A View of Agile Management: A Bibliometric Analysis

Year 2025, Issue: 27, 71 - 88, 12.11.2025

Reyhan Başaran , Şimal Çelikkol

https://doi.org/10.58724/assam.1778052

Abstract

This study explores the role of agile management as a modern managerial approach and its position in current literature. Although its origins can be traced back to the Agile Manifesto from 2001 in software development, agile management has since extenden to various sectors and is now recognized as a strategic capability. Unlike traditional management approaches, which are characterized by stability, hierarchical structures, and rigid planning, agile management focuses on flexibility, rapid adaptation, and continuous improvement. This paper discusses the conceptual foundations of agile management, its distinctions from classical management approaches, its core principles, its relationship with organizational transformation, and contemporary trends in the literature. Additionally, bibliometric analyses that highlight research directions are included to underline the interdisciplinary impact of agility. In conclusion, agile management should be regarded not merely as a project-level methodology but as a managerial paradigm that enables organisations to achieve resilience and sustained competitive advantage in environments characterized by uncertainty and change.

Keywords

agile management , organizational agility , management , bibliometric

Çevik Yönetim Perspektifi: Bibliyometrik Bir Analiz

Abstract

Bu çalışma, çevik yönetimin modern bir yönetim yaklaşımı olarak örgütlerdeki rolünü ve literatürdeki konumunu incelemektedir. Çevik yönetim, kökenlerini yazılım geliştirme alanında 2001 yılında yayımlanan Agile Manifesto’dan almakla birlikte, günümüzde farklı sektörlere yayılmış ve stratejik bir yetkinlik olarak görülmeye başlanmıştır. Geleneksel yönetim yaklaşımlarının stabilite, hiyerarşik yapı ve katı planlama gibi özelliklerine karşılık, çevik yönetim; esneklik, hızlı adaptasyon ve sürekli iyileştirme ilkelerini öne çıkarmaktadır. Bu bağlamda çalışma, çevik yönetimin kavramsal temelleri, klasik yaklaşımlardan farkları, temel ilkeleri, örgütsel dönüşümle ilişkisi ve güncel literatürdeki eğilimleri tartışmaktadır. Ayrıca, bibliyometrik analizlerin işaret ettiği araştırma yönelimleri ele alınarak çevikliğin disiplinler arası etkisi vurgulanmaktadır. Çalışma, çevik yönetimi sadece bir proje yönetim aracı olarak değerlendirmek yerine aynı zamanda belirsizlik ve değişim ortamlarında örgütlere dayanıklılık ve sürdürülebilir rekabet avantajı sağlayan bir yönetim paradigması olarak ele almaktadır.

Keywords

örgütsel çeviklik , çevik yönetim , yönetim , bibliyometrik

Ethical Statement

Makaledeki araştırmada ikincil veriler kullanıldığı için etik kurul raporu bulunmamaktadır.

References

• Augustine, S., Payne, B., Sencindiver, F., & Woodcock, S. (2005). Agile project management: Steering from the edges. Communications of the ACM, 48(12), 85–89. https://doi.org/10.1145.1101779.1101781
• Aytaç, S., Tran, C. Y., & Frye, N. (2025). Lotka’s Law of Scientific Productivity Across the Research Disciplines: A Review. Science & Technology Libraries, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/0194262X.2025.2503941
• Beck, K.L., Beedle, M.A., Bennekum, A.V., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., Grenning, J., Highsmith, J., Hunt, A., Jeffries, R., Kern, J., Marick, B., Martin, R.C., Mellor, S.J., Schwaber, K., Sutherland, J., & Thomas, D.A. (2001). Manifesto for Agile Software Development. http://agilemanifesto.org/
• Birkinshaw, J. (2018). What to expect from agile. MIT Sloan Management Review, 59(2), 39–42.
• Birkinshaw, J., & Gibson, C. (2019). Building ambidexterity into an organization. MIT Sloan Management Review, 61(1), 65–71.
• Conboy, K., & Carroll, N. (2019). Implementing large-scale agile frameworks: Challenges and recommendations. IEEE Software, 36(2), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.1109/MS.2018.2884865
• Conforto, E. C., Salum, F., Amaral, D. C., da Silva, S. L., & de Almeida, L. F. M. (2014). Can agile project management be adopted by industries other than software development? Project Management Journal, 45(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmj.21410
• Conforto, E. C., Amaral, D. C., da Silva, S. L., di Felippo, A., & Kamikawachi D. S. L. (2016). The agility construct in project management theory. International Journal of Project Management, 34(4), 660-674. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2016.01.007
• Cooper, R. G., & Sommer, A. F. (2018). Agile-Stage-Gate for manufacturers: Changing the way new products are developed. Research-Technology Management, 61(2), 17–26.
• Denning, S. (2018). The Age of Agile: How Smart Companies are Transforming the Way Work Gets Done. New York: AMACOM.
• Denning, S. (2019). The ten stages of the agile transformation journey. Strategy & Leadership, 47(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1108/SL-11-2018-0109
• Dikert, K., Paasivaara, M., & Lassenius, C. (2016). Challenges and success factors for large-scale agile transformations: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software, 119, 87–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2016.06.013
• Dingsøyr, T., Nerur, S., Balijepally, V., & Moe, N. B. (2012). A decade of agile methodologies: Towards explaining agile software development. Journal of Systems and Software, 85(6), 1213–1221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2012.02.033
• Fernandez, D. J., & Fernandez, J. D. (2008). Agile project management - Agilism versus traditional approaches. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 49(2), 10–17.
• Foschiani, F., Röber, & Oesterle, M-J, B., (2021). Agile, Handle with Care! A Systematic Literature Review of the Nature and Limits of Agile Methods. International Journal of Managerial Studies and Research, 9(8), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.20431/2349-0349.0908005.
• Gurbaxani, V., & Dunkle, D. (2019). Gearing up for successful digital transformation. MIS Quarterly Executive, 18(3), 209–220.
• Highsmith, J. (2013). Adaptive leadership: Accelerating enterprise agility. Addison-Wesley Professional. Hoda, R., & Murugesan, L. K. (2016). Multi-level agile project management challenges: A self-organizing team perspective. Journal of Systems and Software, 117, 245–257.
• Hoda, R., Noble, J., & Marshall, S. (2013). Self-organizing roles on agile software development teams. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 39(3), 422–444.
• Huber, J. C. (2001). A new model that generates Lotka’s Law. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 53(3), 209-219. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.10025
• Joiner, B. (2019). Leadership agility for organizational agility. Journal of Creating Value, 5(2), 139-149. https://doi.org/10.1177/2394964319868321
• Koppman, S. (2016). Different by design: The importance of recognizing the intentionality of differences in creative organizations. Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 136–153. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2013.0164
• Lotka, A. J. (1926). The Frequency distribution of scientific productivity. Journal of Washington Academy of Science, 16, 317-23.
• Maurer, F., Cohn, M., Griffiths, M., Highsmith, J., Schwaber, K., Kruchten, P. (2004). Agile Project Management. 4th Conference on Extreme Programming and Agile Methods (XP Agile Universe 2004), Proceedings.
• McKinsey & Company. (2017). How to create an agile organization. McKinsey Insights.
• Mergel, I. (2016). Agile innovation management in government: A research agenda. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3), 516–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2016.07.004
• Paasivaara, M., Behm, B., Lassenius, C., & Hallikainen, M. (2018). Large-scale agile transformation at Ericsson: A case study. Empirical Software Engineering, 23(5), 2550–2596. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-017-9555-8
• Peters, T. (2018). The excellence dividend: Meeting the tech tide with work that wows and jobs that last. New York: Vintage Books.
• Rigby, D. K., Sutherland, J., & Noble, A. (2018). Agile at scale. June. Harvard Business Review, 96(3), 88–96.
• Rigby, D. K. Elk, S., & Berez, S. (2020). Doing Agile Right: Transformation without Chaos. HBR Press.
• Serrador, P., & Pinto, J. K. (2015). Does Agile work? A quantitative analysis of agile project success. International Journal of Project Management, 33(5), 1040-1051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2015.01.006
• Stettina, C. J., & Hörz, J. (2015). Agile portfolio management: An empirical perspective on the practice in use. International Journal of Project Management, 33(1), 140–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2014.03.008
• Schwaber, K., & Sutherland, J. (2012). Software in 30 Days: How Agile Managers Beat the Odds, Delight Their Customers, and Leave Competitors in the Dust. John Wiley & Sons.
• Teece, D. J., Peteraf, M. A., & Leih, S. (2016). Dynamic capabilities and organizational agility: Risk, uncertainty, and strategy in the innovation economy. California Management Review, 58(4), 13–35. https://doi.org/10.1525/cmr.2016.58.4.13
• Uhl-Bien, M., & Arena, M. (2018). Leadership for organizational adaptability: A theoretical synthesis and integrative framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.12.009