Dissertation

THE STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS OF BELT & ROAD INITIATIVE FOR CENTRAL ASIA

Volume: 5 Number: 1 June 30, 2021
TR EN

THE STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS OF BELT & ROAD INITIATIVE FOR CENTRAL ASIA

Abstract

China has gained a significant position in Central Asia since the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991, both as an economic and strategic partner. Central Asian states are approaching a cornerstone for their history, in which their economies and - somehow their policies - are shaped more towards Chinese influence rather than Russia’s, considering that China’s economic plans and infrastructure activities under the Belt & Road Initiative (BRI) framework, the BRI have bolstered this scenario. Today, China is an important steak-holder in the region and has a real impact on Central Asian economies, especially the five countries, Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, which have respectfully cooperated and sought to achieve mutual benefits through the BRI. In this policy, through bilateral relations, China promises to improve the traffic connectivity to the strategic regional places from the Pacific to the Baltic Sea. In order to create a new economic Belt in Asia, particularly in Central Asia, China's President Xi Jinping suggested that China and Central Asian countries must expedite their communication, improve road connectivity, and further trade. For financial integration, the Chinese government created the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank (AIIB), which is part of China's broader push to develop the necessary infrastructure to connect China with trading partners. China considers the AIBB, like the BRI, as a tool to replicate its economic success by considering the needs of the states in Central Asia. New approaches, achievements, opportunities, challenges, and obstacles exist between the Central Asian countries and China. According to each country's interest, other neighboring and trans-regional countries direct and indirectly influence this relationship, and the reaction or response to this influence is diverse. The focus, then, is to comprehend the strategic implications of the BRI for Central Asia and how this region so far has answered to it.

Keywords

References

  1. Alexandrov, Mikhail. Uneasy Alliance: Relations Between Russia and Kazakhstan in the Post-Soviet Era, 1992-1997. Greenwood Publishing Group, 1999.
  2. “Ambassador Talks China-Uzbekistan Milestone.” China.Org.Cn, 21 Jan. 2012, http://www.china.org.cn/opinion/2012-01/21/content_24437462.htm.
  3. Blank, Stephen. “Russian Anxiety About Central Asia Becomes Palpable.” Eurasia Daily Monitor, vol. 14, no. 39, Mar. 2017, https://jamestown.org/program/russian-anxiety-central-asia-becomes-palpable/.
  4. ---. “The Strategic Importance of Central Asia: An American View.” The US Army War College Quarterly: Parameters, vol. 38, no. 1, Mar. 2008, pp. 73–87.
  5. Callaghan, Mike, and Paul Hubbard. “The Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank: Multilateralism on the Silk Road.” China Economic Journal, vol. 9, no. 2, Routledge, May 2016, pp. 116–39. Taylor and Francis+NEJM, doi:10.1080/17538963.2016.1162970.
  6. “China, Uzbekistan to Deepen All-around Cooperation.” CHINA DAILY, 8 Sept. 2013, http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2013xivisitcenterasia/2013-09/08/content_16952894.htm.
  7. “China-Kazakhstan Relations Grow Stronger.” CHINA DAILY, 15 Oct. 2007, http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2007-10/15/content_6173531.htm.
  8. Dave, Bhavna, and Yuka Kobayashi. “China’s Silk Road Economic Belt Initiative in Central Asia: Economic and Security Implications.” Asia Europe Journal, vol. 16, no. 3, Sept. 2018, pp. 267–81. Springer Link, doi:10.1007/s10308-018-0513-x.

Details

Primary Language

English

Subjects

-

Journal Section

Dissertation

Authors

Publication Date

June 30, 2021

Submission Date

May 4, 2021

Acceptance Date

June 29, 2021

Published in Issue

Year 2021 Volume: 5 Number: 1

APA
Çelik, Y. (2021). THE STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS OF BELT & ROAD INITIATIVE FOR CENTRAL ASIA. Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 5(1), 79-94. https://izlik.org/JA53CU99FJ
AMA
1.Çelik Y. THE STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS OF BELT & ROAD INITIATIVE FOR CENTRAL ASIA. Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2021;5(1):79-94. https://izlik.org/JA53CU99FJ
Chicago
Çelik, Yavuz. 2021. “THE STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS OF BELT & ROAD INITIATIVE FOR CENTRAL ASIA”. Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 5 (1): 79-94. https://izlik.org/JA53CU99FJ.
EndNote
Çelik Y (June 1, 2021) THE STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS OF BELT & ROAD INITIATIVE FOR CENTRAL ASIA. Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 5 1 79–94.
IEEE
[1]Y. Çelik, “THE STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS OF BELT & ROAD INITIATIVE FOR CENTRAL ASIA”, Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 79–94, June 2021, [Online]. Available: https://izlik.org/JA53CU99FJ
ISNAD
Çelik, Yavuz. “THE STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS OF BELT & ROAD INITIATIVE FOR CENTRAL ASIA”. Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 5/1 (June 1, 2021): 79-94. https://izlik.org/JA53CU99FJ.
JAMA
1.Çelik Y. THE STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS OF BELT & ROAD INITIATIVE FOR CENTRAL ASIA. Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi. 2021;5:79–94.
MLA
Çelik, Yavuz. “THE STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS OF BELT & ROAD INITIATIVE FOR CENTRAL ASIA”. Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 5, no. 1, June 2021, pp. 79-94, https://izlik.org/JA53CU99FJ.
Vancouver
1.Yavuz Çelik. THE STRATEGIC IMPLICATIONS OF BELT & ROAD INITIATIVE FOR CENTRAL ASIA. Asya Araştırmaları Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi [Internet]. 2021 Jun. 1;5(1):79-94. Available from: https://izlik.org/JA53CU99FJ
Asian Studies International Journal of Social Sciences is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial 4.0 (CC BY NC) International License