Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Postoperatif Ağrıda Transdermal Fentanil Kullanımı

Year 2004, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 9 - 16, 01.05.2004
https://doi.org/10.1501/Ashd_0000000051

Abstract

Bu çalışma, postoperatif ağrıda
transdermal fentanilin etkinliğinin araştırılması
amacıyla planlandı. Çalışmaya onkolojik
cerrahi geçirecek ASA I-II grubu 45 hasta
alındı. Hastalar rasgele 3 gruba ayrıldı. Genel
anestezi indüksiyonundan 1 saat önce grup I’e
plasebo, grup II’ye 25 µg-saat -1’lik fentanil
yaması (TTS-25), grup III’e 50 µg-saat -1’lik
fentanil yaması (TTS-50) uygulandı.
Operasyonun bitiminde analjezi için her
hastaya 1.5mg-kg-1 IV tramadol yapıldıktan
sonra IV PCA (Patient Controlled Analgesia)
uygulamasına geçildi. Tüm hastaların TTS
uygulamasından sonraki 4, 12, 24, 32, 40, 48,
72. saatlerde ve TTS çıkarıldıktan 12 saat
sonra (84. saat), solunum hızı, SpO2,
sedasyon, ağrı şiddeti (VAS) kaydedildi.
Gelişmesi olası yan etkiler sorgulandı.
Hastaların 0-12, 12-20, 20-24, 24-32, 32-40,
40-48, 48-72. saatler arasında kullandıkları
tramadol dozu hesaplandı. Çalışma bitiminde
analjezi düzeyi hasta ve doktor tarafından
değerlendirildi.
Hareket VAS değerleri grup I ile
karşılaştırıldığında, grup II’de 4.,12., 24.
saatlerde, grup III’de 4, 12, 24, 32, 40, 48.
saatlerde anlamlı olarak daha düşüktü. İstirahat
VAS değerleri grup I ile karşılaştırıldığında
grup II’de 12. saatte, grup III’de 4, 12, 24, 32,
40, 48. saatlerde anlamlı olarak daha düşük
bulundu. Grup III, grup II ile
karşılaştırıldığında hareket VAS değerleri 24,
32, 40, 48. saatlerde, istirahat VAS değerleri
24. ve 32. saatlerde anlamlı olarak daha düşük
bulundu. Tramadol ihtiyacı her üç grupta da
zaman içinde azaldı. Hasta ve doktor
memnuniyeti grup III’de grup I’e göre daha
iyiydi.
Çalışmamızda, akut postoperatif ağrıda
50 µg-saat-1’lik fentanilin özellikle hareket
VAS değerlerinde azalmaya neden olması,
ilave analjezik ihtiyacını azaltması ve yan
etkilerinin kabul edilebilir olması nedeniyle 25
µg-saat-1’lik fentanile oranla daha üstün olduğu
sonucuna varıld

References

  • Jeal W, Benfield P. Transdermal fentanyl. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficiacy in pain control. Drugs 1997;53:109-38
  • Houmes RJM, Voets MA, Verkaaik A, Erdmann W, Lachmann B. Efficiacy and safety of tramadol versus morphine for moderate and severe postoperative pain with special regard to respiratory depression. Anesth Analg 1992;74:510-514.
  • Vickers MD, Paravicini D. Comparison of tramadol with morphine for postoperative pain following abdominal surgery. Eur J Anaesth 1995;12:265-271.
  • Vickers MD, O’ Flaherty D, Szekely SM, Read M, Yoshizumi J. Tramadol: Pain relief by an opioid without depression of respiration. Anaesthesia 1992; 47:291-6.
  • Bulow HH, Linnemann M, Berg H, Lang-Jensen T, LaCour S, Jonsson T. Respiratory changes during treatment of postoperative pain with high dose transdermal fentanyl. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995;39:835-9.
  • Broome IJ, Wright BM, Bower S, Reilly CS. Postoperative with transdermal fentanyl following lower abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia 1995;50:300-3.
  • Sevarino FB, Naulty JS, Sinatra R, Chin ML, Paige D, Conry K, Silverman DG. Transdermal fentanyl for postoperative pain management in patient recovering from abdominal gynecologic surgery. Anesthesiology 1992;77: 463-6.
  • Sandler AN, Baxter AD, Katz J, Samson B, Friendlander M, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of transdermal fentanyl after abdominal hysterectomy. Anesthesiology 1994;81:1169-80.
  • Grond S, Radbruch L, Lehmann KA. Clinical pharmacokinetics of transdermal opioids: focus on transdermal fentanyl. Clin Pharmacokinet 2000;38:59-89.
  • Esteve M. Transcutaneous fentanyl. Can J Anesth. 1994;42:195-217
  • Lehmann LJ, De Sio JM, Radvany T, Bikhazi GB. Transdermal fentanyl in postoperative pain. Reg Anesth 1997;22:24-8.

USE OF TRANSDERMALFENTANYL FOR POSTOPERATIVEPAIN

Year 2004, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 9 - 16, 01.05.2004
https://doi.org/10.1501/Ashd_0000000051

Abstract

We aimed to evaluate the use of
transdermal fentanyl for postoperative pain.
Study group consisted of 45 ASA I-II class
patients undergoing oncologic gynecologic
surgery. Patients were randomized to one of
the three treatment groups. Group I received
plasebo patch, group II received a patch
delivering fentanyl 25 µg-h-1 and group III
received a patch releasing fentanyl 50 µg-h-1
.
Approximately 1 h after patch application, all
patients were administered general anesthesia.
After operation, analgesia was provided
with intravenous 1.5mg.kg-1 tramadol then
analgesia continued via PCA device. All
patients were assessed 4,12, 24, 32, 40, 48, 72
h after patch application and at the 12th h after
patch removal. Measurements included respiratory rate, hemoglobin oxygen saturation
by pulse oximetry and sedation. Pain intensity
was measured with a 10-cm visual analogue
scale (VAS). The tramadol dosage was
recorded for 0-12, 12-20, 20-24, 24-32, 32-40,
40-48, 48-72 hour intervals. Upon completion
of the protocol, patients and investigators each
rated the analgesia.
Compared to the plasebo group, there
were significant differences at group II with
respect to VAS pain scores at ambulation at 4,
12, 24. hours and at group III at 4, 12,24, 32,
40, 48. hours. Compared to plasebo, there were
significant differences with respect to VAS
pain scores at rest at 12. hour at group II and at
4, 12, 24, 32, 40, 48. hours at III. Tramadol
requirement was lowest in group III. Patients’
and investigators’ satisfaction was good in
group III compared with group I.
We concluded that TTS fentanyl 50 µg-h-1
is better than TTS fentanyl 25 µg-h-1 for acute
postoperative pain. If properly used, TTS
fentanyl 50 µg-h-1 decreases the ambulation
VAS pain score and decreases analgesic
requirement with acceptable side effects

References

  • Jeal W, Benfield P. Transdermal fentanyl. A review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficiacy in pain control. Drugs 1997;53:109-38
  • Houmes RJM, Voets MA, Verkaaik A, Erdmann W, Lachmann B. Efficiacy and safety of tramadol versus morphine for moderate and severe postoperative pain with special regard to respiratory depression. Anesth Analg 1992;74:510-514.
  • Vickers MD, Paravicini D. Comparison of tramadol with morphine for postoperative pain following abdominal surgery. Eur J Anaesth 1995;12:265-271.
  • Vickers MD, O’ Flaherty D, Szekely SM, Read M, Yoshizumi J. Tramadol: Pain relief by an opioid without depression of respiration. Anaesthesia 1992; 47:291-6.
  • Bulow HH, Linnemann M, Berg H, Lang-Jensen T, LaCour S, Jonsson T. Respiratory changes during treatment of postoperative pain with high dose transdermal fentanyl. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995;39:835-9.
  • Broome IJ, Wright BM, Bower S, Reilly CS. Postoperative with transdermal fentanyl following lower abdominal surgery. Anaesthesia 1995;50:300-3.
  • Sevarino FB, Naulty JS, Sinatra R, Chin ML, Paige D, Conry K, Silverman DG. Transdermal fentanyl for postoperative pain management in patient recovering from abdominal gynecologic surgery. Anesthesiology 1992;77: 463-6.
  • Sandler AN, Baxter AD, Katz J, Samson B, Friendlander M, et al. A double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of transdermal fentanyl after abdominal hysterectomy. Anesthesiology 1994;81:1169-80.
  • Grond S, Radbruch L, Lehmann KA. Clinical pharmacokinetics of transdermal opioids: focus on transdermal fentanyl. Clin Pharmacokinet 2000;38:59-89.
  • Esteve M. Transcutaneous fentanyl. Can J Anesth. 1994;42:195-217
  • Lehmann LJ, De Sio JM, Radvany T, Bikhazi GB. Transdermal fentanyl in postoperative pain. Reg Anesth 1997;22:24-8.
There are 11 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Health Care Administration
Other ID JA58KJ33CS
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Aynur Ketene This is me

Publication Date May 1, 2004
Submission Date May 1, 2004
Published in Issue Year 2004 Volume: 6 Issue: 2

Cite

APA Ketene, A. (2004). Postoperatif Ağrıda Transdermal Fentanil Kullanımı. Ankara Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi, 6(2), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1501/Ashd_0000000051
AMA Ketene A. Postoperatif Ağrıda Transdermal Fentanil Kullanımı. ASHD. May 2004;6(2):9-16. doi:10.1501/Ashd_0000000051
Chicago Ketene, Aynur. “Postoperatif Ağrıda Transdermal Fentanil Kullanımı”. Ankara Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi 6, no. 2 (May 2004): 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1501/Ashd_0000000051.
EndNote Ketene A (May 1, 2004) Postoperatif Ağrıda Transdermal Fentanil Kullanımı. Ankara Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi 6 2 9–16.
IEEE A. Ketene, “Postoperatif Ağrıda Transdermal Fentanil Kullanımı”, ASHD, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 9–16, 2004, doi: 10.1501/Ashd_0000000051.
ISNAD Ketene, Aynur. “Postoperatif Ağrıda Transdermal Fentanil Kullanımı”. Ankara Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi 6/2 (May 2004), 9-16. https://doi.org/10.1501/Ashd_0000000051.
JAMA Ketene A. Postoperatif Ağrıda Transdermal Fentanil Kullanımı. ASHD. 2004;6:9–16.
MLA Ketene, Aynur. “Postoperatif Ağrıda Transdermal Fentanil Kullanımı”. Ankara Sağlık Hizmetleri Dergisi, vol. 6, no. 2, 2004, pp. 9-16, doi:10.1501/Ashd_0000000051.
Vancouver Ketene A. Postoperatif Ağrıda Transdermal Fentanil Kullanımı. ASHD. 2004;6(2):9-16.