THE SATISFACTION DEGREE EVALUATION OF THE PATIENTS TREATED WITH DENTAL IMPLANTS

Year 2009, Volume: 2009 Issue: 3, 181 - 186, 01.03.2009

Dr. Sertan Ergun Dr. Ali Çekici Dr. Alp Saruhanoğlu Dt. Oğuz Kazancıoğlu Dt.atilla Uzman Prof. Dr. Gülsüm Ak Prof. Dr. Hakkı Tanyeri

https://izlik.org/JA55WC42HS

Abstract

-

Keywords

-

DENTAL İMPLANTLAR İLE REHABİLİTE EDİLMİŞ HASTALARIN MEMNUNİYET DERECELERİNİN DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

https://izlik.org/JA55WC42HS

Abstract

İmplant destekli sabit veya hareketli protezler, yaklaşık 40 yıldır düşük implant kaybı yüzdeleri ile başarılı implantların başarısı ile ilgili birçok makale yayınlanmış fakat bunların az bir kısmı hasta memnuniyetini baz almıştır. Çalışmamızın amacı 2001-2007 yılları arasında dental implantlar ile rehabilite edilmiş hastaların implant destekli protezlerinin kullanımından duydukları memnuniyet derecelerini subjektif olarak belirlemektir. 104 adet hasta, tedavi ve gözetim süresince klinik ve radyolojik olarak başarılı kabul edilme şartı ile incelenmiş ve 6 yıllık gözetim sonunda hastalara 12 sorudan oluşan ve hastaların dental implant destekli protezlerini subjektif olarak sorgulayan bir anket formu uygulanmıştır. Hastaların yaklaşık yarısı implant temizliğinin diş fırçalamaktan daha kolay olup olmadığı ve impant çevresi dişeti kanaması ile diş etrafındaki diş eti kanaması arasında fark olup olmadığı hakkında net bir görüş savunamamıştır. Çalışmada yer alan hastaların büyük çoğunluğu fonksiyon, fonasyon ve estetik açıdan dental implant tedavisinden memnun kalmışlar memnuniyetsizliklerini dile getirmişlerdir

Keywords

Dental implant , protez , hasta memnuniyeti

References

• Albrektsson, T. & Isidor, F. Consensus report of session IV. In: Lang, N.P. & Karring, T., eds. Proceedings of the 1st European Workshop on Periodontology. 1994; 365–369. Berlin: Quintessence
• Lang, N.P., Karring, T. & Meredith, N. Group E summary 4th European Workshop on Periodontology, periodontal practice. Journal of Clinical Periodontology (Suppl. 3) 2002;29: 232– 233.
• Pjetursson BE, Karoussis I, Bürgin W, Brägger U, Lang NP. Patients' satisfaction following implant therapy. A 10-year prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(2):185-93
• Wismeyer, D., Vermeeren, J.I. & van Waas, M.A. Patient satisfaction with overdentures supported by one-stage TPS implants. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 1992;(7):51–55
• Walton, J.N. & MacEntee, M.I. A retrospective study on the maintenance and repair of implantsupported prostheses. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 1996;6: 451–455.
• Walton, J.N., MacEntee, M.I. & Glick, N. One-year prosthetic outcomes with implant overdentures: a randomized clinical trial. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2002;17: 391–398.
• Branemark, P.I., Engstrand, P., Ohrnell, L.O., Grondahl, K., Nilsson, P., Hagberg, K., Darle, C. & Lekholm, U. Branemark Novum: a new treatment concept for rehabilitation of the edentulous mandible. Preliminary results from a prospective clinical follow-up study. Clinical Implant Dentistry and Related Research 1999;1: 2–16.
• Sandberg, G., Stenberg, T. & Wikblad, K. Ten years of patients’ experiences with fixed implantsupported prostheses. Journal of Dental Hygiene 2000;74: 210–218.
• Gibbard, L.L. & Zarb, G. A 5-year prospective study of implant-supported single-tooth replacements. Journal of the Canadian Dental Association 2002;68: 110–116.
• Levine, R.A., Clem, D., Beagle, J., Ganeles, J., Johnson, P., Solnit, G. & Keller, G.W. Multicenter retrospective analysis of the solidscrew ITI implant for posterior single-tooth replacements. International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants 2002;17: 550–556.
• de Bruyn H, Collaert B, Lindén U, Björn AL. Patient's opinion and treatment outcome of fixed rehabilitation on Brånemark implants. A 3-year follow-up study in private dental practices. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1994;8(4): 265-71.
• Cune, M.S., de Putter, C. & Hoogstraten, J. Treatment outcome with implant-retained overdentures: part II – patient satisfaction and predictability of subjective treatment outcome. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1994;72: 152–158.
• Naert, I., Gizani, S. & van Steenberghe, D. Rigidly splinted implants in the resorbed maxilla to retain a hinging overdenture: a series of clinical reports for up to 4 years. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 1998;79: 156–164.
• Bakke, M., Holm, B. & Gotfredsen, K. Masticatory function and patient satisfaction with implantsupported mandibular overdentures: a prospective 5-year study. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2002;15: 575–581.
• Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Consensus report: towards optimized treatment outcomes for dental implants. J Prosthet Dent. 1998;80(6): 641.
• Vermylen K, Collaert B, Lindén U, Björn AL, De Bruyn H. Patient satisfaction and quality of singletooth restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003;14(1):119-24. . 17. R. S. R.Buch, G.Weibrich, J.Wegener, W.Wagner. Patientenzufriedenheit in der Implantologie. Mund Kiefer GesichtsChir 2002;6: 433–436.
• R. Timmerman , G.T. Stoker, D. Wismeijer, P. Oosterveld, J.I.J.F. Vermeeren, and M.A.J. van Waas An Eight-year Follow-up to a Randomized Clinical Trial of Participant Satisfaction with Three Types of Mandibular Implant-retained Overdentures. J Dent Res 2004;83(8): 630-633.
• Att W, Stappert C Implant therapy to improve quality of life. Quintessence Int. 2003;34(8): 57381.
• Clancy JM, Buchs AU,Ardjmand H. A retrospective analysis of one implant system in an oral surgery practice. Phase I:patient satisfaction.J Prosthet Dent 1991;65:265–271.
• Kiyak HA, Beach BH,Worthington P,Taylor T, Bolender C, Evans J. Psychological impact of osseointegrated dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1990;5: 61–69.
• Wismeijer D,Van Waas MA,Vermeeren JI, Mulder J,Kalk W Patient satisfaction with implantsupported mandibular overdentures. A comparison of three treatment strategies with ITI-dental implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1997;26: 263– 267.