THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN UPPER BUCCAL FRENULA AND MAXILLARY ANTERIOR TEETH

Year 2006, Volume: 2006 Issue: 3, 14 - 18, 01.03.2006

Prof. Dr. M. Üstün Güldağ Arş. Gör. Dt. Fatih Şentut Arş. Gör. Dt. U. Şebnem Büyükkaplan

https://izlik.org/JA33EZ94ZN

Abstract

-

Keywords

-

ÜST BUKKAL FRENULUMLAR ARASI MESAFE İLE MAKSİLLER ANTERİOR DİŞLER ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİNİN İNCELENMESİ

https://izlik.org/JA33EZ94ZN

Abstract

Tam protezlerle ilgili kar la lan güçlüklerden biri maksiller anterior di lerin seçimidir. Tam di siz hastalar için di seçimi yap l rken, günümüzde çok say da anatomik yap rehber olarak kullan lmaktad r.Bu çal man n amac üst iki bukkal frenulumla üst altanterior diara t rmakt r. ;rreversible hidrokolloid ölçü maddesi ve fabrikasyon ka klar kullan larak 50 adet ölçü al narak model haz rland . Ölçüsü al nan ve ya lar 19-22 aras nda olan bireylerde üst çenede diolmamas na ve herhangi bir restorasyon bulunmamas na dikkat edildi. Modeller üzerinde üst alt di in mesiodistal geni likleri ve kaninlerin en distal noktalar ile bukkal frenulumlar n anterior s n raras ndaki mesafe dijital kumpas kullan larak ölçüldü. Sonuçlar korelasyon ve regresyon istatistik testleri ile de:erlendirildi. ;statistiksel analiz sonuçlar na göre bukkal frenulumlarla anterior di ler aras nda anlamlbir ili ki oldu:u görüldü. Bununla birlikte bukkal frenulumlar üst anterior di lerin seçiminde tek ba na rehber olarak kullan lmamal d r

Keywords

bukkal frenulum , diseçimi , anterior di boyutu

References

• Sellen PN, Jagger DC, Harrison A. Computergenerated study of the correlation between tooth, face, arch forms, and palatal contour. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80:163-168.
• Lang BR, Razzoog ME. A practical approach to restoring occlusion for edentulous patients. Part I: Guiding principles for tooth selection. J Prosthet Dent 1983;50:455-458.
• Woelfel JB, Winter CM, Igarashi T. Five–year cephalometric study of mandibular ridge resorbtion with different posterior occlusal forms. Part I: Denture construction and initial comparasion. J Prosthet Dent 1976; 36:602-623.
• Ortman HR. Complete denture occlusion. Dent Clin North Am 1977; 21:299-320.
• Smith BJ. The value of the nose width as an esthetic guide in prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent 1975; 34:562-573.
• Al Wazzan KA. The relationship between intercanthal dimension and the widths of maxillary anterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86(6):608-12.
• Scandrett FR, Kerber PE, Umrigar ZR. A clinical evaluation of techniques to determine the combined width of the maxillary anterior teeth and the maxillary central incisor. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48:15-22.
• Hickey JC, Zarb GA. Boucher’s Prosthodontic treatment for edentulous patients. 8th ed. St. Louis: CV Mosby, 1980:321-28.
• Latta GH Jr, Weaver JR, Conkin JE. The relationship between the width of the mouth, interalar width, bizygomatic width, and interpupillary distance in edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65:250-4.
• Sellen PN, Jagger DC, Harrison A. Methods used to select artificial anterior teeth for the edentulous patient: a historical overview. Int J Prosthodont 1999; 12:51-58.
• Nelson AA. The esthetic triangle in the arrangement of teeth: face form, tooth form and alignment form, harmonious or grostesque. National Dent Assoc J 1922; 9:392-401.
• French FA. Selection and arrangement of the anterior teeth in prosthetic dentures. J Prosthet Dent 1951; 1:587-593.
• Krajicek D. Guides for natural facial appearance as related to complete denture construction. J Prosthet Dent 1969; 21:654-662.
• Lowery PC. Art and esthetics as applied to prosthetics. Dental Cosmos 1921; 63:1223-1226.
• Boucher CO. Swensons complete dentures. 6th ed. St Louis: CV Mosby; 1970:155-194.
• Latta GH Jr, Weaver JR, Conkin JE. The relationship between the width of the mouth, interalar width, bizygomatic width, and interpupillary distance in edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65:250-4.
• Scandrett FR, Kerber PE, Umrigar ZR. A clinical evaluation of techniques to determine the combined width of the maxillary anterior teeth and the maxillary central incisor. J Prosthet Dent 1982; 48:15-22.
• Hasanreisoglu U, Berksun S, Aras K, Arslan I. An analysis of maxillary anterior teeth: facial and dental proportions. J Prosthet Dent 2005; 94:530538.
• LaVere AM, Marcroft KR, Smith RC, Sarka RJ. Denture tooth selection: an analysis of the natural maxillary central incisor compared to the length and width of the face: Part I. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67:661-663.
• Mavroskoufis F, Ritchie GM. The face-form as a guide for the selection of maxillary central incisors. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 43(5):501-505.
• Johnson DL, Stratton RJ. Fundamentals of Removable Prosthodontics. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co, 1980;387-406.
• Çalkkocao:lu S. Tam Protezler. Cilt 2. 3. Bask, ;stanbul 1998; 399-414.
• Mavroskoufis F, Ritchie GM. Variation in size and form between left and right maxillary incisor teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1980; 43:254-57.
• Grove HF, Christensen LV. Relationship of the maxillary canines to the incisive papilla. J Prosthet Dent 1989; 61:51-53.
• Mersel A, Ehrlich J. Connection between incisive papilla, central incisor and rugae canina. Quintessence Int Dent Dig 1981; 12:1327-9.
• LaVere AM, Marcroft KR, Smith RC, Sarka RJ. Denture tooth selection: an analysis of the natural maxillary central incisor compared to the length and width of the face: Part I. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 67:661-3.
• Lavelle CL. Relationship between tooth and skull size. J Dent Res. 1974; 53(5):1301.
• Hoffman W Jr, Bomberg TJ, Hatch RA. Interalar width as a guide in denture tooth selection. J Prosthet Dent. 1986; 55:219-21.