Konjenital Dudak Ve Damak Yarıklı Bir Hastanın Sabit Ve Hassas Tutuculu Protezlerle Rehabilitasyonu

Abstract

Yarık dudak ve damak (YDD) en yaygın kafayüz doğum defektidir ve etiyolojisi literatürde çoğu çalışmanın odağı olmuştur. YDD ' nin sebebi bilinmemektedir, fakat muhtemel sebepler; hamilelik süresince kötü beslenme ve ışın tedavisi, psikolojik stres, teratojenik ajanlar, enfeksiyon ajanları (virüsler) ve kalıtımdır. Çoğu yarıklar muhtemelen genetik ve genetik olmayan birçok faktör tarafından oluşturulur. Anterior maksillanın protetik rehabilitasyonu bu hastalar için önemlidir. Bu makale, 27 yaşındaki YDD ' li bir erkek hastanın protetik rehabilitasyonunu anlatmaktadır. Hasta estetik ve psikolojik problemlerinden dolayı sabit ve hassas tutuculu protezlerle tedavi edilmiştir.

Keywords

• Konjenital, Yarık dudak ve damak, Protez, Hassas tutucu

Rehabilitation of a Patient with Congenital Cleft Lip and Palate By Fixed and Precision Attachments Prosthesis

Abstract

Cleft lip and palate (CLP)is the most common craniofacial birth defect and its etiology has been the focus of many reports in the literature. The cause of CLP is unknown, but possible causes are malnutrition and irradiation during pregnancy, psychological stress, teratogenic agents, infectious agents (viruses), and inheritance. Most clefts are likely caused by multiple genetic and nongenetic factors. Prosthetic reconstruction of the anterior maxilla is important for these patients. This paper describes the prosthetic rehabilitation of a patient with CLP, 27 years-old man. The patient was treated with fixed and precision attachments prosthesis because of his aesthetic and pshychological problems.

Keywords

• Congenital, Cleft lip and palate, Prosthesis, Precision attachment

References

1. Trotman CA, Collett AR, McNamara JA, Cohen SR, Analyses of craniofacial and dental morphology in monozygotic twins discordant for cleft lip and unilateral cleft lip and palate. Angle Orthod 1993; 63: 135-40.
2. Raghavan R, Sidhu SS, Kharbanda OP. Craniofacial pattern of parents of children having cleft lip and/or cleft palate anomaly. Angle Orthod, 1994;64:137-44.
3. Strauss RP. The organization and delivery of craniofacial health services: the state of the art. Cleft Palate Craniofac J,1999;36:189-95.
4. Vaderas AP, Incidence of cleft lip, cleft palate and cleft lip and palate among races: a review. Cleft Palate J 1987;24:216-25.
5. Murray JC, Daack-Hirsch S, Buetow KH. Clinical and epidemiologic studies of cleft lip and palate in the Philippines. Cleft Palate J 1997;34:7-10.
6. Tunçbilek G. Dudak- damak yarıklarında kalıtım ve epidemiyoloji. In: Erk Y, Özgür F, eds. Dudak damak yarıkları. Ankara: İşkur Matbaacılık Ltd Şti, 1999; 7-13.
7. Epker BN, Fish LC. Dentofacial deformities. Integrated orthodontics and surgical correction. St Louis: CV Mosby 1986;642-709.
8. Jayasekera T, Hall R, Lopacki S. Management of cleft lip and palate. In: Cameron A, Widmer R. Handbook of Paediatric Dentistry. St Louis CV Mosby 1998;289- 306.

9. Moyers RE. Handbook of orthodontics. 4th ed. Chicago: Year Book Medical Publishers, 1988;19
10. Enacar A. Dudak ve Damak Yarıkları. Dudak damak yarıklarında. orta yüz büyümesinin kontrolü: Maksiller ortopedik ve ortodontik tedavi. Hacettepe Üniv Tıp Fak. Plastik ve Rekonstrüktif Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı, Ankara, 1999.
11. Bhat AM. Prosthetic rehabilitation of a completely edentulous patient with palatal insufficiency. Indian J Dent Res 2007;18:35-7.
12. Bıçakçı AA, Nalçacı R, Turgut M. Damak dudak yarıklı bir hastada multidisipliner tedavi yaklaşımı (Olgu sunumu).Türk Diş hek Derg 2007; 69:136-8.
13. Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. The orthodontist, an essential partner in CLP treatment. B-ENT, 2006; Suppl 2:57-62.
14. Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Borstlap-Engels VM, Spauwen PH, Borstlap WA. Team management of orofacial clefts. Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd 2000;107:447-51.
15. McWilliams B J, Musgrave R H. Psychological implications of articulation disorders in cleft palate children. Cleft Palate J 1972;9:294–303.
16. Marcusson A, Paulin G, Ostrup L. Facial appearance in adults who had cleft lip and palate treated in childhood. Scand J Plastic Reconst Hand Surg 2002;36:16–23.
17. Hickey AJ, Salter M. Prosthodontic and psychological factors in treating patients with congenital and craniofacial defects. J Prost Dent 2006;95:392-6.
18. Turner SR, Rumsey N, Sandy JR. Psychological aspects of cleft lip and palate. Eur J Orthod 1998;20:407-15.
19. Van Steenberghe D, Branemark P-I, Quirynen M, De Mars G, Naert I. The rehabilitation of oral defects by osseointegrated implants. J Clin Periodontol 1991;18:488-93.
20. Bolender CL, Smith DE, Toolson LB. Overdentures: their effectiveness and clinical considerations in treating the partially dentate mouth. In: Bates JF, Neill DJ, Preiskel HW. Restoration of the Partially Dentate Mouth. Chicago Quint. Publ. Co 1984;127
21. Mensor MC. Removable partial overdentures with mechanical (precision) attachments. Dent Clin North Am 1990;3:669-81.
22. Tunçbilek E (ed). Türkiye’ de Konjenital Malformasyon Sıklığı, Dağılımı, Risk Faktörleri ve Yenidoğanların Antropometrik Değerlendirilmesi. Ankara TÜBİTAK Matbaası, 1996;94.
23. Chapman KL, Graham KT, Gooch J, Visconti C. Conversational skills of preschool and school-age children with cleft lip and palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1998;35:503-16.
24. Berk NW, Cooper ME, Liu YE, Marazita ML. Social anxiety in Chinese adults with oral-facial clefts. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2001;38:126–33.
25. Starr P. Self-esteem and behavioral functioning of teenagers with oro-facial clefts. Rehabilitation 1978; 39: 233–25.
26. Leonard B J, Dwyer Brust J, Abrahams G, Sielaff B. Self-concept of children and adolescents with cleft lip and/or palate. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991;28:347–53.
27. Brantley H T, Clifford E. Maternal and child locus of control and fielddependence in cleft palate children. Cleft Palate J 1979;16:183–7.
28. A. J. Hickey and M. Salter. Prosthodontic and psychological factors in treating patients with congenital and craniofacial defects. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2006;95:392–396.
29. Ayna E, Başaran EG, and Beydemir K. Prosthodontic rehabilitation alternative of patients with cleft lip and palate (CLP): Two cases report. International Journal of Dentistry 2009;10: 1155-8.
30. K. Randow, P. O. Glantz, and B. Z¨oger. Technical failures and some related clinical complications in extensive fixed prosthodontics. An epidemiological study of long-term clinical quality. Acta Odontologica Scandinavica 1986; 44:241–55.
31. M. Saito, K. Notani, Y. Miura, and T. Kawasaki. Complications and failures in removable partial dentures: a clinical evaluation. Journal of Oral Rehabilitation 2002; 29:627–33.
32. B. Bergman, A. Hugoson, and C.-O. Olsson. Caries, periodontal and prosthetic findings in patients with removable partial dentures: a tenyear longitudinal study. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1982;48:506–14.
33. A. H. B. M. Vermeulen, H. M. A. M. Keltjens,M. A. Van Hof, and A. F. Kayser. Ten-year evaluation of removable partial dentures: survival rates based on retreatment, not wearing and replacement. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1996;76:267–72. Yazışma Adresi Dr. Hatice ÖZDEMİR
34. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Protetik Diş Tedavisi Anabilim Dalı 25240, Erzurum, TURKEY. Tlf.: 0 442 231 1736 Fax: [phone] e- mail: [e-mail]