Post Systems From Past To Present

Abstract

Endodontically treated teeth with coronal damages are restored with post-cores system to fully retain a final crown restoration. Until recently, posts were made of metal and they commonly used because of their superior physical properties. Along with demand for esthetic restorations has increased, metalfree materials with physical properties similar to those of dentin has become a major objective in dentistry. The tooth-colored posts have improved the esthetics of teeth restored with posts and cores. Esthetic posts made of either reinforced resins or strength ceramic. Several types of fiber reinforced posts such as quartz, glass, polyethylene, carbon, are currently available. Selection of an appropriate post-core system from the wide variety of available systems may lead to a dilemma for clinicians. Therefore, the purpose of this article is to review some informations about post systems and assist the selection of the post-core assembly.

Keywords

• Post, Post types, posts history

Geçmişten Günümüze Post Sistemleri

Abstract

Kronal hasarlı endodontik tedavili dişler postkor restorasyonları ile restore edilir. Metal postlar günümüze kadar yaygın olarak kullanılmaktadır. Artan estetik ihtiyaçla bereaber metal içermeyen, fiziksel özellikleri dentine benzeyen restorasyonlar dişhekimliğinin konusu olmuştur. Diş renginde olan postlar, post-kor ile restore edilen dişlerin estetiğini arttırmıştır. Estetik postlar güçlendirilmiş rezin veya sermakten oluşur. Quartz, Cam, polyetilen ve carbon ile güçlendirilmiş post sistemleri mevcuttur. Birçok post sistemi arasından uygun olanı seçmek klinisyenleri hep bir çıkmaza sokmuştur. Bu nedenle, bu makalenin amacı post sistemleri hakkında bazı bilgiler vererek post-kor seçiminde klinisyene yardımcı olmaktır.

Keywords

• post, post çeşitleri, postların tarihçesi

References

1. Aydemir H, Balkaya B, Yeşilyurt C. İki Farklı Post Ve Kor Sistem İle Restore Edilen Dişlerin Fraktüre Direnci. Atatürk Üniv.Diş Hek Fak Derg 2008;2:416
2. Trabert KC, Cooney JP. The endodontically treated tooth. Restorative concepts and techniques. Dent Clin North Am 1984;28:923-51.
3. Smith CT, Schuman NS. Prefabricated post and kor systems: An overview, Compend Contin Educ Dent 1998;19:1013-8.
4. Tait CME, Ricketts DNJ, Higgings AJ. Restoration of root filled tooth pre operative assessment. Br Dent J 2005;198:395-404.
5. Qualtrough AJ, Mannocci F. Tooth colored post systems: A review Oper Dent 2003;28:86-91
6. Alaçam T, Nalbant L, Alaçam A. İleri restorasyon teknikleri. Ankara, 1998 Polat Yayınları, 3.
7. Kwiatkowski S, Geller WA. Preliminary consideration of the glass ceramic dowel post and kor. Int J Prosthodont. 1989;2:51-5.
8. Pissis P. Fabrication of a metal-free ceramic restoration utilizing the monobloc technique. Prac Perio Aest Dent 1995;7:83-94.

9. Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. New concept of coronoradiculer reconstruction: the Composipost, Chir Dent 1990;60:131-41.
10. Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjogren U, Sundquist G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:10-5.
11. Barkhordar RA, Radke R, Abbasi J. Effect of metal collars on resistance of endodontically treated teeth to root fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:676-8.
12. Mattison GD, Delivanis PD, Thacker RW Jr, Hassel KJ. Effect of post preparation on the apical seal. J Prothet Dent 1984;51:785-9.
13. Kvist T, Rydin E, Reit C. The relative frequency of periapical lesions in teeth with root canal -retained posts. J Endod 1989;15:578-80.
14. Alaçam T, Nalbant L, Alaçam A. İleri Restorasyon Teknikleri. Ankara.1998, Polat Yayınları 50,74130,176,199-209.
15. Guttman JL. The dentin- root complex: anatomic and biologic considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:458-67.
16. Hatzikyriakos AH, Reisis GI, Tsingos N. A 3-year postoperative clinical evaluation of posts and kors beneath existing crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67: 454-8.
17. Torbjorner A, Karlsson S, Omdan PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 73: 439-44.
18. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: Effect of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978; 39: 401-5.
19. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52: 28Chapman KW, Worley JL, von Fraunhofer JA. Retention of prefabricated posts by cements and resins. J Prosthet Dent 1985; 54: 649-52.
20. Fernandes AS, Shetty S, Coutinho I. factors determining post selection: A literature Rewiew. J Prosthet Dent 2003;90:556-62.
21. Arslan İ. Güncel Post Sistemlerinin Farklı Üst Yapı Restorasyonları İle Birlikte Değerlendirilmesi. Ankara Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Doktora Tezi 2006
22. Aran B. Farklı Postlarda Mikrosızıntının İncelenmesi. Doktora Tezi. Ege Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü, 2006.
23. Rosential L, Stephen F, Land Martin F, Fujımoto J. Contemporary fixed prostodontics. The Mosby Inc.2001 Chapter 12
24. Sidoli GE, Kimg PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and kor system. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:5-9.
25. Schwartz RS, Robbins JW. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: A literature review. J Endod 2004;30:289-301.
26. Monoghan P, Roh L, Kim J. Corrosion behavior of selected alloys. J Dent Res 1992;71:25-9.
27. Dean JP, Jeansonne BG, Sakar N. In vitro evaluation of carbon fiber posts. J Endod 1998;24: 807Xible AA, Tavarez RRJ, Araujo CRP, Bonachela WC. Effects of silica coating and silanization on flextural and composite- resin bond strengths of zirconia posts: An in vitro study J Prosthet Dent 2006;95:224-9.
28. Torbjorner A, Karlsson S, Syverud M and HenssenPettersen A. Carbon fiber reinforced root canal posts. Mechanical and cytotoxic properties, Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:605-11.
29. Drummond JL. In vitro evaluation of endodontic posts. Am J Dent 2000;13:5-8.
30. Bateman G, Ricketts DNJ, Saunders WP. Fibrebased post systems: a review, Br Dent J 2003;195:43-8.
31. Torbjorner A, Fransson B. A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth, Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:369-75.
32. Mannocci F, Sherriff M, Watson TF. Three-point bending test of fiber posts, J Endod 2001;27:758
33. Vallittu PK, Lassila P. Reinforcement of acrylic resin denture base material with metal or fibre strengtheners, J Oral Rehabil 1992;19:225-30.
34. Raygot CG, Chai J, Jameson L. Frakture Resistance and Primary Failure Mode of Endodonticaly Treated Teeth Restorated with a carbon Fiber –Reinforced Resin Post System In Vitro. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:141-5.
35. Love RM, Purton DG. The effect of serrations on carbon fibre posts-retention within the root canal, kor retention and post rigidity. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:484-8.
36. Yazdanie N, Mahood M. Carbon fiber acrylic resin composite: An investigation of transverse strength, J Prosthet Dent, 1985;54:543-7.
37. Murphy J. Reinforced plastics handbook, Oxford 1998, Elsevier, 63-106.
38. Lassila LVJ, Tanner J, LeBell AM, Narva K, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mater 2004;20:29-36.
39. Goldberg AJ, Burstone CJ. The use of continious fiber reinforcement in dentistry. Dent Mater 1992;8:197-202.
40. Ferrari M, Vichi A, Garcia-Godoy F. Clinical evaluation of fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts and cast post and cors, Am J Dent 2000;13:15b18b.
41. Cormier CJ, Burns DR and Moon P. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. J Prosthodont 2001;10:26-36.
42. Braden M, Davy KW, Parker S, Ladizesky NH, Ward IM. Denture base poly (methyl methacrylate) reinforced with ultra-high modulus polyethylene fibers. Br Dent J 1988;164: 109-13.
43. Eskitaşçıoğlu G, Belli S. Use of a bondable reinforcement fiber for post-and-kor buildup in an endodontically treated tooth: A case report Dent Mater 2002;33:549-51.
44. Ichikawa Y, Akagawa Y, Nikai H, Tsuru H. Tissue compatibility and stability of a new zirconia ceramic in vivo. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:322-6.
45. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999;27:275-8.
46. Toman M, Toksavul S. Clinical evaluation of zirconia ceramic post. Selçuk Üniv Dişhek Fak Derg 2007;16:5-9.
47. Kosmac T, Oblak C, Jenkıvar P, Funduk N, Marion L. The effect of surface grinding and sandblasting on flexural strength and reliability of Y-TZP zirconia ceramic. Dent Mater 1999;15: 426-33. Yazışma Adresi
48. Dr. Emine GÖNCÜ BAŞARAN Dicle Üniversitesi Dişhekimliği Fakültesi Protetik Diş Tedavisi A.D. Diyarbakır/TÜRKİYE Telefon: [phone] Fax: [phone] email: [e-mail]