CLINICAL INDICATIONS OF SOFT LINING MATERIALS

Abstract

-

Keywords

• -

YUMUŞAK ASTAR MATERYALLERİN KLİNİK ENDİKASYONLARI

Abstract

Klinik pratikte, geçici ve daimi olarak kullan lan de,i ik tipte yumu ak astar materyaller vard r. Bu grup ürünlerden beklenen fonksiyonlaranlamak önemlidir. Bu materyallerin ba ar ya da ba ar s zl , , fiziksel ve mekanik özelliklerinin yans ra protez oturma alan n n fizyolojik ve biyolojik özelliklerine de ba,l d r. Bu makalenin amac ,yumu ak astar ve materyale materyallerin muhtemel ba ar sgereksinimleri belirleyen klinik endikasyonlar ile aynzamanda, kullan mgeçirmektir

Keywords

• Yumu ak astar materyaller, s n rlayan faktörleri gözden

References

1. Okeson JP. Management of Temporomandibular Disorders and Occlusion. 2nd ed CV Mosby, St Louis, 1989: 114-5.
2. McCabe JF, Carrick TE, Kamohara H. Adhesive bond strength and compliance for denture soft lining materials. Biomaterials 2002; 23: 1347-52.
3. Murata H, Taguchi N, Hamada T, Kawamura M, McCabe JF. Dynamic viscoelasticity of soft liners and masticatory function. J Dent Res 2002; 81: 123-8.
4. Nikawa H, Iwanaga H, Hamada T, Yuhta S. Effects of denture cleansers on direct soft denture lining materials. J Prosthet Dent 1994; 72: 657- 62.
5. Gonzales JB. The Use of Resilient Liners in Winkler’s Book: Essentials of Complete Denture Prosthodontics. 2nd ed PSG Publishing, Littleton, 1988: 427-8.
6. Craig RG. Restorative Dental Materials. 9th ed Mosby, St Louis, 1993: 532-5.
7. Kydd WL, Daly CH, Wheeler JB. The thickness measurement of masticatory mucosa in vivo. Int Dent J 1971; 21: 430-41.
8. McCabe JF, Walls AWG. Applied Dental Materials. 8th ed Blackwell Science, Oxford, 1998: 108-14.

9. Kawano F, Dootz ER, Koran A, Craig RG. Comparison of bond strength of six soft denture liners to denture base resin. J Prosthet Dent 1992; 68: 368-71.
10. Mack PJ. Denture soft lining materials: Clinical indications. Aus Dent J 1989; 34: 354-8.
11. Grant AA, Heath JR, McCord JF. Complete Prosthodontics: Problems, Diagnosis and Management. Wolfe Publishing, Spain, 1994: 117-8.
12. Braden M. Polymeric Dental Materials. Springer- Verlag, Berlin, 1997: 120-55.
13. Çal kkocao,lu S. Tam Protezler 2.Bask Cilt 2. Gür-Ay Matbaas , =stanbul, 1993: 252-6.
14. Bell DH. Clinical evaluation of irradiated soft and hard tissues. J Prosthet Dent 1976; 35: 549- 52.
15. Suchatlampong C, Davies E, Von Fraunhofer J. Frictional characteristics of resilient lining materials. Dent Mater 1986; 2: 135-8.
16. Loney RW, Moulding MB. The effect of finishing and polishing on surface roughness of a processed resilient denture liner. Int J Prosthodont 1993; 6: 390-6.
17. Tan H, Woo A, Kim S, Lamoureux M, Grace M. Effect of denture cleansers, surface finish and temperature on Molloplast B resilient liner color, hardness and texture. J Prosthodont 2000; 9: 148- 55.
18. Qudah S, Harrison A, Huggett R. Soft lining materials in prosthodontic dentistry: a review Int J Prosthodont 1990; 3: 477-83.
19. Braden M, Wright PS, Parker S. Soft lining materials a review. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 1995; 3: 163-74.
20. Kazanji MNM, Watkinson AC. Soft lining materials: their absorption of and solubility in- artificial saliva. Br Dent J 1988; 165: 91-4.
21. Baysan A, Whiley R, Wright PS. Use of microwave energy of disinfect a long-term soft lining material contaminated with candida albicans or staphylococeus aureus. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 79: 454-8.
22. Verran J, Maryan CJ. Retention of candida albicans on acrylic resin and silicone of different surface topography. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 77: 535-9. Yaz0,ma Adresi
23. Dr. Orhan Murat DO*AN
24. Sokak No: 2 Mutluköy Sitesi Ümitköy/ANKARA Tel: [phone]
25. e-mail: [e-mail]