THE RECENT DEVELOPMENTS IN COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS

Abstract

-

Keywords

• -

KOMPOZİT RESTORASYONLARDA SON GELİŞMELER

Abstract

Restorasyonlarýn klinik performansýný arttýrabilmek için adeziv materyalleri ve kompozitler geliþtirilmiþtir. Günümüzde restoratif diþ hekimliðinde,restorasyonlarýn klinik baþarýsýný arttýrmak içinmateryaller, adeziv sistemler, ýþýk kaynaklarý ve kavitepreparasyonu ile ilgili çeþitli geliþmeler olmaktadýr.Rezin bazlý restoratif materyallerin doldurucu teknolojisinde ve doldurucu daðýlýmýnda modifikasyonlaryapýlmýþtýr. Bu derlemede, rezin bazlý materyaller,adeziv teknolojisi ve uygulanmasýndaki yeni geliþmeler ve onlarýn klinik önemi tartýþýlmýþtýr

Keywords

• kompozit rezin, yenigeliþmeler, ýþýk cihazlarý, dentin bonding ajanlar

References

1. Manhart J, Hickel R. Esthetic compomer restora- tions in posterior teeth using a new all-in-one adhe- sive: case presentation. J Esthet Dent 1999; 11(5): 250-258.
2. Hickel R, Manhart J. Glass-ionomers and com- pomers in pediatric dentistry. In: Davidson CL, Mjör IA, editors. Advances in glass-ionomer cements. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing Co.; 1999, 221-226.
3. Martin N, Jedynakiewicz N. Measurement of water sorption in dental composites. Biomaterials 1998; 19: 77-83.
4. Tanoue N, Matsumura H, Atsuta M. Properties of four composite veneering materials polymerized with different laboratory photo-curing units. J Oral Rehabil 1998; 25(5): 358-364.
5. Buonocore MG. A simple method of increasing the adhesion of acrylic filling materials to enamel sur- faces. J Dent Res 1955; 34: 849-853.
6. Dayangaç B. Kompozit Resin Restorasyonlar. Güneþ Kitabevi Ltd. Þti., Ankara, 2000.
7. Bayne SC, Thompson JY, Swift EJ, Stamatiades P, Wilkerson M. A characterization of first generation flowable composites. J Am Dent Assoc 1998; 129(5): 567-577.
8. Burgess JO, Norling BK, Rawls HR, Ong JL. Directly placed esthetic restorative materials--the continuum. Compend Cont Edu 1996; 17(8): 731- 746.

9. Haller B, Trojanski A. Effect of multi-step dentin bonding systems and resin-modified glass ionomer cement liner on marginal quality of dentin-bonded resin composite Class II restorations. Clin Oral Investig 1998; 2(3): 130-136.
10. Beznos C. Microleakage at the cervical margin of composite Class II cavities with different restorative techniques. Oper Dent 2001; 26(1): 60-69.
11. Civelek A, Ersoy M, E L'Hotelier, Soyman M, Say EC. Polymerization shrinkage and microleakage in Class II Cavities of various resin composites. Oper Dent 2003; 28(5): 635-641.
12. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties of new composite restorative materials. J Biomed Mater Res 2000; 53(4): 353- 361.
13. Jedrychowski JR, Caputo AA, Keper S. Antibacterial and mechanical properties of restora- tive materials combined with chlorhexidines. J Oral Rehabil 1983; 10: 373-381.
14. Addy M, Thaw M. In vitro studies into the release of chlorhexidine acetate, predonisolone sodium phosphate and predonisolone alcohol from cold cure denture base acrylic. J Biomed Mater Res 1982; 16: 145-157.
15. Wilson SJ, Wilson HJ. The release of chlorhexidine from modified dental acrylic resin. J Oral Rehabil 1993; 20: 311-319.
16. Imazato S, Torii M, Tsuchitani Y, McCabe JF, Russell RRB. Incorporation of bacterial inhibitor into resin composite. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1437- 1443.
17. Imazato S, McCabe JF. Influence of incorporation of antibacterial monomer on curing behaviour of a dental resin composite. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1641- 1645.
18. Imazato S, Tarumi H, Kato S, Ebisu S. Water sorp- tion and colour stability of composites containing the antibacterial monomer MDPB. J Dent 1999; 27: 279-283.
19. Paraizo MA, Mendes LC, Gomes AS, Miranda MS, Amaral ACF. Degradation of a dental filling materi- al after high caries challenge. Materials Research 2004; 7(4): 639-642.
20. Ajlouni R, Bishara SE, Soliman MM, Oonsombat C, Laffoon JF, Warren J. The use of Ormocer as an alternative material for bonding orthodontic brack- ets. Angle Orthod 2005; 75(1): 106-108.
21. Manhart J, Kunzelmann KH, Chen HY, Hickel R. Mechanical properties and wear behavior of light- cured packable composite resins. Dent Mater 2000; 16(1): 33-40.
22. Davis N. A nanotechnology composite. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003, 24(9): 665-667.
23. Duke ES. Has dentistry moved into the nanotech- nology area? Compend Contin Educ Dent 2003;
24. Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Reduced polymerization stress through non-bonded nanofiller particles. Biomaterials 2002, 23(18):3807-3815.
25. Ure D, Harris J. Nanotechnology in dentistry: reduction to practice. Dent Update 2003, 30(1): 10- 15.
26. Mitra SB, Wu D, Holmes BN. An application of nanotechnology in advanced dental materials. J Am Dent Assoc 2003, 134(10):1382-1390.
27. Schwartz RS, Summitt JB, Robbins JW. Fundamentals of Operative Dentistry, A Contemporary Approach. Quintessence Publishing, Illinois, 1996.
28. Peutzfeldt A. Resin composites in dentistry: the monomer systems. Eur J Oral Sci 1997; 105(2): 97- 116.
29. Stansbury JW. Synthesis and evaluation of new oxaspiro monomers for double ring-opening poly- merization. J Dent Res 1992; 71(7): 1408-1412.
30. Stansbury JW, Dickens B, Liu DW. Preparation and characterization of cyclopolymerizable resin formu- lations. J Dent Res 1995; 74(4): 1110-1115.
31. Manhart J, Garcia-Godoy F, Hickel R. Direct pos- terior restorations: clinical results and new develop- ments. Dent Clin N Am 2002; 46(2): 303-339.
32. Stansbury JW. Cyclopolymerizable monomers for use in dental resin composites. J Dent Res 1990; 69(3): 844-848.
33. Guggenberger R, Weinmann W. Exploring beyond methacrylates. Am J Dent 2000; 13: 82-84.
34. Wakefield CW, Draughn RA, Sneed WD, Davis TN. Shear bond strengths of six bonding systems using the pushout method of in vitro testing. Oper Dent 1998; 23(2): 69-76.
35. De Munck J, Van Landuyt K, Peumans M, Poitevin A, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Van Meerbeek B. A crit- ical review of the durability of adhesion to tooth tis- sue: methods and results. J Dent Res 2005; 84(2): 118-132.
36. Yoon T.-H, Lee Y.-K, Lim B.-S, Kim C.-W. Degree of polymerization of resin composites by different light sources. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29(12): 1165- 1173.
37. Mills RW, Uhl A, Jandt KD. Optical power outputs, spectra and dental composite depths of cure, obtained with blue light emitting diode (LED) and halogen light curing units (LCUs). Br Dent J 2002; 193(8): 459-463.
38. Uhl A, Mills RW, Vowles RW, Jandt KD. Knoop hardness depth profiles and compressive strength of selected dental composites polymerized with halo- gen and LED light curing technologies. J Biomed Mater Res 2002; 63(6): 729-738.
39. Jandt KD, Mills RW, Blackwell GB, Ashworth SH. Depth of cure and compressive strength of dental composites cured with blue light emitting diodes (LEDs). Dent Mater 2000; 16(1): 41-47.
40. Meyer GR, Ernst CP, Willershausen B. Decrease in power output of new light-emitting diode (LED) curing devices with increasing distance to filling surface. J Adhes Dent 2002; 4(3): 197-204.
41. Hofmann N, Hugo B, Klaiber B. Effect of irradia- tion type (LED or QTH) on photo-activated com- posite shrinkage strain kinetics, temperature rise and hardness. Eur J Oral Sci 2002; 110(6): 471-479.
42. Özel E, Soyman M. LED Iþýk Kaynaklarý. Atatürk Üniversitesi Diþ Hekimliði Fakültesi Dergisi, (Cilt:13, Sayý:3, Cilt:14, Sayý:1) Sayfa:13-17, 2003- 2004.
43. Kurachi C, Tuboy AM, Magalhaes DV, Bagnato VS. Hardness evaluation of a dental composite polymerized with experimental LED-based devices. Dent Mater 2001; 17(4): 309-315.
44. Tarle Z, Meniga A, Knezevic A, Sutalo J, Ristic M, Pichler G. Composite conversion and temperature rise using a conventional, plasma arc and an experi- mental blue LED curing unit. J Oral Rehabil 2002;
45. Swift EJ Jr. LED curing lights. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002; 14: 206-207.
46. Mills RW, Uhl A, Blackwell GB, Jandt KD. High power light emitting diode (LED) arrays versus halogen light polymerization of oral biomaterials: Barcol hardness, compressive strength and radio- metric properties. Biomaterials 2002; 23(4): 2955- 2963.
47. Leonard DL, Charlton DG, Roberts HW, Cohen ME. Polymerization efficiency of LED curing lights. J Esthet Restor Dent 2002; 14(5): 286-295.
48. Price RBT, Ehrnford L, Andreou P, Felix CA. Comparison of quartz-tungsten-halogen, light-emit- ting diode and plasma arc curing lights. J Adhes Dent 2003; 5: 193-207.
49. Hammesfahr PD, O'Connor MT, Wang X. Light- curing technology: past, present and future. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2002; 23:18-24.
50. Pilebro CE, van Dijken JW, Stenberg R. Durability of tunnel restorations in general practice: a three- year multicenter study. Acta Odontol Scand 1999; 57(1):35-39.
51. Strand GV, Nordbo H, Tveit AB, Espelid I, Wikstrand K, Eide GE. A 3-year clinical study of tunnel restorations. Eur J Oral Sci 1996; 104(4):384-389.
52. Haase SL. An innovative approach to Class II preperation and restoration. Signature 1998; 5: 16- 19.
53. Krejci I, Dietschi D, Lutz FU. Principles of proxi- mal cavity preperation and finishing with ultrasonic diamond tips. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998; 10: 295-298.
54. Liebenberg WH. SONICSYS approx: an innova- tive addition to the restorative continuum. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1998; 10: 913-922. Yazýþma Adresi: MSc. Dt. Emre ÖZEL
55. Yeditepe Üniversitesi
56. Diþ Hekimliði Fakültesi
57. Diþ Hastalýklarý ve Tedavisi A. D. Baðdat Cad. No:238
58. Göztepe-ÝSTANBUL Tel: GSM: Faks:
59. e-mail: [e-mail]