THE POLITICAL PARTICIPATION OF YOUNG WOMEN: GLOBAL BARRIERS AND STRATEGIES

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 12 Sayı: 4, 90 - 116, 31.10.2025

Cüneyt Yılmaz

Öz

The political participation of young women is vital for enhancing democratic inclusivity and promoting gender equality. However, despite increasing global awareness, young women remain significantly underrepresented in political institutions. This underrepresentation is shaped by structural, cultural, and institutional barriers, including entrenched gender norms, unequal access to education and economic resources, male-dominated party structures, and various forms of political violence. Age-based discrimination further compounds these issues, producing intersectional exclusion.
This study employs a qualitative literature review grounded in feminist political theory, intersectionality, and participatory democracy to analyze the multidimensional constraints on young women’s political participation. The discussion addresses systemic exclusion, strategies of resistance, and regional variations. For example, while gender quotas and youth-oriented reforms have fostered progress in Africa and Latin America, persistent patriarchal norms and restrictions on civic engagement continue to impede representation in the Middle East and South Asia.
Emerging avenues such as digital activism, youth-led movements, and transnational feminist networks offer new spaces for engagement. Mentorship and leadership development programs also strengthen political agency. Ultimately, enhancing young women’s participation requires not only legal and institutional reform but also deep cultural transformation and sustained policy commitment. Such engagement is not solely a matter of justice; it is fundamental to building more inclusive and resilient democracies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Young Women , Political Participation , Gender Equality , Global Trends , Representation

Kaynakça

• Abu-Lughod, L. (2013). Do Muslim women need saving? Harvard University Press. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674726338
• Acar, F., & Ayata, A. G. (2019). Gender and politics in Türkiye. Social Politics, 26(4), 567–586.
• Arat, Y. (1989). The patriarchal paradox: Women politicians in Türkiye. Associated University Presses.
• Aydemir, S., & Koyuncu, B. (2020). Gender quotas in Turkish politics: Opportunities and limits. Turkish Studies, 21(6), 875–893.
• Bauer, G., & Burnet, J. E. (2013). Gender quotas, democracy, and women's representation in Africa: Some insights from democratic Botswana and autocratic Rwanda. Women's Studies International Forum, 41, 103–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wsif.2013.05.010
• Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012). The logic of connective action: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics. Information, Communication & Society, 15(5), 739–768. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.674089
• Bjarnegård, E., & Zetterberg, P. (2019). Political parties and gender quota implementation: The role of bureaucratized candidate selection procedures. Comparative Political Studies, 52(1), 69–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414018758757
• Celis, K., Kantola, J., Krook, M. L., & Mackay, F. (Eds.). (2014). Routledge handbook of gender and politics. Routledge.
• Childs, S., & Krook, M. L. (2009). Analysing women’s substantive representation: From critical mass to critical actors. Government and Opposition, 44(2), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1477-7053.2009.01279.x
• Citron, D. K. (2014). Hate crimes in cyberspace. Harvard University Press.
• Crenshaw, K. (1989). Demarginalizing the intersection of race and sex: A Black feminist critique of antidiscrimination doctrine, feminist theory and antiracist politics. University of Chicago Legal Forum, 1989(1), 139–167.
• Dahlerup, D. (2006). Women, quotas and politics. Routledge.
• Dahlerup, D., & Freidenvall, L. (2005). Quotas as a 'fast track' to equal representation for women: Why Scandinavia is no longer the model. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 7(1), 26–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/1461674042000314623
• Eagly, A. H., & Carli, L. L. (2007). Through the labyrinth: The truth about how women become leaders. Harvard Business School Press.
• European Institute for Gender Equality. (2022). Gender equality index 2020: Youth and gender equality.https://eige.europa.eu/publications/gender-equality-index-2020-youth-and-gender-equality
• Flanagan, C., & Levine, P. (2010). Civic engagement and the transition to adulthood. The Future of Children, 20(1), 159–179.
• Franceschet, S., & Piscopo, J. M. (2008). Gender quotas and women’s substantive representation: Lessons from Argentina. Politics & Gender, 4(3), 393–425. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1743923X08000342
• Grasso, M., & Giugni, M. (2022). Youth doing politics in times of increasing inequalities. Political Studies, 70(4), 889–908.
• Henn, M., & Foard, N. (2014). Social differentiation in young people's political participation:The impact of social and educational factors on youth political engagement in Britain. Journal of Youth Studies, 17(3), 360–380. https://doi.org/10.1080/13676261.2013.830704
• Htun, M., & Ossa, J. P. (2013). Political inclusion of marginalized groups: Indigenous reservations and gender parity in Bolivia. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 1(1), 4–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2012.757396
• Inglehart, R., & Norris, P. (2003). Rising tide: Gender equality and cultural change around the world. Cambridge University Press.
• İngün Karkış, Ö. (2023). Gender asymmetry in local politics: Women’s representation in local elections in the Republic of Türkiye. Paradigma: İktisadi ve İdari Araştırmalar Dergisi, 12(99), 29–117.
• Inter-Parliamentary Union. (2023). Women in national parliaments. https://data.ipu.org/women-ranking
• Inter-Parliamentary Union (IPU). (2024). Women in parliament: 2024. IPU. https://www.ipu.org/resources/publications/reports/2024-03/women-in-parliament-2024
• IPU & UN Women. (2021). Women in politics: 2021. https://www.unwomen.org/en/digital-library/publications/2021/03/women-in-politics-map-2021
• Krook, M. L. (2009). Quotas for women in politics: Gender and candidate selection reform worldwide. Oxford University Press.
• Krook, M. L. (2010). Quotas for women in politics: Gender and candidate selection reform worldwide. Oxford University Press.
• Krook, M. L. (2020). Violence against women in politics. Oxford University Press.
• Krook, M. L. (2020). Quotas for women in politics: Gender and candidate selection reform worldwide (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.
• Mama, A. (2011). What does it mean to do feminist research in African contexts? Feminist Review, 98, 4–20. https://doi.org/10.1057/fr.2011.7
• Mansbridge, J. (1999). Should blacks represent blacks and women represent women? A contingent “yes”. The Journal of Politics, 61(3), 628–657. https://doi.org/10.2307/2647821
• Moghadam, V. M. (2003). Modernizing women: Gender and social change in the Middle East (2nd ed.). Lynne Rienner Publishers.
• Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406917733847
• Paxton, P., & Hughes, M. M. (2017). Women, politics, and power: A global perspective (3rd ed.). CQ Press.
• Paxton, P., Hughes, M. M., & Green, J. L. (2021). The women’s political representation dataset (WPRD). Comparative Political Studies, 54(3–4), 493–525.
• Plan International. (2022). Equal Power Now: Girls, young women & political participation. https://plan-international.org/publications Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. University of California Press.
• Schwindt-Bayer, L. A. (2010). Political power and women's representation in Latin America. Oxford University Press.
• Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
• Theocharis, Y., Lowe, W., van Deth, J. W., & García-Albacete, G. M. (2015). Using Twitter to mobilize protest action: Online mobilization patterns and action repertoires in the Occupy Wall Street, Indignados, and Aganaktismenoi movements. Information, Communication & Society, 18(2), 202–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2014.948035
• Tripp, A. M. (2015). Women and power in postconflict Africa. Cambridge University Press.
• Tripp, A. M., Casimiro, I., Kwesiga, J., & Mungwa, A. (2009). African women’s movements: Transforming political landscapes. Cambridge University Press.
• UN Women. (2024, September). Why so few women are in political leadership, and five actions to boost women’s political participation. UN Women.
• UN Women. (2024). Women’s political participation and leadership: Global trends and lessons. https://www.unwomen.org
• UN Women Türkiye. (2022). Women’s leadership and political participation in Türkiye. UN Women.
• United Nations Development Programme. (2016). Youth global programme for sustainable development and peace (2016–2020). https://www.undp.org/publications/youth-global-programme
• United Nations Women. (2022). Facts and figures: Leadership and political participation. https://www.unwomen.org/en/what-we-do/leadership-and-political-participation/facts-and-figures
• Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Harvard University Press. World Bank. (2013). Women as agents of change: Having voice in society. World Bank.
• World Bank. (2020). Women, business and the law 2020. https://wbl.worldbank.org/en/reports
• World Economic Forum. (2025). Global gender gap report 2025. World Economic Forum.
• World Economic Forum. (2025, March). How financial barriers are limiting women in politics. WEF.