THE EFFECTS OF DIFFERENT SURFACE APPLICATIONS ON PRIMARY TOOTH DENTINE CONTAMINATED WITH FERRIC SULFATE, ON THE MICROTENSILE BOND STRENGTH OF THE COMPOMER

Abstract

Objective: Effects of different surface applications on primary tooth dentine, contaminated with ferric sulfate used as a primary teeth pulpotomy agent, on μTBS of the compomers were compared. Materials-Methods: Twenty-five caries-free primary second molars were used. The occlusal surfaces were prepared by cutting enamel and dentin perpendicular to the tooth axis 1 mm above the pulp horn. Teeth were randomly divided into five groups. Except the control groups G-1(Phosphoric acid+Futura Bond+ Glasiosite) the teeth were contaminated with ferric sulfate. Other groups were formed as follows: G-2 (Phosphoric acid+Futura Bond+Glasiosite), G-3 (Maleic Acid+Futura Bond+Glasiosite), G-4 (Citric Acid+Futura Bond+Glasiosite) and G-5 (Futura Bond+Glasiosite). Teeth were sectioned as bar-shaped specimens and subjected to microtensile bond strength testing. μTBS data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests, and the frequency of fracture modes was compared using Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: G-5 presented the minimum μTBS value, while G-3 presented the maximum. The difference between the groups was found statistically significant (P< 0.05). μTBS values were statistically sequenced as G-3=G-4=G-2>G-4=G-2=G-1>G-5. When fracture modes were compared, no statistically significant difference was found (P>0.05). Conclusion: As a pulpotomy agent, ferric sulfate is recommended to be used with a combination of selfetching primers and different acid types.

Keywords

• Ferric sulfate
• microtensile bond strength
• pulpotomy

DEMİR SÜLFAT İLE KONTAMİNE SÜT DİŞİ DENTİNİNDE FARKLI YÜZEY UYGULAMALARININ KOMPOMERİN MİKRO-GERİLİMİNE ETKİSİ

Abstract

Amaç: Bu çalışmada, süt dişi pulpatomi ajanlarından demir sülfat ile kontamine edilmiş süt dişi dentinine farklı yüzey uygulamalarını takiben yerleştirilen kompomer rezin materyalin mikrogerilimi karşılaştırılmıştır. Materyal-Metod: 25 adet çürüksüz süt II. azı dişinin kuronları, radyolojik pulpa odası görüntüsünün 1 mm okluzalinden olacak şekilde yatay pozisyonda kesilmiştir. Dişler eşit sayıda rastgele beş gruba ayrılmıştır. Kontrol grubu[G-1(Fosforik asit+Futura Bond+ Glasiosite)] dışındaki dişler demir sülfat ile 30s süreyle kontamine edilmiş ve 30s süreyle serum fizyolojik ile yıkanmıştır. Diğer gruplar şu şekilde oluşturulmuştur. [G-2(Fosforik asit +Futura bond +Glasiosite), G-3(Maleik Asit +Futurabond + Glossiosit), G-4(Sitrik Asit +Futura bond +Glasiosite) ve G-5(Futura bond +Glasiosite)]. Dişler 1X1 mm kalınlığında kesilerek test çubukları elde edilmiştir. Çubuklar mikro-gerilim testine tabi tutulmuştur. Elde edilen mikro-gerilim verileri tek yönlü ANOVA ve Tukey Çoklu Karşılaştırma testleri ile; başarısızlık şekilleri (adeziv, koheziv ve karışık) tek yönlü Kruskal Wallis testiyle analiz edilmiştir. Bulgular: En düşük mikrogerilim değeri G-5’te bulunurken, en yüksek mikrogerilim değeri G-3’te bulunmuştur. Gruplar arasında farklılık anlamlı bulunmuştur (P< 0.05). Mikro-gerilim bağlanma dayanımlarının istatistiksel olarak sıralanması ise; G3=G-4=G-2>G-4=G-2=G-1>G-5 şeklinde olmuştur. Başarısızlık şekilleri karşılaştırıldığında ise, gruplar arasındaki farklılık anlamsız bulunmuştur(P >0.05). Sonuç: Demir sülfat pulpatomi ajanının kompomer rezinin bağlanma gücünü etkilememesi için, farklı asitlerle self etch primer kombinasyonunun kullanımı önerilebilir.

Keywords

• Demir sülfat
• mikro-gerilim
• pulpatomi

References

1. Fuks, AB. Pulp therapy for the primary and young permanent dentitions. Dent Clin North Am 2000; 44: 571-96.
2. Eidelman E, Holan G, Fuks AB. Mineral trioxide aggregate vs formocresol pulpotomized primary molars: a preliminary report. Pediatr Dent 2001; 23:15Atkinson WH. The preservation of exposed dental pulps. Dent Cosmos 1866; 7:425.
3. Prabhakar AR, Bedi S. Effect of glutaraldehyde and ferric sulfate on shear bond strength of adhesives to primary dentin. J Indian Soc Pedod Prevent Dent 2012; Supp 31: 109-13.
4. Whithworth JM, Nunn JH. Paeditric endodontics. In Welbury RR (ed) Paediatric Dentistry. New York. Oxford University Press. 2001: 157-88.
5. Hill D, Berry CW, Seale NS, Kaga M. Comparison of antimicrobial and cytotoxic effects of glutaraldehyde and formocresol. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1991; 71: 89-95.
6. Lewis BB, Chestner SB. Formaldehyde in dentistry: a review of mutagenic and carcinogenic potential. J Am Dent assoc 1981; 103: 429-34.
7. Zarzar PA, Rosenblatt A, Takahashi CS, Takeuchi PL, Costa LA. Formocresol mutagenicity following primary tooth pulp therapy: an in vivo study. J Dent 2003; 31:479-85.
8. Smith NL, Seale NS, Nunn ME. Ferric sulfate pulpotomy in primary molars: A retrospective study. Pediatr Dent 2000; 22: 192-9.

9. Fuks AB, Holan G, Davis JM, Eidelman E. Ferric sulfate versus dilue formocresol in pulpotomies primary molars: long-term follow up. Pediatr Dent 1997; 19:327-30.
10. Fei AL, Udin RD, Jhonson R. A clinical study of ferric sulfate as a pulpotomy agent in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 1991; 13: 327-32.
11. Eyüboğlu Ö. Farklı materyaller kullanılarak yapılan süt dişi amputasyonlarının klinik, radyografik ve histolojik olarak değerlendirilmesi. Atatürk Üniv Sağlık Bil Enstitüsü Pedodonti A.B.D. Doktora tezi. Erzurum 2007.
12. Salama FS. Influence of zinc-oxide eugenol, formocresol, and ferric sulfate on bond strength of dentin adhesives to primary teeth. J Contemp Dent Pract 2005; 6: 14-21.
13. Shalan H, Awad S, El-Fallal AAS. Influnce of pulpotomy nedicaments on the ultrastructure and shear bond strength of a self-etch adhesive to primary tooth dentin. Quintessence Int 2012; 43: 517Waterhouse PJ, Num JH, Withworth JM. An investigation of the relative efficiacy of Buckley’s Formocresol and calcium hydroxide in primary molar vital pulp therapy. Br Dent J 2000; 188: 32
14. Farooq MS, Coll JA, Kuwabara A, Shelton P. Success rates of formocresol pulpotomy and indirect pulp therapy in the treatment of deep dentinal caries in primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2000; 22: 278-86.
15. Holan G, Fuks AB, Keltz N. Success rate of formokresol pulpotomy in primary molars restored with stainless steel crown vs amalgam. Pediatr Dent 2002; 24: 212-6.
16. Holan G, Eidelmann E, Fuks AB. Long-term evaluation of pulpotomy in primary molars using mineral trioxide aggregate or formocresol. Pediatr Dent 2005; 27: 129-36.
17. Tsai TP, Su HL, Tseng LH. Glutaraldehyde preparations and pulpotomy in primary molars. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 1993; 76: 346-50.
18. Sonmez D, Duruturk L. Success rate of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy in primary molars restored with amalgam and stainless steel crowns. Br Dent J 2010; 208: 408-9.
19. Gruythuysen RJM, Weerheijm KL. Calcium hydroxide pulpotomy with a light cured cavitysealing material after two years. J Dent Child 1997; 64: 251-3.
20. Arslan S, Ertaş H, Zorba YO. Influence of Ankaferd Blood Stoper on shear bond strength on bonding systems. Dent Mater J 2012; 31: 226-31.
21. Baier RE, Shafrin EG, Zisman WA. Adhesion: Mechanism of adhesion of polymer to acid-etched enamel. J Oral Rehabil 1978; 5: 69-80.
22. Pilo R, Ben-Amar A. Comparison of microleakage for three one bottle and three multiple step dentin bonding agent. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 209-13.
23. Ben-Amar A. Microleakage of composite resin restoration. A status report for the American Journal of Dentistry. Am J Dent 1999; 2: 175-80.
24. Land MF, Rosentiel SF, Sandrik JL. Disturbance of dentinal smear layer by acidic hemostatic agent. J Prosthet Dent. 1994;72:4-7.
25. Christoffersen MR, Thyregod HC, Christoffersen J. Effects of aluminum (III), chromium (III) and iron (III) on the rate of dissolution of calcium hydroxyapatite crystals in absence and presence of the chelating agent desferrioxamine. Calcif Tissue Int 1987; 41: 27-30.
26. Selvig KA, Halse A. The ultrasutructural localization of iron in rat incisor enamel. Europ J Oral Sci 1974; 83: 88-95.
27. Kumar P, Shenoy A, Joshi S. The effect of various surface contaminants on the microleakage of two different generation bonding agents: a stereomicroscopic study. J Cons Dent 2012; 15: 265O’Keefe KL, Pinzon LM, Rivera B, Powers JM. Bond strength of composite to astringent-contaminated dentin using self-etching adhesives. Am J Dent 2005; 18:168-72.
28. Abdalla AI, Davidson CL. Bonding efficiency and interfacial morphology of one-bottle adhesives to contaminated dentin surfaces. Am J Dent 1998;11:281-5.
29. Van Meerbeek B, Kanumilli P, De Munck J, Landuyt KV, Lambrechts P, Peumans M. A randomized controlled study evaluating the effectiveness of a two-step self-etch adhesive with and without selective phosphoric-acid etching of enamel. Dent Mater 2005; 21:375-83.
30. Sano H, Shono T, Takatsu T, Hosoda H. Microporous dentin zone beneath resinimpregnated layer. Oper Dent 1994;19:59-64.
31. Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, Horner JA, Matthews WG, Pashley DH. Nanoleakage: leakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 1995; 20: 18
32. O’Keefe KL, Powers JM. Adhesion of resin composite core materials to dentin. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 451-6.
33. Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasuda N, Hybrid layer as a dentin-bonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent 1991; 3:133-8.
34. Agostini FG, Kaaden C, Powers JM. Bond strength of self-etching primers to enamel and dentin of primary teeth. Pediatr Dent 2001;23:481-6.
35. Breschi L, Gobbi P, Mazzotti G, Falconi M, Ellis TH, Stangel I. High resolution SEM evaluation of dentin etched with maleic and citric acid. Dent Mater 2002;18: 26–35. Yazışma Adresi: Yrd. Doc. Dr. Sera DERELİOĞLU
36. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diş Hekimliği Fakültesi Pedodonti A.D, Erzurum, Turkiye Tel.: [phone] Fax:[phone]
37. E-mail: [e-mail]