PROSTHETIC APPROACHES IN ECTODERMAL DYSPLASIA PATIENT’S

Abstract

The National Foundation for Ectodermal Dysplasia (NFED) defines ectodermal dysplasia as a rare congenital disorder characterized by developmental failure of 2 or more ectodermal origin tissues (such as skin, nails, hair, sweat-oil glands and teeth). There are almost 200 common types of the disorder. The dental characteristics of this disorder defined anadontia or hypodontia of the primary or permanent teeth, hypoplastic conical teeth, and underdevelopment of the alveolar ridges. Pediatric patients with congenital/development disorders present the prosthodontist with complex esthetic and functional restorative challenges. Prosthetic treatment can play an important role in the ED cases whose dentition fails to develop normally because of ED patients were very young. At the same time it is very important that dental treatment at an early age for physiologic and psychosocial reasons. The options for aappropiate definitive treatment plan may include fixed prostheses, removable partial dentures, implant-supported prostheses, complete dentures or overdentures, singly or in combination. However, financial constraints and other priorities can prevent patients from choosing the most desirable treatment. The treatment target was to occasion a more favorable starting point for prosthodontic phase of habilitation by improving the sagittal and vertical skeletal relationships and facial esthetics. For this reason the dentist who was to make treatment, should have the sufficient knowledge to evaluate the patient involving pedodontic, orthodontic, surgery and prosthetic aspects. Besides, cooperation with the child and unerstanding of him/her is essential to assure success. In this review we aimed to explain prosthetic treatment alternatives of the ED patient’s for functional and esthetic necessity.

Keywords

• Ectodermal Dysplasia
• Prosthodontic
• anadonti

EKTODERMAL DİSPLAZİLİ HASTALARDA PROTETİK YAKLAŞIMLAR

Abstract

Uluslararası Ektodermal Displazi Kuruluşu (NFED) ektodermal displaziyi iki veya daha fazla sayıda ektoderm orijinli (deri, tırnak, saç, ter-yağ bezleri ve diş gibi) dokunun gelişim bozukluğuyla karakterize, nadir görülen kalıtsal bir hastalık olarak tanımlamaktadır. Hastalığın neredeyse 200’e yakın tipi tanımlanmıştır. Bu sendromun dental özelliği, süt veya sürekli dişlenmede anadonti veya hipodonti, hipoplastik konik dişler ve az gelişmiş alveolar sırtlar olarak tanımlanmaktadır. Kalıtsal/gelişimsel hastalık gösteren erken yaştaki hastalarda prostodontistin kompleks fonksiyonel ve estetik restoratif değişiklikler yapması gerekebilir. Dentisyonu normal gelişmeyen ED vakalarında hastaların yaşının çok genç olması nedeniyle protetik tedavi uygulaması önemli bir rol oynar. Aynı zamanda fizyolojik ve psikososyal nedenlerden dolayı da bu hastaların tedavisinin en erken dönemde yapılması çok önemlidir. Hastaya uygun kesin tedavi planı seçenekleri sabit protezler, hareketli bölümlü protezler, implant destekli protezler, tam protezler ve overdenture protezleri veya bunların kombinasyonlarını içermektedir. Bununla birlikte maddi kısıtlamalar veya diğer öncelikler bazen hastaya en uygun tedaviyi seçmeyi engelleyebilir. Tedavi amacı, hastalarda yatay ve dikey iskeletsel ilişkileri ve yüz estetiğini sağlayabilmek için en uygun prostodontik başlangıç noktasını yaratabilmektir. Bunun içinde tedaviyi yapacak olan hekimin hastayı, pedodontik, ortodontik, cerrahi ve protetik yönden değerlendirebilecek bilgiye sahip olması ve hastayla yakın ilişki kurabilmesi gereklidir. Bu derlemede, ED’li hastaların fonksiyonel ve estetik ihtiyaçlarını karşılayacak protetik tedavi seçeneklerinin anlatılması amaçlanmıştır

Keywords

• Ektodermal displazi
• protetik rehabilitasyon
• anadonti

References

1. Hickey AJ, Salter M. Prosthodontic and psychological factors in treating patients with congenital and craniofacial defects. J Prosthet Dent. 2006; May 95(5): 392-6.
2. Suri S, Carmichael RP, Tompson BD. Simultaneous functional and fixed appliance therapy for growth modification and dental alignment prior to prosthetic habilitation in hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2004; 92(5): 428-33.
3. Duijf P, Bokhoven H. Ectodermal dysplasia: Skinny models on the catwalk. Drug Discovery Today:Disease Models 2005; 2(2): 111-118.
4. Pigno MA, Blackman RB, Cronin RJ, Cavazos E. Prosthodontic management of ectodermal dysplasia: A review of the literature. J Prosthet Dent. 1996; 76(5): 541-5.
5. NaBadalung DP. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of an anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia patient: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 1999; 81(5): 499-502.
6. Vergo TJ. Prosthodontics for pediatric patients with congenital/developmental orofacial anomalies:A long-term follow-up. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86(4): 342-7.
7. Imirzalioglu P, Uckan S, Haydar SG. Surgical and prosthodontic treatment alternatives for children and adolescents with ectodermal dysplasia:A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88(5): 569- 72.
8. Argenziano G, Monsurro MR, Pazienza R, Delfino M. A case of probable autosomal recessive ectodermal dysplasia with corkscrew hairs and mental retardation in a family with tuberous sclerosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 1997; 38(2): 344-348.

9. Tarjan I, Gabris K, Rozsa N. Early prosthetic treatment of patients with ectodermal dysplasia: A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 93(5): 419- 24.
10. Guler N, Cıldır S, Iseri U, Sandallı N, Dilek O. Hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia with bilateral impacted teeth at the coronoid process: A case rehabilitated with mini dental implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol Endod. 2005; 99(5): E34-8.
11. Yavuz I, S. Kıralp, Z. Baskan, “Hypohydrotic ectodermal dysplasia: A case report” Quintessence International 2008; 39(1): 81-6
12. Dai YS, Liang MG, Gellis SE, Bonilla FA, Schneider LC, Geha RS, Orange JS. Characteristics of mycobacterial infection in patients with immunodeficiency and nuclear factor-kB essential modular mutation, with or without ectodermal dysplasia. J Am Acad Dermatol 2004; 51(5): 718- 22.
13. Köymen G, Karaçay Ş, Başak F, Akbulut AE, Altun C. Ektodermal displazi olgusunda kombine dişsel tedavi. Gülhane Tıp Dergisi 2003; 45(1): 79-81.
14. Yavuz I, Baskan Z, Ulku R, Dulgergil TC, Dari O, Ece A, Yavuz Y, Dari KO. Ectodermal dysplasia: Retrospective study of fifteen cases. Arch Med Res. 2006 Apr; 37(3): 403-9.
15. Başkan S.Z, I Yavuz, R Ulku, S Kaya, Y Yavuz, G Başaran, O Adıgüzel, T Ozer. Evaluation of Ectodermal Dysplasia Kaohsiung J Med Sci, 2006; 22(4): 171-6.
16. Hickey AJ, Vergo TJ. Prosthetic treatments for patients with ectodermal dysplasia. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86(4): 364-8
17. Murdoch-Kinch CA, Miles DA, Poon CK. Hypodontia and nail dysplasia syndrome. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1993; 75(3): 403-6.
18. Kaya S, M. Zortuk, O. Adıgüzel, Z. Baskan, E. Tumen. Clinical presentation and Management of Ectodermal Dysplasia. Biotechnology & Biotechnological Equipment 2006; 20(1): 139-143.
19. Yenısey M, Guler A, Unal U. Orthodontic and prosthodontic treatment of ectodermal dysplasia-a case report. British Dental Journal 2004; 196(11): 677-9.
20. Grinberg S, Jover P, Quiros L, Diaz LG, Terron F. Ectodermal dysplasia: report of two female cases. J Dent Child 1980; 17(2): 45-47.
21. Lo Muzio L, Bucci P, Carile F, Riccitiello F, Scotti C, Coccia E, Rappelli G. Prosthetic rehabilitation of a child affected from anhydrotic ectodermal dysplasia: a case report. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2005; Aug 15; 6(3): 120-6.
22. Pavarina AC, Machado AL, Vergani CE, Giampaolo ET. Overlay removable partial dentures for a patient with ectodermal dysplasia:A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2001; 86(6): 574-7.
23. Lakomski J, Kobielak K, Kobielak A, Trzeciak WH. Correcting facial dysmorphism in a patient with anhidrotic ectodermal dysplasia:A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 1998; 80(5): 524-526.
24. Ekstrand K, Thomsson M. Ectodermal dysplasia with partial anadontia: prosthetic treatment with implant fixed prosthesis. Journal of Dentistry for Children 1988; July-August 282-4.
25. Celar AG, Durstberger G, Zauza K. Use of an individual traction prosthesis and distraction osteogenesis to reposition osseointegrated implants in a juvenile with ectodermal dysplasia:A clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 87(2): 145- 8.
26. Guckes AD, Scurria MS, King TS, McCarthy GR, Brahim JS. Prospective clinical trial of dental implants in persons with ectodermal dysplasia. J Prosthet Dent. 2002; 88(1): 21-5.
27. Penarrocha-Diago M, Uribe-Origone R, Rambla- Ferrer J, Guarinos-Carbo J. Fixed rehabilitation of a patient with hypohidrotic ectodermal dysplasia using zygomatic implants. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol Endod. 2004; 98(2): 161-5.
28. Kearns G, Sharma A, Perrott D, Schmidt B, Kaban L, Vargervik K. Placement of endosseous implants in children and adolescents with hereditary ectodermal dysplasia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. Oral Radiol Endod. 1999; 88(1): 5-10.
29. Escobar V, Epker BN. Alveolar bone growth in response to endosteal implants intwo patients with ectodermal dysplasia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1998; 27(2): 445-447.