Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Strategic Planning in Turkish Local Administrations: How Participatory is it?

Year 2024, , 147 - 157, 22.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.53487/atasobed.1490414

Abstract

Strategic plans are more participatory, more responsive, more integrated and more empowering when compared to the traditional plans. It has been nearly 20 years since the Financial Management and Control Law in Turkey required public institutions, including municipalities, to prepare strategic plans and to apply strategic management techniques. It has been observed that most of the metropolitan municipalities in Turkey just conduct surveys in the preparation process of strategic plans without organising workshops with the participation of various stakeholders. It seems that through surveys the legal requirement of ensuring the participation of stakeholders in the preparation process is met. It is considered that the local authorities in Turkey need to revise their approach to the strategic planning process in terms of good principles of governance, especially participation.

References

  • Akay, H. (2015). Yerel Yönetimlerde Katılımcı Mekanizmalar ve Süreçler. İstanbul: Türkiye Avrupa Vakfı Yayınları. Albrechts, L. (2001). In Pursuit of New Approaches to Strategic Spatial Planning. A European Perspective, 6(3), 293-310. Albrechts, L., Healey , P., & Kunzma, K. R. (2003). Strategic Spatial Planning and Regional Governance in Europe. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(2), 113-129.
  • Albrechts, L. (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 31(5), 743-758.
  • Balducci, A. (2004). Strategic Spatial Planning and the Longer Range: Comment 3. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(1), 49-67.
  • Berry, F.S., and B. Wechsler. 1995. State agencies’ experience with strategic planning: Findings from a national survey. Public Administration Review 55(2): 159–68. Doi:10.2307/977181.
  • Bryson, J. M., & Roering, W. D. (1996). Strategic planning and Management. In J. Perry, Handbook of public administration. New Jersey: Jossey-Bass.
  • Decree on the Procedures and Principles about the Strategic Planning in the Statutory Bodies. (2018). Official Gazette. Available at: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2018/02/20180226-10.htm. (Accession: 29.12.2023)
  • Demirkaya, Y. (2015). Strategic Planning in the Turkish Public Sector. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 15-29.
  • Efe, Ş. (2012). Kamuda Stratejik Planlamaya Dayalı Performans Yönetimi: Türkiye Uygulaması ve Sorunlar. Sayıştay Dergisi(87), 121-142.
  • Es, M., & Ateş, H. (2004). Kent Yönetimi, Kentlileşme ve Göç: Sorunlar ve Çözüm Önerileri. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi(48), 206-248.
  • European Institute for Gender Equality. (2021). https://eige.europa. eu/gender-mainstreaming/what-is-gender-mainstreaming Friedmann, J. (1993). Toward a non-Euclidian mode of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(4), 482-485.
  • Friedmann, J. (2004). Strategic spatial planning and the longer range. Planning Theory & Practice 5(1): 49–67. Doi:10.1080/1464935042000185062 Gender Mainstreaming in Urban Development. (2011). Berlin: Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung.
  • Genç, F., N. (2009). Türk Kamu Yönetiminde Stratejik Planlama. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (23).
  • Gender Mainstreaming in Urban Planning and Urban Development. (2013). Vienna: Urban Development Vienna.
  • Guide on Strategic Planning for the Municipalities. (2019). Ankara: Ministry of Interior Affairs
  • Guide to Municipal Strategy Development. (2001). Toronto: Canadian Urban Institute.
  • Habitat III Policy Paper 6 – Urban Spatial Strategies: Land Market and Segregation. (2016). Nairobi: UN Habitat.
  • Half of the buildings in Istanbul are unregistered. (2018). NTV: https://www.ntv.com.tr/turkiye/istanbuldaki-binalarin-yarisi-kacak,WzNFb24S50ih2wcb2iJJcA

STRATEGIC PLANNING IN TURKISH LOCAL ADMINISTRATIONS: HOW PARTICIPATORY IS IT?

Year 2024, , 147 - 157, 22.06.2024
https://doi.org/10.53487/atasobed.1490414

Abstract

Strategic plans are more participatory, more responsive, more integrated and more empowering when compared to the traditional plans. It has been nearly 20 years since the Financial Management and Control Law in Turkey required public institutions, including municipalities, to prepare strategic plans and to apply strategic management techniques. It has been observed that most of the metropolitan municipalities in Turkey just conduct surveys in the preparation process of strategic plans without organising workshops with the participation of various stakeholders. It seems that through surveys the legal requirement of ensuring the participation of stakeholders in the preparation process is met. It is considered that the local authorities in Turkey need to revise their approach to the strategic planning process in terms of good principles of governance, especially participation.

References

  • Akay, H. (2015). Yerel Yönetimlerde Katılımcı Mekanizmalar ve Süreçler. İstanbul: Türkiye Avrupa Vakfı Yayınları. Albrechts, L. (2001). In Pursuit of New Approaches to Strategic Spatial Planning. A European Perspective, 6(3), 293-310. Albrechts, L., Healey , P., & Kunzma, K. R. (2003). Strategic Spatial Planning and Regional Governance in Europe. Journal of the American Planning Association, 69(2), 113-129.
  • Albrechts, L. (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science, 31(5), 743-758.
  • Balducci, A. (2004). Strategic Spatial Planning and the Longer Range: Comment 3. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(1), 49-67.
  • Berry, F.S., and B. Wechsler. 1995. State agencies’ experience with strategic planning: Findings from a national survey. Public Administration Review 55(2): 159–68. Doi:10.2307/977181.
  • Bryson, J. M., & Roering, W. D. (1996). Strategic planning and Management. In J. Perry, Handbook of public administration. New Jersey: Jossey-Bass.
  • Decree on the Procedures and Principles about the Strategic Planning in the Statutory Bodies. (2018). Official Gazette. Available at: https://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2018/02/20180226-10.htm. (Accession: 29.12.2023)
  • Demirkaya, Y. (2015). Strategic Planning in the Turkish Public Sector. Transylvanian Review of Administrative Sciences, 15-29.
  • Efe, Ş. (2012). Kamuda Stratejik Planlamaya Dayalı Performans Yönetimi: Türkiye Uygulaması ve Sorunlar. Sayıştay Dergisi(87), 121-142.
  • Es, M., & Ateş, H. (2004). Kent Yönetimi, Kentlileşme ve Göç: Sorunlar ve Çözüm Önerileri. Sosyal Siyaset Konferansları Dergisi(48), 206-248.
  • European Institute for Gender Equality. (2021). https://eige.europa. eu/gender-mainstreaming/what-is-gender-mainstreaming Friedmann, J. (1993). Toward a non-Euclidian mode of planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(4), 482-485.
  • Friedmann, J. (2004). Strategic spatial planning and the longer range. Planning Theory & Practice 5(1): 49–67. Doi:10.1080/1464935042000185062 Gender Mainstreaming in Urban Development. (2011). Berlin: Senatsverwaltung für Stadtentwicklung.
  • Genç, F., N. (2009). Türk Kamu Yönetiminde Stratejik Planlama. Dumlupınar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi (23).
  • Gender Mainstreaming in Urban Planning and Urban Development. (2013). Vienna: Urban Development Vienna.
  • Guide on Strategic Planning for the Municipalities. (2019). Ankara: Ministry of Interior Affairs
  • Guide to Municipal Strategy Development. (2001). Toronto: Canadian Urban Institute.
  • Habitat III Policy Paper 6 – Urban Spatial Strategies: Land Market and Segregation. (2016). Nairobi: UN Habitat.
  • Half of the buildings in Istanbul are unregistered. (2018). NTV: https://www.ntv.com.tr/turkiye/istanbuldaki-binalarin-yarisi-kacak,WzNFb24S50ih2wcb2iJJcA
There are 17 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Social Work (Other)
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

İhsan İkizer 0000-0002-8527-6131

Publication Date June 22, 2024
Published in Issue Year 2024

Cite

APA İkizer, İ. (2024). Strategic Planning in Turkish Local Administrations: How Participatory is it?. Current Perspectives in Social Sciences, 28(2), 147-157. https://doi.org/10.53487/atasobed.1490414

Content of this journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial 4.0 International License
29909