DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDE ADEZİV SİSTEMLER

Elmas Tüfek; Buket Ayna

doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.285136

DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDE ADEZİV SİSTEMLER

Abstract

Buonocore' un asitle pürüzlendirme yöntemiyle mineye adezyonu tanımlamasından bu yana araştırmacılar yeni yöntemler geliştirmeyi amaçlamışlardır. Adeziv sistemler sürekli gelişim kaydettiğinden sınıflandırmaları da değişim göstermektedir. Adeziv sistemlerdeki gelişmeler hala devam etmekle birlikte diş hekimlerinin bu gelişmeleri düzenli takip ederek uygun materyali tercih etmeleri gerekmektedir. Böylece restorasyonun klinik başarı oranı ve hasta memnuniyeti de artacaktır. Bu derleme, adeziv sistemlerin başlangıcından günümüze kadar tarihsel gelişimi ve klinik uygulama aşamalarının sayısına ve dentin ile etkileşimlerine göre sınıflandırılmasını içermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler: Adezyon, self-etch adeziv, total-etch adeziv

ADHESIVE SYSTEMS in DENTISTRY

ABSTRACT

Since Buonocore described the adhesion of enamel with acid etching method, researchers aimed to develop new methods. Because adhesive systems show continuous improvement, they are classified in various ways. With many developments of adhesive systems, dentists follow these developments regularly and choose suitable materials. Thus the clinical success of the restoration and patient satisfaction will also increase. This review includes the historical development and classification of adhesive systems according to the number of clinical application steps and interactions with dentin.

Key Words: Adhesion, self-etch adhesive, total-etch adhesive

Keywords

Adezyon,self-etch adeziv

References

1. Çınar Ç. Çocuk Diş Hekimliğinde Adeziv Sistemlerin Tarihsel Gelişimi ve Sınıflandırılması. Turkiye Klinikleri Journal of Dental Sciences Special Topics. 2011;2(2):1-7.
2. Eligüzeloğlu E. Son Donem Geliştirilen Adeziv Sistemler. Ondokuz Mayıs Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2009;10(1):22-29.
3. Frankenberger R, Perdigao J, Rosa BT, Lopes M. ‘No-bottle’ vs ‘multi-bottle’ dentin adhesives-a microtensile bond strength and morphological study. Dental Materials. 2002;17(5):373-380.
4. Dayangaç GB. Kompozit Restorasyonlar, 2. baskı, İstanbul, Quintessence Yayıncılık, 2011, 25-57.
5. Van Meerbeek B, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. The clinical performance of adhesives. Journal of Dentistry. 1998;26(1):1-20.
6. Freedman G. The Evolution of Adhesive Techniques. Freedman G. Contemporary Estetic Dentistry. USA, Mosby Elsevier; 2012:168-189.
7. Swift J. Dentin/enamel adhesives: review of the literature. Pediatric dentistry. 2002;24(5):456-461
8. Van Meerbeek B, Inoue S, Perdigao J, Lambrechts P, Vanherle G. Enamel and Dentin Adhesion. Summit JB, Robbins JW, Schwartz RS. Fundamentals of Operative dentistry. 2nd ed. Singapore, Quintessence Publishing; 2001:178-235.

9. Anchieta RB, Machado LS, Martini AP, et al. Effect of long-term storage on nanomechanical and morphological properties of dentin–adhesive interfaces. Dental Materials. 2015;31(2):141-153.
10. Kiremitçi A, Hürmüzlü F. İki Farklı Dentin Adezivin Kompozitleri Dentine Bağlama Dayanıklılığının Karşılaştırılması. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2001;11(2):34-37.
21. da Rosa WLDO, Piva E, da Silva AF. Bond strength of universal adhesives: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of dentistry. 2015;43(7):765-776.
22. Vaidyanathan TK, Vaidyanathan J. Recent advances in the theory and mechanism of adhesive resin bonding to dentin: a critical review. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2009;88(2):558-578.
23. Muñoz MA, Luque I, Hass V, Reis A, Loguercio AD, Bombarda NHC. Immediate bonding properties of universal adhesives to dentine. Journal of dentistry. 2013;41(5):404-411.
24. Küçükeşmen Ç, Erdoğan Y. Süt ve daimi dişlerde bağlayıcı ajanların etkinliği, biyouyumluluğu ve sitotoksisitesi. SDÜ Tıp Fakültesi Dergisi. 2009;16(1):48-55.
25. Ayaz DF, Tağtekin D, Yanıkoğlu F. Dentine bağlanma ve değerlendirme metodları. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi.2011;4:49-56.
26. Erickson RL, Barkmeier WW, Latta MA. The role of etching in bonding to enamel: a comparison of self-etching and etch-and-rinse adhesive systems. Dental materials. 2009;25(11):1459-1467.
27. Altun C. Restoratif diş hekimliğinde mikrosızıntı. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi. 2004;46(3):264-269.
28. Patil BS, Rao BR, Sharathchandra SM, Hegde R, Kumar GV. Comparative Evaluation of Self-etching Primers and Phosphoric Acid Effectiveness on Composite to Enamel Bond: An in vitro Study. The journal of contemporary dental practice. 2013;14(5):790-795.
29. Chiang YC, Wang YL, Lin PY, et al. Mesoporous biomaterial for biomimetic crystallization in dentinal tubules without impairing the bonding of a self-etch resin to dentin. Journal of the Formosan Medical Association. 2016;115(6):455-462.
30. Oliveira SS, Pugach MK, Hilton JF, Watanabe LG, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. The influence of the dentin smear layer on adhesion: a self-etching primer vs. a total-etch system. Dental Materials, 2003;19(8):758-767.
41. De Munck J, Van Meerbeek B, Yoshida Y, et al. Four-year water degradation of total-etch adhesives bonded to dentin. Journal of Dental Research. 2003;82(2):136-140.
42. Gürpınar ÖA, Beklen A, Hukkanen M, Cehreli ZC, Onur MA, Konttinen YT. Effects of two multi-step self-etch primer/adhesives on apoptosis in human gingival fibroblasts in vitro. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials. 2006;79(2):435-440.
43. Barutcigil Ç, Barutcigil K, Kürklü D, Harorlı OT. Güncel Dentin Bağlayıcı Ajanların ve Uygulama Yöntemlerinin Makaslama Bağlanma Dayanımlarının Karşılaştırılması. İnönü Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi. 2013;2:27-32.
44. Reis A, de Carvalho Cardoso P, Vieira LCC, Baratieri LN, Grande RHM, Loguercio AD. Effect of prolonged application times on the durability of resin–dentin bonds. dental materials. 2008;24(5):639-644.
45. Song M, Shin Y, Park JW, Roh BD. A study on the compatibility between one-bottle dentin adhesives and composite resins using micro-shear bond strength. Restorative dentistry & endodontics. 2015;40(1):30-36.
46. Sancakli HS, Yildiz E, Bayrak I, Ozel S. Effect of different adhesive strategies on the post-operative sensitivity of class I composite restorations. European journal of dentistry. 2014;8(1):15-22.
47. Hamouda IM, Samra NR, Badawi MF. Microtensile bond strength of etch and rinse versus self-etch adhesive systems. Journal of the mechanical behavior of biomedical materials. 2011;4(3):461-466.
48. Giannini M, Makishi P, Ayres APA, et al. Self-Etch Adhesive Systems: A Literature Review. Brazilian dental journal. 2015;26(1):3-10.
49. Wagner A, Wendler M, Petschelt A, Belli R, Lohbauer U. Bonding performance of universal adhesives in different etching modes.Journal of dentistry. 2014;42(7):800-807.
50. McCabe JF, Walls AWG. Applied Dental Materials, 9th ed. Oxford, Blackwell publishing; 2008:225-244.
61. Yoshida Y, Van Meerbeek B, Nakayama Y, et al. Adhesion to and decalcification of hydroxyapatite by carboxylic acids. Journal of Dental Research. 2001;80(6):1565-1569.
62. Dieng-Sarr F, Sharrock P, Dabsie F, Grégoire G. Modifications of the organic and mineral fractions of dental tissues following conditioning by self-etching adhesives. Journal of dentistry. 2011;39(2):141-147.
63. Imazato S, Kinomoto Y, Tarumi H, Ebisu S, Tay FR. Antibacterial activity and bonding characteristics of an adhesive resin containing antibacterial monomer MDPB. Dental Materials. 2003;19(4):313-319.
64. Imazato S, Ehara A, Torii M, Ebisu S. Antibacterial activity of dentine primer containing MDPB after curing. Journal of dentistry. 1998;26(3):267-271.
65. Atram H, Jakati SV, Aley M, Chachada A, Mankar M. Clearfil Protect Bond™ versus Uni-Etch™ antibacterial self-etchant: A war of giants against shear bond strength. Indian Journal of Dental Research. 2016;27(1):54-60.
66. Reis A, Moura SK, Pellizzaro A, et al. Durability of enamel bonding using one-step self-etch systems on ground and unground enamel. Operative dentistry. 2009;34(2):181-191.
67. Ito S, Tay FR, Hashimoto M, et al. Effects of multiple coatings of two all-in-one adhesives on dentin bonding. J Adhes Dent. 2005;7(2):133-141.
68. Chopra V, Sharma H, Prasad SDA . Comparative evaluation of the bonding efficacy of two-step vs all-in-one bonding agents-An in-vitro study. Journal of Conservative Dentistry. 2009;12(3):101-104.
69. Takamizawa T, Barkmeier WW, Tsujimoto A, et al. Influence of water storage on fatigue strength of self-etch adhesives. Journal of dentistry. 2015;43(12):1416-1427.
70. Lührs AK, Guhr S, Schilke R, Borchers L, Geurtsen W, Günay H. Shear bond strength of self-etch adhesives to enamel with additional phosphoric acid etching. Operative dentistry. 2008;33(2):155-162.
71. Camelia ALB, Fodor O, Ioan TIG, et al. Tensile Bond Strength of Four Adhesive Systems. Bulletin of University of Agricultural Sciences and Veterinary Medicine Cluj-Napoca. Veterinary Medicine. 2009;66(1):188-195.
72. Tekçe N, Özsoy A, Bağ HG. Yüzey dehidratasyonunun (Etanol Wet Bonding) günümüz iki adet self etch adeziv sistemin mikrosızıntı skorlarına etkisi, Saglik Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi. 2013;4(3):95-103.
73. Tay FR, Pashley DH. Have dentin adhesives become too hydrophilic?. Journal-Canadian Dental Association. 2003;69(11):726-732.
74. Chen C, Niu LN, Xie H, et al. Bonding of universal adhesives to dentine–Old wine in new bottles?. Journal of dentistry. 2015;43(5):525-536.
75. Perdigão J, Swift EJ. Universal Adhesives. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2015;27(6):331-334.
76. Zhang ZY, Tian FC, Niu LN, et al. Defying ageing: An expectation for dentine bonding with universal adhesives?. Journal of dentistry. 2016;45:43-52.
77. Eren D, Bektaş ÖÖ. Dental adezivler. Cumhuriyet Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2006;9(1):63-67.
78. Inoue S, Van Meerbeek B, Abe Y, et al. Effect of remaining dentin thickness and the use of conditioner on micro-tensile bond strength of a glass-ionomer adhesive. Dental Materials. 2001;17(5):445-455.
79. Tyas MJ, Burrow MF. Adhesive restorative materials: a review. Australian Dental Journal. 2004;49(3):112-121.

Details

Primary Language

Turkish

Subjects

Dentistry

Journal Section

Review

Authors

Elmas Tüfek This is me
0000-0001-6087-7590

Buket Ayna
0000-0003-1963-8568

Publication Date

March 22, 2019

Submission Date

November 7, 2016

Acceptance Date

January 10, 2017

Published in Issue

Year 2019 Volume: 29 Number: 2

DOI

https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.285136

IZ

https://izlik.org/JA44AC28TU

Cite

RIS / Bibtex

APA

Tüfek, E., & Ayna, B. (2019). DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDE ADEZİV SİSTEMLER. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, 29(2), 340-349. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.285136

AMA

1.Tüfek E, Ayna B. DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDE ADEZİV SİSTEMLER. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019;29(2):340-349. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.285136

Chicago

Tüfek, Elmas, and Buket Ayna. 2019. “DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDE ADEZİV SİSTEMLER”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 29 (2): 340-49. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.285136.

EndNote

Tüfek E, Ayna B (March 1, 2019) DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDE ADEZİV SİSTEMLER. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 29 2 340–349.

IEEE

[1]E. Tüfek and B. Ayna, “DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDE ADEZİV SİSTEMLER”, Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 29, no. 2, pp. 340–349, Mar. 2019, doi: 10.17567/ataunidfd.285136.

ISNAD

Tüfek, Elmas - Ayna, Buket. “DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDE ADEZİV SİSTEMLER”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi 29/2 (March 1, 2019): 340-349. https://doi.org/10.17567/ataunidfd.285136.

JAMA

1.Tüfek E, Ayna B. DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDE ADEZİV SİSTEMLER. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019;29:340–349.

MLA

Tüfek, Elmas, and Buket Ayna. “DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDE ADEZİV SİSTEMLER”. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 29, no. 2, Mar. 2019, pp. 340-9, doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.285136.

Vancouver

1.Elmas Tüfek, Buket Ayna. DİŞ HEKİMLİĞİNDE ADEZİV SİSTEMLER. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Dergisi. 2019 Mar. 1;29(2):340-9. doi:10.17567/ataunidfd.285136