Research Article

Comparision of MALDI-TOF MS, RAPID ID 32 A, and multiplex real time-PCR for identification of Clostridioides difficile in mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and seawater

Volume: 41 Number: 2 April 29, 2026
EN

Comparision of MALDI-TOF MS, RAPID ID 32 A, and multiplex real time-PCR for identification of Clostridioides difficile in mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and seawater

Abstract

The fact that Clostridioides difficile, known as a nosocomial pathogen, causes infections in individuals lacking traditional risk factors raises the possibility that its source may not be confined to hospital environments. In this context, investigating food matrices and accurately identifying presumptive isolates are important for understanding the possible foodborne relevance of this bacterium. This study comparatively evaluated two selective supplement systems, D-cycloserine–cefoxitin (CC) and moxalactam–norfloxacin (MN), for the recovery of presumptive C. difficile isolates from 536 mussels collected from nine sites in Çanakkale, Turkey, together with seawater samples obtained from the same locations. Presumptive isolates were further examined using MALDI-TOF MS (Bruker and VITEK MS), RAPID ID 32 A, and multiplex real-time PCR. Considerable discrepancies were observed among the identification methods. In particular, one isolate recovered from mussels was identified as C. bifermentans by MALDI-TOF MS but as C. difficile by RAPID ID 32 A; however, this result was not confirmed by PCR. Overall, none of the presumptive isolates from mussel or seawater samples were confirmed as C. difficile by multiplex real-time PCR. These findings demonstrate that detection outcomes are strongly influenced by both the isolation strategy and the identification method used. They also indicate that presumptive recovery and preliminary identification do not necessarily correspond to confirmed C. difficile detection in complex food and environmental matrices. Therefore, molecular confirmation remains essential, and further methodological improvements are needed to improve the reliable detection of C. difficile in food samples.

Keywords

References

  1. Agnoletti, F., Arcangeli, G., Barbanti, F., Barco, L., Brunetta, R., Cocchi, M., Conedera, G., D’Este, L., Drigo, I., Spigaglia, P., & Mazzolini, E. (2019). Survey, characterization and antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridium difficile from marine bivalve shellfish of North Adriatic Sea. International Journal of Food Microbiology, 298, 74–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2019.03.003 google scholar
  2. Akkaya, E., Hampikyan, H., Muratoglu, K., Colak, H., & Bingol, E. B. (2024). Detection, characterization and antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridioides difficile from seafood of Marmara Sea, Turkey. International Journal of Environmental Health Research, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/09603123.2024.2439459 google scholar
  3. Al Saif, N., & Brazier, J. S. (1996). The distribution of Clostridium difficile in the environment of South Wales. Journal of Medical Microbiology, 45(2), 133–137. https://doi.org/10.1099/00222615-45-2-133 google scholar
  4. Atasaral, Ş., Khan, U., Terzi, Y., & Seyhan, K. (2020). Mussel: a potential pollution indicator in the aquatic ecosystem and effect of climate change. International Journal of Environment and Geoinformatics, 7(3), 300–304. https://doi.org/10.30897/ijegeo.788272 google scholar
  5. Bakhtiary, F., Sayevand, H. R., Remely, M., Hippe, B., Indra, A., Hosseini, H., & Haslberger, A. G. (2018). Identification of Clostridium spp. derived from a sheep and cattle slaughterhouse by matrix-assisted laser desorption and ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and 16S rDNA sequencing. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 55(8), 3232–3240. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13197- 018-3255-2 google scholar
  6. Barbosa, J., Campos, A., & Teixeira, P. (2020). Methods currently applied to study the prevalence of Clostridioides difficile in foods. AIMS Agriculture and Food, 5(1), 102–128. https://doi.org/10.3934/agrfood.2020.1.102 google scholar
  7. Eckert, C., Jones, G., & Barbut, F. (2013). Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection: the molecular approach. Future Microbiology, 8(12), 1587-1598. https://doi.org/10.2217/fmb.13.129 google scholar
  8. Fontana, C., Jezzi, T., Dainelli, B., & Testore, G. P. (1995). Differentiation of Clostridium difficile, Clostridium bifermentans, Clostridium sordellii, and Clostridium perfringens from Diarrheal Stool by API ZYM and API LRA Oxidase Test. Microbiology and Immunology, 39(4), 231–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1348- 0421.1995.tb02194.x google scholar

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

Ecology (Other)

Journal Section

Research Article

Publication Date

April 29, 2026

Submission Date

February 13, 2026

Acceptance Date

April 10, 2026

Published in Issue

Year 2026 Volume: 41 Number: 2

APA
Taylan Yalçın, G., Tosun Demir, M. N., Numanoğlu Çevik, Y., & Demirel Zorba, N. N. (2026). Comparision of MALDI-TOF MS, RAPID ID 32 A, and multiplex real time-PCR for identification of Clostridioides difficile in mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and seawater. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering, 41(2), 137-144. https://doi.org/10.26650/ASE.2026.1887297
AMA
1.Taylan Yalçın G, Tosun Demir MN, Numanoğlu Çevik Y, Demirel Zorba NN. Comparision of MALDI-TOF MS, RAPID ID 32 A, and multiplex real time-PCR for identification of Clostridioides difficile in mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and seawater. Aqua Sci Eng. 2026;41(2):137-144. doi:10.26650/ASE.2026.1887297
Chicago
Taylan Yalçın, Gizem, Melike Nur Tosun Demir, Yasemin Numanoğlu Çevik, and Nükhet Nilüfer Demirel Zorba. 2026. “Comparision of MALDI-TOF MS, RAPID ID 32 A, and Multiplex Real Time-PCR for Identification of Clostridioides Difficile in Mussels (Mytilus Galloprovincialis) and Seawater”. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering 41 (2): 137-44. https://doi.org/10.26650/ASE.2026.1887297.
EndNote
Taylan Yalçın G, Tosun Demir MN, Numanoğlu Çevik Y, Demirel Zorba NN (April 1, 2026) Comparision of MALDI-TOF MS, RAPID ID 32 A, and multiplex real time-PCR for identification of Clostridioides difficile in mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and seawater. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering 41 2 137–144.
IEEE
[1]G. Taylan Yalçın, M. N. Tosun Demir, Y. Numanoğlu Çevik, and N. N. Demirel Zorba, “Comparision of MALDI-TOF MS, RAPID ID 32 A, and multiplex real time-PCR for identification of Clostridioides difficile in mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and seawater”, Aqua Sci Eng, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 137–144, Apr. 2026, doi: 10.26650/ASE.2026.1887297.
ISNAD
Taylan Yalçın, Gizem - Tosun Demir, Melike Nur - Numanoğlu Çevik, Yasemin - Demirel Zorba, Nükhet Nilüfer. “Comparision of MALDI-TOF MS, RAPID ID 32 A, and Multiplex Real Time-PCR for Identification of Clostridioides Difficile in Mussels (Mytilus Galloprovincialis) and Seawater”. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering 41/2 (April 1, 2026): 137-144. https://doi.org/10.26650/ASE.2026.1887297.
JAMA
1.Taylan Yalçın G, Tosun Demir MN, Numanoğlu Çevik Y, Demirel Zorba NN. Comparision of MALDI-TOF MS, RAPID ID 32 A, and multiplex real time-PCR for identification of Clostridioides difficile in mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and seawater. Aqua Sci Eng. 2026;41:137–144.
MLA
Taylan Yalçın, Gizem, et al. “Comparision of MALDI-TOF MS, RAPID ID 32 A, and Multiplex Real Time-PCR for Identification of Clostridioides Difficile in Mussels (Mytilus Galloprovincialis) and Seawater”. Aquatic Sciences and Engineering, vol. 41, no. 2, Apr. 2026, pp. 137-44, doi:10.26650/ASE.2026.1887297.
Vancouver
1.Gizem Taylan Yalçın, Melike Nur Tosun Demir, Yasemin Numanoğlu Çevik, Nükhet Nilüfer Demirel Zorba. Comparision of MALDI-TOF MS, RAPID ID 32 A, and multiplex real time-PCR for identification of Clostridioides difficile in mussels (Mytilus galloprovincialis) and seawater. Aqua Sci Eng. 2026 Apr. 1;41(2):137-44. doi:10.26650/ASE.2026.1887297

openaccess.jpgOpen Access Statement:
This is an open access journal which means that all content is freely available without charge to the user or his/her institution. Users are allowed to read, download, copy, distribute, print, search, or link to the full texts of the articles, or use them for any other lawful purpose, without asking prior permission from the publisher or the author. This is in accordance with the BOAI definition of open access.