Ortak Yöntem Yanlılığı Üzerine Sistematik Bir Yazın Taraması

Year 2020, Volume: 31 Issue: 1, 7 - 18, 02.04.2020

Beykan Çizel , Onur Selçuk , Eniser Atabay

https://doi.org/10.17123/atad.713552

Cited By: 10

Abstract

Bu makalenin temel amacı, ortak yöntem yanlılığının ne olduğunu, önemi, olası nedenlerini ve yanlılığı kontrol etmenin yollarını açıklamak ve turizm araştırmalarındaki mevcut durumun tespitini yapmaktır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda karma yöntem ile sistematik yazın taraması gerçekleştirilmiştir. İlk olarak Scopus’ta yayımlanan anahtar kelime ve özetlerinde yöntem yanlılığı, ortak yöntem yanlılığı (OYY) ve ortak yöntem varyansı (OYV) kelimeleri geçen toplam 1534 çalışma, “R” programı ile bibliyometrik yöntemler kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. İkinci aşamada manuel olarak, saptanan temel kaynaklar üzerinden yöntem yanlılığının olası nedenleri ve kontrol etme yolları incelenmiştir. Son olarak ise OYY’nin olası nedenleri ve kontrol etme yöntemleri ile ilgili ölçüt seti oluşturulmuş ve 1534 çalışmanın içerisinde turizm dergilerinde yayımlanan 19 çalışma değerlendirilmiştir. Yazın taraması sonuçları uluslararası turizm dergilerinde araştırmacılar arasında OYY konusunda az da olsa bir farkındalık oluştuğunu göstermektedir.

Keywords

Turizm araştırmaları, Ortak yöntem varyansı, Ortak yöntem yanlılığı, Bibliyometri, R programı

A Systematic Review of Common Method Bias

Abstract

The main aim of this paper is to explain the common method bias (CMB), its importance, possible causes and ways to control it. Additionaly, the current situation of CMB in tourism researches has been examined on the basis of the articles. For this purpose, systematic literatüre review was conducted with mixed method. Firstly, a total of 1534 articles related with CMB published in SCOPUS were analyzed using bibliometric methods with ile “R” program. Secondly, the possible causes of CMB and ways of controlling them were examined manually through the main sources determined by bibliometry. Finally, 19 articles published in tourism journals were examined with determined criteria to present the current awareness of CMB. The results of the literatüre review show that there is little awareness among researchers in international tourism journals.

Keywords

Tourism research, Common method variance, Common method bias, Bibliometry, R program

References

• Aria, M. ve Cuccurullo, C. (2017). Bibliometrix: An R-tool for Comprehensive Science Mapping Analysis, Journal of Informetrics, 11 (4): 959-975.
• Aulakh, P. S. ve Gencturk, E. F. (2000). International Principal– Agent Relationships: Control, Governance and Performance, Industrial Marketing Management, 29 (6): 521-538.
• Bagozzi, R. P. ve Yi, Y. (1990). Multi Trait–Multi Method Matrices in Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research, 17 (4): 426-439.
• Campbell, D. T. ve Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and Discriminant Validation by the Multi Trait-Multi Method Matrix, Psychological Bulletin, 56 (2): 81–105.
• Carlson, D. S. ve Kacmar, K. M. (2000). Work–Family Conflict in the Organization: Do Life Role Values Make a Difference?, Journal of Management, 26 (5): 1031-1054.
• Cheng, J. C. ve Chen, C. Y. (2017). Job Resourcefulness, Work Engagement and Prosocial Service Behaviors in the Hospitality Industry, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29 (10): 2668-2687.
• Cheraghalizadeh, R. ve Tümer, M. (2017). The Effect of Applied Resources on Competitive Advantage in Hotels: Mediation and Moderation Analysis, Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 31 : 265-272.
• Conway, J. M. ve Lance, C. E. (2010). What Reviewers Should Expect from Authors Regarding Common Method Bias in Organizational Research, Journal of Business and Psychology, 25 (3): 325-334.
• Cronbach, L. J. (1946). Responsesets and Test Validity, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 6 (4): 475-494.
• Feldman, J.M. ve Lynch, J.G. (1988). Self-Generated Validity and Other Effects of Measurement on Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior, Journal of Applied Psychology, 73 (3): 421-35.
• Ferreira, A. I., Martinez, L. F., Lamelas, J. P. ve Rodrigues, R. I. (2017). Mediation of Job Embeddedness and Satisfaction in the Relationship between Task Characteristics and Turnover: A Multi Level Study in Portuguese Hotels, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29 (1): 248-267.
• Ferreira, F. A. (2018). Mapping the Field of Arts-Based Management: Bibliographic Coupling and Co Citation Analyses, Journal of Business Research, 85: 348-357.
• Ferrer-Rosell, B., Coenders, G. ve Marine-Roig, E. (2017). Is Planning Through the Internet (Un)Related to Trip Satisfaction?, Information Technology & Tourism, 17 (2): 229-244.
• Gould, J., Moore, D., Karlin, N. J., Gaede, D. B., Walker, J. ve Dotterweich, A. R. (2011). Measuring Serious Leisure in Chess: Model Confirmation and Method Bias, Leisure Sciences, 33 (4): 332-340.
• Huang, Y. C., Chang, L. L. ve Backman, K. F. (2019). Detecting Common Method Bias in Predicting Creative Tourists Behavioural Intention with an Illustration of Theory of Planned Behaviour, Current Issues in Tourism, 22 (3): 307-329.
• Jex, S. M. ve Spector, P. E. (1996). The Impact of Negative Affectivity on Stress or Strain Relations: A Replication and Extension, Work and Stress, 10 (1): 36–45.
• Karatepe, O. M. (2010). The Effect Of Positive And Negative Work-Family Interaction on Exhaustion: Does Work Social Support Make a Difference? International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 22 (6): 836-856.
• Karatepe, O. M. (2011). Do Job Resources Moderate the Effect of Emotional Dissonance on Burn Out? A Study in the City of Ankara, Turkey, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 23 (1): 44-65.
• Karatepe, O. M. ve Zargar Tizabi, L. (2011). Work-Related Depression in the Hotel Industry: A Study in the United Arab Emirates, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 23 (5): 608-623.
• Karatepe, O. M., Yorganci, I. ve Haktanir, M. (2009). Outcomes of Customer Verbal Aggression Among Hotel Employees, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 21 (6): 713-733.
• Klidas, A., Van Den Berg, P. T. ve Wilderom, C. P. (2007). Managing Employee Empowerment in Luxury Hotels in Europe, International Journal of Service Industry Management, 18 (1): 70-88.
• Lance, C. E., Dawson, B., Birkelbach, D. ve Hoffman, B. J. (2010). Method Effects, Measurement Error, and Substantive Conclusions, Organizational Research Methods, 13 (3): 435-455.
• Lee, J. S., Lee, C. K. ve Park, C. K. (2014). Developing and Validating a Multi Dimensional Quality Scale for Mega- Events, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 43: 121-131.
• Luo, Z., Marnburg, E. ve Law, R. (2017). Linking Leadership and Justice to Organizational Commitment: The Mediating Role of Collective Identity in the Hotel Industry, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 29 (4): 1167-1184.
• MacKenzie, S. B. ve Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common Method Bias in Marketing: Causes, Mechanisms, and Procedural Remedies, Journal of Retailing, 88 (4): 542-555.
• Min, H., Park, J. ve Kim, H. J. (2016). Common Method Bias in Hospitality Research: A Critical Review of Literature and an Empirical Study, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 56: 126-135.
• Paek, S., Schuckert, M., Kim, T. T. ve Lee, G. (2015). Why is Hospitality Employees’ Psychological Capital Important? The Effects of Psychological Capital on Work Engagement and Employee Morale, International Journal of Hospitality Management, 50: 9-26.
• Pavlatos, O. (2015). An Empirical Investigation of Strategic Management Accounting in Hotels, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27 (5): 756- 767.
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B. ve Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of Method Bias in Social Science Research and Recommendations on How to Control it, Annual Review of Psychology, 63: 539-569.
• Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B., Lee, J.-Y. ve Podsakoff, N.P. (2003). Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies, Journal of Applied Psychology, 88 (5): 879-903.
• Podsakoff, P.M. ve Organ, D.W. (1986). Self-Reports in Organizational Research—Problems and Prospects, Journal of Management, 12 (4): 531-44.
• Qin, Q., Wen, B., Ling, Q., Zhou, S. ve Tong, M. (2014). How and When the Effect of Ethical Leadership Occurs? A Multi Level Analysis in the Chinese Hospitality Industry, International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 26 (6): 974-1001.
• Richardson, H. A., Simmering, M. J. ve Sturman, M. C. (2009). A Tale of Three Perspectives: Examining Post Hoc Statistical Techniques for Detection and Correction of Common Method Variance, Organizational Research Methods, 12 (4): 762–800.
• Spector, P. E. (2006). Method Variance in Organizational Research: Truth or Urban Legend?, Organizational Research Methods, 9 (2): 221-232.
• Ting, H., Run, E. C., Cheah, J. H. ve Chuah, F. (2016). Food Neophobia and Ethnic Food Consumption Intention: An Extension of the Theory of Planned Behaviour, British Food Journal, 118 (11): 2781-2797.
• Uludağ, O. (2016). The Mediating Role of Positive Affectivity on Testing the Relationship of Engagement to Academic Achievement: an Empirical Investigation of Tourism Students, Journal of Teaching in Travel & Tourism, 16 (3): 163-177.
• Van Eck, N.J. ve Waltman, L. (2010). Software Survey: VOSviewer, a Computer Program for Bibliometric Mapping, Scientometrics, 84 (2): 523-538.