EVALUATION OF UNILATERAL CONDYLAR HYPERPLASIA BY CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY: A REPORT OF TWO CASES AND REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

Abstract

-

Keywords

• -

UNİLATERAL KONDİLER HİPERPLAZİNİN KONİK IŞINLI BİLGİSAYARLI TOMOGRAFİ İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ: İKİ OLGU SUNUMU VE LİTERATÜR DERLEMESİ

Abstract

Kondiler hiperplazi, kondil başı ve boynunda boyutsal ve morfolojik değişikliğe neden olan nadir görülen bir anomalidir. Maloklüzyon ve fasiyal asimetri gibi klinik bulgular kondiler hiperplaziyi işaret etse de kesin tanı için radyolojik değerlendirme esastır. Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi (Cone Beam Computed Tomography, CBCT) kullanarak yapılan doğrusal ve açısal ölçümler ile maksilla veya diğer kafa-yüz kemiklerinin etkilenip etkilenmediği değerlendirilebilir. Bu makalede, kondiler hiperplazinin teşhis ve değerlendirmesinde CBCT’nin etkinliği iki olgu eşliğinde rapor edilmiştir. Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı görüntüleme, temporomandibular eklemin kemiksel anomalilerinin teşhisinde düşük radyasyon dozu, yüksek kalitede görüntü ve kapsamlı analizler sağlayan ekonomik bir alternatif sunmaktadır

Keywords

• Kondiler hiperplazi, Konik ışınlı bilgisayarlı tomografi, Temporomandibular eklem

References

1. Neville BW, Damm DD, Allen CM, Bouquot JE, editors. Oral
2. Philadelphia, Saunders, 1995, pp 15-16. pathology.
3. Yang J, Lignelli JL, Ruprecht A. Mirror image condylar hyperplasia in two siblings. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2004;97(2):281-285.
4. White SC. Cone-beam imaging in dentistry. Health Phys 2008; 95(5): 628-637.
5. Kaneyama K, Segami N, Hatta T. Congenital deformities and developmental abnormalities of the temporomandibular joint. Congenit Anom (Kyoto) 2008; 48(3):118-125. condyle in the
6. Tsiklakis K, Syriopoulos K, Stamatakis HC. Radiographic temporomandibular joint using cone beam computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33(3):196–201. of the
7. Howerton WB Jr, Mora MA. Advancements in digital imaging: what is new and on the horizon? J Am Dent Assoc 2008;139(6):20-24.
8. Samur S. Dişhekimliğinde Cone Beam Bilgisayarlı Tomografi. ADO Klinik Bilimler Dergisi 2009; 3(2): 346-351.

9. Rudisch A, Emshoff R, Maurer H, Kovacs P, Bodner G. Pathologic- sonographic correlation in temporomandibular joint pathology. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 1750-1756.
10. Mühlberger G, Svejda M, Lottersberger C, Emshoff R, Putz R, Kuhn V. Mineralization density and apparent density in mandibular condyle bone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: 573- 579.
11. Katsumata A, Hirukawa A, Okumura S, Naitoh M, Fujishita M, Ariji E, Langlais RP. Relationship between density variability and imaging volume size in cone-beam computerized tomographic scanning of the maxillofacial region: an in vitro study. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2009; 107: 420-25.
12. Obwegeser HL, Makek MS. Hemimandibular hyperplasia-hemimandibular Maxillofac Surg 1986;14(4):183–208. elongation. J
13. Pripatnanont P, Vittayakittipong P, Markmanee U, Thongmak S, Yipintsol T. The use of SPECT to evaluate growth cessation of the mandible in unilateral condylar hyperplasia. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2005;34(4):364-368.
14. Marchetti C, Cocchi R, Gentile L, Bianchi A. Hemimandibular strategies. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery 2000;11(1):46–53. treatment
15. Deleurant Y, Zimmermann A, Peltomäki T. Hemimandibular elongation: treatment and long- term 2008;11(3):172–179. Craniofac Res.
16. Saridin CP, Raijmakers P, Becking AG. Quantitative analysis of planar bone scintigraphy in patients with unilateral condylar hyperplasia. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2007;104(2):259-263.
17. Harris SA, Quayle AA, Testa HJ. Radionuclide bone scanning in the diagnosis and management of condylar hyperplasia. Nucl Med Commun 1984;5(6):373-380.
18. Chan WL, Carolan MG, Fernandes VB, Abbati DP. Planar versus SPET imaging in the assessment of condylar 2000;21(3):285-290. Med Commun
19. Jacobsen PU, Lund K. Unilateral overgrowth and remodeling processes after fracture of the mandibular condyle. A longitudinal radiographic study. Scand J Dent Res 1972;80(1):68-74.
20. Rubenstein LK, Campbell RL. Acquired unilateral condylar hyperplasia and facial asymmetry: report 1985;52(2):114–120. J Dent Child
21. Link TM, Koppers BB, Licht T, Bauer J, Rummeny EJ. In vitro and in vivo spiral CT to determine bone mineral density: Initial experience in patients at risk for osteoporosis. Radiology 2004; 231: 805-811.
22. Thompson P, Taylor J, Fisher A, Oliver R. Quantitative heel ultrasound in 3180 women between 45 and 75 years of age: compliance, normal ranges and relationship to fracture history. Osteoporos Int 1998; 8: 211-214.
23. Laib A, Newitt DC, Lu Y, Majumdar S. New model-independent measures of trabecular bone structure applied to in vivo high resolution MR images. Osteoporosis Int 2002;13:130-136.
24. Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Conebeam CT of the Head and Neck, Part 2: Clinical Applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009; 30(7): 1285-92.
25. Ludlow JB, Ivanovic M. Comparative dosimetry of
26. dental CBCT devices and 64-slice CT for oral and
27. maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral
28. Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2008;106(1):106 –14.
29. Schulze D, Heiland M, Thurmann H, et al. Radiation exposure during midfacial imaging using 4- and 16-slice computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography systems and conventional radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2004;33(2):83–86.
30. Mah JK, Danforth RA, Bumann A, Hatcher D. Radiation absorbed in maxillofacial imaging with a new dental computed tomography device. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 2003;96:508-513.