E7 ÜLKELERİNİN LOJİSTİK SEKTÖRLERİNİN LOJİSTİK PERFORMANS ENDEKSİNE GÖRE ANALİZİ

Öz

Çalışmanın amacı E7 ülkelerinin (Çin, Hindistan, Endonezya, Türkiye, Meksika, Brezilya, Rusya Federasyonu) lojistik performans endeks değerlerinin analiz edilmesidir. Hem lojistik performans endeksi genel skorlarına hem de endeksin 6 adet alt kalemine ait skorlara göre lojistik performansının en yüksek olduğu ülkeler Çin ve Türkiye, en düşük olduğu ülke ise Rusya’dır. Hindistan bazı dönemlerde önemli sıçramalar gerçekleştirse de, ülkenin lojistik performansının istikrarsız olduğu söylenebilir. Lojistik performansındaki iyileşmeler ülkelerin dış ticaretini daha kolay ve efektif bir biçimde yapmasını sağlayarak küresel rekabet gücünü pozitif bir şekilde etkileyecektir. Bu nedenle, ülkelerin küresel rekabet güçlerini yükseltmek için lojistik sektörüne daha fazla yatırım yapması ve sektörel etkinliğini arttırması gerekmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

• E7 Ülkeleri
• Lojistik
• Lojistik Performans Endeksi
• Rekabet
• E7 Ülkeleri, Lojistik, Lojistik Performans Endeksi, Rekabet

ANALYSIS OF THE LOGISTICS SECTORS OF E7 COUNTRIES BASED ON LOGISTICS PERFORMANCE INDEX

Abstract

The aim of the study is to analyze the logistics performance index values of E7 countries (China, India, Indonesia, Turkey, Mexico, Brazil, Russian Federation). According to both the overall scores of the logistics performance index and the scores of the 6 sub-items of the index, the countries with the highest logistics performance are China and Turkey, and the country with the lowest is Russia. Although India has made significant leaps in some periods, it can be said that the logistics performance of the country is unstable. Improvements in logistics performance will positively affect global competitiveness by enabling countries to do their foreign trade more easily and effectively. For this reason, countries need to invest more in the logistics sector and increase their sectoral efficiency in order to increase their global competitiveness.

Keywords

• E7 Countries
• Logistics
• Logistics Performance Index
• Competition
• E7 Countries, Logistics, Logistics Performance Index, Competition

References

1. Almalki, M., & Alkahtani, M. (2022). Allocation of Regional Logistics Hubs and Assessing Their Contribution to Saudi Arabia’s Logistics Performance Index Ranking. Sustainability, 14(7474), 1-27.
2. Bardakçı, H., & Aylin Erdoğdu, A. B. (2020). G-7 ve E-7 Ülkelerinde Lojistik Performans, Ekonomik Büyüme ve Finansal Gelişme İlişkisi. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 9(5), 4154-4166.
3. Cargoline. (2022, 09 25). Lojistik Performans Endeksi. https://kargolinlojistik.com/lojistik-performans endeksi/#:~:text=Lojistik%20performans%20endeksi%2C%20D%C3%BCnya%20Bankas%C4%B1,i%C3%A7in%20durum%20tespiti%20yapmaya%20%C3%A7al%C4%B1%C5%9Fmaktad%C4%B1r.
4. d’Aleo, V. (2015). The Mediator Role of Logistic Performance Index: A Comparative Study. Journal of International Trade, Logistics and Law, 1(1), 1-7.
5. Danaci, T., & Nacar, R. (2017). Comparing thefForeign trade and logistic performance of Turkey and EU members with cluster analysis. PressAcademia Procedia(3), 31-36.
6. Erkan, B. (2014). The Importance and Determinants of Logistics Performance of Selected Countries. Journal of Emerging Issues in Economics, Finance and Banking (JEIEFB), 3(6), 1237-1254.
7. Erkan, B. (2014). Türkiye'de Lojistik Sektörü ve Rekabet Gücü. ASSAM Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi, 1(1), 45-66.
8. Faria, R. N., Souza, C. S., & Vieira, J. G. (2015). Evaluation of Logistic Performance Indexes of Brazil In The International Trade. Revista de Administração Mackenzie, 16(1), 213-235.

9. LPI. (2022). Logistics Performans Report. Washington DC: The World Bank Data.
10. Quintero, H. M., Ariza, H. M., & Mozo, V. R. (2018). Impact and Analysis of Civil Works in Order to Improve the Colombian Logistic Performance Index. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 13(13), 11129-11133.
11. Sanrı, Ö., & Pişkin, A. (2022). The Mediator Effect of Logistics Performance on Economic Growth: Evidence From OECD Countries. Third Sector Social Economic Review, 57(3), 1494-1507.
12. Selvavinayagam, K., Francina, V. J., & Rameshkumaar, V. (2018). Evaluation of Logistic Performance Index of India in the Indian Postal Services. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 8(5), 2394-6962.
13. Song, M.-J., & Lee, H.-Y. (2022). The relationship between international trade and logistics performance: A focus on the South Korean industrial sector. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 44, 1-8.
14. The World Bank Data. (2022). 01 2020, 05 tarihinde The World Bank: https://data.worldbank.org/
15. Yingfei, Y., b, Z. M., Zeyu, L., Ki-Hyung, B., Avotra, A. A., & Nawaz, A. (2021). Green logistics performance and infrastructure on service trade and environment-Measuring firm’s performance and service quality. Journal of King Saud University - Science, 34, 1-10.