution Licence. (CC-BY-NC 4.0)

by-nc.png